Slashdot Mirror


NASA Building Network of Smart Cameras Across US

kkleiner writes "A major government agency is looking to blanket the US with cameras that will never stop their surveillance. But don't worry, privacy pundits, those cameras will be spying on the sky, not civilians. NASA's All-sky Fireball Network is a series of cameras that track meteorites as they enter the atmosphere. With careful triangulation, NASA can not only know where the meteorites will land, they can determine where they came from as well. One of the coolest parts of the All-sky Fireball Network is that it's fully automated. Meteors are detected by a computer which sends images, video clips, and data analysis to William Cooke, head of NASA's Meteoroid Environment Office. Now you can get the same information as Cooke, too – the All-sky Fireball Network's website publicly records all the data for you to peruse."

19 of 117 comments (clear)

  1. Is the Funding Safe? by Sonny+Yatsen · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Considering the cuts that are being pushed through the House, especially for research of earth/space science stuff like tsunami warnings, I can't help but wonder whether it'll just get defunded in a few months. I hope not. This looks interesting, but no amount of federal funding for scientific research is safe from the politicians right now.

    --
    My postings are informational and does not constitute legal advice. Act on it at your risk.
    1. Re:Is the Funding Safe? by Locke2005 · · Score: 2

      A buck spent on this CAN go to a crook, provided the crook is good at stealing cameras!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    2. Re:Is the Funding Safe? by cobrausn · · Score: 2

      Of course he did; he's likely not rich, so what's the problem? Besides, it's not like that higher tax rate for the wealthy might affect hiring or anything.

      --
      How does it feel to be a liar with pants constantly on fire?
    3. Re:Is the Funding Safe? by spun · · Score: 2

      Take a dollar away from the rich man and use it to actually fund jobs in the US, instead of letting him invest it overseas. If the rich weren't rich, everyone would have money to provide jobs for the less fortunate. You act as though taking a dollar away from the wealthy means the dollar disappears. It doesn't work that way. Most of our resources are owned and controlled by a very small percentage of people, and those people do have more in common with Saudi Arabian sheiks than they do with you or I. The rich won't invest in the Us because nearly everyone here is poor and we can't afford to buy anything. We are rapidly becoming a banana republic, in fact, our levels of wealth inequality and income disparity have far surpassed most banana republics.

      This helpful graph illustrates the problem of soaring inequality: http://motherjones.com/politics/2011/02/income-inequality-in-america-chart-graph

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    4. Re:Is the Funding Safe? by c6gunner · · Score: 2

      The rich won't invest in the Us because nearly everyone here is poor and we can't afford to buy anything

      You're really living in your own little world, aren't you? I mean, the rest of the stuff you wrote is fairly silly, too, but this part here is just downright ridiculous.

  2. Re:On the sky. Right. by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

    If it's pointing up and is a fixed camera who is it going to be spying on?

    Alien terrorists, obviously. They're the most dangerous kind, of course.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  3. Similar to USArray for seismology by wcrowe · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I had just been visiting the USArray site to watch the animations associated with the Japan Earthquake right before I read this article. It's a similar idea.

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
  4. Re:WIll it send instant emails / texts ? by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 2
    Oh no, it's a member of the I'll-make-up-ridiculous-worst-case-scenarios-to-show-how-bad-this-idea-really-is crowd!

    Seriously, is that the only objection you can think of? There might be a traffic jam?

  5. Gateway camera? by Grygus · · Score: 2

    Once a few of these cameras are vandalized, we'll need cameras that point down to protect them.

  6. If these meteorites have nothing to hide by makubesu · · Score: 2, Funny

    then they have nothing to fear.

  7. Damn good name! by Dutchmaan · · Score: 2

    I just want to give props to the guy or gal who came up with "All-sky Fireball Network" that name is so full of win I can't stand it. To bad it'll likely be referred to as the ASFN. Maybe we can get scientists to name our legislation packages for us!

  8. Re:WIll it send instant emails / texts ? by LearnToSpell · · Score: 2

    It'll probably shift the balance of weight of the Earth, subtly changing our orbit, and sending us PLUNGING INTO THE SUN!

    Sorry.

  9. Re:On the sky. Right. by northernfrights · · Score: 2

    This isn't a concern at all. All you have to do is attach some infrared LED's to your tinfoil hat, and you'll be safe from CCD based cameras along with malicious electromagnetic signals. But seriously, the 'tech infrastructure' (a bunch of cameras?) needed to watch the whole sky would be completely different than what would be needed to watch the whole country. One camera pointed upwards with a wide angle lens would effectively cover many, many square miles of sky area if all you need to do is make out streaks of light. And they would all be spaced out evenly across the country, meaning the vast majority of them would be located in the middle of nowhere. Not even the most evil government regime in history would have any desire for this.

  10. Re:WIll it send instant emails / texts ? by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 3, Funny

    If a 6 foot tall rock drops anywhere I can "race" to in minutes, I'm sure I'll hear it without the cameras.

  11. It's big, it's heavy, it's wood? by Tetsujin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "This looks interesting" is a lot more legitimate a reason than some of the random tax breaks we've pissed our money away on.

    So it's "better than bad" and therefore "good"?

    --
    Bow-ties are cool.
    1. Re:It's big, it's heavy, it's wood? by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 2

      Better than bad is good is a time honored rationalization.

      From the Log Song of Season One Ren and Stimpy.

      http://www.redbrick.dcu.ie/~fatwa/ren/songs.html

  12. Re:On the sky. Right. by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 2

    The three cameras are pointed straight up and out in the middle of fields.

    Per the article

    http://singularityhub.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/whats-hitting-earth.jpg

    So once again - If it's pointing up and is a fixed camera who is it going to be spying on?

  13. Re:what are the aims of this exercise? by c6gunner · · Score: 2

    Who cares about the homeless or poor, we got fucking meteors to track!

    Hypocrite. Do you have any idea how much food your computer could purchase for a starving homeless person? You obviously don't give a shit about anyone except yourself.

  14. Re:WIll it send instant emails / texts ? by flaming+error · · Score: 2

    Stardust was a good flick. Everything a movie should be - comedy, drama, action, mystery, character growth. And babes.