Slashdot Mirror


Earth's Inner Core Rotation Slower Than Estimated

intellitech writes "Scientists at the University of Cambridge believe they have achieved the first accurate estimate of how much faster Earth's core is rotating compared to the rest of the planet. The rate — about one degree every million years — is much slower than previously thought and arises from the complex dynamic between Earth's inner and outer core, which generates Earth's geomagnetic field. Without our magnetic field, Earth's surface would not be protected from charged particles spewing from the Sun, and life would not be able to exist."

21 of 223 comments (clear)

  1. oh GAWD NO! by Thud457 · · Score: 3, Funny

    we have to quickly assemble a team to tunnel to the center of the Earth with nuclear bombs to restart the core's rotation!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:oh GAWD NO! by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2

      we have to quickly assemble a team to tunnel to the center of the Earth with nuclear bombs to restart the core's rotation!

      But how can we obtain the needed unobtainium?

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    2. Re:oh GAWD NO! by MikeDirnt69 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Jokes

      --
      Am I eval()? - http://www.monst3r.com.br
  2. I have exactly the same problem. by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 2

    My inner core rotation is much slower than it should be, especially after a biggish lunch.

    --
    Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
    1. Re:I have exactly the same problem. by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 2

      Every comedian is rolling in their grave... slowly.

      You mean, like, slower than previously expected?

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
  3. Or ... by PPH · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Earth's surface would not be protected from charged particles spewing from the Sun, and life would not be able to exist.

    ... life would have evolved in such a manner or in a location so as to tolerate the particle flux. In the ocean, for example.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Or ... by kabloom · · Score: 5, Funny

      You mean... "God would have created us in such a manner or in a location so as to tolerate the particle flux. In the ocean, for example." Right?

    2. Re:Or ... by jandersen · · Score: 2

      Possibly - there are some theories which suggest that the solar wind might have blown our atmosphere away were it not for the magnetic field, Mars' thin atmosphere is supposed to be an example of this because its magnetic field is weaker than Earth's.

    3. Re:Or ... by spun · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wafers. I tried him once, at a friend's cannibalistic Sunday religious ceremony, and God tastes like cardboard wafers.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    4. Re:Or ... by mister_playboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Venus manages to have an atmosphere 93 times more massive than Earth's while having no intrinsic magnetic field and being subjected to a stronger solar wind.

      There is still much we have to learn.

      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
    5. Re:Or ... by blair1q · · Score: 3, Informative

      Venus' atmosphere is heavier (almost all CO2) and is constantly replenished by outgassing at the 800F surface.

      Venus also does have a magnetic field large enough to disperse the solar wind.

  4. Life is more robust than that... by mpthompson · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It bothers me how often I hear absolutes with regards to "If not for XXX, life would not exist on Earth." Life has proven to be a lot more robust than such simple statements imply. Certainly, without a magnetic field, life on Earth would look a lot different than it does today as it would have adapted to a much different environment, but it would most certainly still exist with all other things being equal.

    1. Re:Life is more robust than that... by MachDelta · · Score: 2

      What oceans?
      No magnetic field means there's nothing to stop solar winds from stripping earth of it's atmosphere.
      With no atmospheric pressure, the oceans would boil at 0C (and the water vapor would then be blown off into space too).
      Also, no magnetic field implies little to no plate tectonics, meaning volcanism is nonexistant, meaning no tasty little geothermal vents for microbes to snack on.

      Make no mistake - without a magnetic field, life would most definitely not exist on this planet. This is not a case of life being fragile, it's a case of the universe being one giant miserable and goddamn inhospitable womb. The fact that life exists at all within it is testament to life's own robustness.

    2. Re:Life is more robust than that... by M8e · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes, Earth's rotating inner hardcore.

    3. Re:Life is more robust than that... by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Informative

      "What oceans?
      No magnetic field means there's nothing to stop solar winds from stripping earth of it's atmosphere.
      With no atmospheric pressure, the oceans would boil at 0C (and the water vapor would then be blown off into space too)."

      Let me fix that for you.

      Wild speculation has it that our atmosphere will be stripped off without a magnetic field. Most experts now disagree as Venus is proof that that is not true. Venus uses a ionopause (as does Mars) but it is generated a different way than Earth's magnetic field. Mars is a special instance because something catastrophic happened at one point. The atmopshere had enough pressure to hold liquid water (it can now, but only in low lying areas or short amounts of time), enough for oceans. What kind of atmosphere makes a difference too. Hydrogen verses carbondioxide for example.

      The magnetic field does more by keeping us from getting cooked by radiation than anything else.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  5. mmmmmm, bacon.... by Thud457 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I've always wondered what god tastes like...

    bacon, obviously

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  6. Re:"Life would not be able to exist" by jfengel · · Score: 2

    It's a nice way to punch up a news article or info piece. I think they may teach it in journalism school: people are really interested in death, and the apocalypse is a great way to attract eyeballs.

    Scientists usually don't say such things, and the Nature article doesn't. But apparently the person who submitted it figured that a one-sentence answer "Scientists do an experiment and come up with a slightly different number from last time" didn't quite cut it.

    Usually, it's the press who adds such things before it gets to Slashdot, and I suspect that the submitter got to the Nature link from some blog or news page, but decided that linking straight to Nature would be more authentic. Or maybe the submitter does read Nature and went to j-school, so knew how to add the mandatory "apocalypse" part of the story.

  7. Re:Earth's Inner Core Rotation Slower Than Estimat by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 2

    As the imaginary ship gets closer then the margins of error on the distance gets smaller so smaller adjustments are needed.

    They build in course corrections into long space flights like this for a reason.

    If you read up on the history of space probes within our Solar System, you'll see course corrections built into the mission for just this purpose.

    http://www.qrg.northwestern.edu/projects/vss/docs/navigation/1-what-is-course-correction.html

  8. Re:Consequences by Lumpy · · Score: 2

    One single volcanic eruption uses more core energy than all of mankind has EVER used in his entire existence in every single energy form.

    Let me guess, these whacks also believe that windmills will slow down the wind and cause us to not have any more wind and weather.

    DONT USE SOLAR POWER! YOU'RE MAKING THE SUN DARKER!

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  9. Deinococcus radiodurans by circletimessquare · · Score: 3, Informative

    Deinococcus radiodurans takes your puny solar radiation, chews on it, and spits it out as not worthy of food. Go ahead, try and kill me!

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deinococcus_radiodurans

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  10. Re:Huh? by CheerfulMacFanboy · · Score: 2

    What the hell is an "accurate estimate"?

    The opposite of a made-up fact.

    --
    Fandroids hate facts.