Slashdot Mirror


Chrome May Drop the URL Bar

An anonymous reader writes "There isn't much Google can still eliminate from the browser's interface. Yet Google appears to be considering a drastic step to free up space in the UI: It may simply kill the URL bar. Instead of showing the URL bar all the time, it may be hidden within tabs. There are some other features coming as well. For example, Google will allow users to be logged into different Google accounts at the same time, as long as you use those accounts in different windows."

12 of 343 comments (clear)

  1. Really Stupid Idea by kyrio · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I guess the "Really Stupid Idea Department" really does exist because I can only see dropping the address bar as a time-losing feature. In Opera I have two horizontal bars, one for the menu and one for everything else (address, navigation, other buttons). Just make your UI extremely configurable, like Opera's, and you have no problems. I have my tabs stacked vertically on the left hand side. I can have more than 50 tabs visible, this way, with no downside.

    1. Re:Really Stupid Idea by pieterh · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Did you RTFA? Stacking the tabs at the side is one of the layouts, and the "Address bar hidden in tab" Compact layout is one of four.

      Actually I like the idea a lot, it's especially annoying on smaller resolution screens to lose space to something we hardly ever type or read. Sure, it helps people who know what they're looking for against phishing, but such people are unlikely to click on random emails anyhow.

      Chrome has been doing a good job pushing browsers forwards, after years of bloat and slowdown, and I'm looking forward to what comes out of this.

    2. Re:Really Stupid Idea by Runaway1956 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Something we hardly ever type or read? Mmmm-kay. If you say so. Personally, I often type domain names, and even more often read them. Maybe it's just 'cause I'm an old bastard, and I'm set in my ways, but I actually do read that address bar.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  2. Lets go phishing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sounds like a GREAT way to make phishing attempts easier

  3. Re:Who needs the URL bar? by devxo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I bet phishers will love this feature...

  4. Ummmm, no by geek · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sorry but I don't like searching for every single thing when I already know the address. This is just dumb. Far too much emphasis place on searching these days. I rarely need to search anymore as I've been online long enough to basically know where most of the important stuff is.

    Just an attempt to generate hits for google here. I dumped Chrome for Firefox the other day for reasons like this. Google controls enough, it's time to take them down a notch. They make some cool stuff but I'm not willing to tie so much into one company.

  5. Re:Okay, I like my screen real estate... by netsharc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Eh, nowadays people just type what they want in the Google Search bar, remember the Facebook login debacle?

    On the other hand, URLs are going back to the AOL keyword origins anyway, look at this domains: http://nyti.ms/, http://flic.kr/, http://youtu.be/ . Yes, they're real. And yes, I hate them.

    --
    What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
  6. Re:Who needs the URL bar? by NoZart · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You wouldn't believe how many people actually browse that way. I have seen my fair share of people that type URLs in the searchfield of their google homepage.

  7. Just stop it already by rudy_wayne · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Mozilla and Google both seem to be on a crusade to completely fuck up their browsers and make them as shitty and useless as possible. I just don't get their mindset of constantly changing things, removing things, adding things, not to make them better, but to simply make them different. It makes sense for commercial products, whether it's Windows, automobiles or toothpaste, where you have to constantly get people to buy the latest version of your product in order to maintain your revenue stream. But for a product that is given away for free, it makes no sense.

  8. Re:Okay, I like my screen real estate... by guyminuslife · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And that's probably the reason Google thinks it's a great idea. If you just search instead of using the URL bar, you're feeding their core business.

    Hell, I can imagine them going through all the trouble of maintaining the Chrome browser *just for that*. Nobody should use the URL bar again! In 10 years nobody will even remember what it was.

    --
    I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
  9. Re:Who needs the URL bar? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Chrome validates sites for you, and i guess the assumption must be that it is better than the average user at it. That is probably true when you consider that phishing only works because people don't understand URLs.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  10. "Don't make me think" by Waccoon · · Score: 1, Insightful

    First, they took away bookmarks. Then, they took away the menu bar. Then, they took away the status bar. Then, they took away the URL bar. Are they just going to continue taking things away for my own good? As a web developer, I find Chrome infuriating, and I'm not the least bit happy that Firefox is following in these footsteps. If you want to survive on the Internet, there are simply things you MUST know. That's why these bars exist, damn it. Why is anyone in this thread finding ways to justify this behavior? I thought this was the land of the geeks and the purveyors of freedom. Why would anyone justify taking away a feature that's been around for over a decade and actually works?