Slashdot Mirror


Why We Should Buy Music In FLAC

soodoo writes "We have plenty of HDD space and broadband internet. Why don't we demand full CD quality audio in an accessible format from online music stores? The advantage of lossless compression is not only the small audio quality improvement, but better future-proofing and converting capabilities. FLAC is a good, free and open format, well suited for this job."

3 of 550 comments (clear)

  1. Portable players by Xtense · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm a proud owner of a Rockboxed Sansa e250. However, if I kept the music I listen to regularly in FLAC, both the internal storage (2GB) and external microSD fall short. No, hotswapping isn't a good idea, especially if you're treating yourself to music going long distance. That's why I decided to settle for Ogg Vorbis - quality good enough that I don't hear a difference between the source and the compressed file (as proven by several long blind hearing tests), and file sizes that make my collection that much more managable.

    --
    "We are the music makers, and we are the dreamers of dreams [...]."
  2. Seems fairly obvious why not by aarggh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Isn't the fact that it's "good, free, and open" the exact reasons the publishers wouldn't use it? It kinda flies in the face of them being tyrannical mongrels controlling the media distribution if customers can actually meaningfully use it.

  3. Re:If you want CD-quality audio, buy CDs by wirefarm · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "Also, what the hell are you going to do with a CD once you have it but rip it?"

    Sell it used.

    --
    -- My Weblog.