How Facebook Responded To Tunisian Hacks

jamie writes "Facebook's security team opens up, shedding light on a revolution that could become a parable for Internet activism. Quoting: 'After more than ten days of intensive investigation and study, Facebook's security team realized something very, very bad was going on. The country's Internet service providers were running a malicious piece of code that was recording users' login information when they went to sites like Facebook. By January 5, it was clear that an entire country's worth of passwords were in the process of being stolen right in the midst of the greatest political upheaval in two decades. Sullivan and his team decided they needed a country-level solution — and fast. Though Sullivan said Facebook has encountered a wide variety of security problems and been involved in various political situations, they'd never seen anything like what was happening in Tunisia.'"

Comments

Require HTTPS for all connections...

[Cryect]

Really is annoying that Facebook defaults to http

Kudos to facebook

[operagost]

When Facebook does something right, they should be commended. They easily could have shrugged their shoulders and said, "Not our problem!"

HTTPS

[gambino21]

Article Summary: They switched facebook to use https in Tunisia.

I wish facebook would consider just switching all traffic to https.

Re:HTTPS

[heypete]

Hardware costs would soar if they switched entirely to HTTPS. There is an entire industry making crypto co-processors to handle the load that millions of concurrent HTTPS connections place on an infrastructure.

SSL accelerators are useful for offloading the CPU-heavy part of the SSL transaction: the RSA key-exchange part. The rest of the secured connection is quite light, particularly when using a fast cipher like RC4. The RSA part can be sped up by using shorter keys (e.g. a 1024-bit key, rather than 2048 or 4096-bits), while still providing modest security (anything is better than nothing).

That this guy, a Google employee, said the following about SSL:

In January this year (2010), Gmail switched to using HTTPS for everything by default. Previously it had been introduced as an option, but now all of our users use HTTPS to secure their email between their browsers and Google, all the time. In order to do this we had to deploy no additional machines and no special hardware. On our production frontend machines, SSL/TLS accounts for less than 1% of the CPU load, less than 10KB of memory per connection and less than 2% of network overhead. Many people believe that SSL takes a lot of CPU time and we hope the above numbers (public for the first time) will help to dispel that.

If you stop reading now you only need to remember one thing: SSL/TLS is not computationally expensive any more.

Pay Up

[Anonymous Coward]

So Facebook's sales guy called the President of Tunisia and said "Dude, you have to pay for all that user data just like everyone else does. What makes you think you're special?"

Re:Duh

[Anonymous Coward]

I believe the ISP changed the facebook login page to execute additional javascript to grab the entered password before it was sent off, encrypted, to the fb server. But then again I didn't RTFA...

Executive summary

[93 Escort Wagon]

Facebook doesn't want anyone accessing their customers' personal information unless Facebook is being compensated.