Oracle, Google Move To Streamline Java Suit
itwbennett writes "Google and Oracle each submitted proposals on Friday to reduce the number of claims in their Java patent infringement lawsuit, which could help bring the case to a speedier conclusion. Earlier this month, lawyers for the two companies gave Judge William Alsup of the US District Court in San Francisco a crash course in Java to prepare him for a claim construction conference."
So is a Java suit anything like a Zoot suit? Always wanted one o' them. Will the Gap be selling these?
Programmers will influence the judge because they will be affected by the ruling. Only lawyers can be trusted for total impartiality.
The last time something like this happened, Adobe acquired Macromedia... It's how large guerrilla's get to know each other.
And don't forget FORTRAN programmers. You can't get more impartial about a Java lawsuit than FORTRAN programmers...
Java apps don't crash they throw exceptions or the JVM dies.
-- Sun --
Imagine a box of Smalltalk.
Imagine someone dropping that box in a festering pit of C. (Not all pits of C are festering. This one is.)
Redefine "API" as "buzzword implementation".
Extend according to what the competition's doing, rather than as may be technically appropriate.
-- Google --
Recall how Microsoft made Java incompatible and how nerds all hated it.
Recall that you are Google and all nerds love you.
Do the same thing.
Watch your market grow to Apple levels of hysteria.
Observe Hank Scorpio taking over Java.
Take out the flame retardant lawyers, and, in a scenario looking increasingly Monty Python, use them to teach judges Java. ...