Slashdot Mirror


Apple Wants To Store Your History In the Cloud

bizwriter writes "Most online backup is about keeping the latest and greatest version of what resides on a device, whether a PC, tablet, or smartphone. Three recent patent filings suggest that Apple has a super version of backup on its mind. Someone would be able to go into an application (like iTunes or the App Store), find what material was available at a previous time, and recover any or all of what once was there without having to use a separate recovery program."

99 comments

  1. Different from Dropbox? by david_thornley · · Score: 2

    I figure that any information I send to the cloud is at danger of being accessed by anybody at any time, unless I've encrypted it myself. The Apple idea could be really effective, but I'd never trust it with sensitive data, any more than I'd trust Dropbox.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    1. Re:Different from Dropbox? by somersault · · Score: 1

      Dropbox also stores history. As does stuff like Volume Shadow Copy, though obviously it's not in "the cloud. I don't really mind putting stuff in Dropbox. I have one "sensitive" file on it, which is encrypted.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    2. Re:Different from Dropbox? by BasilBrush · · Score: 4, Informative

      Completely different from Dropbox, in that it doesn't have anything to do with the cloud. The article is nonsense, the patent quotes say nothing about the cloud. They very clearly relate to the local document versioning system that Apple is putting in in the next version on OSX (Lion), and has already announced.

      http://www.apple.com/macosx/lion/

    3. Re:Different from Dropbox? by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 1

      If the patents are about being able to recover previous versions of files, or previously deleted files, then it seems like they're getting a patent on what GoBack did years ago.

    4. Re:Different from Dropbox? by BasilBrush · · Score: 4, Informative

      Completely different. GoBack worked at the disk drive level. If I wanted to revert back to my spreadsheet of last week, I'd revert every other file back to last week too.

      Lions "Versions" works at the application level, so that individual document files have a history.

      And the patents themselves regard the user interface, and as you can see, they could not be more different.
      http://soswindowsfr.free.fr/olivier/goback_fichiers/goback-historique.gif
      http://images.apple.com/macosx/lion/images/overview_versions20110127.jpg

    5. Re:Different from Dropbox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Screw you! Ruining a perfectly good argument with correct and researched facts!

    6. Re:Different from Dropbox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Software patents are wrong so Apple are wrong to use them ;-0

    7. Re:Different from Dropbox? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      ...document files with version history or generic version control or generic document management.

      Where would we be with Apple to invent these sorts of things for us? [sarcasm]

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    8. Re:Different from Dropbox? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Be sarcastic all you like, You're also being ignorant. The patents are for the UI. The only precursor that's anything like it is is Time Machine, which is also Apple's, and it's fantastic. No one did anything in the same league before. If you don't know that, it means you never actually experienced it.

      Feel free to present any specific examples you think are even in the same ballpark. I could do with a laugh. I'm especially hoping you'll suggest a one of the git GUIs. LOL!

    9. Re:Different from Dropbox? by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 1

      GoBack could also restore just one file without restoring the whole drive.

  2. Google (Chrome) and Firefox can do this already by Shikaku · · Score: 1

    Non-story?

    1. Re:Google (Chrome) and Firefox can do this already by alostpacket · · Score: 3, Funny

      Nonsense, Apple clearly invented the cloud. And backup. And turtlenecks.

      --
      PocketPermissions Android Permission Guide
    2. Re:Google (Chrome) and Firefox can do this already by stanlyb · · Score: 0

      You forgot their most advanced invention: APPLE.

    3. Re:Google (Chrome) and Firefox can do this already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really Chrome and Firefox can restore a Bookmark I have deleted years ago?

    4. Re:Google (Chrome) and Firefox can do this already by careysb · · Score: 2

      And "APPLE" was stolen from the Beatles.

    5. Re:Google (Chrome) and Firefox can do this already by oliverthered · · Score: 2

      actually it was given to eve, by a dirty snake in the grass wearing a mac.. sorry that's the iTestament.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    6. Re:Google (Chrome) and Firefox can do this already by oliverthered · · Score: 2

      sorry miss read that... i thought it said Adam and Eve, should be Adam and Steve, but where all chums around here.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    7. Re:Google (Chrome) and Firefox can do this already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why would you want them to? Personally when I delete something, I want it to stay deleted. I'd much rather have every deleted thing gone forever than have everything in the facebook-style limbo of "inactive".

    8. Re:Google (Chrome) and Firefox can do this already by the+simurgh · · Score: 0

      in the words of Thomas Edison to Elijah grey READ THE PATENT NUMBER [INSERT DEROGATORY TERM FOR FEMALES HERE]! err... [witty reply routine not found]

    9. Re:Google (Chrome) and Firefox can do this already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds more like you'd want to use rsnapshot and preserve backups for at least a year?

      Sure, Firefox saves bookmarks states for the past week (iirc), but even that's excessive IMO. For all I'm concerned, a simple, immediate "undelete" is all that you'll really need.

    10. Re:Google (Chrome) and Firefox can do this already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because you didn't mean to. You thought it was unimportant but found out later you still needed it. It got deleted by someone else without your knowledge.

    11. Re:Google (Chrome) and Firefox can do this already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good job not answering the question, dumbass.

    12. Re:Google (Chrome) and Firefox can do this already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congrats. You managed two errors in a single sentence.

      1) The guys name was "Elisha Gray", not "Elijah Grey".
      2) Alexander Graham Bell invented the telephone, not Thomas Edison.

    13. Re:Google (Chrome) and Firefox can do this already by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Riiight, and I'm sure there's no way to mark a file or version of a file for permanent deletion. Apple is that short sighted.....

  3. Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It'd take days over DSL to upload everything on the home network to the cloud and probably use up all of my bandwidth for the year. I wonder if they'd ask you to mail in your HDs or drop off your mac at the local Apple store to do the initial capture. /Not saying I'd ever pul all my porn library on the cloud.

    1. Re:Hmmm by julss · · Score: 0

      I have a 100/10mbit connection, not a problem.

    2. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a minority.

    3. Re:Hmmm by dougisfunny · · Score: 2

      That would still take quite a long time to upload 12TB.

      --
      This is not the funny you're looking for.
    4. Re:Hmmm by redJag · · Score: 1

      Do minorities get better internet access? Balls.

  4. Your entire life is in the 'cloud' already by countertrolling · · Score: 1

    Just Google your name.. With some fake credentials you can run a plate

    --
    For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    1. Re:Your entire life is in the 'cloud' already by Gaygirlie · · Score: 1

      Just Google your name..

      I only get my Facebook account with a small selection of what interests me and who I have befriended publicly. Hardly my "entire life." :S

    2. Re:Your entire life is in the 'cloud' already by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      There are quite few people with the same name as me, although I shouldn't be too hard to find. But names are terrible identifiers. Unless you have an unusual name, there's probably at least one other person in your state with that name.

    3. Re:Your entire life is in the 'cloud' already by ColdWetDog · · Score: 3, Funny

      I only get my Facebook account with a small selection of what interests me and who I have befriended publicly. Hardly my "entire life." :S

      The sad thing is that for the rest of us that is our entire life.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    4. Re:Your entire life is in the 'cloud' already by nogginthenog · · Score: 1

      I get some American dude that killed people.

    5. Re:Your entire life is in the 'cloud' already by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      I get some American dude that killed people.

      That's odd, I always thought the most likely match for "Noggin the Nog" would be some fictitious Norse guy from an old kids' TV series.

      Maybe they changed some aspects of his character for the big-budget Hollywood remake (Michael Bay is due to start work on it soon, with an early-2012 release date expected)... God knows many people never forgave Uwe Boll for his "Ivor the Engine" movie ;-)

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  5. So it's just Time Machine in the cloud? by Gavin+Scott · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well duh, Time Machine already does this for local or NAS storage, so any extension of this into the "cloud" would obviously include the same functionality.

    Inflammatory summary is inflammatory.

    G.

    1. Re:So it's just Time Machine in the cloud? by pushing-robot · · Score: 2

      And considering services like Mozy, Carbonite and DropBox already do versioning (preserving overwritten or deleted files), this isn't really a story.

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    2. Re:So it's just Time Machine in the cloud? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mozy, Carbonite and DropBox are integrated in to the Applications like Time Machine is.

    3. Re:So it's just Time Machine in the cloud? by future+assassin · · Score: 1

      So "in the cloud" now is the cool word for remote backups and storage?

      --
      by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    4. Re:So it's just Time Machine in the cloud? by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1

      So "in the cloud" now is the cool word for remote backups and storage?

      Yes, just like "remote" was the cool word off-site, but has now become an accepted term.

    5. Re:So it's just Time Machine in the cloud? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      So "in the cloud" now is the cool word for remote backups and storage?

      In the same way that 'truck' is the new cool word for 'car' when discussing shipping of cargo.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    6. Re:So it's just Time Machine in the cloud? by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      And considering services like Mozy, Carbonite and DropBox already do versioning (preserving overwritten or deleted files), this isn't really a story.

      Except the small details there is no monthly fee, it is a tightly integrated aspect of the OS's user-interface, and you don't have to do anything other than turn your OSX Lion-installed Mac on, I'd say it's exactly the same thing...

    7. Re:So it's just Time Machine in the cloud? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Emacs had CVS integration about 20 years ago.

      Whether or not 2 random things can be integrated together really has more to do with how open each of the components are. If you are dealing with some overly controlling proprietary vendor, mixing and matching tools together in interesting ways will likely be far more difficult and unlikely.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  6. Time Machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's Time Machine but your hard drive is off site.

  7. Cool patents, bro. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I know that "in the cloud" is the hip thing these days; but I'm a bit fuzzy on how this differs in any patentable way from versioning file systems that go back at least as far as VMS, and almost any network backup product that provides differential backups(which is virtually all of them).

    Even more specifically, precisely this sort of 'network-accessed version/time view' of documents is what pretty much any IDE does when you point it at a supported revision control system. Complete history of your project, all in 'app', delivered locally or over the network, or clustered, or what have you. Similar, albeit expensive and somewhat niche, stuff can be had for word processing among legal types.

    Now, from a user experience perspective, more power to Apple if they can bring the benefits of a revision control model to other applications in a way intuitive enough for people who wouldn't know a revision control system if it bit them. That is the sort of thing that they are good at, and the sort of thing that they can charge a premium for.

    Patent worthy, though? Srsly?

    1. Re:Cool patents, bro. by mcgrew · · Score: 2

      "In the cloud" really just means letting someone else be responsible for your data. Of course, the people pushing "the cloud" are (surprise) data hosting companies.

      Patent worthy? Hell, no.

    2. Re:Cool patents, bro. by dkf · · Score: 1

      "In the cloud" really just means letting someone else be responsible for your data.

      There's a bit more to it than that; you also let them run the servers (or even services) that access the data. Of course, it does leave me wondering how much care Apple will take when it comes to privacy laws (EU law is fairly strict in this area, though if the data is encrypted before export those laws are probably satisfied — IANAL of course). I don't expect to figure that out from a patent application.

      Remember: there's very little technical innovation in The Cloud; it's virtually all stuff that was there before. The innovation was all on the business side of things (such as permitting rent by the hour instead of by the month; a couple orders of magnitude difference in flexibility).

      Patent worthy? Hell, no.

      I'd be inclined to agree for the most part. The only really interesting thing would be how they're tuning the systems to cope with the sorts of levels of external I/O; most clouds are terrible at that (well, by comparison with their other capabilities). Yet that's just configuration; anyone properly skilled in the art of system and network administration should be able to spec out how to do that sort of thing.

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    3. Re:Cool patents, bro. by stewbacca · · Score: 2

      IF this is talking about versioning coming in OSX Lion, then I'd say it is different because it is giving average home users and enterprise-like level tool they may find handy without all the enterprise tool fuss and administration.

      And if it is talking about the upcoming Versioning in Lion, then no, they won't charge a premium for it...I'll guess about a one-time $129 upgrade.

    4. Re:Cool patents, bro. by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      The VMS file versioning he is referring to is hardly terribly burdensome.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  8. A better mousetrap? by folderol · · Score: 1

    Not new and totally obvious, so I fully expect them to get their patents :(

  9. Better be opt-out by Coopjust · · Score: 1

    Unless the sync is optional, or it allows the user to use a key separate from the credentials that requires a re-sync if you lose it (like Firefox Sync) where the provider can't tell what you store on their servers (encrypted/decrypted locally), it'll bar me from buying Apple products ever again.

    1. Re:Better be opt-out by xMrFishx · · Score: 2

      Why would it be mandatory? Mobile Me is opt in (purchase), even time machine is opt-in. Hell, even owning the machine is opt-in. Itunes sharing is opt-in. Where's this mandatory idea come from? Nevar

  10. More than that by mr100percent · · Score: 2

    It's far more than that, Apple is rumored to be developing a sort of cloud user-space, where you can login on anyone's Mac as a Guest and it will pull all your apps, documents, and preferences from the App Store and iDisk cloud. There's even talk of a Net-booting cloud.

    1. Re:More than that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's far more than that, Apple is rumored to be developing a sort of cloud user-space, where you can login on anyone's Mac as a Guest and it will pull all your apps, documents, and preferences from the App Store and iDisk cloud. There's even talk of a Net-booting cloud.

      That would only work for 100% locked down Macs. Apple would never venture that low... oh wait...

    2. Re:More than that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So they're making ChromeOS?

    3. Re:More than that by dgatwood · · Score: 2

      It wouldn't require any more locking down than what you already have in Mac OS X, Linux, UNIX, etc. You set permissions to disallow the guest user from writing anywhere on the local machine, then you net-mount the user's home directory, and all the user's reads and writes go in there. We had such setups on plain vanilla Sun workstations a decade ago, minus the automatic app installation.

      Sure, if you want absolute security, there are a few little things you'd want to tweak around the edges—temp file handling, for example—but nothing big. It certainly shouldn't require preventing the machine's owner (the administrator) from arbitrarily modifying the machine.

      Unless, of course, you meant the question of whether a random person can really trust somebody else's machine to not have key sniffers and that sort of thing, in which case the answer is, "No, and they couldn't trust that no matter how much the manufacturer locks down the OS because you can just as easily put a USB key sniffer inside the keyboard itself."

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    4. Re:More than that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course not, it's iShinyOS-X. And despite your flippant response, they invented it, just like smartphones and personal music devices.

    5. Re:More than that by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      That would only work for 100% locked down Macs. Apple would never venture that low... oh wait...

      They *can't* 100% lock down a Mac. The best they could do is start making a laptop version of the iPad and replace the Macbook line with it. Even that would require difficult-to-imagine customer support.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    6. Re:More than that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that what Chromium already does?

  11. Wait... by Locke2005 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So first, any normal business practice becomes patentable if you add the words "on a computer" to it. Now this: anything you do on a computer (e.g. backup) becomes patentable if you and the words "in the cloud" to it??? WTF is wrong with our patent system?

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    1. Re:Wait... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Here's a drinking game that will(briefly, before it kills you) make you feel better about the state of the software/business method patent system:

      1. When you see a bullshit 'on the internet' or 'in the cloud' patent, ask yourself "Could I have done exactly the same thing over a leased line somewhere between 1970 and 1985, if I'd had a checkbook big enough for IBM?".

      2. If yes, take a shot.

    2. Re:Wait... by future+assassin · · Score: 2

      Just like the word digital. Insert it into anything and if you're a corporation you can get laws passed if you cry enough.

      --
      by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    3. Re:Wait... by whisper_jeff · · Score: 1

      WTF is wrong with our patent system?

      Everything.

    4. Re:Wait... by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      So first, any normal business practice becomes patentable if you add the words "on a computer" to it. Now this: anything you do on a computer (e.g. backup) becomes patentable if you and the words "in the cloud" to it??? WTF is wrong with our patent system?

      It prevents patents from being overly broad. In other words, that innovation you came up with on your mechanical record player won't cause Diamond to have to license your idea when they release their new digital music player.

      It's fun to rag on the patent system and all, but it's actually better this way.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    5. Re:Wait... by gig · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Apple is not a patent troll. They have sued over patents only a few times even though they've been widely copied. They obviously have to patent this before they ship to protect themselves against patent trolls.

    6. Re:Wait... by gig · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is we either have to train the 99.999% of humanity who can't do that to do that plus freeze the state of the world's technology in 1985, or we have to invent some new solutions that enable an Apple Store customer to do that with no training on their 2011 systems with every various kind of data they store? I like the latter.

      In Apple's solution the user does not even have to Save a document, let alone check it in or out. They don't even have to Open it, the app makes it appear it is always Open and only Opens it when necessary, and they don't even have to launch the app, because the system makes it appear the app is always running, and only runs it when necessary. All the user has to do is work on the content, and the only meta control they use is a time slider that rolls the document back 1 minute or 2 days.

      But then, your grandmother is not impressed by that, because she could do that over a leased line in 1985.

    7. Re:Wait... by subreality · · Score: 1

      Could I have done exactly the same thing over a leased line somewhere between 1970 and 1985

      That's not the right question. The test you need is: "Did anyone think of doing this over a leased line before now?" If no one thought of doing it before, and it's a nontrivial invention, it's most certainly patentable.

      In this case, remote version history has plenty of examples of people thinking of this a long time ago: AMANDA just off the top of my head. I haven't read the patent to see if they claim something narrower that people hadn't thought of before.

    8. Re:Wait... by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

      It's fun to rag on the patent system and all, but it's actually better this way.

      I don't think it is. See, if Diamond do come up with some idea that was already invented for mechanical record players, then they shouldn't be able to patent it again "digitally".

      There already is a provision in place to prevent licensing forever: patents expire after 20 years.

      It would be a lot better for everyone if (expired) patents were interpreted more broadly. Ideally though there shouldn't be any patents at all (imho).

    9. Re:Wait... by Agripa · · Score: 1

      So first, any normal business practice becomes patentable if you add the words "on a computer" to it.

      Sure. Just like how substituting a transistor for a tube in a circuit allowed the circuit to be patented again. The cathode follower became the emitter follower, the common grid became the common base, and the common cathode became the common emitter.

      * Warning: This post contains sarcasm which may cause cancer, birth defects, or reproductive harm in California. *

    10. Re:Wait... by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      I don't think it is. See, if Diamond do come up with some idea that was already invented for mechanical record players, then they shouldn't be able to patent it again "digitally".

      That's how you get an overly broad patent. If you can't patent it, it's because the other guy has it. Now you're licensing it from him.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  12. cloud + encryption + subversion by careysb · · Score: 1

    How about a subversion (or equivalent) version control system that stores encrypted files to the cloud? That way you could retrieve any version of a file or even files that you had deleted at some point.

    1. Re:cloud + encryption + subversion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey, at least its not clear case

    2. Re:cloud + encryption + subversion by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      best post ever...

  13. Apple? The same Apple that sells you ONE mp3 copy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wouldn't trust these guys with a scanned Nintendo manual, let alone anything actually valuable.

  14. I'm sure this will work out wonderfully by ynp7 · · Score: 0

    Until you install Apple's new photo editing program and it deletes everything, right?

  15. School cheating by vlm · · Score: 1

    find what material was available at a previous time, and recover any or all of what once was there without having to use a separate recovery program

    I bet teachers will request / demand access to catch people whom commit academic dishonesty, then doctor the assignment or paper up to foil simple search detection.

    For example, if someone stole my line above, and then claimed this as their own writing:

    "In the I-enabled internet future, teachers will request or demand access to catch people whom commit academic dishonesty, then doctor the assignment or paper up to prevent simple search detection."

    Because I added and changed a couple words, the copier would probably not be caught. But if the professor had access to the earlier version and googled for it, they'd find my original post, and see how pitifully little work I did to doctor up the copy.

    I suppose if they take all the "whom"s out of my posts they should deserve an "A" anyway, but still, I'm trying to make the general point here...

    --
    "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    1. Re:School cheating by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      If a teacher knows their students the way they should, no special software is needed to detect when they are plagiarizing works.

  16. Most online backup is about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Most online backup is about keeping the latest and greatest version of what resides on a device, whether a PC, tablet, or smartphone. Three recent patent filings suggest that Apple has a super version of backup on its mind. Someone would be able to go into an application (like iTunes or the App Store), find what material was available at a previous time, and recover any or all of what once was there without having to use a separate recovery program."

    A. Most people are fucking morons. Q. Why in 2011 is it still necessary to qualify "backups" with "point in time" and "remote".

  17. FTFY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Could I have done exactly the same thing over a leased line somewhere between 1970 and 1985, if I'd had a checkbook big enough for IBM?"

    More like "Were people doing exactly the same thing over a leased line somewhere between 1970 and 1985 with IBM?"

  18. iTunes needs some work, first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I like how Apple is thinking big, yet missing obvious and practical "backup" issues. Ask anyone who has gotten a new i-device, or had to wipe one: there is no way in iTunes to figure out what all you've bought previously without attempting to download it again. Maybe when you click that "Buy" button, it pops up and says you already bought it, and you re-download it for free. But maybe you clicked on the wrong version of the app thinking it was the one you'd already paid for, and welp, you just bought it. Stupid.

    1. Re:iTunes needs some work, first by LoganDzwon · · Score: 1

      I thought the pop-up comes up before the buy it screen.... regardless, the issue your describing is not existent. All of the apps you have installed are sync into your iTunes. You don't have to do any redownloading. Just plug iphone into iTunes, it'll sync, then click restore, (wait,) select if you want to restore your profile or start clean, it restores everything you had including your Apps, or if you went with a clean slate it will install every app you have in your iTunes. I have apps I bought on my Original launch-day iPhone that are still on my phone, several replacements and upgrades later.

    2. Re:iTunes needs some work, first by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      I like how Apple is thinking big, yet missing obvious and practical "backup" issues. Ask anyone who has gotten a new i-device, or had to wipe one: there is no way in iTunes to figure out what all you've bought previously without attempting to download it again. Maybe when you click that "Buy" button, it pops up and says you already bought it, and you re-download it for free. But maybe you clicked on the wrong version of the app thinking it was the one you'd already paid for, and welp, you just bought it. Stupid.

      A workaround is to click the little arrow beside it and "Add to Wishlist". It turns out iTunes will refuse to add apps to the wishlist that you've already bought.

      And Apple does know how to make it happen. The iPad iTunes Store changes the "Buy $x.99" button to an "Install" button if you've already bought it. I don't know if the iPhone/iPod Touch App Store does a similar thing. So yes, Apple can do it, they just haven't deployed it to iTunes yet (probably because of load issues?).

      Now if only I can figure out why some of my Android Marketplace apps seem to show up in my account rather than all or none of them... (I paid the same price for all of them - they were all free).

  19. And this is a new idea how? by Nyder · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry, this is a new idea? Really?

    Talk about a fucking slow news day.

    --
    Be seeing you...
    1. Re:And this is a new idea how? by gig · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They didn't claim to invent the cloud or versioning. They claim to have an invention that uses the cloud and versioning in a new way, enabling even a non-technical consumer to apply it to all of their documents without training. No, nobody has done that before.

      Steam engine also did not claim to have invented steam.

  20. download caps / roaming fees are to high for this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    and taking that iPhone to canada can cost you UP TO 10K a gig and $20+ a gig in the us.

  21. Re:Apple? The same Apple that sells you ONE mp3 co by foniksonik · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Uh that's what this is supposed to fix. The labels dictate the terms. Not Apple. So Apple needs something big enough to justify paying the labels giant surcharges to let us all do it the sensible way. Google is working on the exact same thing BTW.

    --
    A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
  22. about apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple really strong
    sub_id=222&sub_name=Christan+Audigier+Cap">Christan Audigier Cap,A HREF="http://www.anyincn.com/style_list_2.aspx?

  23. Size by profke · · Score: 0

    Maybe they allready store my whole history in iTunes. It would explain the size of this piece of .. eh .. software -:)

  24. Goals by currently_awake · · Score: 1

    If the advertisers asked you to send them your life (pictures, friend lists, schedule...) so they could better sell you stuff you'd refuse. But if they say here, store your stuff on our servers (in the cloud) for free! (where free means we can spy on you to sell you stuff) then we all go for it without a second thought.

  25. Currently they suck at retireving information.... by westyvw · · Score: 2

    And yet Apple does not have an easy method to show me what I purchased in the Ap-store for my phone? Or an easy way to just reload all purchased apps if my iPhone gets restored? Or make iTunes not suck so hard?
    I wouldn't trust these bozo's to make it easy to get to any information I entrusted them with.

  26. Can we stop using THE cloud. Not only one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A cloud is a network of virtual computers. There isn't just one.

  27. http://www.fullmalls.com by xiaojiekuuii · · Score: 0

    Click on our website: ( http://www.fullmalls.com/ ) Website wholesale various fashion shoes, such as Nike, Jordan, prada, also includes the jeans, shirt, bags, hats and decoration. Personality manufacturing execution systems (Mes) clothing, Grab an eye bag coat + tide bag Air jordan(1-24)shoes $30 Handbags(Coach l v f e n d i d&g) $35 Tshirts (Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste) $15Jean(True Religion,ed hardy,coogi) $30Sunglasses(Oakey,coach,gucci,A r m a i n i) $15 New era cap $12 Bikini (Ed hardy,polo) $20accept paypal and free shipping ( http://www.fullmalls.com/ )

  28. Re:Currently they suck at retireving information.. by LoganDzwon · · Score: 1

    Your purchase history is accessible via iTunes for mac or PC. Not via your itunes for iOS. But, then again the chase.app and esurance.app also only offer limited information over their iOS app. How much info go your banking and insurance companies offer you via an iOS app? All your apps will be restore during your first sync, which is started automatically as the last step in a restore. Get a mac. iTunes is pretty good for mac. I do agree it's not that it just doesn't translate well to windows. The design concepts and process flow are too foreign.

  29. Correction by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

    Apple wants to store apple customers' history in the cloud. I'll have nothing to do wit apple products, thanks.

  30. Re:Currently they suck at retireving information.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You click on "Apps" in iTunes. Everything you purchased on the App Store is there.

    You plug your phone in and hit "Restore". It saves all the preferences for you and reloads your phone just how it was the last time you synced it.

    I agree. iTunes does suck pretty badly. Almost as badly as your knowledge of the iPhone.

  31. Jordan Fusion by youtina · · Score: 1

    Jordan Fusion series as the main sneakers of the Nike this year.Because of its own hold concurrently sports classics and fashionable idiosyncratic,controversial,is dye in the wood topic.No only this.We also offer the Jordan Women , Jordan 1 .If you like it,just visit our website.

    Come here and you will fall in love with Jorden products, which have high-class workmanship and high quality.for example the Jorden air , Air Jordan 12 and Air Jordan Shoes .they are all use the high quality materials and superior quality.the Air Jordan 12 with its fashionable unique attracted numerous shoppers.So if you also like it you can visit our website to buy.

  32. How about this.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would be very happy just for Apple to allow access to re-download apps, music and other content that WE PAID FOR if we should happen to lose the original. The idea that once you download something from iTunes and lose it you can't get your content back is ridiculous.

    There is no additional storage for Apple, the content is already being served, and they also store a history of all purchases made on iTunes, so the fact I cannot re-download content (without having to contact and hassle with their customer support begging to download the content again) is quite retarded.

    So, kudos for brining Time Machine into the cloud, which is what this is, but how about giving us unlimited access to content we have paid for.

      And how about removing the 5 device limitation as well. Apple has been all big about removing DRM, except if its their own damn DRM. Its ineffective anyways, once a year I reset the count and activate only the current systems I have in use at the time, so why bother.