Slashdot Mirror


The Seven Types of Hackers

Bruce Schneier's blog links to a nifty article listing the seven types of malicious hackers. The list is: Cyber criminals; Spammers and adware spreaders; Advanced persistent threat (APT) agents; Corporate spies; Hactivists; Cyber warriors; and Rogue hackers.

31 of 178 comments (clear)

  1. Missed some by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Script kiddies. (They believe they are hackers)\
    The real pros. (The ones you never hear about)
    Probably some others.

    --
    If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    1. Re:Missed some by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 2

      Probably some others.

      Insert name of government agency here ...

    2. Re:Missed some by dkleinsc · · Score: 4, Funny

      You're just being paranoid. Those government agencies don't exist. And if you don't believe me, just ask them.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    3. Re:Missed some by El_Muerte_TDS · · Score: 2

      Don't forget: those who won't be named.

      You know, the people that $^#!***LOST CARRIER

    4. Re:Missed some by baegucb · · Score: 2

      As of when I post this, noone has mentioned http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/hacker-howto.html and I rather doubt the author at infoworld has ever read it.

  2. The common thread by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 2

    They all think they're the "good" kind.

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    1. Re:The common thread by jayme0227 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Nah. Some of them know they are criminals. Their moms probably think they're good boys, but these guys who are actively participating in organized crime know that they are bad guys.

      --
      But then I realized the cable was blue, so I only gave it one star. I hate blue.
  3. Wait A Second by mattwrock · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I always considered myself a hacker in its original sense. Someone who modded an existing piece of hardware or software to suit their needs, or to work around an existing issue. My latest and most simplest "hack" is getting Froyo on my phone, since my carrier wouldn't send the update. Where am I on the list? Certainly not Hackivist. I guess I am now a "modder" or "homebrewer". I am afraid that the previous terms will be added to the hacker list, with the word criminal added in front.

    --
    "Ones and zeros were everywhere. I even think I saw a two!" - Bender
    1. Re:Wait A Second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      He lists malicious hackers!

    2. Re:Wait A Second by jgrahn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I always considered myself a hacker in its original sense. Someone who modded an existing piece of hardware or software to suit their needs, or to work around an existing issue. My latest and most simplest "hack" is getting Froyo on my phone, since my carrier wouldn't send the update. Where am I on the list? Certainly not Hackivist. I guess I am now a "modder" or "homebrewer". I am afraid that the previous terms will be added to the hacker list, with the word criminal added in front.

      You're a hacker in my book. Those others are not. And I'm surprised that Slashdot has started using the word *exclusively* to mean criminals.

    3. Re:Wait A Second by trollertron3000 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Do you code? If not then how do you hack anything? You just load ROMs. So you're a modder. Now you may love the lifestyle, but in my not so humble opinion if you don't write code you really can only "hack" mechanical things because you can't alter the software of anything controlled by code. You can get other people to write it for you and run it. But does that really meet the definition? If so then I'm a mechanic. If that's the bar then half the world can be listed as hackers for jail breaking their phone. No sir you are a scenester. Which is okay I guess If you just want to look like you're a bad ass. Like those guys with all the Celtic tattoos on 50k "motorcycles". It's okay I guess. But it ain't no 1%er.

      --
      Tiger Blooded Bi-Winning Machine
    4. Re:Wait A Second by _anomaly_ · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why exactly do those listed not fall under the category of malicious hackers?
      "Hacker" is only used as a negative word in this context because of the adjective "malicious".

      --
      "I have no special gift, I am only passionately curious." - Albert Einstein
    5. Re:Wait A Second by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You can't fight city hall indefinitely without just throwing in the towel at some point. I get sick of having a 5 minute conversation every time the subject comes up (sometimes the same conversation multiple times with the same person), so i just let it go now. Language evolves and once a phrase is out there publicly, used correctly or not, you can't put the toothpaste back in the tube. Coincidentally, the folks misusing "hacker" also seem to be the ones that call their desktop towers "CPU" or "hard drive" when referring to their entire tower, or refer to any brand of MP3 player as an "iPod".

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    6. Re:Wait A Second by gnapster · · Score: 2

      I believe that the reason people complain about the semantics of hacking is this: they value the definition of 'hack' that first became popular at MIT and is codified in the Hacker HOWTO and the Jargon File. To wit, the application of ingenuity to a problem. This is a beautiful concept, and there is no other word which captures it. I would like to talk to people about this concept, but the vocabulary has been diluted, making my goal more difficult. At the end of the day, though, it is probably futile to attempt to coerce the English-speaking masses towards this definition. That saddens me a bit, although I understand that the Psychology community has suffered much more than those in technology.

  4. Missing option by blair1q · · Score: 5, Funny

    8) Website devs who force simple articles to split unnecessarily across multiple webpages. They're in it for clicks and ad revenue, essentially scamming multiple banner-ad buyers into paying for the same article read. Here's an example.

    1. Re:Missing option by nzap · · Score: 2

      Also missing: users who have installed Adblock Plus and don't even see the ads.

      They don't see the ads, but they still see the inconvenience of imitating the limitations of a paper format.

  5. rogue hackers by smitty97 · · Score: 2

    Does Rogue Hackers include all the roguelikes such as Net Hackers, Moria Hackers and Angband Hackers?

    --
    mod me funny
    1. Re:rogue hackers by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 2

      Perhaps, but some rogue hackers might have trouble resolving Ancient Domains of Mystery...

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    2. Re:rogue hackers by thatskinnyguy · · Score: 2

      No but the font change makes you a scene hacker/tool.

      --
      The game.
  6. Wikileaks? Really? by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 2

    If they're conflating Wikileaks with hackers, then it's pretty clear to me that they either don't know what hackers are, don't know what Wikileaks is, or are riding the Wikileaks-hater bandwagon.

    --
    Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
    altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
  7. I've always broken it down by "hats" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    from good to bad...

    white hat, gray hat, black hat, and asshat

    I don't remember where I originally heard this, known it for years, so sorry to the source.

    1. Re:I've always broken it down by "hats" by camperdave · · Score: 2

      I'd reverse the last two. Black hats are being deliberately malicious and evil, whereas the other is just being a jerk for the sake of being a jerk.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  8. innacurate re: wikileaks by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 5, Informative

    From the article:

    Malicious hacker No. 5: Hacktivists
    Lots of hackers are motivated by political, religious, environmental, or other personal beliefs. They are usually content with embarrassing their opponents or defacing their websites, although they can slip into corporate-espionage mode if it means they can weaken the opponent. Think WikiLeaks.

    I'll grant that Wikileaks are activists. I'll also grant that they have some great hackers working for them. But what the article describes as "hacktivism" is not what wikileaks does. Wikileaks employs hackers defensively, to provide a secure system that guarantees anonymity for the sources who leak information to them.

    Although there have been allegations made in the press by people who probably don't know anything about information security, I have seen no evidence that suggests that Wikileaks obtains information by cracking into systems. On the contrary, Wikileaks have always claimed to work by receiving information from sources who were privileged with access to the information, and who elected to leak it to Wikileaks out of duty to their conscience.

    There has been, to date, no evidence brought forward which suggests that Wikileaks has ever broken into a system to extract information out of it. That isn't the way they do things.

    There are "hacktivists" who do things like deface websites in order to publicize a cause, or DDoS attack some target that they disagree with. But that is not what Wikileaks does, either. Misguided sympathizers from "Anonymous" may have done some of these things in an attempt to aid Wikileaks, but that is still not something that Wikileaks does or endorses.

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    1. Re:innacurate re: wikileaks by gearsmithy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well we know Assange isn't a hacker... we have evidence to suggest that he's be laid at least twice.

  9. Maybe you should have an editor read this one, Rog by Minwee · · Score: 5, Funny

    "If you think simply having a buffer overflow, fully patched systems, and antivirus will defend against all hackers no matter their objectives, you're wrong."

    Um, if you think that a buffer overflow is supposed to defend you, then you're even more wrong.

  10. Re:Gotta Have Catchy Nicknames for Them Though by blair1q · · Score: 2

    Script kiddies.

    The Can't-Somebody-Else-Code-It? Hacker

    "There's a hack for that."

  11. Re:Gotta Have Catchy Nicknames for Them Though by skids · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The seven types of useless speculation-based throwaway tech articles:

    1) Those that try to classify things
    2) Those that list traits of things or people
    3) Those that troll-bait old tech holy wars
    4) Those that recycle old ideas as new and revolutionary
    5) Dups from this-day-last-year because the byline didn't display the year
    6) Shameless FUD
    7) Those that ego-stroke the intended audience by telling them how unique they are.

  12. Re:Maybe you should have an editor read this one, by Spykk · · Score: 2

    The buffer overflow is there to offset the adjacent buffer underrun. It is a very delicate system.

  13. Seven Types by halcyon1234 · · Score: 2
    1. 1. Sleepy
    2. 2. Sneezy
    3. 3. Dopey
    4. 4. Grumpy
    5. 5. Happy
    6. 6. Bashful
    7. 7. Cowboy Neil

    Sidenote: Slashdot's css has fucked up OL. Another entry for my user style. Great job, Slashdot. Great job.

    ol li
    {
    list-style-type:decimal !important;
    }

  14. Sub 7 is 31337 by NSN+A392-99-964-5927 · · Score: 2

    i just clicked the server, then hit his firewall and crashed his computer.

    --
    All cows eat grass!
  15. ****malicious*** by Gunstick · · Score: 2

    It says "Your guide to the seven types of malicious hackers"
    Please note the word malicious

    There are many more types of hackers, which are not malicious at all.

    --
    Atari rules... ermm... ruled.