Slashdot Mirror


Local Currencies To Replace Dollar For 5 Countries' Dealings

An anonymous reader writes "Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa — the BRICS group of fastest growing economies — signed an agreement to use their own currencies instead of the predominant US dollar in issuing credit or grants to each other. The world does need a new financial architecture, but the BRICS by themselves are unlikely to be able to drive that change."

24 of 519 comments (clear)

  1. Bad News for USD by hinesbrad · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is VERY bad news to an already weakened dollar.

    1. Re:Bad News for USD by benjamindees · · Score: 4, Interesting

      More like you *have* to buy treasuries for a month otherwise your dollars lose 3% of their value due to inflation. India and China would love to get loans of Reals. Hamburger futures are going up in value.

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
    2. Re:Bad News for USD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The dollar is kept artificially high in value due to international trade. The current status quo kind of subsidizes the US way of life.

      The US has had the ability to influence and bargain what are essentially one way "free trade " agreements. This is all about to come to an end.

        The dollar will drop somewhat on Monday and unless something big happens within 10- 15 years the US will eventually become like Germany in 1923.
      Not to sound like chicken little but Americans should prepare for the worst, international currency and economic policy is changing with less regard taken for preserving US$ backed wealth than you would think.

      Internationally, Ghadaffi was pushing for a gold backed currency (US gold reserves are actually quite small and has had counterfeiting problems) the problem with this is that to keep the same amount of paper money in circulation gold would be valued at almost $20,000 an oz. To counter this we would need to set back $$$ values and circulation to levels seen pre WWII.

    3. Re:Bad News for USD by rve · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is VERY bad news to an already weakened dollar.

      The dollar has been overvalued for decades, and look at the result: manufacturing jobs have moved overseas, and a vastly negative trade balance. With an over valued currency, It's simply cheaper to import something than to produce it locally.

      A high exchange rate doesn't make a currency strong anyway, long term stability and low inflation are more important.

    4. Re:Bad News for USD by Hognoxious · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Call on line 1. Something about an excluded middle.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    5. Re:Bad News for USD by Fractal+Dice · · Score: 4, Insightful

      One could argue that the dollar *is* what the US manufactures. Since it's been used as the world's reserve currency, printing dollars has behaved essentially like mining gold would have a hundred years ago.

    6. Re:Bad News for USD by Runaway1956 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      In more practical terms, the dollar loses it's importance to the world. Remember the '70's (if you're old enough) when the oil producing countries decided that they wouldn't accept the dollar as payment for their products. They wanted something real to back up the payments. Gold.

      All by itself, this erosion of faith in the dollar wouldn't mean diddly. But, this is just a streamlet which feeds a good sized river. One day, the dollar won't even be accepted in half the countries of the world. "Your green money is no good here, white man - go exchange it for real money, then we'll barter!"

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    7. Re:Bad News for USD by roman_mir · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, deflation is the best thing that happens to economy. You have never observed deflation - which is literally contraction of monetary supply.

      Money must be valuable, otherwise it drives investment capital out and with that go the jobs. Yes, deflation is the best thing for economy from point of view of consumers as well - they get the benefit of saying: today I bought some bread. It was CHEAPER than a year ago.

      Deflation is only the enemy of the state officials who rely on inflation to wipe out their ever increasing debts, because they can't stop consuming and they like to give free money to corporations and to voters for obvious reasons.

      Welcome to the economics.

    8. Re:Bad News for USD by TheLink · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The less the rest of the world uses the US dollar, the worse it becomes for the USA. This is actually a serious issue for the USA.

      Analogy: in Zimbabwe when Mugabe printed lots of Zimbabwe dollars, he was basically taxing everyone who held Zimbabwe dollars. He transferred wealth from them to him and his cronies (who I assume got some of it). The rest of the world mostly didn't care or laughed because they didn't use Zimbabwe dollars.

      The rest of the world however is living in USA's "Zimbabwe" because petroleum, grain, CPUs, country-sized loans and lots of other stuff are all in US dollars. Many countries hold billions or trillions in US dollars to trade stuff with each other.

      So in the past the US could create money at will and thus "tax" the rest of the world ( everyone who holds net positive amounts of US dollars including net creditors[1]). They could spend the created money on big projects and pay (or owe) the rest of the world in US dollars for oil, food, toys etc. As long as they didn't over do it, nobody seemed to notice or care.

      Recently the US created trillions of US dollars (google for Federal Reserve trillions) but rather than the money going into making most of the USA richer, those trillions went to bail-out cronies who lost/siphoned/wasted trillions in the first place.

      The rest of the world is probably starting to notice that created trillions whether directly or indirectly, hence they are switching from the US dollar. They cannot switch too fast because if they start a panic, their billions or more in US dollars could become worth even less.

      [1] Take China as an example. The USA owes China trillions. Foolish people think that means the USA is screwed. But imagine if Hasbro owed their suppliers millions in Monopoly money. Who really is screwed here? Creating US dollars in computers is a lot cheaper than printing Monopoly money ;).

      The USA is only screwed if China says, you can't owe us in US dollars any more. It has to be paid in Euro or RMB.

      So this news is certainly bad for the USA.

      --
    9. Re:Bad News for USD by gmhowell · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I have studied it, albeit years ago.

      Two reasons to do this: first, they retain more control over monetary and fiscal policy by not using another commodity, be it gold or USD, particularly if the value of the commodity (USD) doesn't appear that it will be as stable in the future as it has been. If they really believed in this advantage or the weakness of the USD, they would have gone in more than what they have. Although perhaps it is testing the waters.

      The second, probably bigger issue, is pride. This group of five economicallly small nations could stand up to the big bully on the global scene.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    10. Re:Bad News for USD by jonbryce · · Score: 4, Informative

      You take tungsten, slightly less dense than gold, and a lot cheaper, mix it with a small amount of a more dense but more expensive metal to get up to the right density, then mix and plate it with about 50% gold. Very difficult to detect if you do it right, and costs a little over half the price of real gold.

    11. Re:Bad News for USD by Dunbal · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yeah because the US dollar is not undergoing any inflation at all. Oh wait no, the US simply measures inflation differently by first taking out the prices that are going up (like say energy and transport), then massaging the numbers with subjective bullshit algorithms like hedonics, and then printing a number that has absolutely no contact with reality anymore and calling it inflation.

      Tell me why I should buy a 10 year note at 3.4% per year in a currency that is shedding value like never before on foreign exchange markets and whose government is denying inflation while at the same time conducting policy that is leading to a very real risk of hyperinflation? No thanks. I can get 8% interest on the Costa Rican colon and surprisingly thanks to the devaluing US dollar, the exchange rate is also working in my favor giving me a net of about 10% per year in US dollars. Now when a currency from a 2 bit 3rd world banana republic is more solid than the US dollar, you know that you guys are in trouble.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    12. Re:Bad News for USD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The US is always giving someone the finger. It's called "US foreign policy". Recently the US tacked on a clause to a treaty with my country that guaranteed immunity from prosecution for war crimes for US citizens while in this country. My country rejected the treaty.

      Then you wonder why people hate you, and why things like 9/11 happen. How about learning to live with the rest of the planet, instead of trying to tell it what to do all the time? The US is certainly not an example to follow - its economy stinks, they're not world leaders in anything (except perhaps waste produced per capita), its empty promises of freedom and democracy have been raped and usurped by its own self serving politicians, its human rights record is appalling, its warmongering is not tolerable. What's to like about the US? You can keep it.

    13. Re:Bad News for USD by Dunbal · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As a Canadian all I can say is that it is very sweet, with the Americans needing $1.04 to get one of our Canadian dollars, to remember all the jibes about Canadian currency being worthless as little as 5 years ago. What is even sweeter is that many Americans can no longer afford to travel abroad. Yeah it sucks for the tourism industry, but we welcome Europeans and Asians who have real money, don't speak so loudly in restaurants, and wear something other than dirty T-shirts, shorts and flip flops...

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    14. Re:Bad News for USD by dkleinsc · · Score: 4, Informative

      USD is currently experiencing a 10% inflation. Since the bulk of inflationary pressures caused by the US Gov spending was expected to kick in throughout 2011, it's only expected to get worse.

      I have no idea where you're getting that number, or that suggested cause, but neither of them are even remotely correct. My guess is the rantings of some TV personality, but you and other readers need to know that it's pure nonsense.

      The 12-month price change index (one of the more common measures of inflation) is close to 2.7%, slightly higher than normal but not really out of whack given the huge sums of money destroyed when the real estate market crashed. As far as government spending, in the last year the federal government went from spending about $3.6 trillion in 2010 to spending about $3.7 trillion in 2011 (both of those figures include Social Security and Medicare, which are not part of the general fund). That's an increase that's actually slightly less than inflation.

      The first chart also has a clear answer on what is inflating, although it doesn't add up close to the suspiciously round 10% you cited: Gas prices are much higher in the US than they were a year ago. The most likely reason for this appears to be oil speculators buying up futures in anticipation of the Libya War causing supplies to drop. An increase in the price of crude would also cause a price increase in industrially-produced food, which we're also seeing. But that's different from having $1 today worth only $0.91 next year.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    15. Re:Bad News for USD by Omestes · · Score: 5, Insightful

      , not space flight (rocked the moon)

      Err... how long ago was that? And looking around, we're going to not have any form of space program pretty soon. We're down to leasing use of Russian capsules to actually get people in space now. Hell, we aren't even able to replicate the aging technology that got us to the Moon in the first place. As a space nerd, these are very depressing times.

      May I reiterate? We need Russian technology and approval to get a human in space! Sounds like we're winning, no?

      We won the space battle, but completely lost the space war.

      Thank god too, because who wants the responsibility of helping the whole goddamned world.

      Vast swaths of the world (I'm thinking South America especially) would be very happy if the U.S. never "helped" it. Actually many of the problems we're today "fixing" were caused by us in the first place. U.S. foreign policy is very much damage control over past U.S. foreign policy.

      I'm an American, and I'm not particularly anti-American, I just don't think that we're really the best at anything anymore. I find "exceptionalism" to be a bit odd, what are we really exceptional at? Metrics that matter? Education, not too exceptional. Health, not really that much better off than the rest of the "first world". Standard of living, we're so-so. Technology, falling all the time. Crime, I suppose we're exceptional in a bad way there. Etc... All exceptionalism means is hubris and the lack of ability to learn from more successful countries.

      America should STRIVE to be better, and not just sit around claiming it is, empirically we aren't.

      But then again I've always been suspicious of patriotism. How can we be "#1" when most of the world also claims that the land and people within their fictional borders are also "#1". Most patriotism boils down to the simple tautology "America is the best because we do everything better. We do everything better because America is the best!".

      I like my country. Its terribly flawed, and growing more flawed every day. I'm deeply ashamed of some of our actions, and embarrassed for some of our people. Our government isn't something to really be proud of. Our respect and empathy for the average American (i.e. anyone not in our club) is deplorable and depressing. Our public debate is less mature than that which can be heard in a 3rd grade playground. Our institutions and infrastructure is decaying, and now much worse than other first world countries. Our government looks out for the rich at the expense of the other 90% of the population. We're barely literate. We're morbidly obese. We commit war-time atrocities and torture people.

      I like my country and would like it to be better. We can live up to our ideals. But if we just sit around patting each other on the back for the accidental features of our birth, we're really not going to get anywhere, and will probably continue down of downward spiral.

      Liking something is also admitting its faults, and striving to make it better. Blind pride is stupidity and generally only leads to decline.

      That said, I will always hold my friends and family above any grand concept of "America". I more view myself as a citizen of the desert southwest than an American, really. Proximity breads importance, distance mere abstractness. What does "America" really even mean? We don't share a universal ideal, a universal value system, a universal culture. We somewhat share a language, but that's rapidly changing, and we will be fully bilingual by the time I die.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
  2. BRICS unable to change it my ass by unity100 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ENTIRE modern financial structure depends on trust. That's that. Void papers and monies backed by various privately owned central banks or private investment firms had been the perpetrator of this trust system so far. And all the world obliged by it.

    If you really go down to it, there is nothing real left backing the financial and monetary values and papers right now. They are SO inflated and complicated that, one top hedge fund manager said on cnn, even he himself doesnt know the exact composition of the fund he was managing. However this fund too, is taken as a real fiscal value, and is also considered as a backer of monetary value of the country it is being traded in.

    water vapor. if you erase that water vapor and overinflated stocks, you will see that nothing remains backing the money of most countries like switzerland, britain, usa.

    whereas this BRIC alliance that the summary so gleefully drops down, actually PRODUCES value. they have solid backing for their money. contrary to the others, you can actually buy solid products and services with that money from those countries.

    Once there is traction behind these, and the water vapor of the established financial scourge in the west is ignored, everything easily will change.

    really. china produces most of the world's products now. so, what ? some investment bank from wall street, is going to threaten china ? oh boy. what will happen if china says 'give me yuan' ?

  3. Re:i don't understand what you are trying to say by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Informative

    the american economy suffered a burst bubble from an overheated real estate market in 2008. it might be a long painful recovery

    but if it gets your political inclinations excited to derive deeper portents, have at it

    people trade in the currency that is seen most stable RELATIVELY. some background: as the 2008 crisis began, people began to flee the dollar. then, as the crisis began to ripple across the rest of the world, some places wound up weaker than the usa, and people began to return the dollar. why? not because the dollar was stable, but because the dollar was RELATIVELY stable compared to the problems in many other places, like europe

    currently, the yuan is probably the most stable currency, but china has plenty of exposure to potential problems that could blow up worse than the usa. then the dollar might again be the most RELATIVELY stable currency, or not, or some other currency. i don't know. neither do you

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  4. Re:Yeah! ... The Almighty buck is no more! by smallfries · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The dollar jumped to the forefront of all this because (IMHO) they managed to ensure OPEC only sells using dollars.

    Your opinion is wrong: OPEC sells in dollars because that is the world's reserve currency. America has retained it's dominance this long because everything is denominated in dollars at some level. It doesn't seem to be just your misunderstanding, the second indiatimes link makes the same mistake:

    Reserve currencies are not created by fiat; they emerge from historical forces of trade and investment. The dollar is the world's favourite currency because it is simply the most traded, circulated and accepted currency in the world. Brics or others hoping to supplant the dollar will have to develop large and deep markets, first within their own national economies and then across the world for bonds in those currencies.

    Reserve currencies are created exactly by fiat: this is how the dollar was chosen at Bretton Woods. Everything else is backwards: the dollar is the most traded, circulated and accepted currency in the world precisely because it is the international reserve.

    This move by BRICs does look like the first step towards expanding special drawing rights and replacing the dollar with a weighted basket of currencies.

    --
    Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
  5. Pile of bullshit. by SEE · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Brazil: Only major BRICS trading partner is China. Is major trading partner with US, Japan, Eurozone.
    Russia: Only major BRICS trading partner is China. Is major trading partner with US, Eurozone.
    India: Only major BRICS trading partner is China. Is major trading partner with US, Eurozone.
    China: No BRICS states among its major trading partners. Is major trading partner with US, Japan, Eurozone.
    South Africa: Only major BRICS trading partner is China. Is major trading partner with US, Japan, Eurozone.

    So, the only BRICS that's an important trading partner from the perspective of any of the other BRICS is China, and none of the other BRICS are important trading partners from the Chinese perspective. That means the only BRICS currency of any real importance in inter-BRICS economic activity is the Chinese renminbi.

    And what are the major characteristics of the renminbi? It neither freely floats nor is freely convertible, which means it's unusable as a reserve currency. Further, since the major components of its currency basket are the dollar, euro, and yen, any general move to the renminbi from those currencies would require China to buy them to maintain the "managed float".

    Oh, and the agreement is only about credit and grants, not use in trade, which makes it particularly pointless. None of these countries are major investors in each other, or likely to be anytime soon. Is the Chinese government going to stop building plants in China to start building them in India? Really?

  6. This year by Dunbal · · Score: 4, Interesting

    but the BRICS by themselves are unlikely to to be able to drive that change.

    However a recent Bloomberg article pointed out that China is now Germany's #1 client, replacing the US which has held that position almost since WW2. Considering that China's growth has "slowed" to a mere 9.7% per year, it won't be long at all before they are the largest economy in the world and we will have to do as China says. Another interesting side note is that all those German imports - precision factory machinery, BMW's and other cars, electronics, etc require energy to run. China's demand for oil is about to explode, at a time where we may be nearing peak oil. This is going to be very, very interesting.

    The other side of the coin is that the US dollar as the world currency reserve means that the US is in a very special situation. The US is the only country in the world that can print US dollars. Every other country needs to trade valuable goods and services to obtain one US dollar with which to purchase commodities. The US can simply print it, and in fact this is what it has been doing for a while now. However the minute the US stops being the world reserve currency the US no longer can print its way to importing vital commodities. It will have to earn them like everyone else. Historical data shows that every country that loses status as the world's reserve currency (recent example, the British Pound pre WW2) undergoes severe economic distress. Americans are in denial of this, but irresponsible monetary policy always has consequences. A big hint is the Euro at 1.44 (as if the Euro were in great shape) and the Canadian dollar at 1.04 - not to mention all the other currencies. People don't want US dollars anymore, thanks to Ben and his buddies.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  7. Try this... by denzacar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    India and China alone are over ONE THIRD of humanity.

    Now, when that one third of humanity gives loans to itself (C-I, I-C) it is no longer dependent on the current or the future state of US economy, nor does it have a reason to care about possible changes it may create there.
    Where will this become apparent? Fungible assets that they spend more than anyone else - like food and fuel.

    They take out a loan from each other to import goods, pay goods in dollars because they have to, which influences the dollar value in a positive sense (it goes up or it doesn't go down, but since everyone else is trading in dollars it is usually invisible) - but now, the price of their loans does not increase with the amount of grain or oil they import.

    As a bonus, both economies being outsourcing centers for the US economy, the positive influence their importing makes on the dollar now makes the dollars they are paid in more valuable - while their interest rates and other costs of loan don't go up along with the value of the dollar.
    Bonus points if the exporter country is the lender at the same time. Like say... Russia for grain/oil/coal.

    A smaller economy/country would probably not have that much of a positive effect, but we ARE talking India and China here. And Russia.
    And 2.5 billion people can eat a lot of food and burn a lot of fuel.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  8. Archimedes called from Syracuse... by mangu · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You take tungsten, slightly less dense than gold, and a lot cheaper, mix it with a small amount of a more dense but more expensive metal to get up to the right density, then mix and plate it with about 50% gold. Very difficult to detect if you do it right, and costs a little over half the price of real gold.

    Look, Archimedes called and he wants his density method for counterfeit detection back. The method you describe may be sufficient to sell fake bullion to Ethiopia, where it seems that you don't even need to get the density right, but it will not fool any serious gold trader.

    The problem is not density alone, hardness is fundamental, because practical methods to identify metals today are based on speed of sound in the metal.

    Ultrasonic thickness measuring equipment is the best way to detect fake metals, it works in a principle similar to the traditional "ringing sound" method for detecting fakes. Gold coins and bullion have a precisely defined thickness, if you use an ultrasonic transducer to measure it and get a wrong result it's a fake. And, of course, the transition inside the bar from gold to tungsten is trivially detected when you have the proper equipment, which you surely have if you are trading in large amounts of gold.

    In an "arms race" scenario, technology definitely works against the counterfeiters. It's much harder and more expensive to create a gold-coated tungsten bar than to detect it.

    1. Re:Archimedes called from Syracuse... by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 5, Interesting

      1. You wouldn't collect SS if you were a committed Randian because your principles would stop you. Like every one of her fictional characters would refuse to collect.

      2. SS doesn't steal your money. It forces you to invest it in the safest available investment, US debt, that returns about 50% interest. That also invests in running your country, which keeps all your investments safe.

      If you're really just committed to grabbing as much money as you can, without any actual consistent principles, then you can do as Ayn Rand did. If you're willing to leave the majority of old people with losses instead of gains in their retirement investments, then you can get rid of Social Security. Congratulations! You're a reckless greedmonger, the kind that steered our country and its millions of old people into the grinding poverty of the Great Depression. AKA "Randian". Even if Ayn Rand herself was not. She was merely a hypocrite and a fiction writer.

      --

      --
      make install -not war