Slashdot Mirror
Why Men Don't Have Sensory Whiskers and Spiny Genitals
sciencehabit writes "Most male mammals wield a penis covered with spines made of keratin, the same material that forms fingernails, to sweep out competitors' sperm and irritate a female into ovulating. Even chimpanzees, our closest relatives, have penile spines. So why don't men? A new study suggests that this feature disappeared due to a chunk of DNA that went missing after our evolutionary divergence from chimps. The researchers have identified another DNA deletion that may have contributed to humans' bigger brains."
Because I'm good at irritating females, yet somehow it doesn't lead to their ovulating.
What, you mean these spines on my penis aren't normal?
I'd better go see a doctor.
...because I refrain from sex with porcupines and hedgehogs. And I didn't even have to RTFA.
The phrase "wield a penis" appears in it.
I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
All the women had sex with the first freak born without them.
...because women, generally, don't want them? They by & large run the reproductive sweepstakes, even back in the "me big strong caveman, me conk woman on head" days when "consent" was a little more broadly interpreted.
And which came first, male lack of spines, or female concealed ovulation?
When analyzing the genetic record, how can one 'sort out' the distinction between DNA changes that have happened due to mutation, compared to the changes induced by broad and consistent female choice?
-Styopa
Most male mammals wield a penis covered with spines made of keratin, the same material that forms fingernails, to sweep out competitors' sperm and irritate a female into ovulating.
Human females are different. They get irritated when ovulating. Before, during and after, in fact.
Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
The summary doesn't say we evolved from chimps. It says we have evolutionary divergence from chimps, which means that we evolved differently than the chimps did. Which obviously is true.
The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
...we evolved from a common ancestor. That Ancestor is not a chimp but something completely different in terms of biological classification. That's like saying A GPS device evolved form a defibrillator.
Since nobody suggested we evolved from chimps what is your point? The article says "divergence from" which just implies a common ancestor.
Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
I guess I never really appreciated how lonely it could get during the Russian winter...
"Hello, my name is Peggy."
Still in the genepool only very diluted: https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Hirsuties_coronae_glandis
I think, therefore you are.
Which will no doubt take some barbed comments and pointed insights to thrust ourselves into a much deeper and greater understanding.
Perhaps twice, after a 30 minute resting period.
Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
As a bicycle rider let me assure you, both penile spines and extra-sensitive follicles would have a deleterious effect on the sport.
First off, human males *do* have a mechanism to sweep out sperm from other males, consisting of the most visually obvious part of the male penis and protracted mechanical movement. We lost spikes, we evolved something else to do the same function. Secondly, there are many other mammals that have different methods for accomplishing the same thing: male squirrels have something like superglue that forms a plug after coitus, to prevent other males gaining access afterwards. (And female squirrels have claws and quite a bit of expertise in removing those same plugs, as you'd expect in any good arms race.) Likewise, many male lizards and insects avoid the problem by just staying connected until the female is ready to lay her eggs, which puts a whole lot of stress on the female during that period: they both get eaten pretty often.
But if you really want to get weird, go look at insects like bedbugs, where males practice traumatic insemination: they don't go looking for an orifice, they make one, and let the female's body figure out what to do with the results. Or bees, where the barbs aren't there to stimulate ovulation but to make sure the penis breaks off and acts as a plug that can't be removed.
And the next step weirder is hermaphrodites, where mating is a contest in which both wish to inseminate the other without getting inseminated, so mating strategies get seriously complicated. (The phrase 'penis fencing' has been used.)
Anyone who is curious about this should read the brilliant book Promiscuity: the evolutionary history of sperm competition by Tim Birkhead. It will make you relieved to be human.
Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
Is there something so sacred about the penis that it can't be talked about rationally?
No, not sacred at all. Although, I would prefer you refer to it as "pee-pee".
When are you going to learn that Darwin doesn't exist!
Quite. He died ages ago.
SJW n. One who posts facts.
The home remedies in this previous version are worth the read.
Do you even lift?
These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.
A logical evolutionary step, where physical capability took second place to mental flexibility. Those groups of human where physical capability took precedence over mental flexibility died out when adverse environmental conditions left them less capable of surviving then the mentally flexible brethren who could throw rocks, start a fire and put on and take off a fur coat.
The biggest driver for human evolution has likely been the recent (in evolutionary terms 2 million odd years) repeated ice ages giving precedence to mental agility of physical capability (being able to remain in a region and not having to pursue suitable climatic regions whilst stressed and against competition).
Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen