Slashdot Mirror


Startup Wants To Put 64-Cores In Your Smartphone

angry tapir writes "Startup chip design company Adapteva has announced the multicore Epiphany processor, which is designed to accelerate applications in servers and low-power devices such as smartphones and tablets. The RISC-based processor is scalable to thousands of cores on a single chip, and can sit alongside CPUs to provide real-time execution of diverse applications. Epiphany chips are currently scalable up to 64 cores in smartphones and up to 4,000 cores in servers. The processor can accelerate tasks like hand gesture recognition, face matching or face tracking, but is not designed to be a full-fledged CPU."

5 of 142 comments (clear)

  1. Re:a toaster oven by syousef · · Score: 3, Funny

    I wonder what good it would do them if they stick their toaster oven into my Nokia 6303c?

    You have 64 cores. That's gonna run much hotter than a toaster oven....though probably not for long enough to make toast.

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  2. Re:I'm impressed by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah. With that many cores, you could have TWO websites that use Flash open at the same time!

    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
  3. Re:Um...why? by Darinbob · · Score: 3, Informative

    Because marketing thinks that if they have N cores it will sell better than a phone with only N-1 cores. And they're probably right.

  4. Any tech that has testimonials by mrmeval · · Score: 3, Informative

    Smells of infomercials and burned popcorn.

    --
    I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
  5. Re:a toaster oven by timeOday · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Nah, the total number of transistors in those 64 cores is probably a small fraction of the transistors in one modern CPU - more like stream processing units in a GPU (a GPU has several hundred).

    Modern CPUs use huge numbers of transistors for small increases in speed, so there's no question such a chip would be much more efficient for tasks that fit it - again, like GPUs.