Slashdot Mirror


The World's Smallest Video Camera

fergus07 writes "Medigus has developed what it claims is the world's smallest video camera at just 0.039-inches (0.99 mm) in diameter. The Israeli company's second-gen model (a 0.047-inch diameter camera was unveiled in 2009) has a dedicated 0.66x0.66 mm CMOS sensor that captures images at 45K resolution and no, it's not destined for use in tiny mobile phones or covert surveillance devices; instead the camera is designed for medical endoscopic procedures in hard-to-reach regions of the human anatomy."

7 of 78 comments (clear)

  1. Smallest camera you say? by fridaynightsmoke · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well, they know where they can stick that...

    --
    This is a substitute for a clever sig that fits within the maximum number of characters.
    1. Re:Smallest camera you say? by Abstrackt · · Score: 3, Funny

      They can obviously see Uranus with it.

      Which changed it's name to Urectum because they we're tired of the jokes.

      Actually they got tired of that joke too, so they changed the name again. Something with goats, I think.

      Urkidding?

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
  2. Translation by somersault · · Score: 3, Insightful

    instead the camera is designed for medical endoscopic procedures in hard to reach regions of the human anatomy.

    By that they really just mean "up-skirt" shots.

    --
    which is totally what she said
  3. Re:45k in lines by imsabbel · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Thats what they are doing right now. Guess what. 45k individual fibres, even bundled, need a lot more space than a 1mm^3 camera...

    --
    HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
  4. Re:45k in lines by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 4, Informative

    They do use fibre bundles for endoscopes ; they're very expensive ($10,000 kind of expensive).

    CMOS sensors are actually a significant step up in terms of

    * durability - whack a fibre endoscope on the edge of a surgical trolley and you just broke half the fibres in the bundle. Not so with a wire bundle.
    * price - a CMOS sensor, even a medically certified one, is much cheaper than a carefully aligned bundle of photographic class optical fibres

    And I reckon you can probably make sensors of a usable size and resolution, with lenses, much smaller than an equivalent fibre assembly.

  5. Re:Dupe ? by retroworks · · Score: 3

    I thought it was a duplicate too. But it made my comment on the previous story worth duplicating... "Nine months from now, will these seem large and cumbersome?" The comment got modded down last month, probably foolish to repost.

    --
    Gently reply
  6. Off topic by tehcyder · · Score: 4, Funny

    If someone doesn't change that fucking quote of the day by "Matt Welsh" soon, I'm going to scream and scream and scream until my head falls off and then let my grieving relatives sue slashdot for one trillion dollars.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it