Slashdot Mirror


TiVo To Brick All Remaining UK PVRs On June 1

handelaar writes "Perhaps in order to 'encourage' existing users of UK Tivo units to change their TV service to Virgin Media, pay £149 for a new 'Virgin TiVo' that they won't actually own, plus £34.50 per month in service charges, Tivo is to cancel all EPG data service to all the Tivos still in use in the country — and existing units will become basically nonfunctional at that time. The faithful aren't amused, having stuck by the company for several years, and mostly paying £120 per annum for service until now. 50% of UK residents aren't able to avail of this generous upgrade offer even if they want to — the cable company in question only covers about half the country."

43 of 286 comments (clear)

  1. For those who like this sort of thing, this is the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    tivo must not like having customers

  2. MythTV + Freeview DVB-T Tuners by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 4, Informative

    It might cost more up front, but in the long run it's much cheaper, and you get to control the recordings.

    Although the BBC has been applying to be able to encrypt it's EPG data for HD channels - there was a large fuss made about it at the time but I've heard nothing since, so I presume they are sneaking it in the back door quietly.

    1. Re:MythTV + Freeview DVB-T Tuners by DrXym · · Score: 2

      There isn't much that the BBC can do to encrypt anything. They might be able to scramble the EPG but the variety of different data sources, e.g. DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S2 means the data will leak out. BBC HD on satellite is going to be virtually identical to BBC HD on Freeview except for its program number. The crypto key would also have to be divulged to STBs anyway, probably in firmware so it's going to be there to find. I doubt the BBC really cares much about doing it except to tick a box. They might also be able to mandate crypto for HD broadcast over DVB-T2 but without a CAM or bidirectional comms between STB and network provider, the crypto WILL get broken. And there is no CAM and DVB-T2 is not bidirectional. Even if crypto were implemented correctly it is a big expense and particular problematic for PVRs since it can really screw with trickplay functionality (solving this is a huge topic in itself) which would hamper hardware development. The other crypto found in Freesat/view compliant PVRs is they encrypt HD content as it's saved to disk. I imagine this is done with hardware AES and a unique key per box. Not much can be done about this except don't use logo compliant PVRs. I suppose someone might find a box which is sloppy with the way it saves content (e.g. prepending the key to the front of the content or in metadata or using the same key for every box) to enable a classbreak.

    2. Re:MythTV + Freeview DVB-T Tuners by jonwil · · Score: 3, Informative

      The BBC is not being evil, its the evil MPAA saying "do this or we wont let you broadcast our content".

      The BBC does the bare minimum they are required to by their deals with the big content producers.

      Of course what is needed is for the big content producers stop thinking that DRM (especially DRM on free TV broadcasts) will ever stop their content from being pirated (or even do much to slow it down). But there is as much chance of that happening as there is of George Lucas deciding to give Star Wars away for free and uploading copies to YouTube.

  3. Brick? by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What? Something is bricked because it is no longer served programming info now?

    This is bad, TIVO sucks, their lifetime subscription doesn't cover the lifetime of the device, etc.

    But stop fucking using the term brick unless the device is incapable of powering on.

    --
    There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    1. Re:Brick? by Spad · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't get this, surely it's not hard.

      Something is bricked when it is, to all intents and purposes, interchangeable with a brick. Not simply when it doesn't work properly any more or has less functionality.

    2. Re:Brick? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 3, Informative

      But stop fucking using the term brick unless the device is incapable of powering on.

      You, sir, are correct. From the link in the summary:

      Without the program guide data provided by the TiVo service, Series1 boxes will have limited - if any - functionality. They can still be used to view previously recorded programs and, under certain circumstances, may be used to record programs manually.

      So they are stopping the service used by the device, limiting it's functionality. It's like owning an intelligent radio, and your favorite station goes off the air. They are do not doing anything to brick the device.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    3. Re:Brick? by Gaygirlie · · Score: 5, Informative

      But stop fucking using the term brick unless the device is incapable of powering on.

      There are plenty of ways of bricking something and not being able to even power something on is only one of those. Like for example a gaming console: if you hit the power button and it goes on, but nothing else happens, then it clearly is bricked.

      Basically bricked means the device no longer useable for the purposes it was actually originally made for and getting it to functional state requires tools not even a regular geek has at his or her disposal. It is not bricked if returning it to functional state is sufficiently doable, or if it doesn't do what you want it to do but still serves the purposes it was sold under.

    4. Re:Brick? by vadim_t · · Score: 2

      Sure it does. The point of language is to communicate. If you start arbitrarily changing the meaning of words people stop understanding what you mean.

      "Bricked" is a very precise metaphor. It means the device is as good as an actual brick -- inert and devoid of functionality other than the physical shape of the thing.

    5. Re:Brick? by anomaly256 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes. Like how all those users who call their system cases 'hard drives', 'modems' and 'monitors' diluting the meaning of all the terms involved don't in any way cause confusion and misunderstanding amongst support staff and other savvy users by misusing them as such.

      I'm sorry but a dynamic meaning is different to outright misuse. And as it stands, something still being usable albeit in a limited fashion is NOT bricked. Bricked can have many shades of meaning but even in the most liberal form, it is misused here plain and clear.

    6. Re:Brick? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > It means the device is as good as an actual brick

      So, it is usable in construction projects?

      Please stop diluting the term "brick" by comparing plastic-cased retail electronic devices to useful baked-clay load-bearing mouldings.

    7. Re:Brick? by Man+Eating+Duck · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Basically bricked means the device no longer useable for the purposes it was actually originally made for and getting it to functional state requires tools not even a regular geek has at his or her disposal.

      No, I don't agree. I understand that the device will continue to function exactly as if you disconnected its data cable. Bricked would mean that it functions about as well as if you had disconnected its power cable.

      The company discontinued a service, this does not mean that people can't switch the device on and use all of its offline functionality, ie it is *not* bricked. If they issued a remote update which erased all firmware with no possibility of recovery, now that would be bricking.

      --
      Are you a grammar Nazi? I'm trying to improve my English; please correct my errors! :)
    8. Re:Brick? by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 2

      i propose that "bork" be interchangeable with all words, as words retaining their meaning adds no value to our lives.

      Bork bork bork, bork bork bork bork bork bork. Understand? No, I didn't think so. Bricked = interchangeable with a brick. What these TiVo units will be is "with reduced functionality, but fully capable of playing pre-recorded shows" and not bricked at all.

      Let me put it to you this way; If you would were faced with the situation of throwing $brickeddevice or a brick through someone's window, if you don't choose $brickeddevice it is not bricked.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    9. Re:Brick? by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I would say that your definiton of "bricked" is close. My definition of "bricked" is "the unit in question has the functionality of a brick." It may turn on, but it does nothing useful. If you can recover it without opening the case, you should not use the term "bricked". If someone else can recover it, you may use the term "bricked", but they should not.
      In the case of this story on this board, the term "bricked" is completely inappropiate. It seems that you will still be able to manually program these to record programs, you just will no longer receive scheduling data which will allow the unit to automatically record shows for you. Not only that, but I would think that a good portion of slashdot readers would be able to hack one of these to obtain programming data from an alternate source (I'm not familiar enough with Tivos to know how difficult that might be, it may be more difficult than I imagine).

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    10. Re:Brick? by vadim_t · · Score: 2

      I'm in favor of change, but not arbitrary change for no good reason.

      "Brick" as in to make a device completely non-functional is an useful change, as it creates a way of describing an interesting state that might have formerly taken an entire sentence to explain.

      "Brick" as in whatever meaning being used in this article (not very clear to me, but which seems to be "make a device less functional") creates confusion as to what is actually going on.

      Bricking normally refers to the device itself. Losing AC power doesn't brick your TV, it will still work if power is restored. Neither does shutting down the analog signal, it will still work if a signal is provided. Installing a firmware update that makes it unable to power on or accept the right firmware would do it though.

      According to me:

      Creating new words and new meanings for words that condense complex states and meanings in one word, creating more precision in language: good

      Giving words meanings that make it hard to determine which exact state is meant, reducing precision in language, making a specialized word mean the same thing as general one: bad

      Dates have nothing to do with it.

    11. Re:Brick? by twidarkling · · Score: 2

      He said "arbitrarily" changing. Linguistical shift over time is natural as language evolves. But simply using a word to mean something other than what it means, when there are other words which already mean that which you are trying to convey is not helpful. It is, in fact, doubleplusungood.

      --
      Canada: The US's more awesome sibling.
    12. Re:Brick? by LordLimecat · · Score: 2

      No, brick has a very specific meaning in electronics jargon. You can refer to a router as bricked if the only recourse is to jtag it; you may not correctly refer to it as bricked if you forgot the password. Again-- a surge which fries the flash chip would be a bricking; losing your internet connection and being unable to use the router, not so much.

      You wouldnt call your TV "bricked" if your provider cut you off, because the device still functions. These TiVOs will still function, and are therefore NOT interchangeable with bricks even under your definition.

    13. Re:Brick? by LordLimecat · · Score: 2

      It becomes relevant when we can no longer trust that the summaries have any basis in reality, or that they will be free from gross innacurate hyperbole.

      A headline indicating "TiVO to cancel service" would have been sufficient, and would not have sparked this discussion. A headline indicating "TiVO to come out and physically break all of your crap" is irresponsible and inexcusable, and this discussion is because a good number of us think that using the word "brick" is analogous to such a headline.

      You dont think the inability to trust that the news youre getting has a basis in reality is significant?

    14. Re:Brick? by yurtinus · · Score: 2

      "Disabled." I know it's more syllables than we're used to having to utter, but for the sake of maintaining a reasonably accurate and descriptive language, let's just bite the bullet and say it.

      --
      +1 Disagree
  4. Hmm... by lennier1 · · Score: 2

    How exactly is punishing your loyal (and still paying) customers a good business move?

    1. Re:Hmm... by Jamu · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When they'll remain loyal and pay more than enough to compensate for the ones that leave.

      --
      Who ordered that?
    2. Re:Hmm... by EMN13 · · Score: 2

      Note that the customers are not still paying - assuming TiVo isn't lying anyhow. They say customers have not been billed since November and that service until June 2011 will be free. For a device last sold in 2002, that doesn't sound unreasonable. Sure it's annoying, and the hassle and price-bump may cost em goodwill, but it's hardly an extreme step.

  5. £149? by Richard_at_work · · Score: 4, Informative

    Not sure where you get that from, the Virgin V+ HD box is free (well, a once off £50 activation charge) for new customers, and as an existing customer I can get one for £70 including the activation charge.

    Plus the "£34.50 per month" includes TV, phone (line rental and a fairly decent call package) and 10MB broadband.

    Not saying that what Tivo are doing is acceptable (although they never promised eternal service in the UK, or did they? Since people are paying an annual service charge, I would guess not), but at least get stuff correct before ranting.

    1. Re:£149? by some_guy_88 · · Score: 2

      I just recently moved from Australia to the UK and that's one of the interesting things I noticed. In the UK you pay for the speed of your connection rather than how much you can download. So as others are saying, the 10Mb is referring to a 10Mbit connection speed. You can download as much as you want.

      In Australia, the speed is basically always "ADSL2+" which means a theoretical maximum of about 20Mbit but in practice is highly dependant on how far away you live from the telephone exchange and the quality of the lines in your house etc. I never got speeds anything like 20Mbit and I lived close to the center of town in Melbourne (~3.5mil population). When you go over your download limit (typically 10-50gb), the speed is "shaped" or "capped" to something near dialup modem speeds.

    2. Re:£149? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2

      Ah it means speed, not volume. I am in Australia so 10MB seemed strangely low, not impossible.

  6. Learning experience by lexcyber · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe they learned from a successful business model from cupertino. Where you lock in, treat everyone like crap and make them pay a premium price is the winning ticket to huge stock price increase.

    - Sent from my Iphone

    --
    - To understand recursion, we must first understand recursion -
  7. I'm glad by present_arms · · Score: 2

    That I switched from Virgin Media to Sky, although the broadband was better on cable, the rest is junk, and Virgins customer service sucks (well it did for me), as for tivo, I've never used one, I've always had mythtv, and sky+ so i'm not short of recording from TV options, just my 2 pence worth :D

    --
    http://chimpbox.us
  8. To add some context by bamf · · Score: 3, Informative

    Tivo haven't actively sold the boxes in the UK for about 8-9 years now. This isn't a modern service being canned, it's effectively a legacy system.

    1. Re:To add some context by aug24 · · Score: 2

      Legacy, maybe, but I paid for a 'lifetime subscription', and most of the boxes are still in perfect working order. Do you really think 9 years is acceptable?

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
  9. Boat Anchor Mode by Dredd13 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When TiVo was first coming out on the scene, there was talk that there was, hidden deep in the code, a "boat-anchor" mode, which Tivo assured the faithful (which at the time were typically bleeding-edge technology hounds) that if TiVo ever went belly-up, their boxes wouldn't be useless, that there was a mode which they could push to all the units that essentially said "We're going off the air now, open yourself up for use however the owner wants", and that it would offer up some alternative options for shoving EPG data into it gathered from other sources.

    It seems that maybe this is what TiVo should be doing with these UK Series1 units, even if they're not technically "going off the air".

    1. Re:Boat Anchor Mode by Adrian+Harvey · · Score: 4, Informative

      See Oztivo where they've hacked the series 1 frimware to get it's updates over the Internet from a community run guide service. I'm in NZ and using the New Zealand variant on an English Series 1 TiVo (the kind we're discussing here) to good effect. TiVo have resisted people doing this in countries where they're selling the guide service - perhaps now is the time for the community to have a go?

  10. DIY replacement data? by TenMinJoe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is the TiVo guide data format understood? The BBC offer free XML listings data for all UK channels (not just BBC channels) - it seems like it should be possible for motivated developers to convert this into usable TiVo format data.

  11. Analogue Shutdown by paedobear · · Score: 2

    Analogue TV is currently being shut down in the UK - last region(s) in about a year, so complaining that an analogue TV recorder is no longer usable is a little weird surely? May as well have a moan about the government turning off your TV while you're at it!

  12. Not exactly a drama by Goffee71 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    this is like Microsoft withdrawing support for Windows 98 or Internet Explorer 5 for home users... these things are a decade old and while they were unique back then, there are FreeSAT, Freeview, PVRs and other options now if the S1 owners aren't in Virgin areas. Most of the forum posters have said or suspected this was coming... no tea cups were rattled by this announcement - especially as most users have workarounds planned.

    --
    If he's the Walrus then can I be a penguin please?
  13. Re:For those who like this sort of thing, this is by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    TiVo likes having customers, but they've changed their mind as to who their customers are. They no longer focus on direct sales. Instead, they sell boxes to cable and satellite companies, who rebadge them and sell them on. This cuts their supply chain overhead and guarantees large number of sales, so it's more profitable.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  14. Re:For those who like this sort of thing, this is by Sockatume · · Score: 2

    Given that their UK customer base is microscopic, perhaps they do. They're positioning the Virgin movie as the official UK launch of TiVo, a product which actually hit the shelves about half a decade ago. That should give you some indication of the number of subscribers they have.

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  15. PR fail for very little money. by aug24 · · Score: 2

    What a total PR fail. TiVo used to have such a good reputation.

    Presumably Virgin made this a condition of the contract and TiVo rolled over. Shame on both of you, avaricious, nasty, money-grubbers.

    Remember folks (UK and US): don't buy a TiVo product, or a Virgin Media one, they will take your cash and then let you down.

    Justin.

    --
    You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    1. Re:PR fail for very little money. by aug24 · · Score: 2

      The EGP service costs them almost nothing (and they made money on it with monthly subscriptions). Why would they drop it and piss off a rabidly loyal fan base?

      TiVo customers since 2001 have been asking when the new Series 2 onward TiVos will be available in the UK. I would have jumped at the chance to buy one. However, TiVo UK got into bed with Sky and now Virgin and seem to have decided that their best advocates can fuck off. Hence I think it's a PR fail to save very little cash, or more likely, Virgin wants to pull in the series one owners (if they live in a Virgin area).

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
  16. Fucked by cable TV? Who could have predicted? by gig · · Score: 2

    Canceling cable TV was one of the best things I ever did. It takes a while to adjust, but pretty soon you enjoy TV more, and life more, because you only watch stuff you really like, and you watch it whenever you like. You have to seek out shows and movies a little more because they're not being shoveled onto you, and you find the ones that you end up really cherishing. If you have a TiVo, you already admitted cable TV is broken. Just get off the pipe.

  17. Re:For those who like this sort of thing, this is by jimicus · · Score: 2

    Well, with Tivo you didn't buy their EPG. You bought the box but in order for it to be any use you subscribed to the EPG. Which might mean they'd get away with it - were it not for the fact that they offered one-off lifetime subscriptions for £120.

    Having said all that, they're a business. And almost all business decisions can be boiled down to money.

    Were I in Tivo's shoes, I'd have worked the arithmetic something like this:

    Worst case scenario: Customer(s) take us to court, win, we're obliged to refund some proportion of their lifetime subscription. This isn't the US where you can sue for the loss at £120 then the "hurt feelings" at £1,000,000.

    The only customers who are likely to make a fuss are those still using a lifetime subscription.

    So, how many people with lifetime subscriptions are still using them? Should be easy enough to figure out, the boxes phone home every night to download their EPG. Which means there must be some means of authenticating the box or how else would you know that it was associated with a lifetime sub? Once you've worked out this number, let's call it N

    Multiply N by the cost of the subscription (£120) and you've got an idea of the worst-case you'd be paying out - excluding legal fees. I would be astonished if that number is much more than, say, £120,000 - Tivo pulled out of the UK years ago, the only boxes which are affected are going to be getting on a bit now.

    Okay, so how much does it cost to maintain the EPG service - including a pool of dialin modems, the servers and the software? This would be a service which every other PVR in the country is getting straight from Freeview/Cable/Satellite system and so the cost of running it is exclusive to your old product. I bet you anything you like it's expensive enough that even with the worst-case payout, it's still cheaper within three years to cancel the service.

  18. Re:For those who like this sort of thing, this is by OshMan · · Score: 2

    As one of the "fools" who paid for lifetime service I'd like to inject some facts here. I paid something like $300 for lifetime, and used that service for almost ten years before the box failed from hardware issues. Had I not purchased the lifetime service I would have paid somewhere around $1200 for that service during the same time. In fact I could still repair the box and keep using it if I chose. So please explain to me where it was foolish to pay $300 rather than $1200?

  19. Re:For those who like this sort of thing, this is by OshMan · · Score: 2

    10 years ago when I bought the Tivo, SageTV if it was even available yet was in its infancy. Regardless I believe I paid less than $300 dollars for the Tivo box so your $590 solution wouldn't have been much of a savings if any. Also, I've got to say that myTivo has far outlasted any PC I've ever owned. It took almost 10 years to fail, and I think the only problem is with the modem. But I've moved on to Roku rather than repair it.

  20. Re:For those who like this sort of thing, this is by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 2

    Or you could pay a premium price for a premium product that Just Fucking Works.

    I tried building a DVR back in the early days. What a mess. The software sucked in ways that were so bad that it felt like the suckage must have been intentional because they couldn't have made it that bad by accident. After about a week of dicking around trying to make it somewhat functional, I gave up and bought a Tivo. No dicking around. No crappy, unreliable software. It just worked. It did everything that was promised and it did those things well. PC-based products are starting to catch up but it's taken nearly a decade and the new Tivos can be had for as little as $100. And how are you going to deal with cablecards and SDV with your Sage system? Good luck with that. Sure, you pay $13-20/month for the Tivo service but most cable companies charge $15/month for DVRs that are terrible.

    Some folks would rather pay a bit more to get a product and service that isn't aggravating.