Slashdot Mirror


The Internet's New Alternate Reality

Hugh Pickens writes "Tim Rutten writes in the LA Times that when President Obama released his long form birth certificate last week, one of the striking things about the reaction to the president's calm and — to reasonable minds — entirely persuasive appearance in the White House briefing room Wednesday was the rapidity and ease with which so many leading birthers rejected the evidence he presented. 'Until very recently, if every professional news organization in the nation examined a charge and found it baseless, it was — for all intents and purposes — dropped,' writes Rutten. 'Today, the growth of the Internet has drained the noun "news" of its former authority. If you don't like the facts presented on the sites of established news organizations, you simply keep clicking until you find one whose "facts" accord with your beliefs.'"

38 of 869 comments (clear)

  1. kind of like the police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You are supposed to trust the police, but then one of them treats you like shit. Then you end up not trusting any of them.

    It is easy to criticize people for not trusting the media, but who hasn't been intentionally lied to by the media? The blame belongs on a lot of people here. Don't just blame the birthers.

    1. Re:kind of like the police by Internetuser1248 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Damn right. The pundits screaming Obama is a socialist, communist, nazi, islamic, athiest who wasn't born in the US on the Faux news network, the idea that the media would then subsequently blame the internet for this is laughable and pathetic.

    2. Re:kind of like the police by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You are supposed to trust the police, but then one of them treats you like shit. Then you end up not trusting any of them.

      It is easy to criticize people for not trusting the media, but who hasn't been intentionally lied to by the media? The blame belongs on a lot of people here. Don't just blame the birthers.

      It's not just about trust. It's a failure of critical and rational thinking, and people opting for news sources that'll tell them what they want to hear. Plenty of these wingnuts trust Fox News because the channel will give them exactly what they want to see. The Internet has blurred the lines somewhat, with people pointing to blogs and any random site as being authoritative - simply because it happens to agree with their own beliefs.

      It's a country in which the governor of Texas has repeatedly appealed to citizens to telepathically urge an omnipotent invisible deity to change the weather for the state. To borrow an analogy from Sam Harris, would Perry's appeal for divine intervention be any more insane if he asked that people communicate with God by talking in to a hairdryer? It shouldn't really be any more insane. The elephant in the room here is the idea that any kind of communication is possible with some invisible all-powerful being, yet people who believe they can talk to God would almost certainly consider Perry to be mad if he added the hairdryer to his request.

        So long as it's culturally acceptable to proudly hold irrational beliefs it's difficult to imagine how people like the birthers really can be sidelined and ignored? Birthers are just one symptom. We have the anti-vaxxers, 9/11 truthers and God knows how many other nutjobs who receive far too much consideration and acceptance. There's a real need here to school people in rational and critical thinking. That doesn't mean being anti-religious, but certainly one would hope that with critical thinking people would realise that such beliefs are best kept as a personal thing in much the same way that a man's fondness for dressing up as a schoolgirl and getting his arse paddled is certainly harmless fun, but probably not something he can demand respect for in the public square.

      --
      -- Using the preview button since 2005
    3. Re:kind of like the police by somersault · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This isn't about the internet. It's just basic human behaviour. Look at religion for an example of the same types of thinking for the last few thousand years. Any time one of the basic beliefs of a religion is proven false, they either route around it or ignore it.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    4. Re:kind of like the police by HungryHobo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      of course.
      total certain atheism is irrational.

      tooth fairy agnosticism is the sensible approach as in:
      "the existence of god is about as likely as the existence of the tooth fairy"

      now let us put our hands together and ask the tooth fairy to help with the weather.

    5. Re:kind of like the police by jpapon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The point is you can't prove or disprove god. ever.

      Perhaps, but non-existence of God is the null hypothesis... People claim that God exists, so if they want to use God as a reason for their actions, then the burden of proof is on them. My only objection to most peoples religious beliefs is that they treat existence of God as the Null.

      I am defined as an Atheist not because I don't believe in God, but because others do.

      --
      -- Let us endeavor so to live that when we pass even the undertaker shall be sorry. -- M. Twain
    6. Re:kind of like the police by cHALiTO · · Score: 4, Informative

      As Stephen J. Gould put it:

      In the American vernacular, "theory" often means "imperfect fact"--part of a hierarchy of confidence running downhill from fact to theory to hypothesis to guess. Thus the power of the creationist argument: evolution is "only" a theory and intense debate now rages about many aspects of the theory. If evolution is worse than a fact, and scientists can't even make up their minds about the theory, then what confidence can we have in it? Indeed, President Reagan echoed this argument before an evangelical group in Dallas when he said (in what I devoutly hope was campaign rhetoric): "Well, it is a theory. It is a scientific theory only, and it has in recent years been challenged in the world of science--that is, not believed in the scientific community to be as infallible as it once was."

      Well evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape-like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered.

      Moreover, "fact" doesn't mean "absolute certainty"; there ain't no such animal in an exciting and complex world. The final proofs of logic and mathematics flow deductively from stated premises and achieve certainty only because they are not about the empirical world. Evolutionists make no claim for perpetual truth, though creationists often do (and then attack us falsely for a style of argument that they themselves favor). In science "fact" can only mean "confirmed to such a degree that it would be perverse to withhold provisional consent." I suppose that apples might start to rise tomorrow, but the possibility does not merit equal time in physics classrooms.

      Evolutionists have been very clear about this distinction of fact and theory from the very beginning, if only because we have always acknowledged how far we are from completely understanding the mechanisms (theory) by which evolution (fact) occurred. Darwin continually emphasized the difference between his two great and separate accomplishments: establishing the fact of evolution, and proposing a theory--natural selection--to explain the mechanism of evolution.

      - Stephen J. Gould, " Evolution as Fact and Theory"; Discover, May 1981

      --
      "Luck is my middle name," said Rincewind, indistinctly. "Mind you, my first name is Bad." -- Terry Pratchett
    7. Re:kind of like the police by HangingChad · · Score: 4, Insightful

      the idea that the media would then subsequently blame the internet for this is laughable and pathetic.

      Exactly. Those rumors and criticisms are being started by people being paid a lot of money to skew the news. There's nothing accidental about it. Just because the dumbest fraction of society doesn't want to give up the lies isn't the fault of the internet, it's a failure of our educational system.

      --
      That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    8. Re:kind of like the police by ArcherB · · Score: 4, Informative

      Damn right. The pundits screaming Obama is a socialist, communist, nazi, islamic, athiest who wasn't born in the US on the Faux news network, the idea that the media would then subsequently blame the internet for this is laughable and pathetic.

      Wasn't it Dan Rather of Fox News that released that document about George Bush that was an obvious fake? Even after it was proven beyond any reasonable doubt that it was a fake, didn't he insist that it was authentic? I remember the contempt he held for those that dared to question him. He even tried to discredit them by claiming that they sat around in their pajamas, challenging the work of "real" jounalists?

      All of that is true, except Dan Rather never worked for Fox News. And Fox News wasn't the ones pushing the "birther" thing. It headlined MSNBC every single night for weeks. The pundits at Fox News were calling birthers a joke. Sean Hannity, Bill O'Reilly and even Glenn Beck called it a waste of time and every single one of them said Obama was born in HI well before the certificate was ever released.

      Don't let the facts get in the way of your hatred of Fox News. I'm sorry the truth in the real world doesn't match the fantasies you've dreamed up in your head. I guess if the people you hate are not evil enough to justify your hatred, you have to make stuff up to fill the void. The sad part is that you have managed to convince yourself of something that doesn't match reality.

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    9. Re:kind of like the police by UnknowingFool · · Score: 5, Informative

      All of that is true, except Dan Rather never worked for Fox News. And Fox News wasn't the ones pushing the "birther" thing. It headlined MSNBC every single night for weeks. The pundits at Fox News were calling birthers a joke. Sean Hannity, Bill O'Reilly and even Glenn Beck called it a waste of time and every single one of them said Obama was born in HI well before the certificate was ever released.

      Some pundits called the birthers a joke. Others let them have a forum to espouse their wild theories. Some like Glen Beck would admit the authenticity of the birth certificate on TV then go on other media like radio and internet and question it: Obama's birth certificate 'horrible forgery'. And that was just a single search.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    10. Re:kind of like the police by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      When I was in religious studies, I took a sociology class called "The True Believer" that dealt with this phenomenon. In short, the True Believer exists in religion, politics, in movements and causes of every kind. For the True Believer, his/her cause has surpassed reason and become a matter of faith. Anyone who questions it has become a mere obstacle to test their faith. Any evidence to the contrary is false simple by virtue of that contradiction.

      Any attempt to sway a True Believer is pointless. A True Believer can only be swayed by a serious personal crisis or epiphany, a "Road to Damascus" moment that shifts their faith radically. And when they do change, it's usually just to move on an embrace some new cause to be a True Believer in.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    11. Re:kind of like the police by tnk1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't think anyone believes he's not actually a US citizen. The point of conflict is that the US President is required to be a natural-born citizen. That means that if you immigrate and become a US citizen, you can become a citizen with all rights and privileges, except for one, becoming President. Like many things, the Constitution stipulates that, but doesn't really define the term in complete detail.

      The major question is not of citizenship, but whether Obama (or McCain in this example) qualify for the natural-born part. The reality is that they do, but Obama's early life was one where he traveled with his mother quite a bit outside the US and that makes some suspicious that he was not natual-born. It's all garbage, of course, but history is filled with people trying to use these loopholes and conspiracy theories to challenge an order that they do not accept for whatever reason. This is just more of the same sort of thing that kingdoms used to have to deal with when the rumors were instead that the heir to the throne was actually the son of the Queen's lover, instead of the King. It's as old as having prerequisites for office.

    12. Re:kind of like the police by 1u3hr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As for me I had no idea is Obama was born in Hawaii or not. Hillary and Bill Clinton SAID he was a foreign national

      Bullshit. Prove it: when and where did either say that?

      Some of Hillary's campaigners may have done so; believe if you like that she encouraged this, but she never herself made the statement you ascribe to her.

      How could Obama have offered HIllary a place in his cabinet if she had?

  2. Birthers still unconvinced Obama white enough by David+Gerard · · Score: 5, Funny

    KENYA, Indonesia, Wednesday (WorldNetDaily) — Barack Obama's alleged long-form birth certificate has been declared fraudulent by the noble and patriotic "Birther" movement, who claim firm evidence that the President is insufficiently white.

    "I've seen a few Photoshops in my time," said immigrant Birther and world's oldest emo kid Orly Taitz. "I can tell from a few of the pixels. They're nowhere near light enough."

    Donald Trump, the next Sarah Palin, takes credit for provoking the release of this initial documentation of the mysterious Obama, and has now asked if Obama's college transcript is all that, and something about basketball as the President's favourite pastime. Betting pools are now forming on when Trump will allude to watermelon and fried chicken.

    Birthers are routinely outraged at suggestions that blatant racism is at the heart of their disquiet with Obama's landslide victory in the 2008 presidential election. So it's really worth saying it to them, every time.

    The Birther movement was originally started by Party Unity My Ass, a group of disgruntled Hillary Clinton supporters during the 2008 Democratic primary. They note that Obama has, on his track record so far, been a first-class Republican president.

    --
    http://rocknerd.co.uk
  3. Surprising? by VortexCortex · · Score: 5, Funny

    I call bullshit... I find it hard to believe that people only like to be told what they want to hear.

    1. Re:Surprising? by David+Gerard · · Score: 5, Funny

      "People believe any quote they read on the internet if it fits their preconceived notions." - Martin Luther King

      --
      http://rocknerd.co.uk
    2. Re:Surprising? by Hognoxious · · Score: 5, Funny

      People will believe any old tripe if you tell them Benjamin Franklin said it.

          -- Benjamin Franklin

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    3. Re:Surprising? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Funny

      He did, however, make a 'whooosh' noise as he flew overhead.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  4. Irony? by Mjec · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I can't be the only one who sees the irony in the URL being /news/opinion/...

    --
    "But everyone should know everything." -markab
    1. Re:Irony? by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's a typo. It should in fact read "s/news/opinion/;

      easy mistake to make.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    2. Re:Irony? by TeknoHog · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's a typo. It should in fact read "s/news/opinion/;

      That's what she sed.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  5. The news establishment do not deserve our trust. by miffo.swe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Many revelations in later years have show us that the news establishment don't care for the truth at all. Many of the things reveled in the wikileaks cables was known but not reported. The war against Iraq was totally baseless but nobody seemed to care in the media. All they did was distributing what officials told them, without even bothering a simple fact check. All in all i think the problem described comes from the total lack of moral fiber in the media.

    When you know almost everybody is lying to you, its only human to be drawn to news you think sounds most plausible.

    --
    HTTP/1.1 400
  6. Blame where blame is due by Soulfader · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think the traditional mass media has done plenty to damage their own credibility. Why blame the internet?

    1. Re:Blame where blame is due by sco08y · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I think the traditional mass media has done plenty to damage their own credibility. Why blame the internet?

      Their credibility was an aberration to begin with, and really only came about because of big business got in bed with big government during the 1920s. The syndicates, naturally, wanted to get stories ahead of the smaller papers and came to a cozy agreement with politicians not to say anything too outrageous. The politicians were only too happy to comply, and this pushed the smaller, noisier papers to covering local matters. The syndicates were able to promote themselves as being the voice of authority, the peak of which came with Walter Cronkite.

  7. Re:The news establishment do not deserve our trust by thijsh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yeah, it's a bit of both... We are being lied to by media / governments and by our self delusion online... Neither is the full story. The problem is distinguishing the lie from the truth is becoming more and more impossible for people...

  8. Re:Shock, horror by Soulfader · · Score: 4, Informative

    (and, hey America, what happened to all men created equal when it comes to who can be president? Or does that "rule" only apply if you're American, born in America, never set foot outside the borders?)

    Erm, actually, yes, for the first two. It's in the Constitution. You can presumably visit other countries, but you do have to be a natural-born citizen:

    No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

  9. Nothing new, it's a fishing expedition by sco08y · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is yet another story about something we've heard a million times over, but they put "Internet!" in the title and treat it as though it's novel.

    "Birtherism" isn't new, nor limited to black presidents. There was a long argument over whether McCain was native born, there were even debates about whether George W Bush was native born, and have been about presidents going way back. Even recently there was a huge amount of discussion over whether Sarah Palin was really Trig's mother. Even after multiple journalists reported that they had seen her pregnant belly, other equally prominent journalists were still Just Asking Questions.

    And birtherism is loopy, but nothing compared to trutherism. About one third of Democrats believed that the government intentionally killed its own citizens to start a wars or, at least, that Bush knew about 9/11 and let it happen. Most Democrats also still claim that W was AWOL from his guard duty, and many prominent figures demanded explanations. CBS's Dan Rather, a 40 year veteran reporter, completely destroyed his career trying to pass off some forged documents. To this day, the guy insists that those forgeries were "fake but accurate". And, of course, there are long standing conspiracy theories about the Bush family's involvement with Nazis and such.

    This gets play because "ooh, look, the Internet!" but if you look at what various conspiracies have in common, they're all old fashioned fishing expeditions. After Obama presented the long form, Trump *instantly* went to demanding his college records. The weird Palin birthers want all sorts of hospital records. The AWOL Bush people had huge lists of demands.

    All these demands seek to scrutinize every possible second of a person's life. What happens when it's put into practice is the unbounded, independent prosecutor. Ken Starr, for instance, started out by investigating serious claims of corruption by the Clintons. When that turned up nothing, it morphed into a fishing expedition that turned up Lewinsky, Jones and Flowers. Incidentally, there are Clinton obsessives who are still Just Asking Questions, I won't link to it, but do a search for the "Clinton Death List" if you're curious to see some real crazy.

  10. us news is unique by Jeek+Elemental · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I occasionally get a glimpse of US news shows (clips and some cnn), the contrast with bbc or al jazeera is pretty striking:

    The most important piece of information is always the name of the host, which is repeated every 5 seconds.
    The hosts seem to be picked up straight from plastic surgery, complemented by exaggerated facial expressions.
    Its roughly 5 minutes of program then 5 minutes of commercials.
    If there are 2 hosts they spend half the time demonstrating their "chemistry" for eachother, its painful to watch.
    The graphics remind me of old arcade cabinets, classy like las vegas.
    Interviews are rude and annoying, the object seems to be that noone should speak a complete sentence.

    I dont think its odd americans dont trust news, theres nothing trustworthy about it.

  11. Re:Where did the lost authority come from? by jejones · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I would've sworn McCain did. (See http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23415028/ns/nightly_news/, "McCain's citizenship called into question".) Sorry, Charlie, not everybody who disagrees with Obama is racist.

  12. Re:Shock, horror by garethjrowlands · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why does it not make sense to allow a person to own an item?

    Don't you need to draw a line somewhere? Which of the items below would you ban? Any of them?

    1. Three foot poles.
    2. Ten foot poles.
    3. Unroadworthy cars.
    4. Guns.
    5. Car bombs.
    6. Heavy weapons.
    7. Non-weapons grade nuclear material.
    8. Biological weapons.
    9. Nuclear weapons.

  13. Re:Where did the lost authority come from? by Fulminata · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The difference is that McCain's birth was questioned, the question was resolved, and people moved on. Since then the only questioning of McCain's birth has been as a counter-example to the questioning of Obama's birth. On the other hand, Obama's birth was questioned, the question was resolved, and people continued to question anyway.

    Simple disagreement with Obama is not racism, but continuing to question the circumstances of his birth long after any reasonable doubt on the issue has been removed (which happened long before the release of the long form birth certificate), indicates something far beyond simple disagreement.

  14. Re:kind of like religion by somersault · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Of course the idea that a god existing makes anything more meaningful is also pretty funny if you think about it.

    What would then be the "reason" for that god existing for example?

    In the end there is no meaning other than what you create for yourself. Most find it easier to copy their meanings from others - and the larger a group is, the more convincing their meanings appear..

    --
    which is totally what she said
  15. Re:kind of like religion by Black+Parrot · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Of course the idea that a god existing makes anything more meaningful is also pretty funny if you think about it.

    What would then be the "reason" for that god existing for example?

    In the end there is no meaning other than what you create for yourself. Most find it easier to copy their meanings from others - and the larger a group is, the more convincing their meanings appear..

    IOW, religions have always exercised the same sort of alternate-reality support as this story describes as "new" for the Internet Age.

    When you immerse yourself in a subculture that believes X, it becomes easy to believe X and hard to be motivated to ask questions that challenge X. It doesn't matter whether your source of authority is FOX News, David Koresh, or the Pope - it works the same in each case, and depends on surrounding yourself with people who suckle at the same tit.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  16. Re:Where did the lost authority come from? by edremy · · Score: 5, Informative

    The difference is that McCain's birth was questioned, the question was resolved, and people moved on. Since then the only questioning of McCain's birth has been as a counter-example to the questioning of Obama's birth. On the other hand, Obama's birth was questioned, the question was resolved, and people continued to question anyway.

    The real difference is that McCain's birth was questioned, IMMEDIATELY answered, and we moved on.

    Obama's birth was questioned, the question was ignored for three years, then suddenly he decides to answer it. People wonder why he didn't answer as soon as it was questioned, and assume that he couldn't answer it then, hence the delay.

    Let me fix that for you: Obama's birth was questioned, IMMEDIATELY answered to the satisfaction of his Democratic primary opponents, his Republican opponents in the general election, and the Supreme Court justice who swore him in when he presented the fully legal certificate from Hawaii. All sane people moved on. It was only not "settled" in the minds of a few pathetic trolls who can't accept the fact that a black man with a funny name might actually be allowed to sit in the Oval Office.

    --
    "Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
  17. Re:who is a "natural born" citizen? by Black+Parrot · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Article II - The Executive Branch

    Section 1 - The President

    "No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President;"

    Question: who is "natural born"? I propose all candidates must prove they are natural born.

    Well, it's clear that no one living today was a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of that Constitution, so it looks like we need to stop having presidents.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  18. Re:Where did the lost authority come from? by scumdamn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You mean like when he originally released his birth certificate that serves as valid ID anywhere else? That actually happened. What then followed was two years of people saying he needed to go even further than anybody else and release a "long form" certificate that nobody else needs to submit. Somehow this became a claim that a birth certificate wasn't released when it's simply not true. Thanks for being gullible enough to repeat it, though.

  19. Re:The trust died when it became "The Media" by Black+Parrot · · Score: 4, Informative

    If the media would do a better job releasing the "news" to us then maybe the public would be more likely to believe what they were told.

    The release of the "long form" birth certificate is a perfect example

    No, it's a horrible example. The media didn't sit on the LFBC for three years, because they didn't have it either.

    Hawaii released the SFBC because that's their policy. It just wasn't good enough for a lot of people who had some reason to desperately believe that the prez wasn't really the Prez. The media had nothing to do with it, except perhaps for some propaganda outfit fanning the flames of the kookery.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  20. Re:Where did the lost authority come from? by zeroshade · · Score: 4, Informative

    Note also the argument that it was illegal to show his long-from birth certificate was a silly one from the get-go. Since Obama has miraculously managed to get a waiver to show it, there's no reason to suspect he couldn't have gotten a waiver in 2008....

    If you did some research you'd realize that the Department of Health in Hawaii made a special exception for him in the interest of stopping the tide of requests they kept getting to release it. By policy, the Department of Health will not release the long-form birth certificate, even to the person in question. This was a special circumstance, over the last three years it has been independently verified by the governor and others that it was on file, yet the birthers refused to believe it.