Slashdot Mirror


P2P Music Downloads At All-Time Low

RedEaredSlider writes "According to research group NPD Group, the shuttering of Limewire's music file sharing service has led to a similar decline in the usage of such services throughout the US. The number has gone from a high of 16 percent in the fourth quarter of 2007 to just nine percent in the fourth quarter of 2010, right after Limewire shut down its file-sharing services due to a court order, when a federal judge sided with the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA)."

33 of 369 comments (clear)

  1. Give me good services by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Most people I know stopped downloading music after Spotify came a few years ago. It's an awesome service, and I gladly pay the monthly fee for it. Others take the ad supported version. But all in all, it did wonders to stop piracy.

    The same can be said about Steam. I currently own over 250 games on Steam and I gladly buy more, as it's easy, fast and just works. Yeah yeah, Steam might go down in 500 years, but you know what, I don't care. It's great for me now and I probably won't be playing those games then, if they even work with that generations systems. And if I really want to play some classic again, there will always be (and even increasingly) services similar to Good Old Games and console stores that sell old games cheaply and modified to work with current systems.

    Those two services have come to a point where it's easier and better to buy than pirate. Now just give me the same for movies and TV and I'm set. And I wont be making any stupid comments about how music labels are ripping off hard working artists (while forgetting the artists signed that contract themself) or how some item you buy should still be working 1000 years from now, because frankly I don't care. I just want a good working service where I can throw my money and get the product quickly and easily.

    And on a related note, I just bought Crysis 2, Portal 2 and Assassins Creed: Brotherhood from Steam. All great games (AssBro has amazingly fun multiplayer where everyone have targets to kill while also being someone elses target).

    1. Re:Give me good services by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I wish I had mod points because this is so on target.

      This is how the music business survived for decades. First of all it was so very expensive to have vinyl pressers (you notice people still did bootlegs though) and then with cassettes the quality loss was so bad it was better to buy new. If you give people a product that is better and easier than using B.T. or Limewire or whatever they WILL pay for it.

      All the RIAA innovates on though is how to infuriate and sue people...

    2. Re:Give me good services by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is also true... have you ever tried to properly license a song for a small product? They ask for thousands of dollars and treat you as if you're going to be making money on the project. They don't even like to call you back unless you're some super-huge corporation.

      Just put in a system that allows you to pay $20 to license a song for a personal-use video, youtube, whatever and people will pay that as well. In terms of licensing where someone is using a song for some creative work they generally want to stay within the law but when the only option that someone gives them to license a song is thousands of dollars they *can't* stay within the law without emptying their wallets completely.

    3. Re:Give me good services by mlts · · Score: 3, Informative

      Only downside is that Spotify isn't available in the US. Yes, you can proxy, but it takes gymnastics to get it working on your Android or iPhone, especially if you want a subscription.

      The only analog of that in the US would be Rhapsody and the Zune Marketplace. After my effort in trying to cancel Rhapsody service (when URGE [1] moved to them), I would hesitate on recommending them.

      [1]: MTV/Microsoft's URGE was one of the best subscription music services, although it had a relatively brief lifespan. It actually had decent band articles, showcased new bands and was good at recommending new bands.

    4. Re:Give me good services by tom229 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I agree. Correlation doesnt equal causation. It seems more likely that the market finally giving people want they want through services like grooveshark and itunes is the cause. Encforcing draconian bullshit on the worst p2p service available is ancillary.

      --
      If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
    5. Re:Give me good services by Stregano · · Score: 3, Informative

      You know you can go to mp3.com of Amazon or somewhere like that and get very good quality mp3's that you can purchase, right?

      --
      The world is how you make it
    6. Re:Give me good services by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 3, Funny

      Or (shocked look) make some of your own music.

      But don't be surprised if some other people copy it.

    7. Re:Give me good services by poetmatt · · Score: 3, Informative

      pandora works in the us. Paid version $36 a year, unlimited listening, basically it's spotify. Outside the US, use spotify. Problem solved.

    8. Re:Give me good services by Reapman · · Score: 5, Informative

      "Outside the US, use spotify"

      And for those of us outside Europe AND the US (such as Canada, although I'm sure other countries are in the same boat) NEITHER option works. However GrooveShark is a pretty good substitute I find..

  2. Crappy Music by denshao2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There isn't much left to download.

    1. Re:Crappy Music by h4rm0ny · · Score: 3, Funny

      I like the modern music

      I thought I was brave taking an anti-piracy stance on Slashdot. But daring to say that modern music isn't crap? You're going to really upset people now!

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
  3. And... by redemtionboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Music sales suddenly skyrocket right? Right?? Oh, they're still abysmal. Never mind then.

  4. Re:In related news... by mcmonkey · · Score: 4, Funny

    Editors, can we get a story about the $75 trillion P2P lawsuit soon plz?

    No.

    http://yro.slashdot.org/story/11/03/23/1930238/Limewire-Being-Sued-For-75-Trillion

  5. Correction by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There is a decline in music downloads that NPD Group is able to track.

    Think about that one for a second.

  6. shitty statistics by fwice · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The number has gone from a high of 16 percent in the fourth quarter of 2007 to just nine percent in the fourth quarter of 2010

    16% of what? the article doesn't mention.

    16% of the population? 16% of what it used to be?

    1. Re:shitty statistics by smelch · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah I came in here to say the same thing. 16% was the high in 2007, now its down to 9% so it can't be "of what it used to be"... somehow I doubt thats total population in the United States either, I would have expected it to be lower than that with all the old people. Mostly though I feel like any of these statistics have to be bullshit numbers to begin with. They may reflect what they measured, but I don't think anybody could accurately measure all P2P traffic of illegal songs and not snare other kinds of P2P and miss a huge chunk of song sharing as well.

      --
      If I can just reach out with my words and touch a butthole, just one, it will all be worth it.
    2. Re:shitty statistics by Captain+Spam · · Score: 5, Funny

      The number has gone from a high of 16% in the fourth quarter of 2007 to just $9,000 in the fourth quarter of 2010. This has been going down at a rate of 34W per day, and it can be expected to be down to 18 acres by the end of 2011. Analysts believe, however, that new P2P technology could see that number jump back up by 12kg before settling at 64 degrees Fahrenheit.

      --
      Demanding constant attention will only lead to attention.
  7. Was shutting down Limewire the real cause? by Itesh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Or are services like Pandora, Spotify, and even iTunes giving the consumers what they want at a price they want and thus helping to drive pirating down?

    1. Re:Was shutting down Limewire the real cause? by Gabrosin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This. Streaming services make it a lot easier to hear the music you want whenever you want without having to download OR pay for it. I'm partial to Grooveshark myself, but Pandora's pretty good too.

  8. Re:I smell RIAA trolls today... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ugh, both of you ACs, how can you listen to such terrible quality???

  9. All time low? by jolyonr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You mean lower than they were in, say, 1776?

    --


    Please read my Canon EOS tech blog at http://www.everyothershot.com
  10. Thank Amazon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I don't know about others, but since Amazon started selling unencrypted MP3s, I've stopped turning to illegal sources for music.

  11. Re:In related news... by Kjella · · Score: 5, Funny

    I know, it's soooo time for a dupe. The editors have gotten really sloppy about it, nothing like in the good old days.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  12. Re:I smell RIAA trolls today... by thehostiles · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'd tell you a joke about audiophiles, but you wouldn't appreciate it as text instead of a 5000 kbps sound file wilth an 8000 dollar stereo.

  13. Re:I smell RIAA trolls today... by Anthony+Mouse · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There's no way this number is true. I bet it was paid for by the RIAA's lawyers so they can say, "See! The lawsuits are working!!!"

    That or they're just measuring it wrong because they're idiots. The article is highly unclear -- 16% of what? If people start using sneakernet and private trackers that they don't have access to measure, did the amount of sharing go down? Or did it go up because downloading 1TB of music from a private tracker once and then passing it around a school or an office on an external hard drive is way more efficient than sucking it through the straw of US broadband a thousand different times?

  14. Re:How about the fact.... by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You don't really want original music. You want music that sounds like something else you like.

    There is no reason why a mix of two songs that suck can't be fantastic. I don't like to eat cabbage or lactobacillus but I love sauerkraut. "Fusion cuisine" is usually an excuse for some stupid food concept that is being pushed on you but once in a while it results in nirvana, like the potato, pesto, and garlic pizza at Escape from NY. Potato on a pizza sounds stupid until you eat it. (Of course, the stuff is also a poster child for thisiswhyyourefat...)

    Anyway I'm not into Jay-Z and the number of Beatles songs I think are worth a crap can be counted on one hand but DJ Danger Mouse's Grey Album is one of the best things I've ever heard. So basically I think you are being ridiculous.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  15. Re:How about the fact.... by mlts · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have to disagree about "modern music" being crap.

    The difference is that in the past, good bands got the spotlight and were heavily promoted.

    These days, what gets the promotion dollars are cookie cutter bands who wouldn't even be able to croak out anything near a melody if it wasn't for Antares's Auto-Tune product. Why do they get promoed? Because it is cheaper to hype some naiive and malleable stars for a few years, then find some new meat when the news stories about their rehab and DUI misadventures hit the press.

    There is still good music being made. However, you won't be finding it on the radio (unless you happen to have an independent station). It will be through services like Pandora, last.fm, and other places, not to mention Web forums and word of mouth that one finds bands that don't suck.

    Trust me; there are a lot of new bands that are worth the ear; they just don't have the huge money behind them that Justin Beiber and Ke$ha do.

  16. Re:How about the fact.... by Hatta · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Right now? Mainstream music has utterly sucked since the late 90s. If you want some quality music over P2P, check out bt.etree.org.

    Personally, my downloading is at an all time low because I have everything I want. I pass up free leech at the private trackers I'm on, simply because I wouldn't have the time to use it anyway.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  17. Oh good... by Graham+J+-+XVI · · Score: 3, Funny

    I guess we'll be seeing that huge uptick in music sales anytime now...

    *holds breath*

  18. Still miss one feature by clickclickdrone · · Score: 4, Informative

    Back in the day pre torrents etc, the best thing for me was searching for a track then being able to browse that person's hard disk for their other shared tracks. I used to find all manner of cool stuff I never knew existed or artists I'd never heard of. I'd *never* have bought them via iTunes or whatever because I simply didn't know they were there. This happened a lot with people from other countries who typically had their local bands mixed in there that you'd never find in your own country. I've lost count of the amount of albums/tracks I've bought because of that ability to dig around. Sure, some sites try and offer 'if you liked this, what about that?' but it rarely produces anything of note and misses out completely on stuff that's way outside your normal listening area. These days, most of my 'discovering' is done via obscure podcasts but it's not very efficient.

    --
    I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
  19. What day comes after today? by Tackhead · · Score: 3, Funny

    Or (shocked look) make some of your own music.

    So this is all your fault!

    (Backstory: Her parents paid $2000 to a couple of guys at the music industry's equivalent of a vanity publisher to pipe their kid's vocals through autotune and spend an hour doing a couple of video shoots with her and her friends. Pretty good testament to what can be done with modern technology on a shoestring budget, but also a pretty good testament to "just because you can, doesn't mean you should".)

    But don't be surprised if some other people copy it.

    Nothing wrong with copying. That's what remix culture is all about. The song itself may be execrable, but the explosion of creativity it's inspired is nothing short of awesome.

  20. Re:I smell RIAA trolls today... by reeno49 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I just use iTunes, honestly. Sure, the quality isn't as good as it absolutely could be, but it's leaps and bounds beyond the average mp3 I used to find in crappy malware infested software like Limewire. I've been buying all my music from there over the last few years. Early on the DRM was bothersome (especially when I wanted to listen to my music on my Linux box, though it's easy enough to get around that) but now they've removed that. I get the idea that pirating is "better" because it's free, but at this point in my life I'm willing to spend money on the things that I enjoy, especially when I look at it as an investment

    1. Find music I like
    2. Support the artist by buying their music
    3. Artist makes money, has the means to create more music
    4. ???
    5. Profit! (Enjoy more music from the artists I like)

    Why is it then that I'm looked at like an extra-terrestrial being when I tell people I pay for things?

    Sure, not ALL of the money goes to the artists, but that's not within my control. Paying for the music gets the artist a piece of the pie while pirating gives them nothing.

    Eventually, artists will smarten up and start selling their own music (see: Radiohead) off of their own websites and get even bigger pieces of the pie.

    --
    I should have been a girl, with the way I can dance... my moves are amazing!
  21. Re:How about the fact.... by dkleinsc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    (If they were musicians, they would create their own original music)

    That's not really true though. For starters, the line between "original" and "unoriginal" music isn't very clear. Which of these groups is creating original music?
    - The Boston Symphony Orchestra playing Beethoven's Ninth Symphony with a fantastic new interpretation
    - A group playing Beethoven's Ninth Symphony on kazoos
    - A disco group who took Beethoven's Ninth Symphony and rewrote it with a dance beat
    - A DJ who took the BSO's recording of Beethoven's Ninth Symphony and made a great dance beat with it
    - An MC who took the DJ's great dance beat and busted some rhymes to it.
    - A folk singer who goes to some obscure area of Hungary, learns a popular folk song from that area, translates the lyrics, and records and popularizes it in the US
    - A second folk singer who adds 10 new verses to that same folk song

    All of them took a musical legacy, added some twists or nuances to it, and made something new. But in the RIAA's worldview, the DJ, MC, and second folk singer did something thoroughly horrible.

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/