Slashdot Mirror


Science Channel Buys Rights To Firefly

citking writes "The Science Channel has purchased the rights to Firefly and plans to air all episodes in order and in high definition. In addition, physicist Dr. Michio Kaku will appear to explain the theoretical science behind the show's sci-fi concepts. There's a brief interview in the article as well with Nathan Fillion, who chimes in with his thoughts on Firefly and playing Mal."

2 of 380 comments (clear)

  1. Re:This is important? by westlake · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Since when is it news that a second rate basic cable channel gets the rights to air a show?

    The Science Channel is a Discovery network.

    Market penetration, 100 million households for Discovery Channel, 50-70 million households for each of its second-tier networks. Discovery Networks U.S.

    Discovery tends to stay on target. True crime on I.D. Animals on Animal Planet. No pro wrestling to pump up the male demographic. I'm looking at you, SyFy.

    You could do much worse if you were looking for a new home for "Firefly."

  2. Re:This is important? by JackieBrown · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I always look at Farscape as the '90's version of American cultural propaganda

    Your assumption that this Australian show was an American show demonstrates how well you have succumbed to the notion that all things are American :)

    This show was very pro-UN control (versus American control,) very much against the idea of a group making themselves the police of the galaxy that nobody asked for or wanted, renamed NASA to ISA (or something like that,) and towards the end was pro-peace to the point that I was expecting them to break out in song. HEck, they even had an episode that showed how the US was letting 9/11 destroy world unity over the space program.

    That said, this is my second favorite shows of all time only trumped by Babylon 5. And it surpasses Babylon 5 in terms of consistent awesomeness.