Slashdot Mirror


Iran Launches Cyber-Police Units

Khopesh writes "Iran is implementing a cyber police force to combat social networks and similar sources of 'espionage and riots.' This will likely result in more control over internet access than efforts that might hinder attacks like Stuxnet. 'Ahmadi Moghaddam said that Iran's cyber police will take on the "anti-revolutionary" dissident groups that used online social networks to organize protests against President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad following disputed elections held in 2009. "Through these very social networks in our country, anti-revolutionary groups and dissidents found each other and contacted foreign countries and triggered riots," said Ahmadi Moghaddam, referring to the protests that took place at the time.'"

31 of 45 comments (clear)

  1. watch out 4 chan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Yo have been reported, and backtraced.

    1. Re:watch out 4 chan by Seumas · · Score: 1

      No, they'll just open up a socket and put a filter on it.

  2. anti-revolutionary... by Zelgadiss · · Score: 4, Interesting

    anti-revolutionary

    Heh. They don't seem to want to admit that they are the status quo now.

    Those seeking to over throw them would be the revolutionary ones.

  3. World Power Quality Counter Espionage by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1

    Iran has learned from Soviet mistakes - you do need computer weapon to catch moose and squirrel.

    1. Re:World Power Quality Counter Espionage by Bahamut_Omega · · Score: 1

      They'll find they just caused World War 3 due to 4chan's wave of marauding motormouths taking down the Revolutionary Guard, Basij, Madman & Supreme Bleater. This war would not be fought with bullets, but with bullshit.

  4. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The consequences will NEVER BE THE SAME!

  5. Iran: catching up with the West by FuckingNickName · · Score: 1

    Don't forget to do it without judicial oversight, to infiltrate protest groups and cyber with legitimate members, and to incite violence. It's OK because when you're working for the government you are in the right by definition, right?

    1. Re:Iran: catching up with the West by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Dammit ... why do all the really great trolls awlways come out right after I've used up my last mod point?

  6. !Democracy by should_be_linear · · Score: 3, Funny

    We all know in our western democratic society such thing as cyber police is unthinkable! (Rolls eyes)

    --
    839*929
    1. Re:!Democracy by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Of course the consequences for misdeeds in the Islamic Republic of Iran are likely to be.... severe.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  7. The consequences will never be the same by md65536 · · Score: 1

    I can only hope that any lying no-good punks will be reported to this new group when Iranian citizens backtrace anyone who done goofed

    1. Re:The consequences will never be the same by shmeck · · Score: 1

      I tried to write something that more succinctly captured the Jessi Slaughter meme than what you wrote, but failed. I guess I dun goofed.

  8. Employment by pspahn · · Score: 2

    Are they hiring?

    =)

    --
    Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    1. Re:Employment by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      Yes, and not only do you get to support an autocratic and human-rights-infringing regime in the short term, you also get to be put up against a wall and shot following the counter-revolution in the medium term.

      Pretty much a win-win situation.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  9. Revolutions caused by "anti-revolutionary groups"? by Noam.of.Doom · · Score: 1

    So basically they're trying to stop "anti-revolutionary groups" from causing riots and revolutions?
    (Yes, I know what they really mean by "anti-revolutionary").

    --
    It is the universe that makes fun of us all.
  10. Consequences... by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

    ...will never be the same.

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  11. Looks like it works by plaukas+pyragely · · Score: 1
  12. Re:Lucky buggers by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    Does that also mean they get to have sex with the activists? Kewl!

    Well, it's not like they're infiltrating a pornstar training school or something.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  13. Re:Revolutions caused by "anti-revolutionary group by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    The Russians carried on using "counter-revolutionary" as an insult well past the time when the 1917 Revolution led to the Communists being in power.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  14. Huh... by ViperOrel · · Score: 1

    So what happens when the cyber police force gets influenced by these evil social networks? Will there be a cyber police police?

    1. Re:Huh... by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      So what happens when the cyber police force gets influenced by these evil social networks? Will there be a cyber police police?

      Loyalty tests and executions; the tried-and-true method.

  15. Obligatory Meme by Chowderbags · · Score: 1

    So what you're saying is that Iran has called the cyber police, those cyber police can backtrace you, and the consequences will never be the same?

  16. Re:Revolutions caused by "anti-revolutionary group by cold+fjord · · Score: 2

    The Russians carried on using "counter-revolutionary" as an insult well past the time when the 1917 Revolution led to the Communists being in power.

    The Soviets used "counter-revolutionary" as a charge that could get you sent to the Gulag or worse.

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  17. so stupid.... by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    If i want to send out a message to those who know what to look for in advance, then it will be easy...i can post on a website, like any website, that has blog or forum capability, and let them read what i am saying and insert an encoded message there...simple, and no need of facebook or else, this is just a means to come around and control more of what is accessible on the web because they do not like that people can blast their gov. or what not.

  18. here comes the false equivalency by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    if you don't know what exactly is illegal in iran versus western democracies, and you don't know what the punishments are in iran versus western democracies, you are an idiot. but idiots like you dependably crop up in any story critical of north korea or china or iran: "it's the same here in usa/ europe/ australia"

    actually, no, moron, it clearly is NOT the same, by very very wide margins of what is illegal and what the punishments are. to announce north korea, iran, or china equivalent to what you are allowed to do and how you might be punished in western democracies is simply to loudly proclaim that you are a very ignorant person

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:here comes the false equivalency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      if you don't know what exactly is illegal in iran versus western democracies, and you don't know what the punishments are in iran versus western democracies, you are an idiot.

      Right, because since I don't live in Iran and never plan on going there, I'm really worried about examining the intricate details of their legal code. (end sarcasm)

      No, the 'Western World' is not nearly in as bad a shape as places like Iran and China. But you're wearing some rose-colored glasses if you think our legal code is in any way simple, clear, or easy to understand. And if you think it's applied equally or that the punishments are consistent then quite frankly you're a raving lunatic.

    2. Re:here comes the false equivalency by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      "if you think our legal code is in any way simple, clear, or easy to understand."

      what?!

      you ARE a moron. simpleminded legal codes are for simpletons who like cramming their little simpleminded ideas into simple fundamentalist thinking. a rich society is a complex society, and a complex society naturally has a very complex legal code, as it SHOULD be

      "And if you think it's applied equally or that the punishments are consistent then quite frankly you're a raving lunatic."

      yes, it's called judicial discretion

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_discretion

      judicial discretion is a GOOD thing if the only applicable statutes in a particular legal case are too harsh or too mild considering the heinousness or mildness of the crime before the judge

      look: the west has PLENTY of problems. but you're a moron if you start talking about the west's problems in the same sentence as the problems in iran or north korea or china. orders of magnitude worse

      educate yourself. then open your mouth

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  19. Rule #1 by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

    The people of Iran made a mistake this time. They attempted a revolution. You either do, or don't do. There is no try. That's the lesson to be learned here.

    Every successful revolution involves giving it your 110% effort all the way through.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  20. Re:Revolutions caused by "anti-revolutionary group by ladoga · · Score: 1

    The Soviets used "counter-revolutionary" as a charge that could get you sent to the Gulag or worse.

    ...used "terrorist" as a charge that could get you sent to the Gitmo or worse.

    These things just go on and on.

  21. Re:Revolutions caused by "anti-revolutionary group by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

    ...used "terrorist" as a charge that could get you sent to the Gitmo or worse.

    These things just go on and on.

    There are some distinct differences.

    Making a joke about Stalin could get you sent to the Gulag, or just a quota due to a shortage of prisoners being used for forced labor at an important state project. Apparently more than 18,000,000 people passed through the Gulag system from Lenin's time.

    It is nearing 10 years now, and less than 1,000 people have been sent to Guantanamo, and it is emptying. Making jokes about George Bush is practically a national pastime, but people don't go to jail over it. The vast majority of Guantanamo's prisoners were either captured on the battlefield or in hiding, overseas. They either were active participants in making war against the United States, or suspected of active participation or direct support.

    There really isn't any meaningful comparison.

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  22. Re:Obligatory DKM Reference by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    link shows Daniel Keys Moran, I thought you meant Dropkick Murphys for a minute.
    Proud working-class punks there to be sure, but no specifically anti-police song of theirs comes to mind.

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.