Slashdot Mirror


MPAA Threatens To Disconnect Google From Internet

An anonymous reader writes "Over the last few months, Google has received more than 100 copyright infringement warnings from MPAA-affiliated movies studios. Most are directed at users of Google's public Wi-Fi service, but others are meant for Google employees. The MPAA is thus warning the search giant that it might get disconnected from the Internet. Although the copyright holders use strong language, these notices are simply warnings, and typically do not lead to legal action."

8 of 468 comments (clear)

  1. Moving the earth rather than changing themselves by mykos · · Score: 3, Informative

    No law is adequate, no business is more important, no constitutional right can supersede the wishes of the commercial content industry.

  2. Re:Illegal Threats? by Locke2005 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I think the word you're looking for is "barratry".

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  3. Re:I think it's time by Chyeld · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually no. It's a mutated urban legend based on the truth that they did refuse to speak to CNET's reporters for a year after CNET published an article containing a number of personal facts about Eric that they 'discovered' using Google.

  4. Re:I think it's time by Stregano · · Score: 4, Informative
    You are talking like Google is still a small time shop here. You are also talking like Google has never de-indexed a site before.
    Site removed from the Google index

    Google may temporarily or permanently remove sites from its index and search results if it believes it is obligated to do so by law, if the sites do not meet Google's quality guidelines, or for other reasons, such as if the sites detract from users' ability to locate relevant information. We cannot comment on the individual reasons a page may be removed. However, certain actions such as cloaking, writing text in such a way that it can be seen by search engines but not by users, or setting up pages/links with the sole purpose of fooling search engines may result in removal from our index. Please read our Webmaster Guidelines for more information.

    If your site is blocked from our index because it violates our quality guidelines, we may alert you about this using Webmaster Tools. Simply sign in to our Webmaster Tools, add your site URL, and verify site ownership. The Overview page provides information about the indexing of your site.

    If you receive a notification that your site violates our quality guidelines, you can modify your site so that it meets these guidelines, then submit your site for reconsideration.

    --
    The world is how you make it
  5. Re:I think it's time by jjinco33 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually according to http://investor.google.com/financial/tables.html Google broke $10 billion in profit.

    --
    Meh.
  6. Re:there once was a time by WeatherServo9 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Avatar made money only because it was a first of the new technology of 3d. It has zero re-watch-ability so DVD sales will be dismal at best.

    Dismal at best? Avatar-DVD-and-Blu-ray-smash-sales-records or how about 'Avatar' DVD sells big, despite paltry two dimensions or Avatar Crushes Yet Another Record: DVD and Blu-Ray Sales. Just a few random links, google revealed quite a few saying the same thing. I'm sure some people bought a copy and then regretted it, but it seems a lot people didn't seem to mind (or didn't expect to mind) the lack of 3D.

  7. Re:I think it's time by brunes69 · · Score: 5, Informative

    All of the members of the MPAA combined have a market cap barely more than Google itself

    Disney - 82 billion
    Viacom - 26 billion
    News corp. - 44 billion
    Time Warner - 40 billion
    NBC Universal - 35 billion estimated
    --
    Total = 227 billion

    Google - 196 billion

  8. Re:More evidence of MPAA thuggery by RedACE7500 · · Score: 5, Informative

    at least not without the help of a Republican president.

    Who is it that's sitting in the White House, pushing for an internet kill switch and is already taking control of domains suspected of activities related to possible copyright infringement?