Slashdot Mirror


Why the AT&T and T-Mobile Merger Is Bad For Consumers

adeelarshad82 writes "AT&T recently announced that it will buy T-Mobile for $39 billion. If the transaction gets approved by the government and closes in a year as planned, it will create the nation's largest wireless carrier by far. While this is great news for both companies, analysts believe that it's an awful idea for end consumers for a number of different reasons — from obvious ones, like a rise in rates due to lower competition, to subtler ones, like more selective phone choices for consumers."

4 of 367 comments (clear)

  1. Great news for both companies? by blair1q · · Score: 5, Interesting

    AT&T shareholders just watched their management pay way too much for T-mobile. T-mobile and AT&T employees are both now extremely fearful for their jobs, as there is almost 100% overlap in most markets in everything but customer service call centers. This goes all the way up the management chains.

    This is less like "joining forces" than conquering your neighbor by buying his mortgage from the bank for double the house's value, then throwing him and his kids and your wife out on the street.

  2. Re:Reject by dgatwood · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's ultimately not the FCC, but rather, the DOJ that would have to step in and stop it. So write them.

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  3. Re:$39 BILLION!? by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They are amoral, but allow evil deeds to flourish because the people doing the deeds know they will never be held accountable. Lack of personal accountability is the REAL evil of the corporations.

  4. Re:Reject by ciscoguy01 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The DOJ only has jurisdiction over federal anti-trust laws. And while we may not like it, this does not actually breach any of those laws

    This does violate the Sherman Antitrust Act.
    Why do you say having only one GSM carrier in the entire country wouldn't result in less or no competition?

    GSM is the only network wherein your Iphone can talk and use data at the same time.
    I for one am against any more consolidation among huge companies. We have had it in banks, supermarkets, phone companies, we don't need any more. Do you want there to be only one or two banks, one or two wireless carriers, one or two supermarkets, and that's it? If you don't like it you can just not buy any. I want more competition, not less. More companies duking it out so I have choice.

    These wireless companies have spectrum licenses. They don't own those frequencies, they get to use them in the public interest.
    Remember when AT&T bought Cingular? They sold off the old AT&T network and frequencies to Tmobile. They kept the better performing Cingular Wireless network. Why did they do that? They had to. The Justice Department wouldn't let them buy their competition unless they divested those assets. That's fair. MORE competition, not less.

    AT&T and the baby bells were all separated out years ago in the AT&T Divestiture. Now, Pacbell turned into SBC which bought Bellsouth and others and finally bought their former parent AT&T, and whopee, they are all back together. It was a 25 year plan, they planned it all, the crooks.
    Now they want to take away more customer choice.

    Just say no. No to companies buying their competition. No to consolidations that limit competition. Especially where these companies have government licenses. It's just not right.

    --
    .