Slashdot Mirror


OpenOffice.org To Be Given Back To the Community

An anonymous reader writes "Oracle has stated they will give back the OpenOffice.org productivity suite to the community. Edward Screven, Oracle's Chief Corporate Architect, said the company intends upon 'working immediately with community members to further the continued success of Open Office.' Because there was a 'breadth of interest in free personal productivity applications,' the company believes the OpenOffice.org project would be 'best managed by an organization focused on serving that broad constituency on a non-commercial basis.'"

47 of 219 comments (clear)

  1. Translation: They couldn't "monetize" it. by mmell · · Score: 4, Funny
    Can't make money off it? It isn't competing with something we already offer? Get rid of it!

    Oh, and could somebody ban "slashushi"? Some troll out there is generating slashdot ID's just to post pictures of himself.

  2. Read between the lines by broknstrngz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It actually says: the code is a mess and we don't have any customers that would even remotely consider using it. So there, have it back and get off our lawn.

    1. Re:Read between the lines by jd · · Score: 4, Informative

      I suspect it's more a "what do we do with a brand name with a collapsing value and no product?"

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  3. Re:Phew. by ae1294 · · Score: 2, Funny

    That is all.

    No that is not all.... IT'S A TRAP!!!!

  4. LibreJava by GeneralSecretary · · Score: 2

    Cool, let's try this with Java. LibreJava anyone?

    1. Re:LibreJava by medv4380 · · Score: 2

      Don't forget Red Hat and their Tea

  5. BAN: "slashboot (2042376)". Troll by mmell · · Score: 2

    Posting your picture online again?

  6. Too late Oracle Bye Bye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have already uninstalled and deployed LibreOffice across our 500 client org.

    I will not keep bouncing about.

    We now fully back LibreOffice and will continue to do so. We will not backtrack back to OO until the next time Oracle change their mind.

    Bye Bye Oracle.

  7. Re:Translation: They couldn't "monetize" it. by ArhcAngel · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I suspect the mass brain drain of former Sun employees has a lot to do with it as well. It's hard to support your customers if everybody who knows how to support it has left the building. This just might be an olive branch to keep some of the talent from flying the coop long enough to get new blood up to speed.

    --
    "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
  8. The OpenOffice name/brand by Bloodwine77 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Does it mean we can rename LibreOffice to OpenOffice now? Or are the two forks going to continue separate lines of development?

    1. Re:The OpenOffice name/brand by Mikkeles · · Score: 2

      Well, I think it should be called "SweetOffice"!

      (because it's an office suite; get it!
        er, never mind, I'll go away now)

      --
      Great minds think alike; fools seldom differ.
  9. let me translte for ya by poetmatt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Actually, more like "wah! guys! please come back! we promise we won't spite the community!"

    This doesn't mean shit unless they change the bylaws which give oracle complete control over openoffice with the ability to nullify the community basically.

    1. Re:let me translte for ya by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 2, Informative

      Why would they need "the community" when most of the actual paid developers are still at Oracle. The people who left were mostly auxiliary people who were easily replaceable.

    2. Re:let me translte for ya by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 5, Interesting

      If what you say is true. Then why is LibreOffice already so much better than OpenOffice ever was?

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    3. Re:let me translte for ya by 10101001+10101001 · · Score: 2

      Yes, it's quite easy to make it the case that one's official line is mostly developed by one's own employees if one choses to incorporate one's own employees' contributions over outsiders' contributions. This is precisely why the Go-OO/LibreOffice fork formed and is precisely why when Oracle changed its rules to be even more restrictive than Sun was there was enough of a push that people wanted LibreOffice to be the official fork.

      In short, trying to deny "the community" as an important part of OpenOffice's future really does miss the big picture under some bizarre idea that OpenOffice is closed source and Oracle has full say on the future of the code base. The trademark may die. The brand may die. But, that doesn't mean the program won't live on if Oracle doesn't want to be a part of it.

      The real question is for Oracle's future in the long term. Who wants to buy products from a company who is so willing to let a trademark and a brand die just because it's not readily profitable? It's the Oracle brand that keeps people coming back to pay them money, even more than their products themselves. That is, they've developed a reputation which is why people haven't simply switched to a free alternative to most their products. Even if most of those free alternatives were a failure to deliver, Oracle would be crippled if enough people left them for a few years. Now perhaps killing an office suite brand doesn't matter to people because Oracle does databases, but Oracle's future might not be databases. Consider how Microsoft being so stuck on the Windows brand instead of the more general concept of developing and maintaining the Microsoft brand and sub-brands is hurting them (Windows Phone, Windows Tablet, and Microsoft Zune).

      --
      Eurohacker European paranoia, gun rights, and h
  10. Too late. by smcn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've already switched to LibreOffice.

  11. Oracle Lost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They are trying to take the Document Foundation and Libre Office brands now.

    Do not fall for Oracle's scam. Back LibreOffice and the Document Foundation.

    Show Oracle how we play the game. Kill Oracle Open Office by not using it.

    1. Re:Oracle Lost by Ashe+Tyrael · · Score: 3, Interesting

      To be fair, one of the things the Libreoffice peeps have done is started going to town on the "this is awful/redundant code, can you help us rewrite it" thing, complete with one of the nicest ideas I've seen, http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Easy_Hacks

      Basically, a list of stuff that needs doing, but they don't necessarily have time for, but is easy enough that a beginner/lower level coder can do the grunt work. Eases people into working with a big project.

      --
      "How fine you look when dressed in rage."
  12. Re:Translation: They couldn't "monetize" it. by Asic+Eng · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Be that as it may: that's good news. OpenOffice is a well established (and well chosen) name it will be good to have it back for the OSS community.

  13. Re:Outcry by Luyseyal · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Heh, no kidding. Every time I see it in dselect (shut up, I'm old), I think "What's lib reoffice, oh wait, that's libre office".

    -l

    --
    Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
  14. LibreOffice has better icons by Zandamesh · · Score: 5, Informative

    The first thing I though when I installed it was: woah, these icons look awesome!

    --
    Lo and behold, for I am a sig!
    1. Re:LibreOffice has better icons by jo_ham · · Score: 2

      I agree, the original OpenOffice icon, especially on OS X, looks very nice - the sweeping line separating the two shades of blue and the two stylised birds. It's one of the icons that I "keep" in my Dock, unlike some truly ugly app icons that are only there when the apps are running that I launch from the Apps springloaded folder.

      I wanted to loved LibreOffice but the name and icon are... suboptimal. I think this makes me shallow, but I like my UI to look good, especially if I am staring at it for long periods. There's no reason for modern app icons to look poor - and it's not just open projects that fall victim to this, commercial apps are just as guilty.

  15. Re:Goatse by ae1294 · · Score: 3, Funny

    but not for crap like Goatse - everyone on the planet must be bored of it by now but it's hardly going to hurt you

    Are you sure about that? Some people may have been scarred for life.

    A -1 goatse mod would be a start.. but nooooo change is bad unless it slows down the site or is shiny...

  16. Re:Forsks work aren't they by Anon-Admin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You dont have to blacklist the URL. Just strip all url's from any post tagged as TROLL. Should take care of the issue.

  17. Let them keep their oO.o fork by symbolset · · Score: 2

    It is a trap, a trick to try and salvage some tiny remnant of influence now that they've lost control of the mindshare and developers.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  18. Woah by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2

    Who are you, and what have you done with Oracle?

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  19. Please, let's keep LibreOffice brand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Even if Oracle gives OO.org brand to the comunnity, I think it's a great opportunity to stick with LibreOffice and leave behind all karma associated with the OpenOffice age.

  20. Re:Forsks work aren't they by ae1294 · · Score: 2

    You dont have to blacklist the URL. Just strip all url's from any post tagged as TROLL.

    Should take care of the issue.

    Agreed, I like my -1 Goatse mod idea but your idea would work.. How about instead of stripping the link totally it just strips the html link bit out and leaves the text so if someone wants to see a gaping hole they still can manually copy/paste.

  21. what a coincidence.. by Jeek+Elemental · · Score: 5, Funny

    the story before this one was "Students Build Life-Sized Trojan Horse For Class Project"

  22. A no win Battle by TrueSatan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Oracle (and Sun before them) were, prior to the fork that created LibreOffice, able to prevent the additional features that were in their commercial Ooo derivative from being added to Ooo itself and thus had a product that they could monetise. Novel sponsored GoOo and that then offered code Sun (and then Oracle) would not allow into Ooo (mostly to "protect" those additional, commercial derivative only, features) and this was what first put the skids on Oracle's continuing support of Ooo. Once LibreOffice merged the GoOo code into their Ooo fork there was no real point in Oracle attempting to sustain hope for their commercial derivative...it has simply taken them a while to acknowledge its demise. As there's now no money in it for them their "handing to the community" of Ooo means little and may well come with the existing bylaws of Ooo that will preclude a merger with the Libreoffice fork. Out of spite alone (WaaaaaI If I can't play with my ball I'll take it away so nobody can play with it.) I can't see them making a merger of the two into a possibility.

    1. Re:A no win Battle by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

      In that case OO.org will simply disappear into obscurity. Sure, for a while name recognition will keep in going, but in the end it's toast. I've got some other big projects on the fly, but likely in June I'll be moving the thirty workstations we have running OO.org over to LibreOffice, mainly for OOXML support (though it's still far from perfect). Once we're down that path, there's no way in hell I'm going to move back to OO.org, even if they roll in the GoOo features, simply because I've got better things to do. So if OO.org is serious about keeping guys like me on, they'd better roll in those changes damned fast.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  23. Re:"Prank" Window by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 2

    Here's the page source.

    Wouldn't this be like a vulnerability? Doesn't seem to work on Opera though.

    var yBase = screen.width / 2;
    var xBase = screen.height / 2;
    var delay = 10;
    var step = .2;
    var currStep = 0;
    var Xpos = screen.width / 4;
    var Ypos = screen.height / 2;
    var j=0;

    function start() {
            window.resizeTo(500,500);

            movew0w();

    }

    function movew0w() {
            for ( j = 0 ; j

    The above fine work of art is © the Goatse guy.
    Thanks to goatse.ru for hosting it.

    setTimeout("start()", 1000);

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  24. Someone at Oracle just had an "oh crap" moment by TheSpoom · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And this is how it got expressed. LibreOffice people, just keep doing your thing. You don't need corporate control.

    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
  25. Clingy Ex-Husband by dcollins · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah, it feels like a clingy, manipulative ex-husband. "This time I'll change", etc., etc.

    --
    We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
  26. Re:Translation: They couldn't "monetize" it. by fermion · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think oracle deserves some credit for this decision. They looked at their core mission, they looked at their resources, and discovered they had a product that was not a good fit. In the case of Sun, openoffice.org was a small part of a solution for the desktop. For Oracle it was not. It was an asset that may or may not be worth something. It could have helped out the Java asset. It did not. So they let it go. They could have made an attempt to make money off it, and let the brand flounder and die. They did not. I think Oracle, unlike some tech companies, does not just randomly try things and let's products die, to customer detriment, when something does not work. They are pros. They have customers that us openoffice.org, that use the brand to give them some protection, and this gift was for them.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  27. Jenkins / Hudson by tomhermann · · Score: 2

    I wish they would've taken this approach with the Hudson CI server rather than fragmenting the community.

    http://jenkins-ci.org/content/about-jenkins-ci

  28. Re:Outcry by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

    You do realize that now that you've shown it, everyone who has read this comment is going to read it that way? You've just scarred many /. readers for life!

  29. Re:Translation: They couldn't "monetize" it. by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think this is more like "We really screwed up with the community, and now let's do the only thing possible to make them forget what turkeys we've been".

  30. Best thing about LibreOffice... by Culture20 · · Score: 2

    It's not named LibreOffice.org.

  31. Re:Translation: They couldn't "monetize" it. by SomePgmr · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Respectfully, I think you give them too much credit. Sounds suspiciously like, "We're not going to make anything on this, throw 'em a bone. We'll focus on Oracle Cloud Office and avoid allocating valuable resources to this thing in the back of the shipping container." Though that could just be how the release and write-up were worded.

  32. I question a 1% difference is "so much better" by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 4, Interesting

    why is LibreOffice already so much better than OpenOffice ever was?

    Listen, I tried open office from 1.04.

    It wasn't quite there yet.

    But as of 3.00 I went to OO and had no need to look back.

    I even had a large series of Word 1998/2000/2003 documents which would not work in Word 2010 and 2007. No explanation-no error message - they just hung.

    I loaded them into OO (which I'd used since as early as 1.04 to fix broken Word documents which crashed word by loading and resaving them) and the problem was apparent. The bounding boxes on the artwork was overlapping the tables. These did not display in Word so it would have been nearly impossible to fix.

    So.. I bit the bullet and converted my 100 page document from Word to OO. It took about 8 hours. I got to learn about what the "little grey lines" meant and about styles. I figured out the replacement for techniques like "styleref".

    So then I converted my next 130 page document. It took 2 hours.

    Then I converted all the rest of my documents- each taking under 2 hours.

    Bonus? They printed MUCH faster than in word. Seriously- these things were taking 15 minutes to print in Word before they became unusable- now they printed in seconds in OO.

    Libreoffice-- well it's different (not necessarily better- it does some new things OO doesn't- OO does some new things LO doesn't.). I'm okay with EITHER since either will load my OPENDOCUMENT format documents.

    I'm no longer LOCKED IN to word. I no longer have to pay HUNDREDS of dollars for new versions every 3 years.

    I've gotten in to Openoffice draw and created lots of maps and pictures and have developed a basic tool set of objects I can use in the documents.

    I've gotten into Openoffice Calc and written a starfleet battles damage allocation program (complete with sound effects) which I can port to Excel if I ever felt the need to.

    In business- I'm forced to use Word, Excel, Powerpoint. I *still* (after 12 months ) am struggling with these new interfaces. I'll be fine then I want to do something that used to be easy and it's very hard. I waste a few hours trying to find out where the hell they moved the command in Word.

    And when I use word, I look for OO features which are not implemented in word and it's jarring since Word is supposed to have everything including the kitchen sink.

    Libre office, Open office. They are both excellent and SUFFICIENT programs even if they cost up to $75. But they don't- they are free.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    1. Re:I question a 1% difference is "so much better" by udippel · · Score: 2

      For me, the lack of a good grammar checker is a serious issue.

      Fully agree! That's why I wouldn't spend a fiver for Microsoft Office. OpenOffice also cannot, but at least it cannot for free.

    2. Re:I question a 1% difference is "so much better" by psnyder · · Score: 2

      Libreoffice-- well it's different (not necessarily better- it does some new things OO doesn't- OO does some new things LO doesn't.)

      This is wrong as far as I know. Libreoffice is the latest OpenOffice with Go-OO fixes and some plug-ins merged in. Go-OO was made during a time when developers were getting frustrated that OO development was stagnating and they weren't being allowed to include improvements and fixes. So they made them available elsewhere, at go-oo.org

      LO will continue to fork, but for now, it's OO with bug fixes and improvements. They even used the same version number, 3.3, because "The Document Foundation and most of the software's developers saw LibreOffice as being a direct continuation of OpenOffice.org"

      So I'm curious what you mean when you say OO does something LO doesn't, as I can't think of anything. LO is currently the same product (plus a few fixes/addons).

    3. Re:I question a 1% difference is "so much better" by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2

      Okay- I had the impression there were minor differences however you are correct.

      Libre is a fork of OO and has these notable additions.

              * SVG image import
              * Lotus Word Pro and MS Works import filters
              * Improved WordPerfect import
              * Dialog box for title pages
              * Navigator lets you unfold one heading as usual in a tree view
              * "Experimental" mode that allows users to test out unfinished features
              * Certain bundled extensions (including Presenter View in Impress)
              * Color-coded document icons

      What are the features which are so spectacular that OO is now trash and Libre is Zomg the best?

      To me they seem 99% the same. There is some comment of new bugs in Libre as a result of adding the Gooo ( something around PDF's which made LO unusable for someone).

      I don't hate LO. I don't love OO. I have both on my computer but haven't had time to open and test drive LO.

      Since I can afford to have both, even at double the price, I will.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  33. You have issues that need addressed... by meosborne · · Score: 5, Informative

    Perhaps your rant applies in *your* world, but it certainly doesn't apply in mine. The company I work for has been using OpenOffice.org quite happily for years. It does everything we need to do. We've integrated it into a majority of our workflows. We've felt no loss from not having either Microsoft Office or even Windows. Yeah, we're a double conundrum. We're a long-term successful business who doesn't use Microsoft Office or Windows. And we're not even a remotely IT-related business, nor are most of our employees computer experts.

    In short, I think you are completely full of it.

  34. Google Trends -- Openoffice vs Libreoffice by BlackSupra · · Score: 2

    Google Trends --> http://www.google.com/trends?q=openoffice%2C+libreoffice&date=ytd

    Screen Cap: Openoffice vs Libreoffice --> http://i.imgur.com/7hY4G.png

  35. Re:Goatse by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Require good karma to allow link posting. You have to make some positive contributions before you're allowed to post goatse links. I think most people wouldn't mind the occasional goatse link if they required a few dozen insightful comments to build enough karma, and I think most trolls would get bored if they couldn't post them with a brand new account.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News