Slashdot Mirror


Programmer Arrested For Logic Bombing 'Whac-A-Mole'

McGruber writes "WFTV.com has the curious story of programmer Marvin Wimberly, who was arrested for having installed a logic bomb on Whac-A-Mole arcade games made by Bob's Space Racers in Holly Hill, Florida."

218 comments

  1. It's safer by buchner.johannes · · Score: 1

    when the moles don't have bombs. Especially logic bombs.

    --
    NB: The message above might reflect my opinion right now, but not necessarily tomorrow or next year.
    1. Re:It's safer by Unkyjar · · Score: 1
    2. Re:It's safer by Anubis350 · · Score: 1

      First I read that as wenches. Twice. Then I wondered what a Mole Wench would look like. Then I reread your post again :-p

      --
      "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
    3. Re:It's safer by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      Something like Digger's girlfriend Annie, perhaps?

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    4. Re:It's safer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess they will have to find the HP programmer who invented maintenance kits and ink jet cartridge counters. Also, I've had a Dell battery that has an EEPROM on it to make it die after 600 charges. I really don't understand how this whack-a-mole thing is any different and why a 15 year jail sentence came out of it.

  2. If they didn't figure it out, they wouldn't have. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > "If they hadn't of discovered that they had the virus installed
    > in the equipment, they wouldn't have known why their
    > machines were failing," said Cpt. Steve Aldrich, Holly Hill
    > Police Department.

    Holly Hill's finest at work. You heard it here folks, if they hadn't of figured it out, they wouldn't have known!

  3. Planned Obsolescence by MrQuacker · · Score: 1

    Kinda like having a 100000 mile warranty, and your cars engine dies at 103000 miles.

    1. Re:Planned Obsolescence by ibsteve2u · · Score: 2

      Kinda like having a 100000 mile warranty, and your cars engine dies at 103000 miles.

      Exactly what I was thinking. My parents had a lightbulb in their garage that was there when they bought the house and never burned out in the subsequent 40 years and still hasn't burned out. Yet every incandescent bulb I've ever bought was only good for a couple hundred hours.

      I hope his jury remembers what the corporations have been doing to them for decades and decades.

      --
      Orwell: "In a Time of Universal Deceit, telling the Truth is a Revolutionary Act"
    2. Re:Planned Obsolescence by Aeternitas827 · · Score: 1

      To be fair, how many hours of operation does a garage bulb experience? Even despite the trauma of off-on cycles on an incandescent bulb, the short duration of the on-time really seems to offset.

      --
      I don't post AC. I like my -1, Flamebaits. Trump/Sheen 2012 on the Batshit Insane ticket!
    3. Re:Planned Obsolescence by adolf · · Score: 1

      It depends on the garage: My garage lamps, if I had a garage currently, would be used quite a bit since I would be spending a fair bit of time out there. Other folks, not so much: The garage might just be where they park their cars, and/or have some infrequently-accessed storage. Either way, "garage" by itself doesn't indicate much about the usage of the bulb, but only that the space it is installed in was at one point intended to park a car in.

      And it depends on the bulb.

      Perhaps some forward-thinking bloke, back in the day 40 years ago, installed a 130V lamp instead of a 120V, which is a common "trick" for areas with bulbs that are difficult to replace or where safety is more important than efficiency. Or perhaps its particular tungsten filament just has an unusually high impedance.

      The oldest known, continuously-lit light bulb is currently about 109 years old, and still doing fine.

      For one to last 40 years is impressive, but is really no more impressive than a 40-year-old Ford that still runs fine with minimal maintenance: It's unusual, but there were so many of the things made that it is a statistical certainty that some of them will last a lot (decades, at least) longer than others.

      In other news, I've got an old 15-year-old hard drive that still works fine. Is it remarkable? Perhaps. Is it an indication of forgotten manufacturing prowess? I doubt it -- this particular device was just lucky. Most others failed a long time ago.

    4. Re:Planned Obsolescence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Please don't link to the DM: they're like Westboro Baptists with red faces and gritted teeth.

    5. Re:Planned Obsolescence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a trade-off between efficiency and longevity. The efficiency of incandescent light bulbs increases with the temperature of the filament, because the higher temperature shifts the produced spectrum from the infrared range further into the visible light range. Unfortunately the higher temperature also limits the lifetime of the bulb because the filament vaporizes faster. Burnt-out light bulbs are darkened from the inside: That's the filament material which gets deposited on the colder glass.

      There's a very simple method for making incandescent bulbs very long-lasting: Use higher wattage bulbs and dim them. Unfortunately this is only cost-efficient if changing bulbs is a significant cost, because otherwise the reduced efficiency means you pay more for the additional electricity than for replacement bulbs.

    6. Re:Planned Obsolescence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      never burned out in the subsequent 40 years and still hasn't burned out

      They replaced it every month, while you slept.

    7. Re:Planned Obsolescence by Joce640k · · Score: 3, Informative

      Long lasting bulbs use more electricity. ie. It costs you more at the meter than the replacement bulbs.

      --
      No sig today...
    8. Re:Planned Obsolescence by drinkypoo · · Score: 0

      Perhaps some forward-thinking bloke, back in the day 40 years ago, installed a 130V lamp instead of a 120V, which is a common "trick" for

      ...decreasing the lifetime of the lamp. Undervolting harms the lifespan AND puts out less light. You never want to undervolt your light source. You can get more light over the lifespan of an LED by overvolting it and pulsing it, too. If you want less light you can just pulse it. Can't do that with a heated filament, of course. Heated filament light bulbs are lame by modern standards. I notice that I have a shitload of brownouts and I lose a shitload of lightbulbs. I suspect that some of it is related to the cheapass lightswitches our landlords used when they build their own house, which can be causing undervolting during switching. Probably a real good thing I have about 300W of computer on 680W of power supply... big caps FTW

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:Planned Obsolescence by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1

      My parents had a lightbulb in their garage that was there when they bought the house and never burned out in the subsequent 40 years and still hasn't burned out.

      Add some stone tablets and a good back story and you could start your own religion.

    10. Re:Planned Obsolescence by adolf · · Score: 1

      [citation needed]

      Your anecdotes are interesting, but don't really doesn't seem to have anything to do with the fact that the lower the voltage feeding a given bulb, the lower the temperature of the filament will be. And the lower the temperature of the filament, the slower the tungsten evaporates. And the slower the tungsten evaporates, the longer the bulb lasts.

    11. Re:Planned Obsolescence by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Not really.

      The warranty covers material defects and workmanship. It generally lasts as long as the weakest part needed to keep the engine running will last within the normal use cycle that wouldn't void the warranty.

      In the case of your engine dieing at 103000 miles, it would be a mechanical fault from wear and tear or perhaps some other failure due explicitly to the normal operation of the engine. If the car company programmed a the car's computer to stop running after 103000 miles, then it would be a malicious act and likely a criminal act against you.

      The difference is that one is a byproduct of normal use, the other is the intentional disabling of something otherwise capable of functioning. While the motivation to do it might seem similar, and the source of the problem seems to be the same, legally speaking, you have to accept damages resulting from your usage of a product (unless otherwise warranted) and you don't have to accept damages from the manufacturer or seller or the neighbor or the gas station, or the kids down the street. Therefore, it's reasonable for a manufacturer or seller to put something until the product that is so cheaply made it will wear out shortly after the warranty expired. But it is not reasonable for that same manufacturer or seller to purposely render an otherwise working product, unable to or incapable of operating normally.

    12. Re:Planned Obsolescence by khallow · · Score: 1

      If you hadn't of told us, I'd never of figured out that Bob's Speed Racers was responsible for all that corporatist stuff. Next time I deep six an economy, I'll remember to pass the blame on to some arcade dealer in Florida.

      "Senator, while a reasonable person might think the failure of our 15 trillion dollar company and complete collapse of the world economy was due to criminal incompetence, coke and hookers, and a 0.3% reserve, I must place blame wholly where it is deserved. Bob's Speed Racers did it."

    13. Re:Planned Obsolescence by khallow · · Score: 1
      Exo-terra 3:2

      The agent of the Vendor appeared to him in a flame of fire from within a light bulb. He looked and the bulb was ablaze with fire, but it was not being consumed!

    14. Re:Planned Obsolescence by gnapster · · Score: 1

      Please don't reply to people you won't listen to; it is futile.

    15. Re:Planned Obsolescence by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Wow, what a string of BS.

    16. Re:Planned Obsolescence by gnapster · · Score: 2
      Lumeniticus 5:11-12:

      If, however, he cannot afford two LEDs or two halogens, he is to bring as an offering for his sin ten AAA cells for a sin offering. He must not polish the contacts, because it is a sin offering. He is to bring it to the Senior Electrical Engineer, who shall take a couple of the cells as a memorial portion and insert them in the altar circuit with the offerings made to the Lord by short-circuit. It is a sin offering.

    17. Re:Planned Obsolescence by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      But ... but ... *shivering lower lip*

      First Santa Claus and now that!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    18. Re:Planned Obsolescence by TheLink · · Score: 1

      That's a remarkable claim. So if you put 2 volts across a 130V lamp it'll no longer work after that?

      2 volts is definitely a major undervolt compared to 120 volts on a 130V lamp.

      --
    19. Re:Planned Obsolescence by andrea.sartori · · Score: 1

      This whole subthread doesn't seem to have anything to do with whac-a-mole.

      --
      Mostly harmless.
    20. Re:Planned Obsolescence by number11 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Perhaps some forward-thinking bloke, back in the day 40 years ago, installed a 130V lamp instead of a 120V, which is a common "trick" for

      ...decreasing the lifetime of the lamp. Undervolting harms the lifespan AND puts out less light. You never want to undervolt your light source.

      Don't be silly. A 130-volt bulb has a higher resistance (for the same wattage rating) than a 120-volt bulb therefore at 120 volts pulls less current. It puts out less light, and runs at a lower temperature. And lasts longer. That's what most 'long life' bulbs are. The effect on lifetime is governed by the 12th power of the ratio of voltages, i.e. a 1500hr 130-volt bulb would last almost twice as long at 120 volts (1500e(130/120)).

    21. Re:Planned Obsolescence by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      That's a remarkable claim. So if you put 2 volts across a 130V lamp it'll no longer work after that?

      P=VI. If you attempt to flow the proper wattage through the lamp at 2 volts you're going to burn out the filament. And if it didn't burn out, you'd burn out your wiring. As the lamp approaches its optimum voltage it puts out pure lumens per watt. Undervolting the lamp decreases the number of photons it will produce over its lifetime AND the number of photons expended per watt-hour of energy consumed.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    22. Re:Planned Obsolescence by corbettw · · Score: 1

      You're confusing someone maliciously causing an equipment failure to churn profits for himself with an actuarially-derived lifetime for your car. Yes, most cars make it past 100,000 miles, and half start to fail at 150,000, therefore giving a warranty to 100,000 miles is less risky than giving one to 150,000 miles. It's just math.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    23. Re:Planned Obsolescence by Smallpond · · Score: 1

      If you attempt to flow the proper wattage

      LOL

    24. Re:Planned Obsolescence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So how is this different than HP inkjet cartridges with with chips that prevent refills?

    25. Re:Planned Obsolescence by Smallpond · · Score: 1

      Eh? You pay for watts (actually VA) so you pay the same for a bulb of the same wattage.

    26. Re:Planned Obsolescence by Smallpond · · Score: 1

      Two words:: "printer cartridges"

      Good luck with the criminal lawsuit..

    27. Re:Planned Obsolescence by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Well maybe the "understanding" I gained from the last explanation I got was all retarded, but the current flow (I do know that it's current that flows, pushed by the potential of voltage through the resistance of the conductor... not sure the proper terminology for wattage occurring) is controlled by the resistance of the filament which rises with temperature.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    28. Re:Planned Obsolescence by TheLink · · Score: 3, Informative

      Water pipe analogy for you:

      Volts = water pressure
      Amps/current = amount of water flowing.
      Ohms = resistance to water flow.
      Watts = amount of water flowing * pressure.

      Bulb = narrow high resistance pipe attached to big pipe.

      If you put a low amount of pressure (2V) across a narrow high resistance pipe there is no way a lot of current will flow through that pipe.

      The higher the pressure the more current will flow.

      A 130V 40W incandescent bulb will have about 420 ohms resistance at operating temperature and voltage, and be carrying 0.3 amps.

      If you put 2 volts across a cold 130V 40W incandescent bulb, the bulb will be about 30 ohms (when cold[1]), and carry about 0.07 amps. The bulb certain won't blow up, nor would your wiring start burning up.

      A 130 V 40 W bulb running 120 Volts will only be 34 watts (but I believe a smaller percentage of that will be visible light compared to a 120V 40W bulb).

      [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incandescent_light_bulb#Electrical_characteristics

      --
    29. Re:Planned Obsolescence by Auroch · · Score: 1
      Revelation 1:1

      Geek jokes are awesome

      ... as it turns out, that's not a revelation >_

      --
      Quartz Extreme and Core Image. Are there any other real reasons to spend all that money on generic hardware?
    30. Re:Planned Obsolescence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I realized that the lightbulb in my 1980 Sharp microwave had never been replaced when the mechanical timer gave out and I replaced the 650 watt "Cooks a Whole Turkey" monster two years ago. Thats 29 years of daily use.

    31. Re:Planned Obsolescence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn, I hope you don't do ANYTHING with that involves electricity... Here's a hint: Which of these things is a constant in a parallel circuit? Potential, Current, Resistance?

      Follow up: How should we calculate the power drawn by a component in this circuit?

    32. Re:Planned Obsolescence by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      It uses the same amount of energy, producing less visible light/more infrared and heat. Sometimes this is a part of the bulb's purpose, but usually it's undesirable.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    33. Re:Planned Obsolescence by Smallpond · · Score: 2

      True, but it still doesn't mean that long life bulbs use more electricity.

      100W, 750 hour bulb -- 1710 lumens
      100W, 1500 hour bulb -- 1580 lumens

      so not a bad tradeoff

    34. Re:Planned Obsolescence by Renraku · · Score: 1

      Bbbbbut printer cartridges have a set life span for your own good! Else the ink coagulates and you have to buy a new printer cartridge!

      --
      Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
    35. Re:Planned Obsolescence by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 1

      So how is this different than HP inkjet cartridges with with chips that prevent refills?

      When the ink cartridges stop working you can still hit them with a mallet.

    36. Re:Planned Obsolescence by waives · · Score: 1

      Yes but you could just use a 90 watt short lifetime bulb instead and get the same lumens... If your electricity costs a fairly cheap $0.15/KWH, then the short life bulb will save you almost 90 cents in electricity cost before it burns out. So if you can find your incandescents for less than about $1 apiece (not hard to do), it makes no sense to buy long-life bulbs.

    37. Re:Planned Obsolescence by sortius_nod · · Score: 1

      It's sad when you have to give a basic lesson on how electricity works via a geek website. I wish people would spend a few seconds searching before they decide to reply.

    38. Re:Planned Obsolescence by adolf · · Score: 1

      Aw, shucks. You caught us.

      Now what?

    39. Re:Planned Obsolescence by sodul · · Score: 1

      Except for the time spent in the dark, driving to get the bulb (you've seen the price of oil lately ?) and the number of slashdot readers required to change said light bulb.

      Whoohoo I spent 20 minutes saving 90c.

    40. Re:Planned Obsolescence by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 1

      In our old place, the light bulbs in the bedrooms kept working for about 15 years even after being used for several hours each day. The only reason we stopped using them was we replaced them with compact flourescent bulbs. All the new bulbs we buy last a few months at best. And even one of the CF bulbs stopped working within a year.

    41. Re:Planned Obsolescence by BillX · · Score: 1

      Somewhere between these two clear-cut extremes is "designed to fail" - intentional design choices that serve little or no purpose but to artificially reduce the product's useful life, although without being so explicit as an automatic destruct timer. A couple real-world examples from my own experience:

      When an old Xerox photocopier at my dad's office failed for the last time, we disemboweled it (not quite Office Space style, but it was thoroughly disassembled). One component stood out as truly bizarre: it was either an extremely ghetto method of faking a log-scale amp, or a design-to-fail timer: the component was literally an incandescent light bulb glued to a photosensor, hidden inside a black shroud similar to a relay casing. Given that the lamp filament had burned and the copier broke, I lean toward the latter.

      Last year or so, my front-load Sears/Kenmore washing machine broke after only a few years' use. The culprit: A cheap, uncoated pot-metal bracket, continuously submerged in water/detergent/dirt by design, corroded through. This failure mode would be completely avoided by a few cents' worth of engine paint or similar applied to the bracket. This is an old and well-known problem.

      --
      Caveat Emptor is not a business model.
    42. Re:Planned Obsolescence by ibsteve2u · · Score: 1

      Add some stone tablets and a good back story and you could start your own religion.

      The religion is already in place: The individual is nothing, and shall bow to *Corporation.

      (*Regardless of the fact that Corporation is but the man behind the curtain - with the acknowledgment due to L. Frank Baum.)

      --
      Orwell: "In a Time of Universal Deceit, telling the Truth is a Revolutionary Act"
    43. Re:Planned Obsolescence by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Designed to fail is somewhat mitigated by consumer reviews. After the failure, it will be known as the cheap product that doesn't last produce by the company that makes crap products. Their pricing levels will eventually reflect that so the 5 cents of engine paint savings might eventually end up costing them 50 or more dollars in what they can price their equipment at actually have it sell.

      It then becomes a matter of consumer knowledge and choice- do you want to spend the extra 50-100 dollars and get something that will last longer or do you want the el cheapo and only get a few years of useful service from it. It's really a buyer beware at that point. Of course, you could always take the panel off and shoot paint on it yourself to get the extra time out of it.. but then you might lose the warranty benefits.

      I don't know about the Xerox copier. You admit you're guessing to why it was that way in the first place and it does look somewhat suspicious. I imagine if you could prove it, you could probably refurbish a lot of them by changing out the bulb and defeat their efforts. But in the least, it's a little different as the bulb itself has a usable life. It's not going to be a software switch that tells the power supply not to function after so many hours with nothing else preventing it from functioning.

      Perhaps the line is blurred a little further when some products need deal with power usage and pollution limits and requirements. If the law requires it to operate within certain limits, then I suppose making it fault outside the limit might be acceptable. but it's just not the same when it's something that wears out verses software that stops.

    44. Re:Planned Obsolescence by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Else the ink coagulates

      I thought that was what the print head was for.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    45. Re:Planned Obsolescence by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Consumer reviews don't tend to pick up on short lifespans because they are usually written only a few days/weeks after buying the product.

      The bulb/photosensor in the Xerox was probably an opto-isolator of some kind, but I'm not sure why it would use an incandescent instead of the usual highly reliable LED. Either it was designed to fail or there was some stupid design decision due to wanting to sense high voltage AC or something. As Xerox often rent out their hardware figuring out their angle is a bit trickier. From the limited experience I have had of their gear it does seem to often fail for want of some cheap component like a paper feed motor or something.

      Many inkjets are the same, for example using a sponge to remove excess ink from the print head which eventually saturates. The printer counts the number of print cycles, it doesn't measure the saturation level.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    46. Re:Planned Obsolescence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe he used to know stuff, but he has been drinking too much poo.

    47. Re:Planned Obsolescence by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Typically you'd buy long life bulbs for fixtures where it's inconvenient to replace them, like high ceilings and such.

    48. Re:Planned Obsolescence by BillX · · Score: 1

      You make some good points. Ideally, conscientious consumers and bad reviews would keep them in line. If the product failed within weeks of purchase, consumer review sites would be a strong negative feedback loop. But in a case like this, with an MTTF of 4-5 years, it doesn't really work since the product is no longer on shelves by the time the complaints start rolling in. (Actually, conveniently enough, products with the same basic guts are still on shelves with new names and model numbers, which return glowing first-impression reviews from new purchasers when Googled.) You *are* right in that it will stop me from buying Sears/Kenmore products in the future. This is somewhat academic too, though: Sears really just buys and rebadges an assembly from another manufacturer (for this specific model, Electrolux), and it takes a fair amount of sleuthing even for professional consumer groups to determine where the crap parts are really coming from. Since the "secret" OEMs are interchangeable and insulated from being tied to the negative reviews, there is no penalty and every incentive to cut corners.

      Admittedly, there is a non-zero chance of the lamp + photodiode "part" serving a purpose other than to trigger a service code when the bulb burns out. But if not, how is building in such a mechanism different than building in a turn-on counter? Whether the built-in failure is a counter that runs out, a flash memory cell toggled every 10 seconds until it wears out, a bulb that burns out after 'x' hours telling the CPU to shutdown, or even a gearmotor with a screw that very slowly turns until it reaches a kill switch, the distinction seems somewhat academic.

      --
      Caveat Emptor is not a business model.
    49. Re:Planned Obsolescence by Quirkz · · Score: 1
      Not directly related to that, but I've noticed we have two sockets in the house that burn through bulbs roughly every 2-3 months of light use, while the rest of the sockets and lamps tend to last upwards of a year to many years. Anyone know why that would happen?

      I'm reminded of this because in my childhood home it was our garage light which burned out all the time, the opposite of your parents' situation. We tried different wattages, different manufacturers, and still it burned out five to ten times more often than any other bulb in the house.

    50. Re:Planned Obsolescence by commodore6502 · · Score: 1

      And you call me a dumbass???
      You don't know jack shit about bulbs.

      >>>a 130V lamp instead of a 120V, which is a common "trick" for decreasing the lifetime of the lamp. Undervolting harms the lifespan

      So if you put 2 volts across a 130V lamp it'll no longer work after that?

      >>>P=VI. If you attempt to flow the proper wattage through the lamp at 2 volts you're going to burn out the filament

      --
      Information wants to be expensive AND wants to be free. So you have Value vs. Cheap distribution fighting each other.
    51. Re:Planned Obsolescence by ibsteve2u · · Score: 1

      Most of the time when I've seen it the actual cause was the fixture or lamp was subjected to more vibration - say, the fixture below the kids' rooms, or the lamp that sat on a coffee table which itself sat on a joist that supported the washing machine on the other side of the wall - than the other fixtures in house. I.e., mechanical rather than electrical cause. The garage light? I'd bet electric garage door opener either on the same rafter or connected by cross-bracing. Not to rule out electrical...I've seen people have sockets that were wired in series with some other load and they didn't even know it. Filaments don't make all that good resisters.

      --
      Orwell: "In a Time of Universal Deceit, telling the Truth is a Revolutionary Act"
    52. Re:Planned Obsolescence by adolf · · Score: 1

      It's not futile. My comment lost two points!

      For all you know, this was precisely my goal. ;)

  4. Why programmers will never rule the world.... by Auroch · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Mostly because any good software engineer could put a hard-to-find bug in the code. Thank goodness it takes a good social engineer to make money off it - and the two skills don't often overlap in real life (as much as software engineers seem to think they do).

    The other reason programmers will never rule the world - eventually the whack-a-person machines will require Marvin to come fix them.

    --
    Quartz Extreme and Core Image. Are there any other real reasons to spend all that money on generic hardware?
    1. Re:Why programmers will never rule the world.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      both good software engineers and good social engineers are a rare bread anyway

      However judging by 419 scams, making money is probably just about finding someone more stupid/gullible than you ;)

    2. Re:Why programmers will never rule the world.... by antifoidulus · · Score: 3, Funny

      both good software engineers and good social engineers are a rare bread anyway

      I know it costs more, but you just cannot beat fresh baked!

    3. Re:Why programmers will never rule the world.... by pieterh · · Score: 4, Interesting

      419 scams depend on finding someone greedy; one original form was to find a house who's owner had left on holiday, bribe the watchman for the keys, and then sell it to another person on the basis of "OK, we've had a few good parties here, you know I'm a great guy, but suddenly I have to leave the country and need $10,000 real quick", at which the mark realizes this is a great opportunity (the house is easily worth ten times that), and offers to buy it.

      Houses in Lagos, Nigeria (when I worked there) sometimes had "419! Not for Sale!" painted on their walls, when their owners were away.

      However, social engineering depends on decent peoples' trust; head hunted calling the receptionist and asking, "who's your best Java developer?", or emailing the tech support from a hacked account so you look like the boss, and asking, "hey, give me ssh access and a new password, ok?"

      What this guy did was more like simple robbery, getting money by force.

    4. Re:Why programmers will never rule the world.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      eh, i'd still call it fraud, getting money by lying about the service he is providing.

    5. Re:Why programmers will never rule the world.... by oliverthered · · Score: 2

      many just rely on hard to find code in lots of bugs to keep their jobs.....

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    6. Re:Why programmers will never rule the world.... by ArAgost · · Score: 2

      Mostly because any good software engineer could put a hard-to-find bug in the code.

      Yeah, I do it all the time without even concentrating. I'm that good.

    7. Re:Why programmers will never rule the world.... by rvw · · Score: 3, Funny

      Mostly because any good software engineer could put a hard-to-find bug in the code. Thank goodness it takes a good social engineer to make money off it - and the two skills don't often overlap in real life (as much as software engineers seem to think they do).

      The other reason programmers will never rule the world - eventually the whack-a-person machines will require Marvin to come fix them.

      Programmers will never rule the world, because by then they have been promoted to software engineers, managers, etc. It's the same with toddlers.

    8. Re:Why programmers will never rule the world.... by aeoo · · Score: 1

      Programmers already rule the world.

      "The Code Is the Law" --Lessig

      Some programmers know that they rule the world. Some don't. That's the only difference.

    9. Re:Why programmers will never rule the world.... by Smallpond · · Score: 3, Funny

      both good software engineers and good social engineers are a rare bread anyway

      That's a rye observation.

    10. Re:Why programmers will never rule the world.... by Auroch · · Score: 1

      Mostly because any good software engineer could put a hard-to-find bug in the code.

      Yeah, I do it all the time without even concentrating. I'm that good.

      lmao ....

      --
      Quartz Extreme and Core Image. Are there any other real reasons to spend all that money on generic hardware?
    11. Re:Why programmers will never rule the world.... by catmistake · · Score: 1

      hmm... I think software engineers were socially engineered into believing the marketing hype that they were actually engineers and not just mere mortal programmers or computer scientists. Where are the mathematical engineers? The slashdot comment engineers? My thin point is the word 'engineer' is losing it's meaning, much to the heartbreak of civil, mechanical, industrial, electrical and computer engineers.

    12. Re:Why programmers will never rule the world.... by Auroch · · Score: 0

      My thin point is the word 'engineer' is losing it's meaning, much to the heartbreak of civil, mechanical, industrial, electrical and computer engineers.

      And it's about time. Very few other professions have titles attached to them so rigorously as the engineering profession. Even as a teacher (arguably more important than any other profession - education being the root of most things...), belonging to a teaching union, with a strict set of entrance guidelines and educational requirements, I don't get a fancy-dansy title or ring - I barely get paid $3/day to babysit.

      I think the reason the title "engineer" is no longer relevant, is because it is only engineers who believe it *is* relevant. An indication of the types of personalities that profession attracts, perhaps?

      --
      Quartz Extreme and Core Image. Are there any other real reasons to spend all that money on generic hardware?
    13. Re:Why programmers will never rule the world.... by kevinNCSU · · Score: 1

      Where are the mathematical engineers?

      The answer is all Engineers are "Mathematical Engineers" and all Engineers are "Science Engineers". There is nothing beyond engineering other than the application of those two things to solve real world techinical problems. If you think building bridges is more prestigious then designing airplanes or designing the software and algorithms to make missiles hit other missiles that's fine and dandy but you don't get to redefine engineering into "only the specific disciplines states bother to license". The fact of the matter is you want the same commitment to technical thinking, grasp of physics and science, and ability to do thorough and ethical work in the person you want writing all the software controlling the 747 you're flying in as you want from the civil engineer who built the runway. I was going to say designed the plane but that's an Aerospace "engineer" who isn't licensed as a P.E. either.

      As an aside: Industrial Engineering, really? IE? Imaginary Engineering? They don't even make things. If you want to say something doesn't fit the definition of engineering it'd be the Industrial guys for sure. My heart weeps for the supposed "watering down" of their field.

    14. Re:Why programmers will never rule the world.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Programmers will never rule the world, because by then they have been promoted to software engineers, managers, etc. It's the same with toddlers.

      Sorry toddlers do rule the world

  5. Nitpicking. by underqualified · · Score: 3

    Each game, after turning on and off a certain number of times, sometimes 50, sometimes 500, would fail. Wimberly would be paid to fix it, and police reports say, he would insert a new virus with a new countdown.

    Does it really qualify as a virus?

    1. Re:Nitpicking. by MachDelta · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure they're using "virus" for the layman.
      Its a classic logic bomb.

    2. Re:Nitpicking. by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      In the past they at least restricted "virus" to something that actually spreads.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    3. Re:Nitpicking. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It looks much more like DRM than a virus. It's just that in this case the company releasing the product doesn't want DRM installed on their product.

    4. Re:Nitpicking. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does it really qualify as a virus?

      Not a virus. In fact, I fail to see how this is even a criminal matter. This is a private internal matter for the company as far as I'm concerned.

    5. Re:Nitpicking. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not a virus, it's a "feature".

  6. Lies by Konster · · Score: 1

    He's going to have to tell all the other inmates he's in for murder because he'll surely get his ass kicked for telling them he rigged Whack-A-Mole.

    There are a lot of preposterous ways of winding up in the clink, and this is in the top 100.

    1. Re:Lies by Auroch · · Score: 4, Funny

      He's going to have to tell all the other inmates he's in for murder because he'll surely get his ass kicked for telling them he rigged Whack-A-Mole.

      There are a lot of preposterous ways of winding up in the clink, and this is in the top 100.

      Can you imagine, that in some states, he'll be sitting next to a guy in prison, who was busted for smoking marijuana.

      Marvin: So, what are you in for?
      Prisoner B: Smoking a joint while trying to relax at the carnival. You?
      Marvin: Rigging whack-a-mole so it'll fail. on purpose.

      And suddenly prisoner B is in jail for manslaughter.

      --
      Quartz Extreme and Core Image. Are there any other real reasons to spend all that money on generic hardware?
    2. Re:Lies by pclminion · · Score: 2

      What wouldn't I do for a mod point?

    3. Re:Lies by davester666 · · Score: 2

      Kill someone?

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    4. Re:Lies by nadaou · · Score: 1

      The question you should ask yourself is "What would Jesus do for a Klondike bar?"

      --
      ~.~
      I'm a peripheral visionary.
    5. Re:Lies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With that crisp mint flavour he feels like...

      He's on top of the mouuuunt!

    6. Re:Lies by calmofthestorm · · Score: 2

      Insert logic bombs into slashdot to grant you five modpoints on a regular basis?

      --
      93rd rule of Slashdot: No matter how obvious my sarcasm is, my comment will be taken seriously by someone.
    7. Re:Lies by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      did the three strikes rule ever make it's way down as far as life if you didn't pay three parking tickets?

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    8. Re:Lies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was about the dumbest thing I've ever seen someone say. Marijuana smokers are not always violent...actually more often they are non violent.

    9. Re:Lies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surely you mean get his head bashed ;-)

    10. Re:Lies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The joke
      ------------
      Your head

    11. Re:Lies by sumdumass · · Score: 2

      I think you are confusing the Klondike bar with a york peppermint patty.

      Oh I couldn't find the one about the top of a mountain I think you were referring to.but I think this is close.

    12. Re:Lies by sjames · · Score: 1

      Maybe he should just tell them he was disturbing the peace.

    13. Re:Lies by CoderJoe · · Score: 1

      But... what does God need with a Klondike bar?

  7. Re:If they didn't figure it out, they wouldn't hav by Auroch · · Score: 2, Informative

    > "If they hadn't of discovered that they had the virus installed > in the equipment, they wouldn't have known why their > machines were failing," said Cpt. Steve Aldrich, Holly Hill > Police Department.

    Holly Hill's finest at work. You heard it here folks, if they hadn't of figured it out, they wouldn't have known!

    ... Actually, the article states that if he hadn't mentioned it, they wouldn't have been looking at a software "feature" at all.

    --
    Quartz Extreme and Core Image. Are there any other real reasons to spend all that money on generic hardware?
  8. If only the "mole" was a "gopher"... by Dahamma · · Score: 1

    The Caddyshack quotes would be endless...

  9. You gotta feel for this guy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    From his mugshot, he looks like a sad character. I kinda feel bad for what he's about to go through on his little vacation to the justice system. There are certainly worse things a person could do.

    For Slashdot points, I will now note that what this guy planted was a logic bomb, not a virus.

    1. Re:You gotta feel for this guy. by Auroch · · Score: 2

      From his mugshot, he looks like a sad character. I kinda feel bad for what he's about to go through on his little vacation to the justice system. There are certainly worse things a person could do.

      For Slashdot points, I will now note that what this guy planted was a logic bomb, not a virus.

      I will mention that logic bomb is stated in the summary. In the article too, but also in the summary. In order to be commenting here, unless you wildly click on random stories and type random things ... you'd have to have read logic bomb. For slashdot points, I will tell people to RTF ... summary ... before commenting.

      --
      Quartz Extreme and Core Image. Are there any other real reasons to spend all that money on generic hardware?
    2. Re:You gotta feel for this guy. by pclminion · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? The true Slashdot hardcore do not even read the TITLES, much less the summaries. The articles? Those don't actually exist. Ever tried clicking on one? Don't waste your time, there's never anything at the other end of that link.

    3. Re:You gotta feel for this guy. by azalin · · Score: 1

      There is no spoon ... errrr... title

    4. Re:You gotta feel for this guy. by zill · · Score: 4, Funny

      For Slashdot points, I will now note that what this guy planted was a logic bomb, not a virus.

      I'm guessing Detective Sherlock here didn't read the title.

    5. Re:You gotta feel for this guy. by AlamedaStone · · Score: 4, Funny

      What are you talking about? The true Slashdot hardcore do not even read the TITLES, much less the summaries. The articles? Those don't actually exist. Ever tried clicking on one? Don't waste your time, there's never anything at the other end of that link.

      That's insane, no rational human being can justify stealing music from content creators. If you want to listen, buy the media - period.

      --
      "All these years believing you're the signified monkey, only to find out you're just a big hunk of nobody cares."
    6. Re:You gotta feel for this guy. by FuckingNickName · · Score: 1

      True Slashdot hardcore does not even involves TITTIES, much less the mammaries.

    7. Re:You gotta feel for this guy. by tqk · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? The true Slashdot hardcore do not even read the TITLES, much less the summaries. The articles? Those don't actually exist. Ever tried clicking on one? Don't waste your time, there's never anything at the other end of that link.

      That's insane, no rational human being can justify stealing music from content creators. If you want to listen, buy the media - period.

      Ho! Ly! Fuck, are you guys jaded, or what?!?

      So, why do people believe vampires exist, again?

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    8. Re:You gotta feel for this guy. by Alyred · · Score: 1

      For Slashdot points, I will now note that what this guy planted was a logic bomb, not a virus.

      I'm guessing Detective Sherlock here didn't read the title.

      And I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that Watson here didn't RTFA. :)

    9. Re:You gotta feel for this guy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stealing from the content creators would be using their lyrics directly verbatim, their music and all of that without their permission and selling the creation.
      A person makes music, why? Because they want people to listen to said music. They like making music and they like that people enjoy listening.
      So, by downloading music you are actually supporting them in the essence of music, not in the essence of business. The financial side of the equation
      only comes into being because we live in a system where we are required to earn nonexistent resources to live and provide for basic necceseties(sp.)
      So every full-time job/hobby has to provide income.

        Plus a lot of people have a problem seeing so little of the percentage of music going to the actual artist.

    10. Re:You gotta feel for this guy. by gnapster · · Score: 1

      No, no! You are all missing the point! This is a red-letter day! For once, Slashdot editors made a change to a summary that actually made it better than the article!

      Except that "logic bomb" was already in the submission. Never mind. :c/

    11. Re:You gotta feel for this guy. by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Actually. I did stop reading titles and summaries.

      Its pretty much accepted at this point that slashdot no longer does any sanity checks on posts or are intentionally posting stories which are flat out lies posted to support trolling for page views.

      Reading the summary or title is almost certainly going to give you the wrong idea about the actual article.

      I challenge you to prove me wrong.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    12. Re:You gotta feel for this guy. by datsa · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the mammaries.

  10. At Least it Wasn't Boon-Ga Boon-Ga by Scarletdown · · Score: 4, Funny

    Imagine the hilarity that would have ensued had it been Boon-Ga Boon-Ga that was rigged instead of Whack A Mole.

    --
    This space unintentionally left blank.
    1. Re:At Least it Wasn't Boon-Ga Boon-Ga by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've said it before but I'll say it again...

      What the FUCK, Japan...

    2. Re:At Least it Wasn't Boon-Ga Boon-Ga by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      >>Imagine the hilarity that would have ensued had it been Boon-Ga Boon-Ga that was rigged instead of Whack A Mole.

      Berlusconi loves that game!!

    3. Re:At Least it Wasn't Boon-Ga Boon-Ga by _merlin · · Score: 1

      It's Korean - not Japanese. Get it right.

    4. Re:At Least it Wasn't Boon-Ga Boon-Ga by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 1

      This is a japanese phenomenon, that game cabinet was only made by a korean company.

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
    5. Re:At Least it Wasn't Boon-Ga Boon-Ga by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also in 10 years it hasn't gained any real popularity in Japan...

    6. Re:At Least it Wasn't Boon-Ga Boon-Ga by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      If you face the wrong direction, it's Whack A Male.

    7. Re:At Least it Wasn't Boon-Ga Boon-Ga by mgblst · · Score: 1

      I've said it before but I'll say it again...

      Yeah, and please stop.

  11. He should be working as a government contractor by 517714 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    At least when you defraud the government you don't have to worry about being prosecuted: http://news.slashdot.org/story/11/02/20/0228236/Feds-Pay-Millions-For-Bogus-Spy-Software

    --
    The US government have made it clear that we have no inalienable rights; any we do not defend vigorously will be taken.
    1. Re:He should be working as a government contractor by initialE · · Score: 1

      Oh please, it's not only the government that is being defrauded all the time. Chances are you've been a target before too: http://www.consumeraffairs.com/news04/2007/02/ink_cartridges.html

      --
      Starbucks, Harbuckle of Breath.
  12. It's not a bug... by St.Anne · · Score: 1, Informative

    Sounds like normal run of the mill american capitalism. Except I would call it a "Service Bomb".

    1. Re:It's not a bug... by azalin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sounds like normal run of the mill american capitalism. Except I would call it a "Service Bomb".

      I would recommend calling it "Forced Service Intervals" and get a pay raise in addition. Laser Printers anybody?

    2. Re:It's not a bug... by orangebox · · Score: 2

      I've known "consultants" for small businesses that would replace failed components with other cheap components. That way he'd have a somewhat steady source of income. "That file server lost connectivity...probably that dlink nic I installed six months ago."

    3. Re:It's not a bug... by blackest_k · · Score: 2

      I know the laser printer designed failure is true the fuser was designed so after a certain amount of use it would stay on overheat and kill the printer.
        A friend had a printer with this feature and there was a reset on the printer to stop this happening , he got to find out from a service engineer. Unfortunately I can't remember which printer it was on.

      must have been in the mid 90's when he told me about it. Funny thing is I can't find anything about it on google or even snopes. Anyone find any links

    4. Re:It's not a bug... by PRMan · · Score: 1

      What about inkjets that count pages and then don't let you print using your half-full cartridge. HP would at least let you change it and put it back in. Epson remembered and didn't even let you do that. Can we send Epson to jail for 15 years?

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    5. Re:It's not a bug... by gnapster · · Score: 2

      If you want it to be on Snopes, you need to circulate it in an email that makes it clear that there is imminent danger to everyone on the internet. Send it to everyone in your address book.

    6. Re:It's not a bug... by MrQuacker · · Score: 1

      My Brother laser printer is the same. With a 3/4 full cartridge of toner it wont let me print; after 1500 pages it just stops. Fortunately it is easily disabled using just a sharpie to cover up the optical sensor. A cartridge rated for 1000 pages easily prints out closer to 3000 before it really dies.

    7. Re:It's not a bug... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The page count you get from a toner cartridge is going to depend on the coverage per page. the 1000 page rating is likely based on 2-3 times the coverage you're printing.

  13. Nice code reviews at whac-a-mole by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 3, Informative

    Nice code reviews. Way to go whac-a-mole!!!

    When you have a tiny bit of quality, these things couldn't really happen and certainly the programmer could never be blamed.

    But any which way I put it, the programmer in this case is a truly sorry character.

    --

    I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
    1. Re:Nice code reviews at whac-a-mole by Dahamma · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Eh, "whac-a-mole" and "code reviews" are probably stretching the realm of probability. I'm pretty sure the "programming staff" required to implement "mole pops up, detect if whacked" could be done by a single programmer in this mostly mechanical-game-oriented company, making useful code reviews a bit tough. Sounds like it really was a mom-and-pop company, and they just put way too much trust in a real douche bag of an employee...

    2. Re:Nice code reviews at whac-a-mole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about I give you a mole on a stick, a servo, and some wire, and you write the program for "mole pops up". (Hint: It will probably take you more than a few lines of code.)

    3. Re:Nice code reviews at whac-a-mole by pnewhook · · Score: 1

      Nice code reviews. Way to go whac-a-mole!!!

      Code review for whac a mole?? Are you serious?

      The only way for companies that make thinks like whac a mole to make money is to contract hire the programmer, probably the lowest bidder for the job. They would not have a programmer on staff. They would then hire back the programmer when they needed someone to diagnose the issue. Hence the situation where they had to hire him back to figure out what was wrong with the machines. There is no point to having a single full time programmer let alone a team that would perform a code review.

      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
    4. Re:Nice code reviews at whac-a-mole by Pharmboy · · Score: 2

      He was worried about being laid off as a programmer, so they obviously had more than one programmer. Once you start noticing that the machines are breaking down twice as often as normal, and no physical parts are needed to fix them, its gets obvious that it is a software issue. Assuming they pay attention to the breakage rate, which any normal company would. Might have been how they figured it out.

      I've seen "computer administrators" that work out for small companies do very similar things. It is typically very difficult to prove, so accusing them or telling the owners usually results in you looking bad yourself. Or they just take 5 hours to do what really takes 10 minutes. Same concept. I'm having to deal with some of that as we speak, and the owner doesn't believe it. It took him two weeks to export a database of around 10k items x 5 fields, something I would normally do in about 10 minutes. Instead he made a grand or more for it.

      In all cases, artificially creating work this way is the sign of a true douchebag.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    5. Re:Nice code reviews at whac-a-mole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And by no means limited to the computing industry. In fact, based on its record, the computer industry is still miles above most other industries when it comes to value an ethics.

      Medical supplies: Ever seen what hospitals pay for something as simple as rubber gloves?

      Government contracts: Value for your money? Not if it's being spent by the government!

      Eyeglass industry: $300 for half an ounce of metal frame? Another $200 for someone to type the specs in and have a computer grind out a lens? Yeah, ok.

      Hearing aids: Complete fucking ripoff at $3k a pair. How do these people sleep at night?

      Housing industry: Ripoffs abound everywhere you look. Shady, uneducated, lying agents who demand 6% of the gross sale price as commission?! Substandard construction materials. Poor and sometimes downright unsafe build quality. Greedy banks demanding interest on loaned money they made up out of thin air. Government land transfer tax costing thousands of dollars for someone to type in some simple paperwork.. It goes on and on.

      Even with guys like Mr. Rig-A-Mole around, this industry is a shining bastion of honesty and integrity compared to the cesspool of shit out there.

    6. Re:Nice code reviews at whac-a-mole by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      Depends, is it a real mole or a plastic one?

      Anyway, are you saying that a single programmer is only capable of writing a few lines of code on a project? I didn't say "trivial", just easily doable by one person...

    7. Re:Nice code reviews at whac-a-mole by BillX · · Score: 1

      The only thing really complicating this was it was developed in the early 70s; microcontrollers sucked, dev tools sucked (even for assembler), reprogramming the hardware was cumbersome (anyone remember UV-erase eeproms?)... the "program" may even be partially written in hardware (combinatorial logic circuits). The code itself is pretty well a one-person job, and formal "code review" would be pretty silly.

      Of course nowadays, this sort of game is produced by a kid with an Arduino and some beer over a weekend.

      --
      Caveat Emptor is not a business model.
  14. Hacker hysteria strikes again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Congratulations gentlemen, we're the witches of the 21st century, hunted for our powers beyond mortal comprehension.

    This is only news because it involved computers, when's the last time a dodgy plumber made the news?

    1. Re:Hacker hysteria strikes again. by Aeternitas827 · · Score: 2

      According to Google, two days ago.

      --
      I don't post AC. I like my -1, Flamebaits. Trump/Sheen 2012 on the Batshit Insane ticket!
  15. Isn't this just your typical shareware license? by mysidia · · Score: 2
    • Run the software fine for 30 days
    • After 30 days, discover previously unknown hidden countdown timer/activation requirement having made software useless after 30 days requiring exhorbitant charge to clear
    • ???
    • Fail
  16. Thank you for the accurate summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, it's a logic bomb, even though the article refers to it as a "virus". It doesn't replicate itself, so it's not a virus.

  17. Re:(sigh) .... must prepare for the onslaught.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    what in the fuck does that have anything at all to do with this article.

  18. Planned obsolescence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems to be some kind of planned obsolescence:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planned_obsolescence

  19. Re:(sigh) .... must prepare for the onslaught.... by aamcf · · Score: 0

    I can almost hear the migraines lining up to assault me now.

    Sumatriptan is your friend. I started having migraines badly about 15 years ago. They stopped, but then a couple of years ago. My doctor gave me sumatrpitan, to be taken when a migraine comes on. They are MAGIC. A migraine can be gone in less than 5 minutes.

  20. Re:If they didn't figure it out, they wouldn't hav by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Elistism is just as bad as ignorance. You should of known that.

  21. There is software or computers in all of the games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wtf is that supposed to mean? It's only the 5th sentence and I already lost hope.

  22. Well it's wrong but... by localman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    15 years prison time? In comparison to other crimes that's pretty insane. This guy is a bigger danger to society than the numerous fraudsters that pushed the financial crisis? Bah.

    1. Re:Well it's wrong but... by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 3, Funny

      Presumably whack-a-mole is too big to fail. This guy will be a good scapegoat, but it won't solve the problems inherent in an economy that depends so much on whack-a-mole.

      Yeah. Through incompetence or malice, people can leave a national debt that will take generations to deal with, and economic ruin, yet I'd be surprised if any of them end-up doing more than five years. They'll get out even earlier if they're fortunate enough to be struck with a unique form of alzheimer's that mysteriously vanishes shortly after they're released from prison on medical grounds - as experienced by the Earnest Saunders.

      --
      -- Using the preview button since 2005
    2. Re:Well it's wrong but... by PRMan · · Score: 1

      Seriously. If this guy gets more than a couple years it's not justice. This should in no way exceed any penalty for raping or killing anyone.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    3. Re:Well it's wrong but... by transporter_ii · · Score: 1

      ...You want to win elections, you bang on the jailable class. You build prisons and fill them with people for selling dime bags and stealing CD players. But for stealing a billion dollars? For fraud that puts a million people into foreclosure? Pass. It's not a crime. Prison is too harsh. Get them to say they're sorry, and move on. Oh, wait — let's not even make them say they're sorry. -- Rolling Stones

      .

      --
      Doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, universities destroy knowledge, religion destroys spirituality
    4. Re:Well it's wrong but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure rape victims everywhere feel a little better now knowing that what they went through isn't quite as bad as this.

    5. Re:Well it's wrong but... by Hartree · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The key is "up to" 15 years. Unless it has a mandatory minimum sentence, the judge has a lot of leeway in what is handed down. A lot of other crimes have pretty broad sentencing guidelines as well.

      In this case, Whac-A-Mole isn't that big of a deal. If an arcade game fails, it's rare someone gets hurt. He'll get off lightly.

      If he'd done this with something more mission critical (and it somehow made it past QC) that might warrant more.

      Imagine if he'd put a logic bomb in a system controlling a radiation therapy machine for cancer. Even if it hadn't hurt anyone, the potential for harm would be much greater, and the judge would take that into account in setting the sentence.

    6. Re:Well it's wrong but... by surmak · · Score: 1

      Why is this even a criminal matter? The guy should be fired, and possibly sued by his employer, but that's it. There is no reason to get the police involved.

    7. Re:Well it's wrong but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It might have something to do with overreaching laws that are abused in situations there have no business being in. Maybe he's being charged with some sort of cyber-terrorist plot since the crime involved "komputars".

      It's like the good old fashioned scenario where a desperate teenager holds up a general store in a small town. But since that store also doubled as the town's post-office, it's a federal crime.. Boom, big time jail sentence.

    8. Re:Well it's wrong but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have too much faith in our justice system. If the judge is the "tough on crime" type combined with an aggressive prosecutor it will matter little that he probably has a public pretender, he's screwed. I spent a weekend in jail and sat by a guy who was serving three years for a joint, second offense, but still holy shit. I've seen others in the local paper get 15+ years for having less than ten plants in their basement. Don't think just because the crime causes little or no harm that the judge is going to let someone off lightly.

    9. Re:Well it's wrong but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      15 years prison time? In comparison to other crimes that's pretty insane. This guy is a bigger danger to society than the numerous fraudsters that pushed the financial crisis? Bah.

      By fraudsters that pushed the crisis i assume you are referrring to Joe american who took out home loans / credit cards that they could not afford?

    10. Re:Well it's wrong but... by PMuse · · Score: 2

      Did he even commit this crime? Wasn't he authorized to be in that system altering code? What are the police doing involved? Shouldn't this just be a civil suit in which the company sues him for damages?

      --
      "We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals." --The American President (20.1.2009)
    11. Re:Well it's wrong but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His authorization ended the moment he did something that wasn't specifically and explicitly set out in his job duties or by his manager. Literally something like opening up Solitaire could be considered unauthorized activity and a crime.

      Even if he wasn't told "hey, don't screw around and logic bomb us!" the act of installing such a thing was unauthorized by its very nature just as much as it would have been if somebody who was not an employee did it. The law doesn't make a distinction between somebody exceeding their authority and somebody hacking in via brute force.

      He is not the first person to be prosecuted and convicted for such things. He won't be the last.

  23. subject by Legion303 · · Score: 2

    FTFA:

    " 'If they hadn't of discovered [...]' "

    and:

    " 'The real key is they need a piece of equipment that works from the Fourth of July, on the busiest day of the year, and it's consistent and they can depend on it,' Mike Lane, Bob's Space Racers."

    Are media outlets contracting journalism work to illiterate morons now, or has it always been that way and I'm just now noticing it?

    1. Re:subject by Psychotria · · Score: 2

      FTFA:

      " 'If they hadn't of discovered [...]' "

      and:

      " 'The real key is they need a piece of equipment that works from the Fourth of July, on the busiest day of the year, and it's consistent and they can depend on it,' Mike Lane, Bob's Space Racers."

      Are media outlets contracting journalism work to illiterate morons now, or has it always been that way and I'm just now noticing it?

      I you hadn't of discovered this I am pretty sure that on some point of the future, probably on the busiest day of the year, you'd have the mormons knocking at your door and would of discovered this your self. This thus has always be the way. The journalism writers are correct in there.

    2. Re:subject by PRMan · · Score: 2

      It's the frog in the pot. It has slowly been degrading over the past 30 years. It's hard to notice when it becomes unreadable...

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    3. Re:subject by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Competency went out of fashion while you were asleep.

  24. Re:If they didn't figure it out, they wouldn't hav by Joce640k · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is being able to read/write now considered 'elistism'{sic}?

    --
    No sig today...
  25. Re:If they didn't figure it out, they wouldn't hav by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

    I'm sure he meant "they wouldn't of known."

  26. WNF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WNF. As designed.

  27. Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ""If they hadn't of discovered that they had the virus installed in the equipment, they wouldn't have known why their machines were failing," said Cpt. Steve Aldrich, Holly Hill Police Department."

    Its phrases like this that.... well.. ya....

  28. The real profit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What I don't understand is why he didn't rig the games to spit out all the tickets for hitting the moles in the right order. Just think of all the great prizes he could have won!

  29. Re:If they didn't figure it out, they wouldn't hav by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unfortunately it is. Ignorance is being portrayed as acceptable, cool and even fashionable.

  30. Re:If they didn't figure it out, they wouldn't hav by sumdumass · · Score: 1

    No, but insisting on the strict applications or the rules of writing, even across cultural boundaries, when the parent clearly was poking fun of (or should it be have) the entire situation is a pretty good sign of it.

    And yes, I'm poking fun at yous too. Critique my writing.

  31. Re:If they didn't figure it out, they wouldn't hav by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whenever somebody writes "of" instead of "have" I imagine some retard, toothless, inbred redneck...

    While we are criticizing people's use of the English language, I should probably point out that you should have used "retarded" rather than "retard"

  32. If I were doing this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Strange that he was "caught". I mean, you do it right and you can probably just claim incompetence. I write firmware for a living and the way I would do this is intentionally write to the game eeprom - a lot. It wouldn't be as "predictable" as just lazily coding in a "logic bomb" but it would eventually destroy the eeprom, rendering the game bugged / not working. It'd be very easy to mask as a flurry of "bad decisions" and even when fixing the problem that you created, you could just play pretty stupid and replace micro / eeprom and shrug your shoulders, if pressed on the issue.

  33. Re:If they didn't figure it out, they wouldn't hav by gnapster · · Score: 1

    [...]when the parent clearly was poking fun of (or should it be have) the entire situation is a pretty good sign of it.

    I think it should be, "poking fun at the entire situation is a pretty good sign." I don't see where you would inject 'have' in that sentence.

    Critique my writing.

    There you go! :c)

  34. Well then... by davidbrit2 · · Score: 2

    It looks like the mole...

    (sunglasses)

    ...got whacked.

    YEEEAAAAAHHHHHHH!

    1. Re:Well then... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Best comment...

      (sunglasses)
       
      ...ever.

      YEEEAAAAAAAAAAHHH

  35. Planned Obsolescense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's the big deal? This is just planned obsolescence, a rather old concept as far as corporations are concerned.

  36. Re:(sigh) .... must prepare for the onslaught.... by gnapster · · Score: 1

    Our story: "Programmer who visits sites to fix problems introduced the problems himself to make sure he stayed in business!"
    The lusers' fear: "Programmers who make anti-virus software introduced viruses into the wild to make sure they stay in business!"

    mark-t was not offtopic. If I had not already commented in another thread on this article, I would mod him back up, myself.

  37. And the moral of the story by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Pay your programmers sensible rates and show them that they are not just some hire and fire goon to you, so they don't have to resort to shady practices to ensure their job security.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:And the moral of the story by El+Royo · · Score: 2

      No, the moral of the story is to not hire criminals. If he didn't like the wages/working conditions he should get another job, not find ways to criminally bilk his current employer.

      --
      Author of Enyo: Up and Running from O'Reilly Media
  38. Re:If they didn't figure it out, they wouldn't hav by OakDragon · · Score: 2

    Now, now... let's not loose our temper. For all intensive purposes, your right.

  39. Its not about whack-a-mole its fraud by voss · · Score: 2

    He was committing fraud against honest people for his own benefit. He wasnt doing it as a joke, he was doing it to defraud.

    Would you be saying the same thing if someone did the same thing to your laptop or your car.

    15 years in prison is excessive but 5 years in prison would be about right.

    1. Re:Its not about whack-a-mole its fraud by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 1

      In answer to your question, if bankers, property developers and financial regulators came together in a mixture of fraud and reckless hubris, leaving the economy of my laptop or car in tatters, I'd be quite annoyed. Thankfully though my laptop doesn't use a fiat currency - thus rendering it immune to the machinations of international financiers and whack-a-mole.

      Don't be naive. Everything is about whack-a-mole. This guy just tried to break the hold that whack-a-mole has on us, and for his trouble he'll spend 15 years in prison - assuming he doesn't have a convenient "accident".

      --
      -- Using the preview button since 2005
    2. Re:Its not about whack-a-mole its fraud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, 5 is still too much, prison is expensive, there are too many people in prison, and it is unlikely this guy will be a danger to society if he released early. If this is his first fraud conviction, then maybe a year or two and a large fine would be more suitable. Or maybe even just a sufficiently large fine will do so long as he pays it, a fine that significantly exceeds what he made from the fraud should be a reasonable punishment and deterrent.

  40. Re:If they didn't figure it out, they wouldn't hav by nabsltd · · Score: 1

    Now, now... let's not loose our temper. For all intensive porpoises, your right.

    FTFY

  41. lmao by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Said thing is, car manufacturers have been doing this for decades

  42. Why not do a Ronald Harris and make it pay out wit by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    Why not do a Ronald Harris? and make it pay out with a hidden code / make it payout way more then it should.

  43. Lots of companies do this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lots of companies build appliances, such as TVs, refrigerators, washing machines, phones, etc and now even cars. to break down after X years. Obviously they don't do anything as blatant as putting a piece of code in that disables the device after X period of time or X power cycles but they build the items using material which is going to fail after X period of time, usually the warranty has expired. They're manufactured this way so people are in a continuous loop of buying appliances and buying the same things again a few years later rather than buying something and having it last for decades.

    This practice isn't illegal but it doesn't seem much different to what the programmer was doing.

    1. Re:Lots of companies do this by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Are you sure it isn't just that they use the cheapest components that will last the warranty period (after which point it isn't there problem) since all that the buyer cares about is the price. You really think you can't find a fridge that costs twice as much but last much longer?

      And once upon a time you used to actually repair things, whereas now people just buy something new every few years. Sure your old TV lasted for 15 years but there was also a local repair man who replaced a capacitor a couple of times.

  44. Re:(sigh) .... must prepare for the onslaught.... by mark-t · · Score: 1
    I didn't think I was being that obtuse.

    To summarize my train of thought - the guy was deliberately installing a virus so that he would have to be contacted to fix the problem, thereby making money off of it.... which is, near as I can see, not all that dissimilar from the notion that virus companies deliberately manufacture viruses so that they can make money by selling virus scanners.

  45. Re:If they didn't figure it out, they wouldn't hav by mooingyak · · Score: 1

    Someday I will be ask my opinion on something, and I'll say "They would've blah blah blah", and I'll be quoted in print as "They would of blah blah blah" and then there will be another article about me killing the reporter.

    --
    William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
  46. Exercise your futility by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

    "If there really had been a Mercutio, and if there really were a Paradise, Mercutio might be hanging out with teenage Vietnam draftee casualties now, talking about what it felt like to die for other people's vanity and foolishness." — Kurt Vonnegut (Hocus Pocus) "The hardest thing of all is to find a black cat in a dark room, especially if there is no cat." — Confucius "Man makes plans . . . and God laughs." — Michael Chabon "Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain" — Friedrich von Schiller "(He) mourned mankind, and the blindness of men, who thought that the Kosmos had rules and limits that would shelter them from their own freedom. There were no shelters. There were no final purposes. Futility, and freedom, were Absolute" — Bruce Sterling (Schismatrix) That's why so many Americans are obese - they won't even exercise their futility!

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    1. Re:Exercise your futility by gnapster · · Score: 1

      That's why so many Americans are obese - they won't even exercise their futility!

      Quick, get the surgeon general on the phone! I have an idea for a new school program!

  47. Re:If they didn't figure it out, they wouldn't hav by isopropanol · · Score: 1

    Perhaps he's referring to a later francophone redneck?

  48. Hacked Whack-a-mole. by weeboo0104 · · Score: 0

    This guy was really 1337. I never thought of a logic bomb to beat Whack-a-mole.
    My own exploit involved a brute-force attack, but the results were hit or miss.

    --
    It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men. -Frederick Douglass
  49. Ooh no by msharnouby · · Score: 0

    The guy must me a Muslim ! , this is a matter of national security ! :P Mohamed.

  50. Re:If they didn't figure it out, they wouldn't hav by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately it is. Ignorance is being portrayed as acceptable, cool and even fashionable.

    Yeah - that Zoolander movie really set us back.

  51. Whack a Banker game. by antdude · · Score: 1

    http://www.timhunkin.com/a152_whackabanker.htm and http://www.timhunkin.com/a153_whackabanker-words.htm

    I wonder if the penalty would be higher with this game due to financial companies. ;)

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  52. Auto-mechanics by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Faced with a pay cut, police believe Wimberly programmed games to fail, ensuring he would be needed and keep making money.

    Auto-mechanics do this kind of sh8t all the time: fail to tighten things, put in inferior parts, etc. I don't hear about their prosecution very often.

    1. Re:Auto-mechanics by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      [citation needed]

  53. Shit ass journalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "If they hadn't of discovered that they had the virus installed in the equipment, they wouldn't have known why their machines were failing," said Cpt. Steve Aldrich, Holly Hill Police Department.

    >hadn't of

    >hadn't of

    >hadn't of

    1. Re:Shit ass journalism by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      It's a quote, maybe that is what he said and adding [sic] in a quote from a local police captain might be a wonderful way to get a whole load of traffic infringement stops in the next month.

      Though strange to have "wouldn't have" in the same sentence.

  54. Re:If they didn't figure it out, they wouldn't hav by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

    Whenever somebody writes "of" instead of "have" I imagine some retard, toothless, inbred redneck, barely able to talk like a human being, fucking a pig and yelling "yehaw!".

    My pig is fussy, she likes rednecks but would never sleep with a retarded grammar nazi.

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  55. Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't this what Microsoft do with Windows? It sure does keep a lot of techs in a job.

  56. Re:(sigh) .... must prepare for the onslaught.... by tragedy · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, you have ransomware viruses posing as antivirus software (with names like winantivirus 2010), obfuscating the whole issue.

  57. Technical details? by BillX · · Score: 1

    As an EE I'd like to see actual technical details of how this was accomplished. How would an arcade game built in 1971 know how many times it had been powercycled? Things like battery-backed SRAM and EEPROM would have been somewhat prohibitively expensive at the time, and not otherwise useful to the game. An electromechanical solution? The (single-e) EPROM's UV window left uncovered with a small light pointed at it? The implementation must have been interesting, along with the onsite fix.

    (Of course, if the quality of TFA was any indication, this guy could just as easily be getting strung up for a legitimate failure of the machines (the vintage EPROMs these machines use fail after 'x' years, he must be sabotaging them!) I read about a case not too long ago where an 'insignificant' reformulation of a particular fuse manufacturer's filaments caused them to fail in certain devices after a couple hundred power cycles.)

    --
    Caveat Emptor is not a business model.
    1. Re:Technical details? by BillX · · Score: 2

      Yes, replying to myself... a better article:
      http://www.news-journalonline.com/news/local/east-volusia/2011/02/24/worker-charged-after-virus-clubs-whac-a-mole.html

      This semi-answers my questions. This and another article mention that this guy wrote the logic bomb only in 2008, presumably for much more modern incarnations of the hardware (modern microcontrollers almost always have onboard NVRAM of some kind, making this kind of trick easy to pull off with a field-deployed firmware 'upgrade'). For Whac-A-Mole, it stops working at the 512th reboot, although the original(er) article states he also bugged other games, one with a counter that kills the game at "48 or 49" cycles.

      --
      Caveat Emptor is not a business model.
  58. Re:If they didn't figure it out, they wouldn't hav by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

    Elitism is simply the wrong word to describe rule or diktat from an oligarchical group. It's wrong because being "elite" implies that those in charge are actually competent at what they do. Often they are anything but. In addition, when someone is good at their job, describing them as elite now somehow makes on a negative connotation.

    Elite is simply the wrong word to use. Happily, a suitable alternative exists. That word is ascendancy.

    An Ascendancy is a group which has risen to a ruling position in society and which has maintained that position regardless of competence, merit or even public approval. It is effectively a kind of hereditary group nobility within important institutions in society, public and private. Importantly, it's noblesse without the oblige. Ostensibly all positions are open to all candidates; in reality, membership is restricted--by convention or contacts--to the Ascendancy class.

    The key features distinguishing Ascendancy from "Elitism" or an aristocracy is that in the former, no real concept of merit or a meritocracy is applied and in the latter, no formal system of inheritance or obligation exists. An Ascendancy is simply a group which holds power, almost always undeservedly.

    --
    May the Maths Be with you!
  59. Re:If they didn't figure it out, they wouldn't hav by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heya G W Bush. That is how he got elected. He just one of the people.

  60. Re:If they didn't figure it out, they wouldn't hav by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    Probably a majority of native English speakers make that mistake regularly. Have you lived your whole life in a professors' lounge?

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  61. Re:If they didn't figure it out, they wouldn't hav by DaVince21 · · Score: 2

    Simple. You should feel self-pity for even considering to insult such people. Language is a complex beast and people have always changed it.

    Seriously, you can mention grammatical mistakes to people. But don't be a dick about it.

    --
    I am not devoid of humor.
  62. "virus", indeed by kheldan · · Score: 1

    I LOLed at the article. I used to fix arcade games (back in the dark days of my life). I never worked on Whac-a-mole, but I'm pretty sure something as simple as that has software in EPROMs, not a HDD like a desktop computer would; it can't get a "virus", it's read-only. He just wrote rigged code. Not sure I'd even call that a "logic bomb". At any rate -- no points to the guy. His rigged code was too obvious. He should have done something more subtle/less dramatic than shutting them down completely.

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  63. But windowZ has had this same feature. by niftymitch · · Score: 1

    But windowZ has had this feature for years.

    --
    Truth is stranger than fiction, but it is because Fiction is obliged to stick to possibilities; Truth isn't. Mark Twain.
  64. So how do they prove he did it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are subversion logs going to hold up in court?