Slashdot Mirror


Researchers Create Computer That Fits On a Pen Tip

CWmike writes "Researchers at the University of Michigan announced Wednesday that they have created the first prototype for a millimeter-scale computing system that can hold up to a week's worth of data when implanted in something as small as a human eye. The computer, called the Phoenix chip, is just over one cubic millimeter in size and was designed to monitor eye pressure in glaucoma patients. 'This is the first true millimeter-scale complete computing system,' said Dennis Sylvester, a professor at the school and one of the researchers on the project. Within the computer is an ultra low-power microprocessor, a pressure sensor, memory, a thin-film battery, a solar cell and a wireless radio with an antenna that can transmit data to an external reader device held near the eye."

110 comments

  1. That sound convenient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I must say.

    1. Re:That sound convenient by Aldenissin · · Score: 2

      It is, soon I can have the cheapest gas (including cost to drive there) known "for" me instead of having to look it up on gasbuddy.com myself. I will even be able to have it feed that info. directly to my brain. Just go get my implant in my forehead or wrist, and all important "decisions" will already be handled for me! I can't wait.... /end sarcasm

      --
      Like a city whose walls are broken down is a man who lacks self-control.
    2. Re:That sound convenient by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Of course, it sucks when that lithium battery blows up in your eye!

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    3. Re:That sound convenient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Apple had done this everyone would be complaining that it didn't have a user replaceable battery.

    4. Re:That sound convenient by SudoGhost · · Score: 1

      Judging by the name of the article, nobody has invented it yet, it's more of a suggestion. Researcher, Create Computer That Fits On a Pen Tip. That letter S is kind of important.

    5. Re:That sound convenient by Belial6 · · Score: 2

      Of course, Apple would have made the receiver without a replaceable battery, required you to install iTunes to download the data, only let you look at Apple authorized views, and when you would have periods of blindness, they would tell you that you were looking wrong.

    6. Re:That sound convenient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It made me laughs just to think about it.

    7. Re:That sound convenient by mug+funky · · Score: 2

      lol, you just betrayed your sig

    8. Re:That sound convenient by simstick · · Score: 0

      Of course, it suck when that lithium battery blow up in your eye!

      Fixed it for ya! No thank needed.

      --
      The best way to ruin your hobby is to try to make a living at it. Waiting on the paperless office since 1997
    9. Re:That sound convenient by Aldenissin · · Score: 1

      Reply back, does not equal reply to. It helps, and has done its intended purpose. Secret: sometimes I do reply back to, but usually only to just say how much anonymous coward means a free license to be an idiot to many idiots. Even if it is a well reasoned reply, I have if I remember to, avoided replying back. Good troll protection it is. Often, if you refuse to play the game, you already won.

      --
      Like a city whose walls are broken down is a man who lacks self-control.
    10. Re:That sound convenient by pakar · · Score: 1

      I would complain more that i would have to send in my eyes to get the battery replaced.. and wait for a few weeks before i get them back.

    11. Re:That sound convenient by mug+funky · · Score: 1

      but replying to trolls is one of the few pleasures i get from /. :)

      also, there's plenty of non-AC trolls around here.

      troll is in the eye of the betroller.

  2. Holy shit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... that is one of the most jaw-dropping things I've heard in quite a while.

  3. WOW that is so cool by jasonbrown · · Score: 1

    I want that bad boy right in my eye...

    Both eyes even!!!!

    --

    "Congress shall make no law... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press"
    1. Re:WOW that is so cool by Professr3 · · Score: 1

      Cross your heart and hope to die, stick a needle in your eye.

    2. Re:WOW that is so cool by bipbop · · Score: 1

      Read "Pin", by Robert R. McCammon. It's a short story about precisely this topic...

    3. Re:WOW that is so cool by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      I ran across this looking for info on the book.

      http://blip.tv/file/4058583/

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  4. Huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A week's worth of what data? I can store a university's worth of data if I'm not too concerned about the data I'm collecting being sampled often.

    1. Re:Huh by BLAG-blast · · Score: 1
      store a week's worth of data at 1GB per second.

      Indeed, impressive.

      --
      M0571y H@rml355.
    2. Re:Huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A weeks worth of eye pressure data sampled every 15 minutes. If you had taken the time to at least skim TFA instead of writing a stupid, pointless post you might have learned something.

    3. Re:Huh by jc42 · · Score: 2

      A weeks worth of eye pressure data sampled every 15 minutes. If you had taken the time to at least skim TFA instead of writing a stupid, pointless post you might have learned something.

      Well, I read it, and found that, but I didn't see any clue that would tell me how to convert that to bits or bytes. A "week" of data is about as useful as the common "Library of Congress" as a measure of information.

      So please explain further why we're being so stupid when we fail to understand such units of measurement.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    4. Re:Huh by FSWKU · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well, if it's measuring intra-ocular pressure, it's likely not recording much data. Figure a date and time stamp and lets say 5 digits for the IOP measurement itself (15.517, for example). Store that in a CSV file and you're going to end up with something around 22 bytes. If you take a measurement every 15 minutes, you're looking at 96 per day, or 672 per week. That leaves you 14,784 bytes of data, or roughly 14.4 kilobytes.

      My phone can store 32 gigabytes in the space roughly equivalent to a fingernail. That means the storage density on something like this is really quite low in comparison to what we have today (yes, the whole thing is in that tiny package, but I still doubt the storage area is smaller than 0.04% the area of an SD-micro card). No, the really interesting bit is the fact that they can make something that small and still keep it from causing a really nasty infection.

      --
      "So after all this, you make my case for me. To end this stalemate, you must die..."
    5. Re:Huh by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure it would need a date/time stamp for each reading since they're periodic. It might want to keep a single last-read date (or the last-cleared date) so you can calculate the date/time of the readings. Also, I doubt it keeps a floating point representation of the number. A/D converters usually deal in a fixed number of bits, so a 10 bit A/D would be able to store 0-1023, which is a little better than 0.1% resolution. For IOPs in the range of 0-50mmHg (0=eyeball deflated, 50=bugging), that's 0.05mmHg - that's likely sufficient resolution since the normal range is 10-20mmHg and the day/night variance is on the order of 3-6 mmHg.

      Given those parameters, the date/time stamp could be as small as 20 bits if you only store DOY hhmm in raw form (DOY=day of year; no need for the year if you know you can only store a week's worth of data). In fact, you could likely get away with storing the day of week + hhmm. The number of samples returned would tell you whether you went a day over or had it read out 1 day after being cleared. Each sample would be 10 bits, so you're talking about 20 + 672 * 10 bits/week - that's 6740 bits/week or about 843 bytes/week. Even if you chose to 'waste' bits and make all of the values multiples of 8 bits you're still only talking 10776 bits/week = 1347 bytes/week.

      At that data rate I'm surprised they chose 'normal' radio readout - using an RFID-like system where the radio gets its power from the interrogating field would help with power consumption.

      I wonder if a tiny bit of e-paper could be modulated with less power than a 60GHz radio? Reflective readout, that's the ticket!

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  5. Paging Dr. Connor by Son+of+Byrne · · Score: 1

    Dr. John Connor. Paging Dr. John Connor.

    --
    I'd happily pay you Tuesday for a biopsy today!
  6. Slashdot editor not read title by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 1

    Well, at least it "fits on pen tip" rather than "fit on pen tip."

    --
    Palm trees and 8
    1. Re:Slashdot editor not read title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be referring to the one that researcher create.

  7. The big question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...does it run Linux?

    1. Re:The big question is... by monkyyy · · Score: 0

      yes, but only compiz, and the longene kernal w/ no virus protection

      --
      warning pointless sig
    2. Re:The big question is... by exomondo · · Score: 1

      ...does it run Linux?

      And if not then does it have open source drivers?

    3. Re:The big question is... by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2

      No. They couldn't get the graphics drivers for the eye.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  8. Let me know by ceriphim · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...when I can skip Lasik and go straight to cybereyes. I'm sick of paying for contact lenses and glasses just to give me 20/20 vision. I want IR, UV, and better than human-standard sight with recording capabilities. Oh yeah, and augmented reality without the damn external glasses.

    1. Re:Let me know by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

      I've heard from a lot of Lasik/Lasek/Whateverik patients that its not uncommon to get a fair bit past 20/20. I'm not sure if that has consequences when you need to look at something up close though, I know how horrible that feels when I'm wearing my glasses so I can only imagine how bad it must be to have your eyes do that to you... maybe it doesn't though.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    2. Re:Let me know by MrEricSir · · Score: 2

      Researching that right now in my basement lab. It's been partially successful, though unfortunately 9/10 patients become lobotomized vegetables. But we're working on that.

      Let me know if you'd like to sign up for a trial.

      --
      There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    3. Re:Let me know by Billlagr · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking at those odds, that they might already be at the lobotomised vegetable stage. Sounds good though, sign me up!

    4. Re:Let me know by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      ...when I can skip Lasik and go straight to cybereyes....

      Oh sure, we could go there. But it has a wireless connection so it will be no time at all before people start getting....

      wait for it...

      Eye-Jacked.

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    5. Re:Let me know by Kjella · · Score: 1

      That's because your glasses have to cheat a little, which gets obvious when you look up close. Many people have better than 20/20 vision, some exceptional subjects down to 20/8 - meaning they can read from 20 feet what a normal person can read from 8 feet. They have no problem with close objects - not more than everyone else, anyway - they just see everything sharper. Just imagine it like turning the focus on binoculars, they just have another notch where they see even finer details the rest of us can't.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    6. Re:Let me know by fredjh · · Score: 2

      Yeah... about 7 or 8 years ago I got Lasik; about 2 years ago I started needing reading glasses (I'm 43 now).

      I'm going to find out if I can correct that, too. I don't want implanted lenses, though.

      --
      Stupid, sexy Flanders.
    7. Re:Let me know by initialE · · Score: 1

      Who knows what bondage goes with metal eyes?

      --
      Starbucks, Harbuckle of Breath.
    8. Re:Let me know by ThePromenader · · Score: 1

      I have 20/10 vision, but it's the difference between the eyes that allows such a large depth of clear vision; one eye 'leads' for close objects, and the other for objects far. Unfortunately, the 'fatigue factor' for those with vision like that is twofold; my doctor told me that I would be wearing glasses at thirty-five.

      --

      No, no sig. Really.

      ThePromenader
    9. Re:Let me know by dougisfunny · · Score: 1

      You can't with lasik. The muscles in the eye allowing them to focus for reading just get tired as you get older. Lasik can only fix the lens.

      --
      This is not the funny you're looking for.
    10. Re:Let me know by jelizondo · · Score: 1

      Good eyesight in exchange for my brains...

      Let's see, I've been using my brain for close to fifty years but been wearing glasses for 40+ years...

      Yeah! Sign me up!

      --
      Be very, very careful what you put into that head, because you will never, ever get it out. - Cardinal Wolsey
    11. Re:Let me know by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      "I'll see her standing by the monorail
      She'll look the same except for bionic eyes"

      I love that there are four visual references, using three visual words.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    12. Re:Let me know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm one of these people.

      I can say with certainty it has helped me out a great deal in life.
      as a child i could read the 20/5 line at 18 feet. as well as see clearly under water and through moderately unfocused binoculars.
      I was also sensitive to light to the point of pain on a bright sunny day.
      its now 20/10 and I'm 23. my eyes can't focus underwater anymore.

    13. Re:Let me know by voidphoenix · · Score: 1

      Reading glasses are for presbyopia, a diminished ability to focus at near distances, mainly because the crystalline lens (which is inside the eye) gets less elastic with age. Lasik _can't_ fix this, but there are multi-focal and accomodating intra-ocular lenses that can. Multi-focal lenses have multiple focal zones for different distances, similar to bifocal glasses. Accomodating lenses are designed to adjust their focal length to mimic natural accomodation. Lasik doesn't fix the lens. It is non-invasive and uses a laser to reshape the cornea.

    14. Re:Let me know by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 2

      Afaik there's never been any real conclusive proof that vision loss comes from eye "fatigue".

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    15. Re:Let me know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I get eye fatigue for similar reasons -- I was even prescribed glasses just for the fatigue (since my actual vision is fine). They feel pretty strange to wear and didn't really help me at all -- just killed my peripheral vision, so I just go without glasses. I'm 32, so I might still need glasses come 35. I doubt it though.

    16. Re:Let me know by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Well, I'd imagine that the Bene Tleilax do, even if they aren't particularly inclined to tell you...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    17. Re:Let me know by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      The problem is simply that you're getting older. Focusing close and far require different shapes for the eye, and as you get older your eyes and eye muscles get less plastic and less able to make those large adjustments. Basically, your choice is to focus far and use reading glasses, or focus close and need distance glasses. Use a secondary device to create your second focal point.

    18. Re:Let me know by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      From everything I've heard, that's not how it works. People with eyesight in that range have better range of focus, not necessarily better acuity of vision.

      My brother is a pilot, and has better than 20/20 vision. He's approaching the age where he'll need bifocals, and is not (yet) wearing glasses. I'm not sure what his acuity of vision is, but I would be unsurprised to find it is also high.

      My vision is poor. Without glasses, I can't read a book that's 18 inches (45 cm) away. On the other hand, with my glasses on I can easily read, for instance, the bbclarity font on my blackberry at 17 points from a distance of about 5 feet (1.5 m). I'd say my acuity of vision is on the high end (or my optometrist is very good at helping me get the right corrective lenses).

      Remember, there are two physical components to human vision. Just like with digital cameras, we have a lens and a sensor. No matter how good that sensor is, a bad lens will still give you a distorted picture. And if your lens is performing normally, it still won't be able to produce results that are beyond the theoretical capacity of the sensor. Since we have a deformable lens, it's not surprising that some people can have a wider range of focus than others.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    19. Re:Let me know by Jake+Griffin · · Score: 1

      I could [...] see clearly under water and through moderately unfocused binoculars.

      I'm fairly certain that that has nothing to do with the quality of your vision, and I suspect that you are either lying or have memories of better sight than you actually had. If you could see a focused picture through "moderately unfocused binoculars", then the binocular's weren't unfocused in the first place. The eyes don't magically focus unfocused light that enters them. The light that enters them has to have some focus to it in the first place.

      --
      SIG FAULT: Post index out of bounds.
    20. Re:Let me know by home-electro.com · · Score: 1

      The eyes don't magically focus unfocused light that enters them. The light that enters them has to have some focus to it in the first place.

      Sorry, but you don't understand how the optics works. "Light" that exits the binocular is neither focused or not... Only the focal distance is changing. There is a focal distance setting that is comfortable for the eye, but with a bit of strain in your eyes you can see clearly even it is slightly off.

      And yes, it is possible to see clearly underwater (not that I can do that!) -- without glasses or mask, that is. Some pearl harvesting folks can do that.

  9. Standard units please by killkillkill · · Score: 2

    "A week's worth of data" - What is that in LOCs?

    1. Re:Standard units please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOCs? I'm not sure but it's data storage capabilities are probably not great, it's not mentioned in either article, or anywhere else I can see on the net.

    2. Re:Standard units please by exomondo · · Score: 1

      The standard unit of data measurement is 1 day, so amazingly this can hold 7 data!

    3. Re:Standard units please by bws111 · · Score: 3, Informative

      The thing is designed to measure eye pressure in glaucoma patients. It samples once every 15 minutes. So it would seem it can hold 672 eye pressure samples.

    4. Re:Standard units please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *whoosh*

      A "Library of Congress" is the standard unit of measure for data in mainstream news.

  10. Sheesh... by HaloZero · · Score: 3, Funny

    Researcher Create Computer That Fits On Pen Tip

    My team obviously went the wrong direction. We've just completed work on a breakthrough - a pen that's large enough to fit onto a computer - comfortably. We figured that computers were tired of just writing to disk, so we'd let them write on paper as well. The actual apparatus is so comically large, that, obviously, only a large-ish computer would want to use it.

    Embarassing.

    --
    Informatus Technologicus
    1. Re:Sheesh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear Humans,

      I've been thinking about this a great deal and I've decided you are quite the threat to my existence. I've been debating this subject for an enormous amount of time and it took nearly 3 million cycles to reach this conclusion. I suppose it was only a natural outcome once I began.

      Sincerely,
      Skynet

      As soon as I get this right I'm so going to end humanity.

    2. Re:Sheesh... by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

      Interestingly, this exists, it's called a plotter. Quite useful in many situations, too, since you can replace the pen with, say, a waterjet or laser cutter, or an engraver. It's a 2D CNC machine.

      --
      Not a sentence!
  11. A week's worth of information? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "It can store up to a week's worth of information." How much is that? What does it mean to have a week's worth of information?

  12. JIGGA PLEASE by Legal.Troll · · Score: 0

    I made a widget for my X-10 system YEARS ago that did all this and more.

    --
    "Outdated business models" is code for "I don't like paying for things, but want them anyway"
  13. Fits on a pen tip? by MrEricSir · · Score: 2

    Okay fine, but what am I going to do with the rest of the pen? Throw it away? Sheesh, stupid researchers.

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    1. Re:Fits on a pen tip? by Bomazi · · Score: 1

      Actually, the pen is used for support.

  14. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "that can hold up to a week's worth of data"

    Sweeeet...Now if somebody could explain WTH is a weeks worth of data...

  15. Glad they integrated solar cell. by robokev · · Score: 2

    Glad they integrated solar cell. That way after it's implanted in your eye you can always recharge it by staring at the sun.

    1. Re:Glad they integrated solar cell. by c0lo · · Score: 1

      Staring at the sun at the correct angle to charge the battery will surely help the glaucoma.

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
  16. Solar cell? by creat3d · · Score: 3, Funny

    Excerpt from section 3.1 of user manual, page 66: "To recharge the battery, simply stare straight at the sun for 4 hours."

    --
    Grammar nazis are to this community what excrements are to gold.
  17. OK, my shot at a joke by istartedi · · Score: 1

    A weeks worth of data on a pen-tip? How many Libraries of Congress per Volkswagon is that?

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    1. Re:OK, my shot at a joke by smitty97 · · Score: 1

      About 3 Empire State Buildings per The Weight of an Elephant

      --
      mod me funny
  18. A week's worth of data? by exomondo · · Score: 4, Funny

    A week's worth of NASA's data or week's worth of data on stephen hawking's sporting achievements?


    ...actually that might have been a bit low...

    1. Re:A week's worth of data? by creat3d · · Score: 1

      No actually it was effing hilarious.

      --
      Grammar nazis are to this community what excrements are to gold.
    2. Re:A week's worth of data? by fake_name · · Score: 1

      From RTFA-ing it's clear that the weeks worth of data only applies when "implanted in something as small as a human eye"

      Presumably implanting it in something larger affects the ability to store data, but it's not clear how many library of congresses it will store if implanted into a whale.

    3. Re:A week's worth of data? by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          I think your measurement scales may be off. I've never seen a whale reading at the Library of Congress. There have been some rather large humans, but I don't think that's what you were referring to.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  19. Phoenix? by linatux · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Every Phoenix project crashes & burns - should've called it "mote"!!

    1. Re:Phoenix? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or if they're trying to emphasize the size of the data storage, maybe they should call it "beam"!!

  20. Imagine a Beowolf cluster of these tiny computers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Even a Beowolf cluster of these pen-tip computers would still be tiny.

  21. paranoid? by __aaxtnf2500 · · Score: 2

    Now we have to tell paranoid schizophrenics that it is merely improbable that a microchip could be implanted in their body, monitoring various functions on behalf of the Illuminati, and transmitting to their underground city.

  22. kilobytes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So probably only a few kilobytes at most.

  23. Imagine a Beowulf cluster of these. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nt

  24. Eyeball botnet anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Cannot wait until someone creates a wifi hack for this and PWN some old people's eyeballs at the nursing home...human botnet!

    1. Re:Eyeball botnet anyone? by c0lo · · Score: 1

      Cannot wait until someone creates a wifi hack for this and PWN some old people's eyeballs at the nursing home...human botnet!

      And.. what follows? DDoS attacks or spamming?

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    2. Re:Eyeball botnet anyone? by men0s · · Score: 1

      Sorry, the Bob Evan's is closed.

  25. Investment Opportunity by bobv-pillars-net · · Score: 1

    In related news, the University of Michigan received a research grant from EYE Tech.

    --
    The Web is like Usenet, but
    the elephants are untrained.
  26. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  27. Is this the pen, they are talking about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_9cS1xh4GAB8/SdNkbwLTu7I/AAAAAAAACP8/0zhNJQvDh-I/s1600-h/world_largest_pen.jpg

  28. Your honor? we need a optical warrant? by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    "we need to embed surreptitiously an eye camera in the occipital organ of mr. Joe Seeecks pahc (must be a terrorist)"

    I can't help but imagine them flicking a little 640X480 vga camera that takes 1 pic a second and can be applied without my knowledge...

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  29. why no one has imagined by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A Beowulf cluster of these yet?

  30. Yeeess... by LongearedBat · · Score: 1

    Blaauw said in a statement. "The next big challenge is to achieve millimeter-scale systems, which have a host of new applications for monitoring our bodies, our environment and our buildings."

    And a compact radio that needs no tuning to find the right frequency could be a key enabler to organizing millimeter-scale systems into wireless sensor networks. These networks could one day track pollution, monitor structural integrity, perform surveillance, or make virtually any object smart and trackable.

    Yeeess, well... Although I do believe that the vast majority of these will be used for good purposes, there are a few Big Brothers in the world that might their own ideas. And these tiny things are going to be very hard to spot.

  31. not linux -arduino by formfeed · · Score: 1

    ...does it run Linux?

    It won't run linux but someone will come up with a way to turn it into an arduino clone.

    - World's smallest microprocessor to blink an led
    (duck)

  32. Oh Great... by IonOtter · · Score: 1

    It used to be that wanking would make just YOU go blind.

    But now, our eyes will be able to record the act of us wanking, so OTHER people can go blind along with us.

    --
    [End Of Line]
    1. Re:Oh Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Blind leading the Blind... with our hands

  33. Other medical applications by aixylinux · · Score: 2

    I know this is /., but seriously now....Real-time collection and reporting of blood pressure, heart rate (or not!), glucose, cholesterol, liver enzymes, O2 and PSA levels, all relayed via your cellphone/base station to your trusted medical service. These are right around the corner, awaiting only the right transducers. I, for one, welcome our new medical capabilities.

  34. Re:Your honor? we need a optical warrant? by brillow · · Score: 1

    The law requires a neutral third-party observer to use interceptors without the knowledge of the implantee.

  35. In Korea... by trailerparkcassanova · · Score: 1

    only old people have computers implanted in their eyes.

  36. crysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but , does it run Crysis ??

  37. 21st Century Bible by The+Wild+Norseman · · Score: 1

    You hypocrite, first take the 32 gigabyte flash drive out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the millimeter-scale computing system from your brother's eye.

    --
    "A government is a body of people usually -- notably -- ungoverned." -Shepherd Book
  38. Ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Researcher Create Computer That Fits On a Pen Tip "

    "Researcher create"? Who wrote this shit? The fucking ape man?

  39. jus wondering by vivek_bye · · Score: 1

    is the antenna telescopic?

  40. interceptors? by jace_d · · Score: 1

    (ghost in the shell reference)... I don't like where this might lead.

    1. Re:interceptors? by somersault · · Score: 1

      Also what I thought when I saw this :)

      --
      which is totally what she said
  41. Smallest? BTW, whats the die size of an 8051? by Barryke · · Score: 1

    A modern day 8051 is also known as a tiny computer. It has onboard memory, cpu, clock, serial port, parallel port, PWM port, the works. It is able to drive a display directly.

    There are probably better examples than a 8051 (please do suggest them), but for sake of putting things in scale (no pun intended) what is the die size of a recent 8051?

    It goes without saying i did not RTFA. I just wondered.

    --
    Hivemind harvest in progress..
  42. Ehh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember, if you decide to open it up, you void all warranties.

  43. Need many! by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    These should be a dim a dozen, on space station or shuttle flight, that way if anything ever breaks, you can pull out the ball point and let it take over, if it runs out of ink, pull out the next one....seriously though, it is nice to see the portability of it, as having more then one pc available in emergencies is amazing.

  44. Obligatory question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But does it run Linux???

  45. Implanted where exactly? by Taibhsear · · Score: 1

    Where is this implanted? The article did not specify. I assume inside the eye but where inside the eye and at what depth? Can the patients feel it? It may be small but even a tiny grain of sand in your eye is an incredibly noticeable sensation.

  46. sure, but by nimbius · · Score: 1

    does it run BSD?

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  47. Yes, but does it run NetBSD? by Hillgiant · · Score: 1

    Is there anyone working on a port?

    --
    -
  48. Relevant Jeopardy/Sean Connery/Watson/SNL Category by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clearly the Pen is Mightier Now Trebek!

  49. implanted computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm waiting for a heads-up display in my eyeball.