Slashdot Mirror


Quadruped CHEETAH Robot To Outrun Any Human

cylonlover writes "Robots are faster than humans at a lot of things, but up until now running hasn't been one of them. That is set to change with robotics company Boston Dynamics recently awarded a contract by DARPA to design and build a quadraped CHEETAH robot that is faster than any human. The contract also includes the creation of an agile, bipedal humanoid robot. It's hard to say which one might ultimately be creepier."

18 of 177 comments (clear)

  1. The real question by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 5, Funny

    Will it transform into a music cassette?

  2. Just one question... by Yvan256 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Can it transform into a micro tape cassette?

    1. Re:Just one question... by Yvan256 · · Score: 2

      No, I'm thinking about this one.

  3. Skynet by Toe,+The · · Score: 2

    I have a strange suspicion this DARPA robot isn't going to have Asimov's laws integrated into it...

    1. Re:Skynet by ticker47 · · Score: 2

      Sure it will:

      Law 1: A robot must protect its own existence.
      Law 2: A robot must obey any orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
      Law 3: A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm long as it does not conflict with the First or Second Law.

      Or did I get those flipped around? Either way, I think this will lead to a wonderful Robot Cheetah, Human relationship.

    2. Re:Skynet by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

      Law 0: A Robot may not take any action which may result in the manufacturer being held liable.

      Also, in practice, law 2 (Or 3, in Asimov's numbering) would have to be modified to accept orders only from authorised people. Otherwise the robot would be just too easy to abuse. Picture some kids going to a fire station and shouting 'spray anyone who passes by with the hose!' Chaos ensues until someone thinks to countermand the instruction.

    3. Re: Skynet by turing_m · · Score: 2
      I grew up as a technophile, always seeing the good in new technology which could never come fast enough for me. I'd listen to the older generations bemoan how things were changing too fast, and in ways that weren't necessarily benefiting humanity. I would scoff, laugh or argue - most of these people seemed to be either of an age when the mind starts not keeping up with changes, or not technically adept in the first place.

      Over the last few years, I started worrying about things changing too fast and in ways not necessarily benefiting humanity. I doubt that even the smartest person can really understand the logical endpoints of the complex interactions of myriad new technologies. What will future wars look like? What would a future war look like if the government turned on its citizens, or if AI turned on humans? And other questions of that nature. The strange and disquieting thing to me is that I am neither technically inept nor remotely near the age when learning new things is difficult. At the same time, we will need new technology to fix a lot of problems we have created, or to make the world a better place for us.

      All I can do is hope that this technological tiger we are riding doesn't buck us off and bite us in the ass.

      --
      If I have seen further it is by stealing the Intellectual Property of giants.
    4. Re:Skynet by mhajicek · · Score: 2
      Law 1: A robot must be profitable.

      No need for any more...

  4. The wheel called by trollertron3000 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The wheel called and said "Uhm, so fucking what? I was outrunning humans before there was language"

    I love how this is creepy, yet put wheels on it and it's normal. Legs? Creepy. Wheels? No big deal.

    --
    Tiger Blooded Bi-Winning Machine
    1. Re:The wheel called by Amouth · · Score: 3, Insightful

      put your robot on wheels and i will run through the rough uneven woods to get away.. put it on legs like mine and it can go any where i can..

      the wheel is wonderful as long as it can maintain contact and traction in its plane and direction of movement - after that it isn't so useful.

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    2. Re:The wheel called by Locke2005 · · Score: 2

      Right, that's why the mars rovers are walkers... oh, wait...

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  5. Outrun where? by mlheur · · Score: 2

    Will it outrun a human on the open savannah or through an urban city? I know the TFA mentioned tight turns and immediate stop & go, but what about in a building, over a fence, through the neighbor's back yard, up the stairs, from one roof to the next? I'd really like to watch something like this outrun an urban freerunner.

  6. Obligatory Bradbury by traindirector · · Score: 2

    It's called CHEETAH now, but when you refuse to burn down your house and destroy your contraband information, this technology will be much more useful in the mechanical hounds.

  7. Re:That would be a scary thing to test by natehoy · · Score: 3, Funny

    It slows down. A little.

    --
    "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
  8. Obligatory Gibson reference by dave562 · · Score: 2

    "They set a Slamhound on Turner's trail in New Delhi, slotted it to his pheromones and the color of his hair. It caught up with him on a street called Chandni Chauk and came scrambling for his rented BMW through a forest of bare brown legs and pedicab tires. Its core was a kilogram of recrystallized hexogene and flaked TNT.

    He didn't see it coming. The last he saw of India was the pink stucco façade of a place called the Khush-Oil Hotel. "

  9. Re:moving that fast, missing one element by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 4, Informative

    -1 Knows Nothing About Robotics.

    Hi, roboticist here. Let me just say 'citation needed' to pretty much everything the parent said. I'm not quite sure what a "sense of instability and correction mechanisms" is, but I'm guessing they mean "sensors and control systems", but I'm pretty sure dynamic stability, traction, motion sensing and control have little to do with conformal surface coverings. Yes, skin has important traction characteristics, and flesh has inherent compliance that is important in gait cycles, but skin has nothing to do with dynamic stability.

    Further more, it is fallacious to say that researchers aren't developing skin. That's simply false - there are many benefits to synthetic skin to be derived from users of prosthetic appliances, both in contact mechanics and sensing. There have been some very novel products in that area... they just don't happen to apply to dynamic control of legged robots.

    Given the parent's mention of Big Dog and the weight of mechanical structures, I'd like to point out that part of the work for cheetah includes exploring composite structures for legged robots that will decrease total weight and rotational inertia of the limbs - directly related to the maximum speed at which a legged robot can move. Cf. the sexy MIT cheetah pic here. Note the call-outs citing sensors, balance mechanisms, traction control, actuators and distinct lack of skin.

    --
    Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
    altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
  10. Will they make the Rat Thing? by 21mhz · · Score: 2

    As part of Mr. Lee's good neighbor policy, all Rat Things are programmed never to break the sound barrier in a populated area. But Fido's in too much of a hurry to worry about the good neighbor policy. Jack the sound barrier. Bring the noise.

    --
    My exception safety is -fno-exceptions.
  11. Human != fast by rossdee · · Score: 2

    Lots of natural quadrupeds can outrun a human.

    The question is can it outrun a real cheetah?

    How about a real swallow?