Slashdot Mirror
MoD's Error Leaks Secrets of UK Nuclear Submarine
Tasha26 writes "UK's Ministry of Defence admitted that secret information about its nuclear powered submarines was leaked on the internet by mistake. A 'technical error' (i.e. turning the background colour of certain text to black) meant that sensitive blacked-out parts of the online MoD report could be read by anyone who copy-pasted it into another document. This accidental leak reveals, among many other things, how easy it would be to cause a Fukushima-style reactor meltdown in a sub, and details of measures used by the US Navy to protect its own nuclear submarines."
The other day the administrator in my department was organising a project to electronically sign all documents. Thats how they describe it anyway. They are going to scan a bunch of written signatures and paste them in to the documents which are "signed". There will be a directory (sorry, "folder") full of signatures to choose from.
http://michaelsmith.id.au
Not if they are full of leaks.
http://michaelsmith.id.au
Obviously they meant that it reveals how easy it would be to hit the submarine with a tidal wave after it experiences a ~9.0 earthquake, thus disconnecting its power from the energy grid it relies on to cool its core.
while your quite correct in theory, one must remember that if your average your still and idiot to begin with.
the "average" person isn't smart enough to understand the difference in words like redaction , deletion and blackout.
Or, say..., "your" and "you're".
Does this mean anyone who wants to sign a document as, say, the administrator of your department can use his signature with a simple copy & paste? If so you should issue a memo, "signed" by the administrator, announcing the cancelation of the "electronic signature project". ;-)
YOU CAN SAY THAT AGAIN!
I think these nuclear subs are well worth the expense. How else will Britain deal with Taliban aircraft carriers?