Slashdot Mirror


Libya SIGINT Jamming Satellites, Towers

h00manist writes "Libya's Gaddafi apparently loves radio hacking. Signal jamming is being used to disable Thuraya satellite phones. Also being jammed is satellite TV network provider Arabsat, affecting vast areas in the Middle East, Gulf, Africa and Europe. Cellphone and internet transmissions are working only intermittently. Soldiers are confiscating electronics, too. This has gone on for days, allowing killing to be carried out largely hidden from the rest of the world, quite different from what happened in Egypt. The locations of the jamming signals are known to company executives — around the capital, Tripoli — but nobody can do anything. Only POTS is available, and it is monitored. Technically speaking, could this happen everywhere? Alternatives?"

2 of 463 comments (clear)

  1. Re:What next? by williamhb · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was thinking more along the lines of he'll have purged the majority of his supporters before the UN forms a committee on it. As it's going right now, you've got his thugs running around hacking people up(house to house). You have mercs from some of the bloodiest intra-africa conflicts there, opening fire on people and dragging the bodies away.

    Of course there is some heartening stuff like the fighter pilots who ran to malta, or the couple that ditched in the desert and ran like hell. He doesn't have absolute control on his military, but he has enough that a lot of people are going to die.

    And regardless of that, this is going to be the status-quo for the next 10 years in the middle east.

    Unfortunately, it may be worse than that. Gaddafi has been successful enough in squishing all opposition over the last 40 years that after his toppling the likely result is not "Yay, we're magically transformed into a liberal market democracy" but "Now the tribal leaders get their turn at fighting each other for power in various regions, and tearing any civillians caught in the middle to shreds". The dilemma for the UN and Europe is that there are no certain good options here.

    • Topple Gaddafi and potentially watch the aftermath turn it into another Somalia (but much closer to Europe's doorstep) - not so good.
    • Invade and try to nation build -- hasn't worked so well in Iraq or Afghanistan and nobody has the stomach (or money) for it any more.
    • Hope an African-led UN intervention can take place -- good luck with that.

    They are scratching for options and desperately hoping a good one will appear.

    You can tell the West is stuck for options by what they say -- they still stop short of saying Gadaffi must go. Obama, Cameron, and other western leaders all troop up to say how deplorable and illegal Gadaffi's actions are and that they must stop -- but they all still stop short of calling on him to resign, even after he has already lost control of most of the country and launched attacks on his own civilians that would presumably be considered crimes against humanity.

  2. Re:If you support democracy, leave Libya alone by c0lo · · Score: 4, Interesting
    And the result of it was a global war between several European powers - the equivalent of a World War in what can be considered "world" at that time (England, France, Spain, Dutch republic + colonies... with Austria/ and Russia the only empires missing).

    This is also to put into perspective that what US consider a "local" revolution, many other parties involved had experienced as war.

    --
    Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.