VMware Causes Second Outage While Recovering From First
jbrodkin writes "VMware's new Cloud Foundry service was online for just two weeks when it suffered its first outage, caused by a power failure. Things got really interesting the next day, when a VMware employee accidentally caused a second, more serious outage while a VMware team was writing up a plan of action to recover from future power loss incidents. An inadvertent press of a key on a keyboard led to 'a full outage of the network infrastructure [that] took out all load balancers, routers, and firewalls... and resulted in a complete external loss of connectivity to Cloud Foundry.' Clearly, human error is still a major factor in cloud networks."
I didn't get the sense from reading the linked analysis that it was necessarily a single key-press. It reads like this:
This was to be a paper only, hands off the keyboards exercise until the playbook was reviewed. Unfortunately, at 10:15am PDT, one of the operations engineers developing the playbook touched the keyboard. This resulted in a full outage of the network infrastructure sitting in front of Cloud Foundry. This took out all load balancers, routers, and firewalls; caused a partial outage of portions of our internal DNS infrastructure; and resulted in a complete external loss of connectivity to Cloud Foundry.
My sense is that "touched the keyboard" doesn't literally mean "touched a single key on the keyboard", but actually means "ignored the hands-off-the-keyboard part of the exercise, and executed some commands".
But who knows, I could be wrong... I'm sure hoping I'm not!
This pretty much describes my entire career.
Price, Quality, Time. Pick none. What, you thought you had a choice?
They just have to remove that key from the keyboard. You know, the one that massively crashes the entire system. Poor judgement to have that key there.
Don't go knocking my typewriter
It's Electric, and has wonderful BNC connector
for network access. IBM, you did good.
VMware's explanation of events is troubling to me. The company as a whole is responsible for any of its failures. Internally the company could blame an individual but to shareholders and other vested entities an individual employee's failure is not something they care about. A better PR response would be to say that "we" made an unscheduled change or simply an unscheduled change was made to our infrastructure that caused X.
"Transparency is bad" +4 Insightful
What the... ?