Google Faces Privacy Audits For Next 20 Years

Hugh Pickens writes "The San Francisco Chronicle reports that Google has reached a settlement with the Federal Trade Commission over Buzz, a social blogging service the company introduced through Gmail last year. The deal will require that Google have regular, independent privacy audits for the next 20 years. Buzz drew heavy criticism at launch in February 2010 for a glaring privacy flaw. When users turned it on, it suggested people to follow based on their Gmail contacts list and their most frequent email partners. 'Although Google led Gmail users to believe that they could choose whether or not they wanted to join the network, the options for declining or leaving the social network were ineffective,' says the FTC. Along with the 20 year oversight, the settlement also says that Google is barred from misrepresenting privacy or confidentiality of the user information it collects, Google must obtain user consent before sharing their information with third parties if it changes its privacy policy, and Google must establish and maintain a comprehensive privacy program."

Comments

facebook

[SpiralSpirit]

I'd suggest the same with facebook too. I'm not too sure the legality of presenting 12 year old with changes to user agreements, misleading games that collect your info, etc.

Re:facebook

[MickyTheIdiot]

This is stupid in light of the fact that Facebook is openly hostile to idea of user privacy and Google actually seems to care, at least a little bit.

Good

[gman003]

Honestly, these kinds of things should be mandatory for any large company with that much personal information. Regular independent audits? Sounds like the kind of oversight we need. Can't lie about how private your info is? Sounds like something that should be a law. Need to get consent again after changing the terms? Again, I'm surprised you could get away with it before.

Now let's just get these things applied everywhere else like Google. Facebook, for one, deserves even more oversight.

Google got hit before Facebook?

[KlomDark]

Not fair. Google's been a lot better at protecting info than Zuckerberg's famous pig.

Re:Google, meet Samsung

[lgw]

Evil or not, it's pretty cool to see the US Government siding with consumer privacy against a major corporation. Is this a sign of an attitude change, or merely a sign that Google is (relatively) new and hasn't figured out who they need to bribe yet?