Slashdot Mirror


Officials Say "Capes For the Unemployed" Plan Not Super

After what must have been an epic marketing meeting, a Florida unemployment agency decided to give 6,000 red capes to the jobless as part of its "Cape-A-Bility Challenge" public relations campaign. The capes cost $14,000 (not a bad price for 6k capes actually) and featured a cartoon character named "Dr. Evil Unemployment." As one might imagine, officials are calling for an investigation to be launched. It's a good thing there are an abundance of caped do-gooders without jobs in the area who should be able to help.

23 of 392 comments (clear)

  1. Only.... by Jaysyn · · Score: 3, Informative

    Only in Florida. I can say that cause I live in the crazy-ass state.

    --
    There is a war going on for your mind.
    1. Re:Only.... by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Crazy as that state is, there had to be at least *one* sane person in the room when that was pitched. Surely to god, there had to be one person there who saw the disaster coming. My question is "What kind of environment was so toxic that he wouldn't or couldn't speak up and challenge such an obviously FUCKING INSANE idea?" How beaten down and scared do you have to be before you let something like that slide by without comment? How crazy does a boss have to be before his subordinates are so tired that no one even bothers to say "I think this might be a bad idea."?

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    2. Re:Only.... by Runaway1956 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You seem to be making an assumption here. I have actually been the only sane person in a room - and, when I walked out, that left no sane people. Now, when you get a group of nutcases together, without any oversight at all - shit just happens. Take a look at both the Republican convention, and the Democratic convention. Go on - tell me that any of that crap makes sense to a sane person. I mean, ANY sane person - male, female, gay, bi, old, young, healthy, decrepit - even a sane retard would barf on anything that comes out of either of those conventions.

      So, yes, I can easily imagine a bunch of crazies buying capes for the unemployed just as soon as the last sane person has walked out of the room.

      What I'm really wondering is, how many of the unemployed actually wore the capes to fill out an application, or to an interview? And, how many of them got the job? Most likely, those capes were used for wiping rags, unless some Suzy Homemaker type used them to make something for her kids.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    3. Re:Only.... by Synn · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sometimes people don't want to hear things or don't put a lot of value on underling opinions.

      Was in a meeting when a client wanted a website called "Busted Moms" for a financial thing and just couldn't get the porn reference. The site got designed, published and everything, THEN taken down after all the work got done.

      http://www.adrants.com/2009/03/sears-appeals-to-techie-moms-with-new.php

  2. Don't like it by geek · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm not opposed to the price tag. I think that's reasonable if spent on something motivational. What they did however, was in my opinion, demeaning to the unemployed. It's akin to your boss walking around the office and passing out candy bars for effort. Treating adults like little children is ridiculous. Lift them up, don't hold them down. The last thing these people needed while down on their luck and possibly in dire straits was for some jackass marketing person dressing them up like super heroes and playing fucking games with their self esteem. The people who thought this up should be fired in my opinion.

    1. Re:Don't like it by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 5, Funny

      The people who thought this up should be fired in my opinion.

      Well that will help the unemployment problem for sure.

    2. Re:Don't like it by residieu · · Score: 4, Funny

      The people who thought this up should be fired in my opinion.

      Do they get one of the capes?

    3. Re:Don't like it by dkleinsc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'd be opposed to it for another totally obvious reason: The cape manufacturer probably is either a committee member's brother-in-law, or bribed the committee to spend public money on their company's stupid product.

      Although I guess the cape could help the unemployed stay warm and dry when they're thrown out onto the street.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    4. Re:Don't like it by Thud457 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Edna Mode does not approve of this hair-brained government idea.

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    5. Re:Don't like it by Joce640k · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You think it's easier for older people?

      --
      No sig today...
    6. Re:Don't like it by hoggoth · · Score: 5, Funny

      Watch as UnemployedMan steps into this phone booth, dons his bright red cape and emerges as... UnemployableMan!

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    7. Re:Don't like it by Thud457 · · Score: 3, Funny

      It'll open up a job for someone in marketing who isn't a jackass .

      That umpossible.

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    8. Re:Don't like it by Duradin · · Score: 3, Funny

      "And what is amazing is that, I'd be willing to bet that you wouldn't be willing to pick up that shovel yourself."

      Them picking up a shovel would destroy job opportunity. If they pick up a shovel it'd be silly to hire more "people" to do it for them, now wouldn't it? It's not laziness, its a strong desire to stimulate the economy.

  3. Targets For Ridicule by crow_t_robot · · Score: 4, Insightful

    a Florida unemployment agency decided to give 6,000 red capes to the jobless

    To simplify the task of acquiring targets to point and laugh at? This is as brilliant as having children at school that can't afford lunch stand in a line to get lunch tickets/vouchers so the other kids know who the poor ones are to ridicule.

    1. Re:Targets For Ridicule by StikyPad · · Score: 3, Funny

      This is as brilliant as having children at school that can't afford lunch stand in a line to get lunch tickets/vouchers so the other kids know who the poor ones are to ridicule.

      Right, because without explicitly pointing them out, the poor kids might simply be mistaken for very young hipsters.

  4. At least Slashdot did it right by mangu · · Score: 5, Funny

    Putting a story about the unemployed on "Idle"...

  5. Even worse? by ShavedOrangutan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wonder if the capes were made in China.

    --
    Godaddy is a scam and a ripoff.
  6. Re:Missed opportunity by dr_dank · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm surprised they went public with this. Usually, these things are cloaked in secrecy.

    --
    Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
  7. Better than their last idea by daremonai · · Score: 4, Informative
    This is not as bad as Workforce Central Florida's previous idea: Careereoki.

    I wish desperately I could say I was making this up, but I am not.

  8. Re:It's just a marketing by jittles · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Did you RTFA? They are already under investigation for using $250,000 of government money to provide "company cars" to employees and had to repay over $3M to the Federal government after they were found to have mismanaged federal unemployment funds. Something tells me this isn't just a marketing campaign. They were doing someone a favor.

  9. Re:I Do like it by DarkOx · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Maybe but its not Government's job to make you feel empowered. The Government should not be in the business of self esteem you precious little snowflake.
    Someones tax dollars however few went to buy what are basically tchotchkes for the unemployed and not even good ones like a paper weight or something most recipients could make use of. Its simply irresponsible. If that tax (read other peoples hard earned money) money was going to be allocated to the unemployed it should been something useful like a card with some interview tips on it in their mailbox, or at the very worst an extra few dollars on their unemployment checks.

    --
    Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
  10. They just didn't want to risk losing their jobs... by mmell · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...someone might make them wear some idiotic cape!

  11. Re:Ahem...NOT a government agency, folks by makomk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The conservative preference for letting private agencies compete to provide such services is such because that way idiotic contractors like this bunch can get thrown out, and the contracting agency can choose from others that will compete to show they're more serious about how they put taxpayers' money to work. If this had been a government agency, the people in it couldn't be fired, and would have little to no incentive for doing a better job.

    Except that in practice, that doesn't happen - governments are consistently really bad at choosing competent private contractors, signing sensible contracts with them, holding them to account when they screw up, and kicking them out to replace them with a more competent contractor when it turns out the original couldn't run a piss-up in a brewery. Conservative governments are if anything slightly worse at this. Meanwhile, actual government employees are often far more competent.