Slashdot Mirror


Threatening YouTube Video Lands Man In Prison

wiredmikey writes "Norman LeBoon of Philadelphia was sentenced to 24 months in prison for his production and transmission of a YouTube video over the Internet last March containing a threat to injure and kill a United States Congressman. Following his arrest, LeBoon told federal agents that Eric Cantor is 'pure evil'; 'will be dead'; and that 'Cantor's family is suffering because of his father's wrath.'"

10 of 243 comments (clear)

  1. Breaking news... by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Threatening people is against the law. Film at eleven.

    1. Re:Breaking news... by fishbowl · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, this is generally only true if the threat is against a government official and if a reasonable person believes that the target has a reasonable apprehension of the threat being carried out. There are state and local laws covering stuff like "terroristic threats" and all kinds of civil statutes, but in order to rise to the level of a federal criminal rap, the threat has to be credible, specific, and targeted at a government official. This is why Pat Robertson got away with making a hit request against Hugo Chavez, for instance.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    2. Re:Breaking news... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What exactly is the cop gaining or losing by not taking care of the poor verses the rich?

      I really cannot fathom a thing that would make your statement remotely true. Perhaps if you said more serious threats get more attention or something else. I don't know, please explain.

      OK. Lemme 'splain this to you.

      In large metropolitan areas, police chiefs are elected. To be elected they need money. To get money(legally), they need to be connected. Money and influence are gained by staying in the good graces of people with disposable income to donate.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  2. Re:meanwhile.... by hedwards · · Score: 4, Funny

    As others have suggested, the difference is that unlike the GOP, the Democratic party doesn't encourage, endorse or suggest violence as a means of solving the political problems int he US. Or have you forgotten about that? The various incidents were pretty well covered by the media.

  3. Re:meanwhile.... by d3ac0n · · Score: 4, Informative

    Care to cite examples? If you can't, you *are* trolling.

    That's because he *is* trolling.

    Here are two recent and telling examples of why the troll is wrong:

    Exhibit A: Crazy person goes on a rampage and shoots a Democrat politician in the head, nearly killing her.

    Media response: Multiple week long circus trying to blame Sarah Palin for the actions of a loon.

    Police response: Local police Chief spends more time in front of the camera railing against the Tea Party than he does investigating the attack.

    End result: Eventually the investigation is completed by the FBI. The crazy person was crazy and acted alone, uninfluenced by any mainstream political thought or either party. Media continues blame game against Palin unabated.

    Exhibit B: After a week spent trashing the capital building in Madison, Leftist thugs send multiple death threats against Wisconsin GOP members and their families.

    Media response: Nonexistent outside Fox and the con-alt-media.

    Police response: 1 month later and they have ONE person in custody.

    End Result: Still playing out.

    These are only the most recent examples. I could come up with many more. The point is, in public life in general and in the media in particular, Dems are generally given a pass and let slide when it comes to misbehavior. But the same behavior done by a GOP member elicits WEEKS of scathing coverage with the clear and obvious intent of the absolute destruction of said GOP politician.

    Not to say that ANY politician should be allowed to slide when they do wrong. They should be absolutely held accountable. But it would be nice, for a change, if we got the same anti-corruption zeal from the MSM when the bad guy or gal is a 'D' as we do when he or she is an 'R'.

    --
    Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
  4. A Fine Expression by macraig · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This guy might have benefitted from a quip emblazoned on a plaque my grandpappy had on his wall:

    It's often a fine expression of the language to simply say nothing.

    Perhaps I'll send Norman the plaque to decorate his jail cell.

  5. BULLSHIT ALERT ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "Threatening normal, everyday citizens? Police care less because their ticket quotas are more important."

    WRONG.

    You have no idea what you are talking about.

    I, on the other hand, do. And that's because I have actual experience.

    Communicating threats has never been taken more seriously than it is now.

    I spent 30 months in prison for this crime. If someone believes your opinion
    is an accurate representation of how law enforcement deals with this stuff, they
    could find themselves in a world of shit.

  6. Re:Wow by ae1294 · · Score: 4, Funny

    That was my thought. Cantor is evil, but that's no reason to threaten him. As rewarding as it would be, you can't just string up politicians for being evil.

    I don't recall reading anything in the constitution that forbids "stringing up politicians" so isn't it then left up to the states? Also I don't recall reading any law forbidding it in my state nor local governments so doesn't that mean it's left up for us to decide? :-)

  7. Re:meanwhile.... by Americano · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Actually he makes a very good point. 18 Wisconsin congressmen reported death threats after the collective bargaining bill was passed there recently. Yet, you actually do have to go looking to find anything about it on most nationwide news sites. That link above is from a daily newspaper in a small town in central Wisconsin. I'm surprised I wasn't able to at easily find a wire service story about the death threats, given the hysterical nature of the rest of the coverage of the issue.

    considering that CNN did report that death threats have led to at least one set of charges, it's hard to imagine that Fox News was just making shit up about the threats, as you're trying to suggest.