Infected Androids Run Up Big Texting Bills
Hugh Pickens writes "Computerworld reports that a rogue Android app is hijacking smartphones and running up big texting bills to premium rate numbers before the owner knows it. Chinese hackers grabbed a copy of Steamy Windows, a free program, added a backdoor Trojan horse to the app's code, then placed the reworked app on unsanctioned third-party "app stores" where unsuspecting or careless Android smartphones find it, download it and install it."
"[...] where unsuspecting or careless Android smartphones find it, download it and install it."
I really dislike careless phones. Perhaps reviewers can test and report which are careful.
I'd also like to know how to make my phone less naive about unauthorised app stores.
Perhaps I should take away my phone's download privileges...
Obviously this means we should abdicate (forcibly, if necessary) all control over our computing devices to large corporations with a vested interest in denying us the ability to use them as we see fit.
When you install any Android app, it explicitly asks for permissions to perform various categories of activities. If you granted the app permission to perform activities it doesn't need, e.g. SEND TEXT MESSAGES, then shame on you, not on the OS!
I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
Who do you trust: The phone company, the phone, or the user?
If you trust the phone company, then having a cellphone contract option to limit data/text/etc. usage to some cap can mitigate the worst case bill you'll be surprised with.
If you trust the phone, then OS options to limit what an app can do can mitigate worse case damage done.
In either case, you have to trust the user to make the right choices with respect to cellphone contract or app permissions.
I think my problem is that I don't trust any of the above.
More importantly, they had to give the app permission to send texts. Very few apps need that permission.
Lots of apps wanting lots of info. Instead of "install or not" there needs to be an option to "deny access to this feature but install anyways".
The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
You buy stuff from trusted sources.
What makes a source trusted? Do they screen apps for inappropriate behavior before putting an app on the store (preempt) or do they just remove inappropriately behaving apps after they are discovered in the field (react)? I don't think trust is a binary state, its a range of levels. A reputable source that preempts may be more trustworthy, a reputable source that merely reacts may be less trustworthy but more convenient.
Seriously--you never hear any iPhone-fan screaming that Android or the Android marketplace shouldn't exist. Never. If that's what you want, then go for it.
The Android world, though, (by and large) is completely obnoxious towards people who choose an iPhone (I guess CHOICE is only a virtue when someone chooses your way)--to the point of trying to somehow force Apple to do things differently. The Android world looks down on the grandmothers of the world who just want to be able to Facetime easily with their grandchildren. You see, if you aren't l33t enough to run SETI@home on your phone then you don't deserve to have a smartphone, right?
And, most irksome to me personally, the Android world operates under the delusion that technical people don't use iPhones. I think I probably know more about computers than you do--and I use an iPhone because I appreciate good design and I want something that works. I don't care that I can't compile the Linux kernel on it for the same reason that I don't care that I can compile the Linux kernel on my microwave.
Get a life.
I though open-source was infinitely more secure than "Micro$oft Windoze omglolwut!". Funny I haven't heard about any viruses affecting windows phones.
That's because there isn't enough marketshare.
Sorry, couldn't resist!
Why does this app have the capability to send text messages? With a Symbian phone, the first time an app tries to send a text message, a dialog will pop up asking if you want to permit it. If you say 'no', then it can't. It also can't do anything else that costs you money, unless you explicitly grant it these permissions. This kind of capability system has been part of Symbian for over a decade. I believe iOS and WP7 have something similar. Doesn't Android?
I am TheRaven on Soylent News
It does, when installing an app you get a list of permissions required for the app which you have to agree to before it is installed. And yes, I must admit that the meaning of this list isn't always as clear and obvious to the less tech-savvy people among us, but it is especially those people that should be careful with what apps they install.