Slashdot Mirror


Dual-core Smartphone Runs Android and Ubuntu

nk497 writes "ARM is showing off a test handset at Mobile World Congress, which runs Android 2.3 and Ubuntu 10.04 at the same time on a Texas Instruments OMAP 4 chip. ARM envisages a time when the only computer you'll ever need is your smartphone and with Nvidia announcing it will be putting quad-core mobile processors into tablets by autumn and smartphones by Christmas, that prospect looks to be approaching faster than anyone expected." Video is attached if you're curious.

6 of 148 comments (clear)

  1. Battery life must be bad by EricTheRed · · Score: 4, Interesting

    but that will improve.

    Saying that this sort of thing will happen eventually, with Meego being mothballed after Nokia defected to Windows we need a good Linux based OS other than Android

    --
    Java gaming nut - http://www.retep.org/ or for the rail http://uktra.in/
    1. Re:Battery life must be bad by migla · · Score: 5, Funny

      Did you watch the video. You could fit a battery the size of a cat on that phone.

      --
      Some of my favourite people are from th US; Vonnegut, Chomsky, Bill Hicks.
    2. Re:Battery life must be bad by MozeeToby · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Most of the Dual cores draw less power than the single cores at idle, which is where your phone's CPU spends most of it's time. There are only a very few applications that seem to peg even my 1.5 year old Motorola Droid, mostly games and whatnot. I would expect the average battery life to improve when moving to a new dual core compared to a single core simply because they can slow the clockrate and disable unused parts of the die. Of course, maybe the new single cores will perform even better battery life wise, I'm just saying compared to what is common now.

      If I'm not playing games the display is typically the number one power user at something around 35%. Next is cell standbyat 18%. Only after that is OS related things which all added up together come to about 17%. CPU just isn't the biggest power draw on most smartphones, unless you're playing graphics intensive games. If you're doing something like browsing the web you'll see the transceiver and display numbers jump up faster than the browser's because there really isn't that much to think about when it comes to displaying a page.

  2. That's not a phone! by Arab · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's a space station!

  3. Phone "external monitor and input" standard by swb · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I really wish they would come up with a standard for external displays and input for mobile phones.

    A standard would allow things like a phone slot in your car that would enable your phone's full UI to appear on your car's larger touch display, enabling music/phone/apps in the car in a way that exceeds "ipod integration" and the lame, out of date software experience most cars provide on in-dash electronics, as well as providing an ergonomic experience (steering-wheel mounted controls for music, volume, phone) more appropriate for behind the wheel.

    I'm semi-surprised Apple hasn't already gone there, given the number of carmakers that provide interfaces compatible with Apple's iPod. Are there technical limitations that would preclude this for the iPhone? Even if it "only" included the standard display 2x zoomed (ala the iPad's execution of iPhone apps), it would be a lot nicer than even a phone on a Pro-clip type mount.

    And this is just cars -- I can imagine TVs with these slots and "remote controls" that provide touch interfaces, etc.

  4. Re:Where are all the neo-luddites? by KingMotley · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just download the internet and put it on a SD card when you want to access it away from home.