Slashdot Mirror


Attachmate Fires Mono Developers

darthcamaro writes "Love it or hate it, Novell's open source Mono project has inspired a lot of debate over the last 7 years. Mono brings .NET to Linux, with some interesting patent connections. The project is now at a crossroads, with news today that Attachmate had laid off the US based development team for Mono."

6 of 362 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Good. by Microlith · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ECMA standards don't protect you from patent lawsuits. Especially not when the standard is saddled with RAND patents (which virtually guarantee that open source usage is out the window.)

  2. Re:Not many tears by Etrigoth · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ok, I'm not going to wholesale bite but you really need to bring some Citation to this FUD.

    You see, a simple google search results in this: http://mono-project.com/Compatibility

    Which show's that as far as base libraries and feature support, Mono is almost all there with full .Net 4.0.

    Seeing as that's the latest version of .Net and not even the latest version that a lot of businesses are targeting, would suggest that Mono isn't lagging at all.

    --
    When we remember we are all mad, the mysteries disappear and life stands explained.
  3. Re:Good. by rzei · · Score: 5, Informative

    Last I checked MONO was aiming to deliver .NET to Linux. .NET (platform) patents scare people, not patents regarding the language specification. I guess you can patent anything in USA and sue on ever more in Texas, but I do not think that the language specification contains anything patentable.

    Have you read the patent statement? It says:

    Microsoft Corporation will grant, [..] licenses on commericially reasonable terms and conditions, for its patent(s), [...] for the implementation of the Ecma Standard.

    So, until you have Microsoft releasing GPL (w/ classpath or whatever assemblies you use on .NET exception) or LGPL code that compiles under Linux you really shouldn't be using it.

  4. Re:Not many tears by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As someone that build's cross platform .NET apps using Mono, you should definitely STFU, and you obviously are talking out your ass. .NET compatibility in mono these days is steller. The only things we really lack are features of Visual Studio, not so much mono itself. MonoDevelop however is pretty dang good. In .NET we've been getting some amazing database ORM's that point & click to build your DAL automatically for you. In mono its a little bit more old-fashioned having to invoke command line for auto-generation. WPF obviously is not available, as to be expected when developing cross platform, so you use GTK. Go back to fox news dude.

  5. Re:Good. by aztracker1 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Well, you could read the legally binding community promise... Or the projects MS has released under OSS licences (MVC, DLR, etc). I'm guessing you've stripped out the FAT32 support, and Samba from your linux builds too then?

    --
    Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
  6. Re:C# *and* core libraries by MareLooke · · Score: 5, Informative

    The FSFs stance, but since the FSF are just anti MS, Stallman following loonies (right?), here's Groklaw's stance. I'm sure you can find more with your friend.

    But don't let the facts presented by people who understand the applicable law and the related issues stop your fanboyism.