Slashdot Mirror


What Happens If You Get Sucked Out of a Plane?

astroengine writes "We've all wondered about it. When flying at 30,000ft, you look around the cramped economy class cabin thinking 'I wonder if I'd survive being sucked out of this plane if a hole, say, just opened above my head?' That's probably around the time that you should fasten your seat belt. According to medical experts interviewed by Discovery News in the wake of the Southwest Airlines gaping hole incident, the rapid depressurization, low oxygen levels and freezing cold would render you unconscious very quickly. Assuming you don't get chopped in half as you exit through the hole and hit the tail, you'd be long dead before you hit the ground. Nice."

19 of 327 comments (clear)

  1. This has sadly happened... by Aphrika · · Score: 4, Informative

    A flight attendant was killed when she was blown out of Aloha Airlines flight 243 back in 1988.

    The plane landed with a huge section of fuselage missing, but the other passengers survived. Not a trip I'd like to be on, and makes the Southwest incident look minor in comparison.

    1. Re:This has sadly happened... by Aphrika · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I was commenting on the survivability of it, not the cause. In the case of the Aloha incident, it's interesting to note the high number of injuries to survivors who were in the plane, no doubt some were caused by environmental rather than physical trauma.

      In any case, planes are design with blow out panels, there's some speculation as to the exact cause of 243, but nevertheless it had a huge impact on aircraft design and safety.

    2. Re:This has sadly happened... by AHuxley · · Score: 5, Informative

      Also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Airways_Flight_5390 the left windscreen failed at 17300 feet and the captain was sucked 1/2 out.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    3. Re:This has sadly happened... by damburger · · Score: 4, Informative

      He survived, but only just. Until the paramedics got there the crew were convinced he was long dead.

      --
      If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
  2. It's pretty well known... by Lord_of_the_nerf · · Score: 4, Funny

    ....you spend six confusing years on an island with a bunch of strangers and a polar bear.

    Hopefully you adapt quickly and learn to hate flashbacks and flashforwards.

  3. They must have overlooked this by houghi · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  4. What about long fall survivors ? by Pastis · · Score: 4, Interesting


    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Magee
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivan_Chisov

    a bit different (and controversal) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vesna_Vulović

  5. Re:Not really by cpghost · · Score: 4, Informative

    Those who walked up the Everest had time to depressurize very slowly. Every diver will tell you what happens if you depressurize too fast.

    --
    cpghost at Cordula's Web.
  6. Re:No by mr100percent · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As I said in an earlier post, Aloha Airlines had 20 feet of walls and ceiling suddenly tear off the fuselage. The only death was a flight attendant who was in the aisle at the time, I'm sure the 700 mile an hour wind and immediate turbulence is what made her fall out, not some sudden pressure change of only 8.5psi. Mythbusters tested it, even detonating explosives on the window in the pressurized plane didn't knock Buster out of his seat.

    Hollywood put this idea in everyone's minds that everyone gets sucked out into space, like Goldfinger, if you shoot out a window on a plane. Just doesn't happen that way.

  7. Re:I've actually thought about this by St.Creed · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I remember a story of WW2 where a crewmember from a flying fortress (tailgunner I believe) couldn't reach his chute due to fire raging on the plane. So he decided to jump rather than burn. During the fall he got unconscious and fell into a pine forest covered with heavy snow. He survived with minor injuries.

    Another case was a parachute jumper who got tangled in the cords, chute produced some drag but impact was still way above 100 Km/hr. Fortunately it was a former swamp and the ground tended to give way a bit. Everything fracturable was fractured on the impact points (she even managed to get those points correct as per training) but the woman remained conscious and survived.

    I think though that when you drop out at 30.000 feet you will lose your consciousness quite soon and don't have much say in what happens. Which will usually be for the best.

    --
    Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
  8. Re:I've actually thought about this by St.Creed · · Score: 4, Informative
    --
    Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
  9. It ain't necessarily so by Simon+Brooke · · Score: 4, Interesting

    According to several of the police officers and volunteer helpers at the Lockerbie incident (Pan Am flight 103) whom I have personally spoken to, a substantial number of the passengers were not dead when initially found, although none survived. The cockpit came down in a field 150 metres from the house of a friend of mine. In the opinion of those witnesses what killed the passengers was injuries sustained in their impact with the ground, not the fall itself.

    --
    I'm old enough to remember when discussions on Slashdot were well informed.
    1. Re:It ain't necessarily so by advocate_one · · Score: 4, Informative

      I can vouch for this as I was there that night and several days after as one of the search parties tasked with finding and marking the positions of the occupants... not fun at all... very messy.

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
  10. Re:Not really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We're talking about like half of one atmosphere, here. I don't think you're going to get the bends.

  11. Re:Not really by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You don't get bonus points for "but he survived to feel the impact" on your autopsy report.

    There is no effing achievement for that!

    Meh, I'd rather not be put down in my sleep like an ailing pet, thanks. More seriously though, the will to survive is probably the single most important factor in any survival situation, closely followed by knowledge of what to do in your environment. Its shocking how many people just give up, lie down and die, sometimes when help was close at hand. Keeping your spirits up is vital, even if you've just been sucked out of a plane! :D

  12. Re:Not really by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'd rather be thinking "Hey I can see my house from here, wheeeeeeeee" than spending my last few minutes in blind animal terror. Sure, the last thing going through my mind would probably be my feet, but that's no reason to quit!

  13. Re:Not really by rgbatduke · · Score: 5, Interesting

    But as soon as you got to low altitudes, opening up your arms a la skydivers would very rapidly take you back to terminal velocity for that position, which can range from 38 to 54 km/sec. I like HELP (the posture) until you get down to ten thousand feet or so, facing flat down splayed and with your jackets and clothing as spread out as possible to try to get your speed down to the better side of 40 m/sec and for the rest of the way down looking for a place that might cushion the impact, and steering for it to the extent you can manage. A fair number of people have survived free falls from airplanes high enough that it doesn't matter, terminal velocity was easily reached, a very few of them so lightly injured that they can even "walk away", although more commonly they barely survive and that only if medical help is immediately at hand.

    Surviving here is like winning a game of egg-toss where you are the egg. You need to spread your de-acceleration out over the longest distance possible in impact. The equation involved (assuming uniform acceleration) is v^2 = 2 a H where H is the stopping distance and a is the acceleration experienced while stopping. Humans have survived a \approx 100 g, or a stopping distance of roughly one meter for an initial velocity of 45 m/sec (100 mph). They do better, of course, if the stopping distance is 2-3 meters, or if one is travelling more slowly -- the square means that a comes down rapidly with v so that stopping from 38 km/sec (roughly 80 mph, terminal velocity if you have e.g. a large overcoat and "parachute" it to slow your rate of fall) over 2 meters is only 37 g's of acceleration. a > 50 g makes it pretty unlikely to survive.

    So what are good targets? Hay rolls out in fields -- good for a bullseye although you need a pretty big one in a soft, plowed field to be carried away with a ruptured spleen and subdural hematoma but alive. Tightly packed pine forest -- acually better, if you avoid skewering directly onto a tree and your head and kidneys take the punching from the branches as they break, because you might slow down over 5 to 10 meters, where the latter reduces a to 20g, easily survivable and you could even walk away from it . Big bushes of any sort better than hard ground, the bigger (taller) and denser the better. Spongy loam better than concrete (maybe a peat bog?). Deep water better than normal ground, but...

    Water carries its own risks. It is an incompressible fluid and quite dense and you can't breathe it when unconscious, so hitting it in, say, a belly-flopper will just cause you to pop. Hitting water that is foamy on top (so that the water contains a lot of air bubbles that can act as a shock absorber) is better than hitting still water. Hitting water that has any sort of "splash" underway on the surface is good, as it might let you get a foot into the water on your way down and start to push the water sideways out of the way in some sort of turbulent flow instead of having to just push it all aside in front of you. The usual prescription for survival here is to fall splayed until quite close, then go straight up vertical, feet first, toes pointed (streamline), arms over head, and clench that sphincter for the 100 mph enema! You'll probably break your legs on the impact, but the rest of the shock will be transmitted up your spine, which is actually quite strong, and if your head is at the right angle your spine may not be jammed up into your brain or your head may not whip down so hard that it snaps your neck. In that case, if you aren't knocked out and don't mind dog paddling with possibly splintered leg bones and broken ankles, hey, you might survive long enough for a nearby boat to get you out.

    So what are the odds? Miniscule, of course. Teensy. Small indeed. Perhaps not much better than if you do nothing at all and let luck determine if you hit that perfect pine forest or the trash pile at the foam rubber factory. But hey, it's something to do on the way down besides just going "Oooooh shiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiitttttt....." and watching the ground reach up to swat you into oblivion.

    rgb

    --
    Even when the experts all agree, they may well be mistaken. --- Bertrand Russell.
  14. Re:Not really by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yes, that's how Outward Bound got started (the realization that numerous Merchant Marine crews torpedoed in WWII were dying when they really could have survived with training and a better mental attitude). However, the physics of floating in a lifeboat and bailing out at 30,000 feet without gear are slightly different.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  15. Re:Sign, discovery showing its high standards agai by Ogive17 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Another incident involved a pilot being SUCKED out through the window in front of him (showing just how wrong the DISCOVERY mythbuster program is in its logic and research). He was SUCKED out and exposed to the cold and lack of oxygen for a long time AND survived.

    What happened to the pilot and what the Mythbusters did are two completely different things. By the way, don't you remember when one of the front windows of the plane they were using blew out and sucked everything from the cockpit, including seat cushions, out the window? But that wasn't their test, their test was if a bullet hole would cause catastrophic failure, which it didn't.

    The simple fact is that Myth Busters is a great example of bad science where they ignore recorded evidence and then twist the experiment until it doesn't resemble to claim at all. The clearest example was the "myth" of Jaws being able to hit a boat. So they tested the myth of a super sized shark hitting a boat, by using a smaller shark because Jaws was an unrealistic size... well? That is the myth, the myth is NOT real shark doing something real shark don't do.

    Do you know how silly that is? I guess they should next test if humans can fly since Super Man can do it.... but somehow they need to find a real superhuman first. What could would it be for a fantasy shark do fantasy damage? Their test was if a great white could actually do that type of damage. In order to test something worthwhile, they tried to make the scenario as realistic as they could.

    I'm not going to say Mythbusters does everything right all the time. But your are trying to compare apples to oranges with your examples.

    --
    "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."