Slashdot Mirror


Discovery's Final Launch Successful

Phoghat writes "Overcoming a down-to-the-last-second problem, space shuttle Discovery made history yesterday, launching on its final mission to orbit. The most-traveled orbiter is carrying a crew of six astronauts and one human-like Robonaut, along with a new permanent storeroom and supplies for the International Space Station." The launch itself went as planned; a few pieces of foam insulation broke free of the external fuel tank on the way up, but it's not expected to be a safety concern, and they're planning an inspection to make sure. NASA has videos of yesterday's launch and a Discovery retrospective, and the Atlantic has a great collection of pictures involving the shuttle. Mike Coats, pilot of Discovery's first mission in 1984, spoke in an interview about his connection to the orbiter. Discovery comes back to Earth on March 7th.

20 of 149 comments (clear)

  1. Final. by grub · · Score: 3, Informative


    "Final Launch Successful"?
    Even if it were unsuccessful, it still would have been Discovery's final launch.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Final. by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2

      Even if it were unsuccessful, it still would have been Discovery's final launch.

      Yes. But this final launch was successful as the title says. I think I'm missing your point.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
  2. Nice work by the editors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    The delay in posting this story was the result of the editors staying up all night to review the footage for foam strikes.

    Other sources rushed to judgment with yesterday's proclamations.

  3. Yeah, they successfully wasted $700 million by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yet another in a 30-year line of NASA PR flights. "Hey, look, we've got a ROBOT on this one!!"

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Yeah, they successfully wasted $700 million by ShavedOrangutan · · Score: 2

      Compared to what, spending it on wellfare for worthless excuses for human beings? It would be more productive just to make a big money pile and light it on fire.....

      The federal budget deficit is a trillion dollars larger this year than 2008, and we don't even get a space program out of it anymore.

      --
      Godaddy is a scam and a ripoff.
    2. Re:Yeah, they successfully wasted $700 million by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Insightful

      you might have noticed that 500 years ago some nations in europe spent a lot of money sending boats in the wrong direction, towards the ends of the earth

      complete waste of money, right?

      it should be a crime to display such ignorant levels of a lack of an imagination, like you do

      nothing worth going into space for, right?

      nothing worth sending perfectly good boats over the ends of the earth for, right?

      what a pinhead

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    3. Re:Yeah, they successfully wasted $700 million by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2

      Yet another in a 30-year line of NASA PR flights. "Hey, look, we've got a ROBOT on this one!!"

      Well of course it's just PR for people who are only interested enough to learn that there is a robot, and not anything more. You can't blame them for sound-biting when you're the one restricting yourself to a sound-bite.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    4. Re:Yeah, they successfully wasted $700 million by geekoid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because it is used to build things and support the Space Station. It is used to learn and advance. We aren't going anywhere until some very specific problems are solved, and to solve them we need a place in space to research and test them.

      The shuttle was an extremely valuable asset in making it happen.

      And of course, the Shuttle itself has lead to many advancements in technology. I mean the things is about 15% lighter now then when it was built due to the replacement of parts with newer material developed for the Shuttle, and then used in the private sector.

      We got far more out of the shuttle, and the space agency as a whole, then we put into it.

      Money very well spent.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:Yeah, they successfully wasted $700 million by Nick+Ives · · Score: 2

      Or it's just someone failing at being funny. No need to get so worked up :)

      --
      Nick
    6. Re:Yeah, they successfully wasted $700 million by Chris+Burke · · Score: 3, Funny

      Or it's just someone failing at being funny. No need to get so worked up :)

      Hello, and welcome to Slashdot!

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    7. Re:Yeah, they successfully wasted $700 million by treeves · · Score: 2

      First UID I'd seen above 2E+06.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    8. Re:Yeah, they successfully wasted $700 million by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2

      Funny you say this because it seems to me that when colombus began his journey to india, the common knowledge was that there was nothing, far to the west, except the end of the world.

      Er, well, actually, "common knowledge" at the time was that there was nothing to the west except for, eventually, Asia. People didn't think Columbus was a ninny because he thought the earth was a globe, they thought he was a ninny because he thought the globe was smaller than it actually is and sailing all the way around it to India was a practical idea. That's why the doofus thought he'd landed in India when he'd traveled less than half the distance everyone else thought he'd have to.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    9. Re:Yeah, they successfully wasted $700 million by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2

      look: the most important discoveries science has ever made stemmed from basic research: research for research's sake. not an economically driven pursuit. yet all of those amazing discoveries from basic research has resulted in trillions in economic development

      And changes to our lives that go way beyond just merely more wealth, but things can't even imagine. There's no way the people researching quantum tunneling in the early parts of last century could have possibly foreseen us having this conversation today, but without that research, the computer age would have never began.

      Which is why I love to hear people making arguments against the value of basic research on the Internet. It's like they don't even realize that the very medium for their message is proving them wrong.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
  4. so by rossdee · · Score: 2

    Do Endeavor and Atlantis also have one last turn,each or is that it?

  5. Re:Taking Off vs. Landing by LWATCDR · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Both.
    Actually if you look at total deaths it is probably re-entry. There are multiple abort modes for the shuttle and conventional rockets that are survivable. Plus if you have an issue you do not have to launch.
    As the old saying goes. Take off is optional landing is not.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  6. Farewell and Good Riddence! by avatar139 · · Score: 2

    I'm continually surprised by the number of people mourning the loss of the Space Shuttle as a major blow to space exploration considering if anything, the Shuttle program did more to kill space exploration than any other singular factor!

    While I disagree with Michael Griffin's views on a lot of issues, the scathing paper he wrote in 2007 criticizing the merits of the Shuttle program should be required reading for both present and future NASA employees as it provides a substantial contribution to the case for why the Space Shuttle did more to kill our ability to explore space than any other factors did by wasting so much money, time, and resources away from the development of ELVs.

    ELVs to this day remain a far more flexible, reliable and cost effective means of getting payloads into orbit and beyond than the Shuttle has ever been.

    To be fair, the loss of both shuttles can be attributed a great deal to the culture shift at NASA, as there was a time when the organization prided itself on having the best engineers in the world, however all too often they have now been ignored in favor of the overly unrealistic views of scientists and management, the latter have shown a clear trend over the past several decades of ignoring safety concerns in favor of maintaining launch dates despite the inevitably fatal consequences of such an attitude.

    More than one former NASA employee that I know has plans to hold a party during the launch of Atlantis' final flight in June (if funding for the mission goes through, if not, it will be at Endeavour's launch in April) not to commemorate the Shuttle program but rather to celebrate the future potential of Space Exploration when the Shuttle program finally dies!

    --
    I'm honest enough to admit I lie to myself.
    1. Re:Farewell and Good Riddence! by blair1q · · Score: 2

      I disagree. Without the shuttle, and the orbital missions it enabled and was needed to service, most of NASA would have simply shut down, and other launch endeavors would have moved into private development, which they mostly have anyway. And a much smaller NASA, without a primary mission as big as the shuttle's, would have likely ended up being killed or further reduced to a few boffins and a coffee machine.

      Even with a big NASA and a known end to the shuttle program, we don't have a realistic plan to go to Mars. And really, there ain't much for us on the Moon. We really were making up shit to do by the last couple of missions.

      What the shuttle and orbital missions have done in the meantime is take all of the skunk-works engineering that went into Apollo and morphed rocket science into a profession of verifying the reliability and safety of the product. And it's allowed us to develop a much better sense of what it takes to survive long durations in space. Things that are absolutely critical for future missions to other planets.

  7. I went to the original Nov 1 launch date by peter303 · · Score: 2

    Postponed 11 times, four months and 4 minutes. It was interesting to tour the NASA complex and see all the excited waiting watchers. For unclear reasons, last minute airfares werent available this week. I think it was due to people visiting Disney World during Presidents week and backlog from last weeks cancelations.

  8. Inspirational by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I watched it, not planning to, after a friend posted it on Facebook. I didn't even know it was happening at that point.

    Then I watched the live video. And I was gobsmacked. Amazed. I didn't realise that human endeavour involved something travelling at 14,000 (fourteen thousand) miles an hour after 7 minutes in flight. I just didn't know quite how incredible it was.

    I was sad that it was at night in the UK, because otherwise I wish that schools would stop so that children could watch this incredible achievement. Just amazing.

    But where is the next achievement like this after the final shuttle launch after this? Shuttles are gone, Concorde is gone. What's going to inspire our children to reach past our current achievements? I worry we're become a society of "now, next minute" rather than "what we could be".

    1. Re:Inspirational by blair1q · · Score: 2

      If you think the teabaggers are not conservatives, or that the conservatives are not behind the teabaggers, you're falling for it.