China's High-Speed Trains Coming Off the Rails
Hugh Pickens writes "The Washington Post reports that China's expanding network of ultramodern high-speed trains is coming under growing scrutiny over costs and because of concerns that builders ignored safety standards in the quest to build faster trains in record time as new leadership at the Railways Ministry announced that to enhance safety, the top speed of all trains was being decreased from about 218 mph to 186. Without elaborating, the ministry called the safety situation 'severe' and said it was launching safety checks along the entire network of tracks. Meanwhile China's Finance Ministry announced that the Railways Ministry continues to lose money as the ministry's debt stands at $276 billion, almost all borrowed from Chinese banks. 'In China, we will have a debt crisis — a high-speed rail debt crisis,' says Zhao Jian, a professor at Beijing Jiaotong University and longtime critic of high-speed rail who worries that the cost of the project might have created a hidden debt bomb that threatens China's banking system. 'I think it is more serious than your subprime mortgage crisis. You can always leave a house or use it. The rail system is there. It's a burden. You must operate the rail system, and when you operate it, the cost is very high.'"
Oh really? You mean there are existing safety standards for new technology? And here I thought it was just the engineer's conservative estimates...
What new technology? High speed rail is over a hundred years old. The billion passenger mark was hit in the 1970s. I think there is sufficient track record to establish standards.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-speed_rail
Melamine in baby formula and animal feed to spike low protein counts (http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1856168,00.html)
Coal mine accidents in disproportionate amounts when you compare China's coal production to that of other countries (http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/english/doc/2004-11/13/content_391242.htm)
Melted down anything remotely resembling metal in the late 50s (The Great Leap Forward) to try to match the United Kingdom in steel production - an arbitrary goal set by Mao Zedong - naturally, the product was useless (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backyard_furnace)
China has come a long way since the end of Republican Era but has also consistently cut corners whenever possible. This isn't an issue of sour grapes, simply one of history.
Unfortunately, that apparently isn't the only bubble in China:
How Big Is the Chinese Property Bubble?
China's credit bubble on borrowed time as inflation bites
China: the coming costs of a superbubble
It seems likely that the world has a few more financial tremors coming.
much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
The phrase you are looking for is the "Sunk Cost Fallacy".
TGV Accidents
Germany's ICE, however, had a bad accident with 101 fatalities (details here ), which was caused by a series of issues, but most notably by a faulty wheel design.
Nevertheless, high speed rail on a global scale has an exceptional safety record.
ich bin der musikant
mit taschenrechner in der hand
kraftwerk