Slashdot Mirror


New Mega-Leak Reveals Middle East Peace Process

An anonymous reader writes "There's been yet another mega-leak, this time of 1,600 papers describing the Israeli/Palestinian peace process negotiations. It's independent of Wikileaks and came to light via al-Jazeera, showing perhaps that the mega-leak meme is here to stay whatever happens to Assange. The papers show a weak Palestinian side offering ever greater concessions to Israel, which flatly rejected this as being insufficient: 'We do not like this suggestion because it does not meet our demands,' Israel's then foreign minister, Tzipi Livni, told the Palestinians, 'and probably it was not easy for you to think about it, but I really appreciate it.'"

49 of 760 comments (clear)

  1. Its really by alexborges · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A whole new game, ain't it now?

    --
    NO SIG
    1. Re:Its really by Magic5Ball · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It only seems like a new game because we've grown accustomed to the non-critical, non-investigative journalism that's handed to us on the nightly news. The news should be surprising to most people since we're mostly not experts in Middle-East relations, but astute readers of Foreign Policy, The Economist, AJ, or even La Presse should find very little new except for the details of individual human speech and interactions (the same can be said of any close transcript of almost any meeting or discussion).

      However, that's not to say that leaked details aren't valuable to somebody. If we were smart about this, we'd ask under what circumstances it's acceptable for professionals in general (who are also accountable to the public) to provide contrasting or conflicting private and public accounts of their professional activities as experts.

      --
      There are 1.1... kinds of people.
    2. Re:Its really by Dolphinzilla · · Score: 4, Insightful

      great post - anyone who travels much and sees the world through their own eyes will quickly realize that most of what we are told on the "news" is highly filtered and twisted to make it palatable to the sheep !

    3. Re:Its really by hoggoth · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You go ahead and forge 1,600 documents involving hundreds or thousands of players that intermingles hundreds of verifiable meetings and facts with your fake counter-intelligence. Good luck with that.

      The only chance of actually pulling off something like that would be if you actually got your hands on 1,600 real leaked documents and carefully wove a thread of fake edits throughout it. Oh, and hope nobody ELSE can get the same leak of 1,600 documents that contradict yours.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    4. Re:Its really by qbzzt · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It would be difficult to forge those 1,600 documents.

      A much easier propaganda use is to go over the documents you do have, and decide selectively which ones to leak - the ones that make your side look good, and the other side look bad.

      --
      -- Support a free market in the field of government
    5. Re:Its really by jamesh · · Score: 4, Interesting

      For sure. It completely baffles me how anyone can have a strong opinion on any issue when they are only fed the information via the mainstream media. War on Terrorism is the main one that springs to mind - so many people wanting the US (and everyone else) out of there and obviously feeling very strongly about it, having only read about it in mainstream media and maybe a few forums. Maybe they're right, maybe there are a whole load of valid reasons why we shouldn't be over there, but how can they know for sure when they are just repeating 'popular opinion'???

      Even wikileaks leaves itself wide open to astroturfing with manufactured 'leaks' to suit someone's agenda. It doesn't even have to go that far if someone somewhere is deciding what to leak and what to bury.

      I don't have a better solution, but it does kind of bug me...

    6. Re:Its really by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Yeah? Well take a look at Al-Jazeera and then take a look at CNN. With CNN, we have in the second row:

      What a first week
      An eclectic mix of superstar guests this week talked with Piers Morgan about love, war and everything in between.
      Stern: I don't like Jay Leno Video
      Rice: Be ready for 3 a.m. call Video
      Oprah: I'm never getting married"

      Al-Jazeera, who may be biased and ignore pop culture B.S. on the front page; or CNN and FoxNews who give priority to celebrity diversion. I can't take credit for pointing that out, that comparison was brought to light in 4chan's /b/ years ago...and it still hasn't changed.

      Harumph, idiot America.

    7. Re:Its really by seanadams.com · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If the other side wants to leak something that makes their point then I'm all ears for that too. Fuck it all, leak everything!

    8. Re:Its really by chrisG23 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Last time I checked (a few years ago), Al-Jazeera was a shining example of independent journalism that reports all sides of a story, and is criticized in the West for being too pro-Islam, and very harshly criticized in the Islamic world for being too anti-Islam. Have things changed? Can you please cite me an example of Al-Jazeera having an agenda (other than "the truth", which is what Al-Jazeera means)?

      Al-Jazeera receives funding from the government of Qatar (and is based in Qatar). The government of Qatar is a pretty big ally of the government of the United States. The government of the United State is a pretty big supporter of the Government of Israel. You make of that what you will when you see them report on news that is not taken well in Israel, the United State, or Qatar.

    9. Re:Its really by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 5, Insightful

      After watching the 'peace' process break down again and again here. You have to realize *NEITHER* side is really interested in it.

      The "peace" process has been Israel and the U.S. telling the people of Palestine to, essentially, "relax and enjoy it". No, the Palestinians are not interested in that, but over and over their leadership has shown an interest in sincerely working for peace. It's not surprising that they cannot find a reliable partner for peace and justice in Israel, any more than the Native Americans nations have ever been able to find a reliable partner for peace and justice with the U.S. government.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    10. Re:Its really by E+IS+mC(Square) · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't get this "because it's al-jazeera, it must be biased".

      Two things:
      1. Al-Jazeera, if you remove your yellow glasses, is actually a very high caliber new organization, unlike most of anything you find in the US. Of course, they belong to a different country, different culture and difference environment, and may not speak your language so to speak, but that does not mean they are not good. Do some research for once for fuck sake. To help you, start with the excellent documentary "Control Room". And don't even try to compare it with CNN.

      2. Even if one assumes AJ is bias, if the document they release prove to be correct, how does that take away the truth in any form?

    11. Re:Its really by u17 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Even wikileaks leaves itself wide open to astroturfing with manufactured 'leaks' to suit someone's agenda. It doesn't even have to go that far if someone somewhere is deciding what to leak and what to bury.

      Wikileaks do their best to verify the leaks before publishing them. IIRC, they sent some people to Iraq to confirm the authenticity of the leaked video, before publishing "Collateral Murder", for example. While it's possible that they will make a mistake sooner or later, I don't think that what you're describing is so easy.

    12. Re:Its really by fishexe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      For sure. It completely baffles me how anyone can have a strong opinion on any issue when they are only fed the information via the mainstream media. War on Terrorism is the main one that springs to mind - so many people wanting the US (and everyone else) out of there and obviously feeling very strongly about it, having only read about it in mainstream media and maybe a few forums. Maybe they're right, maybe there are a whole load of valid reasons why we shouldn't be over there, but how can they know for sure when they are just repeating 'popular opinion'???

      I don't know where you get the idea that popular opinion says to end the War on Terror, based on reading the mainstream media. It seems to me that almost every cheerleader of the War on Terror I've met was someone who limited themselves to the mainstream media and limited their discussion of the issue to repeating talking points, and almost every staunch critic of the War on Terror I've met has based their opinion on having done independent research including talking to people from the affected parts of the world on all sides of the issue, and could engage in lengthy and nuanced debates on the subject. Maybe you just assume because their view doesn't match yours that it must be based on lack of information? Or maybe you're in a country where that is the popular opinion and I'm just assuming you're in the US 'cause I'm a dope ;-)

      --
      "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
    13. Re:Its really by fishexe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      He didn't say Al-jazeera stood alone. What he's trying to convey is that they make Fox News looks like men of honor.

      Which is only true if you take "Muslims are dishonest" or something similar as one of your premises. For all the talk about "fibs" and "lies" on al Jazeera, they are measurably more accurate and less biased than Fox News. It's just that they're biased in a direction that is politically incorrect in present American society, whereas Fox News is biased in a direction that's politically correct (again, within American society) so they usually get a pass.

      --
      "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
    14. Re:Its really by ehack · · Score: 4, Informative

      A point of information: The leak makes the PA look bad. The PA comes out as lying to their citizens

      Israel comes out of it pretty much as they were before, as simply not interested in negotiation that do not give them all they want.

      AlJazeera has demolished the PA with this article. *I* am truly shocked.

      --
      This is not a signature.
    15. Re:Its really by silentcoder · · Score: 5, Informative

      You know what the saddest thing about the whole Middle-East crisis is ? The people fighting are the same people on both sides.

      Genetic research has shown that the Palestinians and the Israeli's are the SAME people. More specifically the Palestinians are the descendants of the so-called "ten lost tribes" - it's not even conjecture, it's basic proven science. In the years since the diaspora (and the classic story about why that happened is simply not true: the Romans never displaced any culture, so to think they did it in Israel is silly).
      Here's what science says happened: A lot of Jews left Israel during the Roman occupation, settling around Europe in two major groups. The Azkanazi in Eastern Europe and the Sephardi in Spain. These two groups were the two not-lost tribes. What happened to the other ten ? They were not scattered and dispersed or lost, that legend is false. They stayed right there where they were, over time they converted to Islam.
      When the other two tribes started coming back they found a largely Arab culture with an Islamic religion living in the area and claiming it as their homeland.
      They could not believe that these Muslim Palestinians were fellow Jews (especially since it didn't fit their legends that all the tribes left), and the Palestinians would never have thought that their ancestors were Jewish Israelites.
      But the scientific evidence is extremely strong - they share a very direct common ancestry and were one people just about 1700 years ago (in other words, almost exactly when the diaspora started).

      An inevitable war between brothers, over a homeland that historically belongs as much to one as the other... and they still can't figure out a way to get along. Now that is human nature at it's worst, in a nutshell.

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    16. Re:Its really by Schlacht · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Exactly as SeanAdams says, if the Isreali side have a counter-leak let us have it. Its total bs to say because it's an AJ leak its invalid and that neither side want peace. The leak shows a flexibility towards peace that we were never made aware of, that the PA are at least willing to make even bigger concessions and the Isrealis just throw it back in their face with a 'thanks but no-thanks attitude. THAT is the news, and as I said if there is an Isreali released and independently verified counter-leak let's see it!

      And to compare this to two children and a toy - well I'd like to spend 5 minutes with you in a boxing ring. You can be blindfolded, no shoes, and with both arms tied behind your back ... then give me a baseball bat and maybe a nice selection of body armor to make sure I don't hurt myself too bad. The way the Isreali army has been using the Palestinians like the center stage attraction at a Mexican birthday party makes me disgusted ... and you call these two opposing forces 'children' -- wtf, open your eyes. At best its a college freshman going to the local kindergarten and kicking around some kids.

      --
      rm -rf ms/*
    17. Re:Its really by kdemetter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Still , it's dangerous to just assume that everything leaked is automatically valid.

    18. Re:Its really by lixee · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Look...I am from a Muslim country and I can assure you that Fox News is pretty benign compared to Al Jazeera. Maybe you don't watch Al Jazeera in Arabic. It's full of conspiracy theories. Even on the Arab-Israeli issue, I would say that that Fox is less biased than Al Jazeera. I know it's hard to imagine when one ever watched Limbaugh or O'Reilly, but it's sadly verifiable.

      --
      Res publica non dominetur
    19. Re:Its really by dkleinsc · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It should also be pointed out that Al Jazeera did the same thing here, doing their best to validate that these were authentic. While they've been demonized in the US mainstream press (largely for not parroting the US view of the Israel-Palestine Conflict), they're the equivalent of CNN or the BBC in the Middle East. Is it 100% credibility? Heck no. But it's a good 95+% credible.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    20. Re:Its really by u17 · · Score: 4, Informative

      They did in fact leave in the fragment where you see people carrying what appear to be rifles. They also gave a clear link to the full unedited version, for people interested in the broader context. The editing is understandable, because few people would want to sit through the whole thing, where mostly nothing happens -- they left in only the most interesting parts.

      Yours is an oft repeated argument, but I just don't see how you can honestly claim such strong bias on their behalf. While they did choose the name "collateral murder", suggesting anti-American military bias, they provided all the necessary information for any intelligent person to make up their own mind about it. The title was just about the only slanted aspect of the release.

      While they could have named the release differently, they certainly did a good job of attracting attention to it, leading to many press articles with more detailed behind-the-scenes information.

      Just as you don't read newspapers that seem wrongly biased to you, you didn't have to watch the Wikileaks release. Pretty much all the media used it as a source and offered their own analysis. But this was only possible thanks to the public service of publishing the leak and drawing attention to it in the first place.

      All things considered, such a service is so valuable that anyone who supports government accountability should be thankful to Wikileaks, even if they disagree with the apparent bias.

    21. Re:Its really by radtea · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Wars can be won, and enemies can be stamped out.

      Tell that to the dead and consider the cost to the "victor". Wars can have first and second losers, and that's all.

      England and it's allies "won" WWII... at the cost of British economic supremacy. The United States "won" WWII... at the cost of discarding forever its tradiational isolationist policies, putting it on a slippery slope to empire that is still costing American lives today, to say nothing of progressively bankrupting the American state.

      Anyone who thinks wars can be "won" hasn't been paying attention to anything but military-industrial propoganda.

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
  2. I've got this one... by Haedrian · · Score: 4, Funny

    The person who leaked this has raped me.

    Please arrest him immediately. Thanks.

    1. Re:I've got this one... by Fluffeh · · Score: 4, Funny

      Were you in Sweden at the time, and did you make him breakfast and throw him a party later in the day? Just asking...

      --
      Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
  3. Re:Good lord... by Pharmboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I thought maybe isolate both sides for 100 years or so. Give them time to cool off.

    Yeah, because it's not like the Jews or Muslim to carry a grudge for hundreds of years, right?

    I'm guessing you are a fellow American. We tend to underestimate the longevity of a grudge in the rest of the world. The beginning of the US seems like a long time ago to us, but to the rest of the world, we are still kids. Then again, we haven't gone that far out of our way to prove them wrong.

    --
    Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
  4. We do not like this suggestion because by unity100 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "we are the the most psychopath right wing coalition that can ever come into being in a country through a democratic process", Tzipi Livni should have said.

    no really, its beyond fathoming, the nature and formation of this ungodly coalition is. my israeli friend (colleague too) says that the exterior minister of this coalition, liebermann, is known as outright mafia in israel. not in a manner of speaking, but, literally. he says the entire coalition is filled with similar right wing zealots and psychos, came to being as a coalition government only through an unholy alliance they have set up among each other after the scattered elections. they, naturally, dont even reflect the true will of the majority of israeli people.

    its no surprise to me to hear these leaks, after being told about the situation in israel and nature of these people by my friend, tho it may be worthy of news to some people.

  5. Re:It's not a meme by Omestes · · Score: 4, Informative

    You realize the term "meme" predates its modern usage of describing "LOL cats", and other internet ephemera, right? The guy who coined the term, Richard Dawkins, coined it to explain much larger phenomena, like the evolution of society as a whole, and pretty much all evolving intellectual and sociological phenomena that is not immediately traceable to genetics.

    --
    A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
  6. Re:Good lord... by mug+funky · · Score: 4, Insightful

    the optimism, vigour, idealism and basically cocky precociousness of youth can explain all those achievements.

    "kids" is not necessarily derogatory. just look at any old person who envies the youth that have overtaken them.

    however, i fear the USA has now entered adolescence and is more concerned with yelling at it's mum and sitting in it's room listening to terrible music and blaming everyone but itself...

  7. Re:palestinians bending backwards... by MrHanky · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yeah, except they were willing to give up parts of their own land, and you didn't bother to read the story since it doesn't fit your moronic prejudices.

  8. Re:Knowing Al-Jazeera... by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 5, Funny

    And where did you leave new jersey motherfucker!!??

    We tried to leave it in Antartica, but the penguins sent it back.

  9. Re:Adaptation and Propaganda by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 4, Interesting

    How long before the world's secret services adapt to the "megaleak" phenomenon, and start using it as a tool to spread propaganda?

    What do you mean "start"? False flag and disinformation campaigns have been a staple of foreign policy for at least as long as recorded history.

  10. Re:Good lord... by tragedy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Oh come on. A good chunk of the US still seems to practically define itself through resentment at the North over the civil war. Forget what Dunbal said about WWI and WWII, lots of Americans seem to be holding a grudge over colonial times and the War of Independence. They also seem to carry a massive grudge against the French for no reason I can figure out.

  11. Re:Farhud by otis+wildflower · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You mean like the Arabs that lost the west bank and gaza during the six day war and the yom kippur war did?

    So we set the marker in the ground only where _YOU_ think we should start over?

  12. Wikileaks Greatest Contribution To Society by definate · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's independent of Wikileaks and came to light via al-Jazeera, showing perhaps that the mega-leak meme is here to stay whatever happens to Assange.

    I think history will find that Wikileaks and by association Julian Assanges greatest contribution to the world, will not necessarily be the Wikileaks service, but helping to cultivate a greater culture of leaking, by showing that it can be done effectively, and that your message will be heard.

    Now that, is something extremely valuable, that's almost impossible to be taken away.

    --
    This is my footer. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  13. Re:Good lord... by c6gunner · · Score: 4, Informative

    I said "effectively". Maybe the meaning was unclear. Would you prefer "essentially"? How about "more-or-less"?

    Given that there are more Muslims in the Israeli Parliament than there are in the US Congress, I'd say they're probably more secular than the US in reality, if not on paper. They have complete freedom of religion, and have had Muslims and Druze serving in all aspects of the government, including as Supreme Court judges, ambassadors, and army generals. When the only thing making them non-secular is that they self-identify as a Jewish state, it's fair to say that they ARE secular for all intents and purposes.

  14. Re:Good lord... by BZ · · Score: 5, Informative

    Pretty close to it, yes. Courts in Israel are civil courts, not based on Jewish religious law. Legislation is passed by a civil legislative body, not a religious one. Religions are considered equal before the law. There is no official state religion, and there is freedom of religion and of worship.

    There is one weirdness, which is marriage. There is no "civil" marriage in Israel; there are only religious marriage under the auspices of the various religions practiced by the people being married. This can cause problems for non-Orthodox Jews, for interfaith marriages, etc. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marriage_in_Israel has details.

    Also note that in Israel being Jewish is not necessarily a religious matter; it's an ethnic matter. You can be an atheist and still be considered Jewish ethnically.

    This can matter for things like military service, where ethnic minorities are generally exempt from the draft (though accepted as volunteers).

    In any case, I suppose it depends on your definition of "separation of religion and state". It's not exactly a black-and-white line; there are gradations. Would you say that religion and state are separated in Germany, say?

  15. Re:ever greater concessions by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Do you mean Israel's right to exist or Palestine's right to exist?

    (Dreadful source, but the map is accurate)

    --
    Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
  16. Re:Good lord... by copponex · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The solution is to arm both sides equally. I'm sure negotiations would be much more productive if the Palestinians had helicopter gunships, tanks, jet fighters, and billions in military aid every year instead of barely enough food to eat. It would also stop the suicide bombing, since they would be able to target what they really want to hurt: the IDF.

  17. Re:Jews: 3,700 years of not living cooperatively by Supurcell · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Try replacing "Jews" with any group. Most social groups are incapable of seeing their own shortcomings.

  18. Re:Jews: 3,700 years of not living cooperatively by KugelKurt · · Score: 5, Interesting

    And I guess Hitler killing millions of Jews was their fault too, eh?

    If you ask an ultra orthodox Jew, you might even get a Yes as answer. A minority opinion among them is that European Jews were punished by god for not living orthodox.
    (Just to be clear: I don't agree with that. I merely wanted to answer your question.)

  19. Re:Jews: 3,700 years of not living cooperatively by KugelKurt · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Um, there were no Jews 3,700 years ago. A monotheistic religion that would later become Judaism was just getting started. Even the first "proto Jews" weren't strictly monotheistic (the Hebrew Bible / Old Testament contains fragments of polytheism, eg. Psalm 82) which -- at least by today's standards -- would not qualify them as Jews...

    As for your Pharaoh comment: There is not a single piece of archeological evidence that hundreds of thousands of people migrated away from Egypt and wandered through the desert for 40 years.
    So either the Exodus never happened and the story is just made up or the ancient people of Israel were the cleanest people ever by not leaving any pottery, weapons, etc. behind....

  20. Re:how the Jews (Israel) has come full circle by Wumpus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's actually a lot more complicated than that. My advice when people ask me about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is that if you think either side is right, it's because you don't know anything. Spend any time really studying the issues and you realize that there's nothing but shades of grey in this conflict.

  21. except for state welfare for ultra-orthodox by SuperBanana · · Score: 5, Interesting

    , I'd say they're probably more secular than the US in reality,

    They have complete freedom of religion

    Riiiight. Pay no attention to the fact that TWO THIRDS of ultra-orthodox men live on welfare and don't work (and amongst the women, 50% don't work, whereas 25% in general Israeli population don't.) If you elect to go into such studies, the government gives you automatic welfare AND excuses you from military service (where it is ordinarily compulsory) AND gives you a complete tax break.

    Did I mention that these ultra-orthodox freeloaders are causing most of the upheaval and supporting hard-line policies? And multiplying like rabbits, marrying young and having huge families?

    If that's "Secular", then I guess you'd be OK with the federal government giving welfare to people who decide to become ultra-right-wing Christians?

  22. Re:Jews: 3,700 years of not living cooperatively by ProfessionalCookie · · Score: 5, Funny

    vi users? *Ducks*

  23. Re:Jews: 3,700 years of not living cooperatively by silentcoder · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "of course, the old accounts also describe Amazon warriors."

    You do realize that there is significant evidence that at least part of the Amazon myth is based on reality right ? Genetic evidence at that. Based on the oldest writings about them - they had entered Europe and Greece from the Russian Steppes to which they later returned. In the steppes are Burial Mounds in which were found the bodies of woman with the adornments of warriors. That's already a big hint.
    It gets better, we know for a fact that the people who lived in those parts of the steppes later migrated from Russia toward Asia - and were the ancestors of Genghis Kahn's hordes. To this day their descendants expect women to fight as well as men - and here it gets really interesting. A small minority of Mongol children are born as blonds, and as far as we know - it's only EVER daughters. Apparently suggesting a female-only gene that causes blondness in a small minority. Genetic testing of some of them found a clear mitochondrial DNA link (that is maternal only) with the bodies found in the Steppes.

    It's not absolute, nothing in science ever really is - and less so in archeology because evidence is *always* incredibly sparse, but right now the evidence we do have, suggests that at least part of the amazon legend as written by the first Greek historians was, in fact, true.

    --
    Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
  24. Re:Good lord... by silentcoder · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You know... the French could justifiably turn your whole "Do you speak German" thing around and ask: "Are you ruled by the Queen of England" to Americans.
    How sad that almost nobody in America knows that the only reason your country even EXISTS is because the French funded your war of independence and kept you going (granted, they did it mostly to spite England but still). Ironically in doing so they impoverished themselves tremendously - directly leading to the French Revolution.

    Yeah you HELPED liberate them in World War 2 (you know there were soldiers at D-Day from ALL the allied nations including Britain and even my little South Africa right ?) - they liberated you 300 years ago.

    How about you both just call it even and learn to STFU about it ?

    --
    Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
  25. Re:Jews: 3,700 years of not living cooperatively by mabhatter654 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you go back and read the same Bible most of the West does, you'd see the Jews are constantly their own worst enemy.... they rise to the occasion under extreme suffering, only to wallow in the gutter when everything goes their way. It's like a micro cell of humanity... it's happened before, it will happen again... 60 years ago somebody tried to exterminate one part of their ethnic group, yet they can't have any kind of grace or honor with people lesser than them. It's straight out of Dickenson where somebody with everything claims injury because they had to clean a little poor kids guts off their carriage and it ruined their day.

    The problem is that most of the "Jews" that ended up in Israel after WW2 would best be termed "carpet baggers". Most of them were from other well-to do places. It was founded as a "fairy tale" religious state... like if Pat Robertson and Dick Cheney had their own country. I think part of why Americans are starting to find it so vulgar is that it mirrors what the Americans did to the Indians not that long ago... and they're starting to realize it was a mistake.

    From a purely "biblical" point of view, the land being squabbled over is the same land Israel failed to take back in the time of King David and the Philistines. There is a prophesy that it would NEVER be their land... and 4000 years later it's still the case. They are trying to take land their OWN religious text says they won't ever get.... They're trying to starve them out, to cheat on their peace treaties, etc, etc. when 60 years ago those people were just "folks" of the land. In ANY western country (like Bosnia, Serbia, Kosovo, etc) we'd call out Israel for "Ethnic Purges" which is exactly what they're doing. It's high time they stop getting a free pass to randomly execute residents of their country... we overthrew Saddam for the same kind of crap.

    Babylon, Persia, Greece, Rome, Crusaders.... all gave the jewish people a chance to participate in their cultures, then wiped them out... then the next guy gave them another chance, rinse n repeat. The UK/USA is another in a long line of big world players that felt the Jewish people earned great respect.... watch them squander it all just as fast!!!

    My opinion is that in the next 5-10 years Israel is going to step over the line with Iran and the US will have to put them down for their own good (and to save our own face with the UN), wipe out all the stuff we've sold them... or 8 other countries will try to wipe them out. Iran is playing a game of talking big, but being careful not to actually violate any international laws, while at the same time stepping up response to minor violations on their own borders. It's a clever game to talk smack, but make sure the other guy throws the first punch. Russia and China have too much invested in Iran to let the US knock it over too... I think those two would hit the veto button on any military action against them.

  26. Different versions by olman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There's English Al Jazeera which you can buy at least in Finland as a part of pay tv packages. Apparently they're by far more balanced with their reporting than the Arabian version is. Not too surprising, perhaps, considering their target audience.

  27. Re:Jews: 3,700 years of not living cooperatively by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Hitler excuse is starting to wear pretty thin. Some of my relatives died in the death camps (my mother's family were German Jews who left the country in the '30s, but not all of them got out in time), so I'm not exactly unbiased on this issue, but every time someone calls Israel to task for their behaviour the reply is always 'but... Hitler killed loads of Jews'. He also killed loads or homosexuals and gypsies, but these groups don't seem to get to use him as an excuse for behaving like asshats several generations later.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News