Slashdot Mirror


JASON Proposes a 'Library of Congress' For Pathogens

An anonymous reader sends this excerpt from a blog at the Federation of American Scientists' website: "In order to help determine the origins of microbial threats in terrorist incidents or epidemics, it would be useful to have a deep archive of various strains of lethal bacteria, the JASON defense advisory panel told the National Counterproliferation Center in a newly released 2009 report (PDF). ... 'This library would consist of strains collected worldwide by methods that preserve sample properties, and capture all relevant data (e.g. geolocation, local environmental conditions). It should include laboratory isolates, natural isolates, and DNA sequence data.'"

42 comments

  1. Be careful, please by mangu · · Score: 1

    That library should have an awesome security around it. It's one thing to keep data secure, that's difficult enough, keeping a collection of biological weapons secure is an entirely different thing.

    Biological weapons have the problem that they are self-reproducing, the release of *one* sample is enough to cause mass destruction.

    1. Re:Be careful, please by lxs · · Score: 1

      Yeah! Like a military biotech lab or something.

    2. Re:Be careful, please by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

      Let's give it to Wikileaks!

      --
      My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  2. Oh, Good by drinkypoo · · Score: 0

    That's all the world needs, the great expansionistic empire-building nation of the modern world to have a complete palette of nasties.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:Oh, Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I agree that it's not a great idea, I'm comforted by the fact that since this is being proposed, it's likely that we don't already have one in secret.

    2. Re:Oh, Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the great expansionistic empire-building nation of the modern world to have a complete palette of nasties

      and machetes.

    3. Re:Oh, Good by marcello_dl · · Score: 1

      Not really an expert, but biological weapons are like artillery or tanks, it seems strange no development or research would occur in that area for any serious army.
      The least optimistic thing is that after development there comes testing.

      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
  3. And then... by bobbinspenguin · · Score: 0

    Bruce Willis visits it in Die Hard 5? From the article I'm assuming there's no actual sample stored though?

  4. Bioterrorism? by Angst+Badger · · Score: 4, Funny

    Epidemics, sure, but maybe I missed the wave of bioterrorism that prompted this orgy of spending. If they can find a way to tie in pedophilia and intellectual property rights, they'll be swimming in cash.

    --
    Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
    1. Re:Bioterrorism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You're looking at this from the wrong angle. We could really use a database of pathogens for medical purposes!

      Just mention "terrorism" and "WMDs", and you'll get all the funding you need.

    2. Re:Bioterrorism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Terror related deaths in US last 10 years or so 4000
      Road related deaths in same period +330,000

      Which is greatest priority?

    3. Re:Bioterrorism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is the job of this group to advise the government on scientific matters. I'm sorry that they didn't cater to your particular interest today.

      Besides. Many road deaths are the fault of the drivers involved. That isn't quite the same as someone who intentionally is out to kill you. Putting up more "Don't drink while driving" signs seems out of their scope.

    4. Re:Bioterrorism? by Tr3vin · · Score: 2

      Terror related deaths in US last 10 years or so 4000
      Road related deaths in same period +330,000

      Which is greatest priority?

      The scary one!

    5. Re:Bioterrorism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My point is not directed at this particular scientific group. Just a commentary on the posture of the US to divert massive resources to a relatively minor threat (in comparison to roads). The terror threat is overstated, to justify expenditure in a particular industry segment. Said expenditure aimed at areas where deaths actually occur will save more lives.

      It may be worthwhile reading paper without pictures of 'neckid' ladies. You will be surprised with what you will learn.

      But then again, some people love to be taken in by nationalist propaganda. Please enjoy your fondling at the airport.

    6. Re:Bioterrorism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe... testing bioweapons on pedophiles and RIAA lawyers?

      I dunno.

  5. CDC by jedidiah · · Score: 2

    I thought we had that already and it's called the CDC.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    1. Re:CDC by LastGunslinger · · Score: 1

      I assumed the same thing, at least for naturally occurring pathogens.

  6. So that's what JASON suggests... by Stormwatch · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...but what do FREDDY KRUEGER and MICHAEL MYERS think about this matter?

  7. Redundancy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think a library of congress implies pathogens.

  8. I approve of this! by SethThresher · · Score: 1

    There is obviously no way this could ever possibly end badly. Let's get this ball rolling!

    (This post brought to you by Lysol)

  9. Dance! by jimmerz28 · · Score: 0

    Let's just hope a terrorist never infiltrates this library using our own system to get in. Talk about a hayday!

  10. "In order to determin the origins..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So we can go and bomb the hell out off some innocent country where the baddies found the stuff.

    How about using that data to create vaccine in advance?

  11. JASON vs JSON by drb226 · · Score: 1

    I know I'm not the only geek that read "JSON" when first skimming this title.

    Nobody knows why they felt the need to capitalize their group name JASON, since according to the WP article, it is a reference to the mythological Greek character Jason.

  12. Library of Congress? It's 2011. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about a Facebook For Pathogens? Way better way to get the kids involved in science.

    Did you see that Streptococcus poked E. Coli?

  13. It will just be full of STDs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After all, it's a library of congress

  14. Does JASON know mythology? by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 1

    The original mythological Jason was undone when he left the alliance that had supported him for another alliance, hoping for a better deal, out of a presumable fear of scarcity in not having enough political power. It is the engineers, scientists, artists, farmers, machinists, and so on who have brought great wealth to our society, while others then have tried to forge that wealth into power, often through creating artificial scarcity through war and commercial competition and passing laws against cooperation (endless copyrights, broad patents, centralizing corporate control, barriers to entry, etc.). The scientists and engineers making up JASON needs to help our society transition to a post-scarcity economic model in order to ensure true security (with mutual security and intrinsic security). But they can only do that by realizing that we need to build a society based on the idea of abundance based on their original alliance to learning and knowledge sharing and not get so caught up in an outdated "war is a racket" kind of economic-driven militarism inappropriate for our exponentially increasing technical powers. In such a society based on the paradigm of abundance, widespread knowledge about pathogens will not be as much of a problem as it might be in today's society that emphasizes competition, unilateral security, and extrinsic soldier-defended security, where such biotech information might be used to build ethically-targeted plagues as opposed to just enabling people change their skin color at will. :-) Social movements towards a basic income, a gift economy, local subsistence, and democratic resource-based planning are all ways to encourage an abundance paradigm. JASON needs to see those sorts of social innovations as part of their mandate to accompany technicla progress.

    --
    A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
    1. Re:Does JASON know mythology? by ediron2 · · Score: 1

      Are we reading the same Jason? I mean, fear of scarcity vs. empire building are hardly 'same thing by degrees', and what Medea did was... er... not the sort of thing that leads to a monty python sketch ("Help, help, I'm being repressed!").

    2. Re:Does JASON know mythology? by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 1

      Sure, I know I'm interpreting the myth towards a point I want to make. :-) But that is the value of broad myths about eternal issues. In this case though, it seems suprisingly apt though in at least some ways. And why do people try to build empires instead of just having a nice life on a farm or in a city somewhere, raising a handful of kids? Is not part of it some sort of inner psychological fear about inadequacy?

      Or as Alfie Kohn suggests:
      "No Contest: The Case Against Competition" By Alfie Kohn
      http://books.google.com/books?id=bLudHIk3gsMC
      "If competitiveness is inherently compensatory, if it is an effort to prove oneself and stave off feelings of worthlessness, it follows that the healthier the individual (in the sense of having a more solid, unconditional sense of self-esteem), the less need there is to compete. The implication, we might say, is that the real alternative to being number one is not being number two but being psychologically free enough to dispense with rankings altogether. Interestingly, two sports psychologists have found a number of excellent athletes with "immense character strengths who don't make it in sports. They seem to be so well put together emotionally that there is no neurotic tie to sport." Since recreation almost always involves competition in our culture, those who are healthy enough not to need to compete may simply end up turning down those activities. ... Each culture provides its own mechanisms for dealing with self-doubt. ... Low self-esteem, then, is a necessary but not sufficient cause of competition. The ingredients include an aching need to prove oneself and the approved mechanism for doing so at other people's expense. ... I do not want to shy away from the incendiary implications of all of this. To suggest in effect that many of our heroes (entrepreneurs and athletes, movie stars and politicians) may be motivated by low self-esteem, to argue that our "state religion" is a sign of psychological ill-health -- this will not sit well with many people.(Page 103)"

      Consider, from the Wikipedia link you supplied, where the very first thing Medea supplies is medical biotechnology: "Presented with the tasks, Jason became discouraged and fell into depression. However, Hera had persuaded Aphrodite to convince her son Eros to make Aeetes's daughter, Medea, fall in love with Jason. As a result, Medea aided Jason in his tasks. First, Jason had to plow a field with fire-breathing oxen, the Khalkotauroi, that he had to yoke himself. Medea provided an ointment that protected him from the oxen's flames. Then, Jason sowed the teeth of a dragon into a field. The teeth sprouted into an army of warriors. Medea had previously warned Jason of this and told him how to defeat this foe. ... In Corinth, Jason became engaged to marry Creusa (sometimes referred to as Glauce), a daughter of the King of Corinth, to strengthen his political ties. When Medea confronted Jason about the engagement and cited all the help she had given him, he retorted that it was not she that he should thank, but Aphrodite who made Medea fall in love with him. ... Because he broke his vow to love Medea forever, Jason lost his favor with Hera and died lonely and unhappy. He was asleep under the stern of the rotting Argo when it fell on him, killing him instantly. The manner of his death was due to the deities cursing him for breaking his promise to Medea."

      Sure, Medea was vindictive in awful ways, but what if we see Medea not as a person but as a representation of all of technology used for social ends (so, say, biotech, useful to cure disease)? In the myth, Jason abandons Medea who had brought him success in life with her technical powers, to ally himself with someone just for political gain. Why should he abandon Medea, if not out of some inner fear of her powers not being eno

      --
      A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
  15. This is a BAD idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's not forget that the 2001 anthrax attacks were actually caused by a strain the came from US labs, it has been widely speculated that this was done by the CIA. They couldn't pin it on anyone except a researcher who was actually working a cure Dr. Steven Jay Hatfill. There was no proof that he was behind the attacks, only that he had been working on the strand. As we all know American investigations often make someone guilty until proven innocent, this caused his friends and family to alienate him which eventually lead him to commit suicide. Having a lab like this will just make it easy for the CIA to start any plague of its choosing when they need support to start a war with any entity.

  16. You Never Miss an Opportunity do You? by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 1

    I've seen you post this stuff about a post scarcity society on every damn story on Slashdot from ones dealing with space exploration to ones dealing with corporate drama in the computer world. I get that you read a book, or went to a lecture or something that pimped the benefits of, "transitioning our society to one of abundance." I get that, whatever your source for these ideas was, it inspired you to tell anyone who would listen about it. I understand that you are trying to fight a cause for the betterment of our world and such.

    But honestly, do you have to post the same 3 - 4 ideas and sentences to every damn story posted to slashdot? We've heard it already. We know there is an alternate society structure out there being thought about. We don't need every single freakin' science story hijacked to become some sociology discussion. This story is about the benefits vs. the risks of documenting, cataloging, and preserving all known microbial agents in the world. Can you please post on-topic for once and add something interesting to the discussion? Or, alternatively, if you don't have anything interesting or insightful to say about the matter at hand, can you please just not click the, "Post Comment," button?

    So we are living in a post-scarcity society. Thanks for that. But stop evangelizing your position on how to fix everything at every opportunity. Believe it or not, there is not a single social pill that will fix all the problems that humans face nowadays. Stop pretending your idea is one. This is getting to the point where you sound like one of the wide-eyed religious freaks who answer, "God and Jesus," every time any topic is mentioned around them. Any topic. It's annoying. Please take it down a notch.

    1. Re:You Never Miss an Opportunity do You? by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 1

      "I get that you read a book..."

      Wrote a (free, online) book, actually. :-)
              http://www.pdfernhout.net/post-scarcity-princeton.html
      And other stuff, example:
          http://www.kurtz-fernhout.com/oscomak/AchievingAStarTrekSociety.html

      But many others have said similar things before, from Albert Einstein to James P. Hogan. Although Einstein also said nuclear weapons did not create a new problem as much as make an old one much worse.

      While I did repeat a general theme, it was JASON specific here. I actually sent a longer essay on this topic of abundance ideology to someone involved with JASON a couple of weeks ago, and developed that mythological issue in some detail. :-) No response to that... So I could not resist a chance to make that point here as summary, too, assuming JASON types or their associates/students might read this.

      Are you saying this point on rethinking society so it works better for everyone and avoids self-destructive ironies does not relate to exactly the fundamental problem of technology allowing us to soon create an internet archive where anyone with a grudge can create a designer plague (given the spread of cheap DIY Bio)? The benefits and risks are presumably very different depending on what social structure exists around the archives. See also my suggestion here:
          "Getting to 100 social-technical points"
          http://groups.google.com/group/openmanufacturing/msg/a7abadb8867dae79

      So, it seems to me you are taking some solutions off the table? Why are we willing to imagine that the advance of technology will soon produce a situation where a teenager can download a file from the internet, mess with it in their computer, print out something with a DNA sequencer, and wipe out the human race with a designer plague (same as teens make compuetr viruses), but then it is sci-fi, off-topic, or out of bounds to think we might actually upgrade our social technology to help teenagers and others not be so alienated or competitive or violence-prone? Many pre-scarcity cultures don't have as many alienated teens and young adults, so alternatives are possible.

      Sure, there are a lot of complex things that need to be considered. But, we'll never get to the point of working out the details if we miss the big picture.

      I'm not saying you don't have some valid points (and frankly I'd rather someone else put in the time to raise these issues). But as I see it, so much slashdot discussions these days are about adding technological epicycles on epicycles, and I'm trying to get people to consider a different model involving more fundamental conceptual change.

      One thing I disagree with though -- we are not living in a post-scarcity society, though. The problem is we are living in a scarcity-paradigm society with post-scarcity capable technology -- sort of like handling blinding-power-level laser pointers to a room full of five year olds wound up on sugar and trained by their teachers to hate each other.

      So, what are your alternative solutions?

      --
      A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
    2. Re:You Never Miss an Opportunity do You? by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 1

      See my other comment too, but this is from some stuff I sent Freeman Dyson, people won't get some of the references without having read his books, but seem my point on a new defense directorate. :-)

      === Beginning ...

      In "The Sun, the Genome, and the Internet", which I'm currently reading aloud to my kid, you talk about how those three tools can bring about a revolution in global abundance, which I have no doubt has truth to it. But, the fact is that we have known for a century how to harness the power of the sun for unlimited energy. Through thousands of years of selective breeding we have created a diversity of abundant agricultural crops like hundreds of flavors of apples including ice cream flavor and loyal dogs to be our playmates and guardians (all currently being lost to monocultures of MacIntosh apples and Golden Retrievers). And we put in place postal services, telegraph lines, printing presses, and rail lines that were in many ways better than the internet because they had less spam and you had to be less of a stegnographic expert to wade through the junk. So, why was the 20th century full of war, whether two world wars, Korea, Vietnam, the Cold War, ethnic wars, and so on? Why did we not use all that potential to create universal abundance? Why did people in Prussia instead invent compulsory schooling to turn humans into factor drones and mindless soldiers, and try twice to take over the world? Why is the USA still obsessed about having an empire? I'd suggest that the missing piece of all that is the idea that we now had the tools of abundance (even bureaucracy that efficiently gassed the Jews while it schooled the Hitler Youth Corps was a potential tool for abundance), but we were using those tools of abundance still from a scarcity perspective. And when misused, such tools of abundance could make terrible weapons, like nuclear bombs instead of nuclear batteries, and weaponized plagues instead of cures for malaria, and killer robots instead of factor robots making food and goods for all.

      I guess, if you wanted to be charitable and not consider this complete lunacy, you could see this as some sort of wacky PhD thesis resulting from the times we talked in your office and you gave me a physical design for a sustainable community (Ted Taylor's Micropolis). This is sort of a thesis on the ideological and social design of such a place, or the larger network of such communities and larger entities that it might be part of. Either that or it is a heap of autobiographical creative writing. :-)

      Anyway, maybe I should bill it as a sort of Christmas present? :-) At a risk of getting this reply: :-)
      "You Shouldn’t Have. I Mean It. (Worst Gift Ever.)"
      http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/12/23/you-shouldnt-have-i-mean-it-worst-gift-ever/?partner=rss&emc=rss
      "This week, City Room’s James Barron asked readers to recall the worst Christmas gifts they had ever received. Here is a selection, lightly edited. Merry, um, Christmas." ...

      === A post-scarcity "Downfall" parody remix of the bunker scene

      Albert Einstein's said: "The release of atom power has changed everything except our way of thinking...the solution to this problem lies in the heart of mankind. If only I had known, I should have become a watchmaker."

      When I first heard that (really just the first part, as people rarely quote the last, I thought what he was saying was, essentially, we should learn to be nice to each other and stop being warlike by an act of will. I don't know if that is what he really meant, or not. But, I now have a somewhat different generalization of his suggestion.

      My generalization of Einstein's insight is to suggest "the biggest challenge of the 21st century is the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those th

      --
      A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
    3. Re:You Never Miss an Opportunity do You? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I for one appreciate the same 3 - 4 ideas and sentences to every damn story posted to slashdot. I for one am capable of seeing it in the context either old or new in which it occurs. If you OTOH have a "better" way to say it in your own posts go for it. It is meaningful for me, each time I see it, for one, re scarcity.

      IF _your_ mileage varies so be it :)

    4. Re:You Never Miss an Opportunity do You? by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 1

      I for one appreciate the same 3 - 4 ideas and sentences to every damn story posted to slashdot. I for one am capable of seeing it in the context either old or new in which it occurs. If you OTOH have a "better" way to say it in your own posts go for it. It is meaningful for me, each time I see it, for one, re scarcity.

      IF _your_ mileage varies so be it :)

      Thanks, AC. :-)

      --
      A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
  17. Why of course we should do this! by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

    Certainly! What could possibly go wrong?

    --
    That is all.
  18. Data only? by tchdab1 · · Score: 1

    If you can sequence the pathogen, maybe you can avoid storing a living or livable (spore, etc.) copy of it and minimize the risk of escape.

    1. Re:Data only? by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      If you can sequence the pathogen, maybe you can avoid storing a living or livable (spore, etc.) copy of it and minimize the risk of escape.

      And if you sequence it and the sequence is published, anybody with the right lab equipment can manufacture it with no physical connection to the "library".

      (Yes they have successfully constructed a bacterium from data already.)

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  19. Say... by Syberz · · Score: 1

    Isn't there a movie plot that started like this? I can't remember what it is, but I do remember that it didn't end well.

    Let's let the CDC do its thing, we don't need more repositories of invisible Armageddon bringers, then again, 2012 is around the corner and we're all supposed to die anyways... oooh... perhaps because of this?

    --
    ~Syberz
  20. hollywood vs japan by crrwx · · Score: 1

    isn't this the premise of a michael crichton book? or did they stop watching movies in japan after godzilla?

  21. Already Exists by tobiah · · Score: 1

    There has been a lot of pathogen-specific research in the last decade, most of that data is public and is available in GenBank, which also happens to be where all the other genetic data resides. There's a European one and a Japanese one too, as well as various topic-specific and private ones, but the GenBank is the biggest. It's a whole lot to sift through, a previous employer has a great graphic for making sense of it all.

    --
    "The ability to delude yourself may be an important survival tool" - Jane Wagner -