Hackers Bringing Telnet Back
alphadogg writes "A new report from Akamai Technologies (CT: Requires login) shows that hackers appear to be increasingly using the Telnet remote access protocol to attack corporate servers over mobile networks.
The report, which covers the third quarter of 2010, shows that 10 percent of attacks that came from mobile networks are directed at Port 23, which Telnet uses. That marks a somewhat unusual spike for the aging protocol used to log into remote servers but that has been gradually replaced by SSH."
I use telnet constantly. Port 110 to check for a broken email header, Port 25 to check for SMTP auth errors, Port 3200 to check for the present of a NetGen DSS unit, etc, etc... I love telnet. Simple 3-way handshake and boom, datastream.
If you manage your company or institution's IT department, please do the following:
Step 1: Turn on "telnet" on your PC. (Of course you Windows, you're management, right?)
Step 2: Try to "telnet" to your company's website, or to any other machine or service names your underlings bandy about.
Step 3: If you don't see "Connection refused" every time, FIRE EVERYONE WHO REPORTS TO YOU.
Um, the reason they are using telnet is because it's trivial to hack, in other words the headline should read "hackers hacking easiest to hack service on poorly configured machines, also water is wet, details at 11"
Monstar L
How can hackers bring telnet attacks back if admins don't run telnet? Should the headline say "Admins are bringing telnet back and getting bitten in the ass for it?"
If telnet reminds you of when you were young you aren't old.
Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
Right on target. I've witnessed many a clerk in a shipping/receiving department using telnet to connect to a server. Not just in-house, but often times across the country. People put those computers in place, and set up their systems 20 years ago, or more, and they aren't about to change. "Don't fix what ain't broke!"
"Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
That's not a good reason to use telnet. That's a good reason not to use Godaddy.
(Using dreamhost.com here, and I use ssh and rsync-over-ssh to do all of that... I wonder if sshfs would work, I imagine it would.)
Would you like to drop the firewalls, then? Perimeter security isn't a complete security solution, but it's still a major part.
Seeing traffic on port 23 does not mean telnet is involved. I know some people who run their SSH daemon on that port to lessen the stupid ssh scans.