Bin Laden's Death Causes Twitter Record
gabbo529 writes "Twitter has been a source of breaking news since its inception five years ago, and the social network was used at a high rate last night with the death of Osama Bin Laden. [Sunday night] saw the highest sustained rate of Tweets ever. From 10:45 p.m. to 2:20 a.m. ET, there was an average of 3,000 Tweets per second."
A joke only UK readers will get:
Who says you can't take a Bin out on a bank holiday.
Brum tish!
It took the death of the most hated man alive to finally put an end to the supremacy of Justin Beiber tweets.
I found the opening statement of TFS ("Twitter has been a source of breaking news...") kind of shocking. Does no-one read well enough to recognize a fluff piece from marketing when they see one, or do we just not care anymore?
Caveat Utilitor
From the bottom of the page: http://slashdot.org/hof.shtml
Looks like a story about Kerry vs. Bush is the current comment champ.
This man caused the deaths of many, and instigated a sense of fear that today still affects millions accross the world in security, and other issues.
I cannot honestly say how much Bin Laden himself actually contributed to any loss of lives, but I can definitely say that any sense of fear along with that tide of intolerance was and is instigated not by some lone raving looney and his YouTube channel but by politicians on all sides of the fence. Osama Bin Laden has never posed any tangible threat to me. That puts him in stark contrast to the supranational police state that has been brought on us since 9/11.
Rudolf Hess edited Mein Kampf. He was the very first grammar nazi.
Counter-Terrorists Win!
How does it feel to be a liar with pants constantly on fire?