Slashdot Mirror


Iran Unveils Flying Saucer Using Old B-Movie Stock Photo

ChronoFish writes "The FARS news agency and a host of others are reporting on Iran claiming to have created a flying saucer-like drone. There is one small problem however. The press release photos from the state-run news service are from a movie."

20 of 174 comments (clear)

  1. Stupid slashdot editors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    TFA said it looks like a b-movie photo not that it IS from a movie.

    Its just an experimental UAV.

    1. Re:Stupid slashdot editors by Low+Ranked+Craig · · Score: 4, Informative
      --
      I still cannot find the droids I am looking for...
    2. Re:Stupid slashdot editors by BLAG-blast · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I notice other subtle attempts to discredit Iranian domestically produced equipment in the US/western press. When ever an "allied" power makes a press release or claim to have produced it's own version of something (a submarine, rocket, satellite, etc.), the press refers to it as "domestically produced". When Iran makes a press release or claim to have made the same thing, the press calls it "home made", which seems to imply it was name in somebodies garage at home (and it's comparable to things like the home made Chinese oil drum submarine).

      --
      M0571y H@rml355.
    3. Re:Stupid slashdot editors by ladoga · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think they just used a stock photo of UFO to illustrate the article. It's not supposed to be any more real than the Bill Gates with Borg apparatus picture that the Slashdot uses ever so often.

      The real one should probably look something like this: http://www.isna.ir/ISNA/PicView.aspx?Pic=Pic-1736235-1&Lang=E

    4. Re:Stupid slashdot editors by Ohrion · · Score: 3, Informative

      The Fars article ITSELF refers to it as being home-made. Article linked from the summary: http://english.farsnews.com/newstext.php?nn=8912250816.

    5. Re:Stupid slashdot editors by Thud457 · · Score: 3

      who built a what that looks like a what now?

      But, do, continue with the belittling of those silly fundamentalists accomplishments.

      Project Caret, anyone?

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    6. Re:Stupid slashdot editors by Jessified · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And upon what do you base your expert knowledge of EVERY non-US culture? You are broad brushing, based on what? Some Indian schools are more competitive than American schools, but you are trying to say that they just hand out As because it's culturally unacceptable in every non-US country to fail a student. WHAT?! Where do you come up with this stuff?

      The simple fact is, inferior societal practices are just that, especially when people are not willing to discuss and address.

      You would do well to start with the inferior practices of American culture. That's what these forums are about, right, according to you? Turning a critical eye on oneself? And you would have a valid point, if that's what you were doing. But you're not. You're turning a critical eye to every non-US culture and not to your own, which in and of itself demonstrates the very characteristics you criticize in others: namely, xenophobia and a superiority complex. As Marshall would say: "Lawyered."

      "Uh, I'm sorry, sir, but did you know that your ignorance is showing?"

  2. Did I miss something? by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I actually read the articles (yes, I know it's a sin) and I didn't see any reference to the picture they released ACTUALLY coming from a movie. The headlines *joke* that it *looks* like something from a B-movie, but the summary seems to take that seriously.

    The picture may be a mock-up, and the claimed craft may be a bunch of bullshit (with some of the crazy claims coming from Iran lately, who knows), but I don't see any news sources saying they actually stole the picture from a specific movie. I will say though, that, for a country completely devoid of homosexuals, they sure do have an unusual bent for the theatrical.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Did I miss something? by MoonBuggy · · Score: 4, Informative

      I just did exactly that search - it's used as the cover art on what appears to be a low budget straight-to-DVD documentary from 2008, but I very much doubt that's the original.

  3. /. News Network by Even+on+Slashdot+FOE · · Score: 3, Funny

    Our contributors never sully themselves with reading the article they are writing about, news at 11.

  4. Iran used to be called Persia... by jenningsthecat · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...so can we consider this an update of a 'flying carpet'?

    --
    'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
  5. Actual Picture by prakslash · · Score: 5, Informative

    The news agency used a stock photo. The actual photo (clickable) is here.

    1. Re:Actual Picture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      The actual photo is of a DraganFlyer X6 built by DraganFly in Saskatoon, Canada. I imagine the folks at DraganFly are busy answering questions this morning.

    2. Re:Actual Picture by ColdWetDog · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It looks like they strapped a couple blades to a charcoal grill.

      I'm wondering if this isn't a translation error - the real reference calls is a "cuadrotour" - not speaking whatever language it's supposed to be in (? Farsi) it's hard to interpret but it sure looks like "quad rotor" which is a much better description of the picture than 'flying saucer'.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    3. Re:Actual Picture by SethThresher · · Score: 3, Interesting

      To save you the trouble, I can tell you that I haven't gotten any mod points yet. I registered just after the update, and my Karma's positive right now.

      It's no big deal for me though at the moment, I don't feel like I've been here long enough to give it a proper job yet. I do have some friends that have started getting mod points like crazy though. Seriously, I know a guy who got mod four or five days in a row. He was tired of it by the end.

    4. Re:Actual Picture by headhot · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh no! The Iranians have discovered RC helicopter technology!

  6. Re:Old news? by Byzantine · · Score: 3, Funny

    Welcome to Slashdot. You must be new here.

  7. Re:Old news? by Sonny+Yatsen · · Score: 3, Funny

    Unlike the news.

    --
    My postings are informational and does not constitute legal advice. Act on it at your risk.
  8. another article by WhiteDragon · · Score: 3, Informative
    --
    Did you mount a military-grade, variable-focus MASER on an unlicensed artificial intelligence?
  9. This smells of propoganda. by CherniyVolk · · Score: 3, Informative

    Iran has scientists and engineers. They can build nuclear power plants, and other advanced technologies. The US would have you believe they are trying to build a nuclear bomb. Iran engineers and manufactures their own long range missiles, so they have the proverbial "rocket scientists" and apparently "competent" ones too.

    What's the point of all this?

    If you think, Iran, or any other country is unable to design and make their own "UAV", you have GOT to be drinking some serious kool-aid. They aren't stupid and they aren't dumb. Whoever from Iran reporting this story probably isn't allowed access to real photos, so they grab something from their little scrapbook and publish the story. Here in the US, we are so stupid to think that Iran scientists and government have nothing better to do than sit around a table and come up with stories to tell the world; for no purpose or goal at all?

    Stop acting retarded people. You want stupid stuff printed in American stories, look at Popular Mechanics. "Oh, but those are artists renditions..." what's the difference!?