Slashdot Mirror


TSA To Retest Full Body Scanners For Radiation

cultiv8 writes with this excerpt from USA Today: "The Transportation Security Administration announced Friday that it would retest every full-body X-ray scanner that emits ionizing radiation — 247 machines at 38 airports — after maintenance records on some of the devices showed radiation levels 10 times higher than expected. The TSA says that the records reflect math mistakes and that all the machines are safe. Indeed, even the highest readings listed on some of the records — the numbers that the TSA says were mistakes — appear to be many times less than what the agency says a person absorbs through one day of natural background radiation. Even so, the TSA has ordered the new tests out of 'an abundance of caution to reassure the public,' spokesman Nicholas Kimball says. The tests will be finished by the end of the month, and the results will be released 'as they are completed,' the agency said on its website."

7 of 199 comments (clear)

  1. Maybe I'm mistaken, but.. by intellitech · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Shouldn't they be testing the radiation output from these machines at regular intervals to make sure they're safe?

    (as opposed to just checking them when the public needs "reassuring")

    In the past, the TSA has failed to properly monitor and ensure the safety of X-ray devices used on luggage. A 2008 report by the worker safety arm of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found that the TSA and its maintenance contractors had failed to detect when baggage X-ray machines emitted radiation beyond what regulations allowed. They also failed to take action when some machines had missing or disabled safety features, the report shows.

    Oh, wait, that's right. For the most part, they're incompetent, or just don't care.

    The least they could do while subjecting people to discomfort and harm is ensure that they're keeping damage to a minimum. Assholes.

    --
    vos nescitis quicquam, nec cogitatis quia expedit nobis ut unus moriatur homo pro populo et non tota gens pereat.
    1. Re:Maybe I'm mistaken, but.. by NevarMore · · Score: 5, Insightful

      God damn republicans.

      http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2011/02/08/house-democrats-who-voted-for-patriot-act-reauthorization-feb-8-2011/

      This is not about partisanship, its about freedom. Do you despise the TSA, the PATRIOT act, the erosion of our Constitution, and our loss of Liberty or do you just want something else to wave in the face of the party that you happen to not be in?

    2. Re:Maybe I'm mistaken, but.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      God damn republicans.

      Because if we had a Democratic President, he'd put a stop to this damn quick.

      Oh wait...

    3. Re:Maybe I'm mistaken, but.. by sjames · · Score: 5, Informative

      A medical facility that allowed an x-ray machine to expose patients to an order of magnitude more radiation than it was supposed to for any length of time would have hell to pay.

      TFA does not say that TSA detected problems and so is re-testing everything. It says that AFTER they were forced by lawmakers and the press to release records AND it was determined that at least 33% of those inspections were rendered worthless by seriously sloppy procedure AND lawmakers rumbled about taking action, THEN and only THEN the TSA reluctantly offered to retest everything.

      That's far from your characterization.

  2. The TSA's math is real wrong. by headhot · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Their example of "appear to be many times less than what the agency says a person absorbs through one day of natural background radiation." is a bad one.

    The force of a bullet hitting a person is the same as that of the stock hitting the shoulder of the shooter. I'd rather be on the shooter's end.

    Just because the amount of radiation is the same (or less) it doesn't mean its the same type. The scanners concentrate that radiation at one frequency, not over a broad spectrum. That frequency is absorbed not by the whole body, but by the first few millimeters of flest. That means that bit of flesh is getting thousands of times higher levels of exposure then that of the whole body mass exposure of back ground radiation.

  3. Re:Carry a radiation detector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They're illegal in New York City. The reason given is to prevent public panic.

  4. Re:Bullshit. by gregrah · · Score: 5, Informative

    While "groped" would certainly be an exaggeration, I have absolutely had my balls touched by a TSA officer after refusing the scanner here in San Francisco. This has happened more than once.