Slashdot Mirror


Marking 125 Years Since the Great Gauge Change

Arnold Reinhold writes "This month ends with the 125th anniversary of one of the most remarkable achievements in technology history. Over two days beginning Monday, May 31, 1886, the railroad network in the southern United States was converted from a five-foot gauge to one compatible with the slightly narrower gauge used in the US North, now know as standard gauge. The shift was meticulously planned and executed. It required one side of every track to be moved three inches closer to the other. All wheel sets had to be adjusted as well. Some minor track and rolling stock was sensibly deferred until later, but by Wednesday the South's 11,500 mile rail network was back in business and able to exchange rail cars with the North. Other countries are still struggling with incompatible rail gauges. Australia still has three. Most of Europe runs on standard gauge, but Russia uses essentially the same five foot gauge as the old South and Spain and Portugal use an even broader gauge. India has a multi-year Project Unigauge, aimed at converting its narrow gauge lines to the subcontinent's five foot six inch standard."

91 of 426 comments (clear)

  1. Part of a general pattern by JoshuaZ · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In the second half of the 19th century the US took rail transit very seriously. The standardization of the gauge isn't the only example of this. The US also spent a large amount of effort building the transcontinental railroad. A major reason for the success of the United States in the 20th century was the massive investment in infrastructure in the end of the 19th. Unfortunately, the US hasn't done much in the way of large scale infrastructural improvement since the building of the highway system in the 1950s. Our electric grid is primitive and outdated and our fastest passenger trains like the Acela high speed rail on the East Coast are slower than regular trains in other places like Japan (the maximum speed of the Acela is less than the average speed for some of the Japanese trains). I'm deeply worried about what the next few years are going to be like.

    1. Re:Part of a general pattern by vlm · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Our electric grid is primitive and outdated and our fastest passenger trains like the Acela high speed rail on the East Coast are slower than regular trains in other places like Japan

      Both have the same core problems...

      First, private monopoly large scale providers result in the inevitable property taxes levied on the routes, after all why not make the "outsiders" pay property taxes until they bleed... The owners can/might survive depreciation and interest costs of improved routes, but they'll never survive the prop taxes on improved routes. Its kind of like adding an extra 5% to the published interest rate in perpetuity, and taxes always and only go up making an unlimited liability for the private owners.

      NIMBY is the second problem, for better or worse we operate sorta kinda partially under the rule of law, and we certainly have plenty of hungry lawyers out to stop all progress.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    2. Re:Part of a general pattern by DigiShaman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I know I'm stating the obvious for many readers. But that's because post WW2, oil was cheap, and driving equated to the ultimate form of personal freedom. So much freedom in fact that the suburbs were created in that time period too. Of course, cheap energy wont last forever. I can't predict what will happen in the future with regards to transportation, but I can predict that the current status quo will not last.

      The problem wasn't our desire for freedom and independence with how we lived our lives. The problem was the instruments of energy we chose to achieve that without a clear vision or plan in mind to maintain it.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    3. Re:Part of a general pattern by Culture20 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      driving equated to the ultimate form of personal freedom

      Still does. Try getting anywhere that's not in New York City, San Diego, or Chicago without a car, and you'll be spending a lot of time waiting or being herded where others want you to go. And you'd better plan in advance, because the bus isn't stopping at that quaint roadside diner you just saw.

    4. Re:Part of a general pattern by Pharmboy · · Score: 2

      As soon as solar and wind becomes cheap and efficient enough the natural gas and coal devoted to power production will be able to go toward syngas and Diesel production.

      I don't think so. It is a Catch 22. If we could magically jump to 50% renewable tomorrow, that would make the price of oil, coal and natural gas go DOWN. This would make biofuels of all kinds relatively more expensive, including syngas and biodiesel. Regular diesel would be cheaper, but the US taxes it heavily (to capture funds from trucking), which is one reason why there are so few diesel cars in the US. Money will NOT flow into these other technologies unless someone is convinced that they will pay off. Otherwise, few will invest in them, which is where we are today.

      Power generation will always be done by the cheapest method, period. The only way to change what is used for power is to change the cost, and the only tool to overcome the market is called "taxation".

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    5. Re:Part of a general pattern by loshwomp · · Score: 2

      Try getting anywhere in America that's not in New York City, San Diego, or Chicago without a car, and you'll be spending a lot of time waiting or being herded where others want you to go.

      There. Fixed that for ya. :)

    6. Re:Part of a general pattern by TheTyrannyOfForcedRe · · Score: 2

      The current reliance on cars gives many areas the perfect excuse not to implement decent public transportation, which is pretty much why the US has terrible public transportation.

      Cars may only be an excuse. I've lived in two different cities where opposition to public transit improvements came from people who wanted to keep their white upper middle class suburbs free of "others." In both cases the improvements would have allowed people living in poor (and mostly nonwhite) areas easy access to upper middle class enclaves. There's a reason people pay a lot of money to live in upscale areas. Aside from the nice landscaping and large homes the main motivation seems to be to get away from "those people."

      --
      "Liechtenstein is the world's largest producer of sausage casings, potassium storage units, and false teeth."
    7. Re:Part of a general pattern by Christopher+Fritz · · Score: 2

      You "pull the cord"? Please tell me that was a figure of speech because otherwise your public transport is in worse shape than I thought! :)

      For US Americans such as myself who are used to either pulling a cord (horizontal cord that goes across the wall of the bus) or pressing a button (much less common from my experience) to signal a stop, what other methods are there? I'm genuinely curious. I did a quick Google search, but I don't seem to be able to come up with the right search terms to get a result that tells the methods of stopping a bus for various non-US bus systems.

    8. Re:Part of a general pattern by SuperQ · · Score: 5, Informative

      You're on the list for "most short sighted person in humanity". Just because something is an inconvenience for you doesn't mean that there is no benefit.

      It sounds like you're delivering stuff by trucks/cars. Guess what, there might be something more important out there than you.

      Trains deliver huge amounts of raw materials. Things like steel that are used to make trucks.

      Trains deliver huge amounts of energy, namely coal used to power nearly half of the electricity in the US.

      Try looking past your nose some time.

    9. Re:Part of a general pattern by SuperQ · · Score: 2

      Most of your quaint roadside diners were eliminated by the Dwight D. Eisenhower National System of Interstate and Defense Highways. People stop are herded along the interstate and only stop long enough for gas, mcdonalds, and starbucks.

    10. Re:Part of a general pattern by peragrin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Solar and wind will never replace coal or nuclear.

      Wind is far too inefficient (something like on average 25% of a given rating is actually produced) So 1MW are only really good for 250KW So to replace say a single nuclear plant you need several thousand wind turbines. Going bigger actually makes things worse. And the land and water areas required will make every cringe.

      Direct solar is also horribly ineffeceint(20% for a given amount of space) and requires huge flat areas to work.

      Solar Salt stands a decent chance, It still requires huge land areas however it can at least get up to decent MW levels.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    11. Re:Part of a general pattern by SuperQ · · Score: 2

      Yup, this is one of the major problems with some train routes in the US. There are tons and tons of train routes, the only ones you notice and get annoyed at are the ones with grade level crossings.

      Nobody gets upset because there's a BART going by. But people (including myself) have to wait for Caltrain to go by in a lot of places. Thankfully I only bike over Caltrain's right of way about once every few weeks these days.

      The US needs a major infrastructure push to get rail fixed.

      A) Eliminate grade level crossings in urban/suburban areas
      B) Electrify track to reduce noise and allow for more modern trainsets
      C) Fix regulations so passenger trains don't need to be as heavy (fixed by automation and better track scheduling systems)
      D) Fix tracks so that we can go faster than 79mph for both passenger and freight traffic.

      Imagine if lighter weight freight goods could be moved at 150+ mph. UPS/Fedex could move online orders cross country in 1-2 days instead of 4-5 via ground shipping.

    12. Re:Part of a general pattern by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 2

      You "pull the cord"? Please tell me that was a figure of speech...

      Eh? One pulls on a cord running horizontally the length of the bus to signal the driver, "please stop at the next bus stop." Otherwise, if there are no passengers waiting to board at that stop, the bus will skip it.

      This is a common method used by buses in the U.S. Perhaps a different method is used where you are; I've been on buses that had some sort of touch sensor, but this is apparently much more expensive.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    13. Re:Part of a general pattern by dave87656 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I know I'm stating the obvious for many readers. But that's because post WW2, oil was cheap, and driving equated to the ultimate form of personal freedom. So much freedom in fact that the suburbs were created in that time period too. Of course, cheap energy wont last forever. I can't predict what will happen in the future with regards to transportation, but I can predict that the current status quo will not last.

      The problem wasn't our desire for freedom and independence with how we lived our lives. The problem was the instruments of energy we chose to achieve that without a clear vision or plan in mind to maintain it.

      The low-hanging fruit in this equation is freight. If we could move a large portion of the long-distance freight to Rail, it would (1) relieve the interstate system and (2) save a lot of oil, since rail miles per gallon per ton is about 435. An 18-wheeler can transport about 36 tons and gets something like 7 or 8 mpg, which is about 250 miles per gallon per ton. Of course, there are other factors, such as the fact that the train will probably have a slightly longer route and that you will still need local delivery, but the potential savings, financial and ecological, are high.

    14. Re:Part of a general pattern by blackchiney · · Score: 2

      Fukushima was built in the late 60s, when nuclear was the wave of the future. But rather than build new reactors and decommission old ones they run those same old reactors until they literally fall apart. Nuclear power construction has improved since then but the only people getting new, updated, clean reactors aren't Japan or the US. If anything Fukushima residents should be blaming TEPCO first and the government second. The former should have shut it down ages ago and the latter should be authorizing new plants to be built.

    15. Re:Part of a general pattern by Edmund+Blackadder · · Score: 2

      Energy from nuclear reactors is not cheap at all. Even if you try to ignore the risk of a disaster, nuclear reactors are incredibly expensive to build and decommission and the story of cheap nuclear energy is a pipe dream that was never realized.

      Why do you think the nuclear lobby complains about Congress? There is no law on the books against building new nuclear plants. Of course you have to get the permits, but Congress does not give those out, the various government agencies do, and they usually do give out permits. There are already permits issued for several new nuclear plants in the US. No the nuclear lobby complains about Congress because they want money. Because the story about cheap nuclear energy is a lie and the private sector will not build a nuclear reactor without getting a bunch of taxpayer or electricity payer money to fund it.

      Take another example natural gas. Nobody asks Congress to build natural gas reactors, they just build them. That's because they actually make money, which means people invest in them, so nobody needs to squeeze money from the taxpayer to make them. But nuclear plants are huge and expensive boondogles and actual investors are not dumb enough to invest in them. So they go after the taxpayer of course hoping that the taxpayer is dumb enough.

    16. Re:Part of a general pattern by m50d · · Score: 2

      In Britain at least, "pulling the cord" means the emergency-stop mechanism. Signalling for a bus to stop is usually a button; we'd probably just say "ring the bell"

      --
      I am trolling
    17. Re:Part of a general pattern by teh+kurisu · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's what they said about the first generation of nuclear reactors. "Too cheap to meter" was the phrase. But we're still in the situation where heating a house using electricity is an expensive option, and even the 'cheap' option of natural gas heating is too expensive for some people during the winter.

      Nuclear reactors exist within an electricity market and will sell their electricity for whatever they can get for it. They also have to make sure that over the lifetime of the plant, they save up enough cash to fund the extensive decommissioning process at the end of the plant's life.

      I'll believe in "too cheap to meter" when I see it.

    18. Re:Part of a general pattern by RockDoctor · · Score: 2

      But that's because post WW2, oil was cheap,

      [SNIP]

      Of course, cheap energy wont last forever.

      cheap energy didn't last forever.

      FTFY

      I am an oil geologist ; finding new reserves is getting harder, and un-explored or under-explored areas are getting fewer and further from market - which is my specialism, and why I work intercontinentally and inter-hemispherically.

      Actually ... you've just proposed a problem for me - is there a hemisphere on the Earth where I haven't worked, and if there is, what would it's pole be? That's an interesting maths problem, but I think it'd be easier to check with my globe and some Post-Its(TM).

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    19. Re:Part of a general pattern by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      You forgot about the cost of pollution. Oil and coal are artificially cheap because the people who use them to pollute don't directly pick up the cost, so the government has to step in with taxes.

      Politics will drive the move to renewable too. In Japan there is more opposition to nuclear than ever now, so projects for generating energy from alternative sources are being accelerated. Japan doesn't have much in the way of natural resources like coal or gas and space based solar looks to be the way forward there.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  2. Re:And still shortsighted by vlm · · Score: 2

    It needs to be done once again when larger areas want to connect. And then continents.

    Europe - Asia no problemo

    N.A. - Australia this is getting difficult

    S.A. - Antarctica now that's ridiculous.

    Arguably with intermodal all that really matters is container size, since you'll be switching transport providers every couple thousand miles anyway.

    --
    "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
  3. Re:Only a few left.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Mosyt of those, there are clear advantage to. easy base conversion and unit creation, unambiguous and lexical-chronological sorting equivalence, more than 4bil addresses respectively

    is there some clear advantage to 240v 50hz AC?

  4. Re:And still shortsighted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Of course, there will always be rouge nations using odd guages.

  5. Re:Only a few left.... by isopropanol · · Score: 2

    Houses are already wired for 240v, just not most appliances so not most outlets. Few residential applications use synchronous motors, so the frequency doesn't matter much (beyond higher frequencies allowing smaller transformers). And at least mainland North American countries all use the same plug.

  6. Re:Only a few left.... by x*yy*x · · Score: 2

    Date format is stupid all around the world. Everyone should just use 2011-05-08 15:00. Yes, drop the stupid am/pm stuff too.

  7. Re:Only a few left.... by Jeek+Elemental · · Score: 5, Funny

    wow that must be one mother of a plug

  8. Re:Only a few left.... by Have+Brain+Will+Rent · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well if you're going to do that then you should also drop the 24 hours clock - 24? What's up with that??? The 100 hour/day clock makes much more sense - think of all the overtime we'd get!

    --
    The tyrant will always find a pretext for his tyranny - Aesop
  9. Re:And still shortsighted by tomhudson · · Score: 5, Funny

    Of course, there will always be rouge (sic) nations using odd guages (sic).

    Rouge nations? Would that be the Kingdom of Maybelline, the Covergirl Islands, or the Republique de l'Oreal?

    And what's a "guage"? It sounds french. Do you pronounce it "goo-aj", "g-ow-gh", or "joo-a-jee"?

  10. Re:Only a few left.... by Cwix · · Score: 2

    Fire marshal had a heart attack when he saw all the daisy chained power strips.

    --
    You are entitled to your own opinions, not your own facts.
  11. Re:Only a few left.... by dj245 · · Score: 5, Informative

    There is a slight advantage to having 240v but not much. Cables can be thinner and carry the same amount of power since the amps are lower. But, for the highest power devices in US homes (water heaters, clothes driers, ovens, etc) they are already on 240V. For other appliances there isn't enough advantage to justify switching the entire country and changing billions of dollars of infrastructure. The efficiency advantage is small. 60hz has the advantage as far as frequency goes. 60hz distribution systems are slightly more efficient. 60Hz steam turbines are smaller than their 50hz counterparts, which saves material costs for turbine manufacturers (and the utilities who buy them). There is basically no difference to the end-user. All the advantages/disadvantages are on the utility and distribution side. Again, there is no compelling reason to change the entire US over to 50Hz, and change out billions of dollars of infrastructure.

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
  12. How did they do it? by hawguy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    How did they get the work done on time? How many people were involved?

    11,500 miles/track is around 32 million railroad spikes that have to be pulled and respiked in the new location. If it takes one person 20 seconds to pull a spike and rehammer it in, it would take a crew of 16,000 people working 16 hour shifts to do the work in 3 days. And this is only the guys that are doing the spiking, it ignores the thousands of others that would be involved in moving (and lengthening/shorting curved sections when necessary) the rails, altering the running stock gauge and handling the supply logistics for materials, food, water, housing, etc for these large teams. So maybe 20,000 - 25,000 workers were involved?

    1. Re:How did they do it? by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 2

      The bulk of the Southern Railroad net was damaged or destroyed by the War, so likely they started the rebuilding during the Reconstruction around fall of 1865 or spring of 1866, there were large numbers of demobbed soldiers and freed slaves for a work force.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confederate_railroads_in_the_American_Civil_War

    2. Re:How did they do it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Here's what's written in a history of the Illinois Central Railroad. Note that this re-gauging, On Friday, July 29, 1881, predates the one mentioned in the summary by several years.

      "Most railroads in Illinois conformed to the Illinois Central gauge of four feet eight and one-half inches, commonly known as the English, or standard, gauge. But in the South the gauge of nearly all railroads...was five feet.

      "Owing to the difference of three and one-half inches between the gauges at the Ohio River, sleeping cars, passenger cars, passenger coaches, baggage cars, and the freight cars employed in service from the completion of the rail route in 1873 were designed and fitted so that cars could be run over specially constructed dual gauge tracks at Cairo, jacked up and converted from standard to wide gauge, or vice versa, by removing one set of trucks and installing another on each trip.

      "In the spring of 1881, Clarke, having obtained authority to undertake the conversion, announced a plan which was without precedent in the history of American railroading -- a plan to change the gauge of the entire 550-mile line between East Cairo and New Orleans in the same day -- in fact, within a few hours! This was the first Southern railroad east of the Mississippi River and one of the first in the entire country to change from wide to standard gauge..." ...

      "To complete the herculean task, more than 3,000 men were distributed along the line. The work began as soon as it was light enough to see, and by 3 o'clock in the afternoon, every rail had been spiked into place in what the Railroad Gazette described as the 'the greatest feat ever accomplished in gauge changing!'

      "Describing the methods employed, the Gazette said:
      'The west rail was moved inward 3-1/2 inches. All the spikes on the inside of rails to be changed had already been drawn, except the spike in every fourth tie on the straight lines and every third tie on curves. Spikes for the new gauge were already driven in every fourth tie and third. All necessary spikes were distributed on the ends of the ties into which they were to be driven. Each section foreman was furnished with a narrow-gauge hand-car and a full set of tools." ...

      "Clarke's feat was hailed as a "truly wonderful achievement," and in 1884-1886 when other Southern railroads began to lay plans for converting their lines to standard gauge, the leaned heavily on his instructions and experience."

      Source:
      Main Line of Mid-America
      The Story of The Illinois Central Railroad
      Carlton J. Corliss
      Creative Age Press
      1950

  13. Electric grid primitive? Compared to what? by calidoscope · · Score: 2

    I'd like to know which country has an electric grid that makes the US grid look primitive. Japan still has the 50/60Hz split, the US grid has been 60Hz only since 1948 (albeit there are remnants of 25HZ systems for railway/electrochemical use). Haven't heard anything about Europe that makes it superior to the US. China might have an edge due to the newness of their infrastructure.

    --
    A Shadeless room is a brighter room.
    1. Re:Electric grid primitive? Compared to what? by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 2

      Actually five grids.

      Two major, three minor.

      Western Interconnection and Eastern Interconnection are the two major, the three minor interconnections are the Québec Interconnection, the Texas Interconnection, and the Alaska Interconnection.

      Western and Eastern currently have six DC connections and a giant connection is being built between Texas, Eastern and Western - Tres Amigas SuperStation was announced to connect the Eastern, Western and Texas Interconnections via three 5 GW superconductor link

    2. Re:Electric grid primitive? Compared to what? by kmdrtako · · Score: 5, Informative

      Maybe it's the piss poor domestic voltage (110V P-E) that necessitates using 2 phase supplies for domestic electric heating, the occasional domestic installations rated for 50 amps (5.5kW) and the un-earthed non-polarised plug / sockets? Or maybe it's just the yearly summer rolling blackouts?

      Coming from a country where you can run a 3kW power-tool from a single phase domestic plug / socket combo, then when your done quickly boil water in an electric tea kettle to make a nice hot drink, and at the end of the day wash yourself clean in a 10kW electric shower I can say that the US domestic supply at least looks pretty fucking dismal.

      110V domestic voltage? Ungrounded, non-polarized plugs? 50A service? Are you referring to North America? If so, you're woefully misinformed, or ignorant, or both. With minor exceptions domestic service is 220V split phase. While most things in American households run on 110V (one half or the other of the 220V split phase) electric appliances like water heaters, stoves, ovens, and clothes dryers, run on 220V. Current building codes require grounded, polarized outlets, and the only place you find ungrounded, unpolarized outlets are old buildings that haven't been upgraded. Most new construction gets 200A service, and like the outlets, the only place you find mere 50A or 100A service is in older homes that haven't upgraded their service.

      And I shower with water, not electricity. ;-)

    3. Re:Electric grid primitive? Compared to what? by Your.Master · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Translation:

      Oh my god, I can't stand ANYTHING about my country not being the best out of all the countries ever; I'd better come up with some excuse to get defensive and turn it into a bad thing about the other countries so mine is best again!

      Yes, there are reasons Europe's grid is better. That doesn't mean it's not...better. The GP was arguing that it wasn't better.

      Seriously, not everything is about your smug sense of nationalistic superiority. You didn't design the fucking grid; what's it to you anyway if somebody says it's bad? Fix it, or accept that it's bad but you're going to focus on other things. Don't pretend that it's a good thing because Hitler. Or some damn thing.

    4. Re:Electric grid primitive? Compared to what? by Patch86 · · Score: 2

      Almost all major Western countries are suffering the same problem. Just because they're all equipped with the same primitive grid systems, it doesn't make it any less of a problem.

      The grids as they stand were mostly designed 60 years to a century ago, principally for powering a few factories and keeping the street lights on. They just aren't designed for handling the intermittent power generation from renewables like wind or solar, or dealing with the intense surges that come of quickly charging large battery cells (al a electric cars).

    5. Re:Electric grid primitive? Compared to what? by moronoxyd · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I think it is clear from what I wrote that, had we had the fortune to deploy our power grid from scratch commencing 1945

      Europe had to rebuild much of it's infrastructure in the 20th century, in some areas twice, which cost's a lot of money and time, and still we managed.

      What's your excuse for not getting your system up to date?
      You didn't have the same drawbacks that we did.

      GP is right: You are one of those people that take any factual statement as a personal insult and lash out.

    6. Re:Electric grid primitive? Compared to what? by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 2

      I have been hearing people complain about the stability of outlet voltage in CFL topics for as long as these bulbs exists. One comment said something like: "These CFL lights don't reach their long life in real world applications. Maybe with the perfect outlets in test labs but not with the varying voltage in real life."
      I have never seen the voltage on my outlets vary, except for an occasional complete fail (due to a tripped fuse or something). My CFL bulbs seem to have the expected lifetime. I live in the Netherlands.
      This is where I get the idea that the US power grid sucks donkey balls.
      Here in Nijmegen is a company called Smit Transformatoren. I had a job interview there a while back, they told me most of the large transformers in the US were outdated, under powered and poorly maintained.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    7. Re:Electric grid primitive? Compared to what? by David+Chappell · · Score: 3, Informative

      You'll notice I wrote 110v(P-E) as in phase to earth, the hilarious American "split-phase" system is merely a testimony to how poor your domestic supply.

      It's hard to jingoism your way around facts, but you still made a good go of it.

      It is true that in the US we use the three wire Edison system and that it does have 110v to earth while in much of Europe they use straight 220v with one side earthed. But exactly how the transformer secondary is earthed does not change the amount of available power. The Edison system simply makes it possible to easily have both 220v and 110v in the same building.

      Your statement that the US system "necessitates the use of 2-phase supplies for domestic heating" is true, but I do not see how this is a disadvantage. All you are saying is that one must connect the two supply conductors of a large electric heater to the proper terminals in the service panel so that it will receive 220v. So what?

      (Aside to US electricians: I know that in your trade split 110v/220v supply is considered single phase. The poster is calling it two-phase because the two hot wires are 180 degrees out of phase. If we were to use strictly consistent terminology, the very old 110 volt only service has a single phase 110 volts from neutral, almost all houses now have two phases 180 degrees apart at 110 volts from neutral, and many office buildings have three phases 120 degrees apart, often at 110 volts with respect to neutral.)

      As other posters have pointed out, you are wrong about water heaters. Only the very smallest are ever connected to a 110 volt supply. You are correct in your statements about electric tea kettles and power tools. Since almost all outlets in the typical American home are wired between one of the phases and the neutral, they can only deliver about 1500 watts.

      I suspect that the justification for the Edison system is that 110 volts is less dangerous than 220 volts. This system provides a (supposedly) safer 110 volts for most plug-connected devices while still making 220 volts available for those things that need it.

      In other words, your complaint is not with the US electrical distribution network, but with the fact that 110 volt outlets predominate in the US home.

      I believe the biggest disadvantages of the US system are that it requires wires twice as thick and that many appliances (such as air conditioners) that should be running on 220 volts run on 110 volts because the manufactures know that few users would buy them if they had to install a 220 volt outlet in order to use them.

      Finally, yes, there are 50 amp 220 volt/110 volt service panels still out there. At least in New England they are now very rare. 60 amp was standard in the 1960's and nothing less than 100 amp is installed today.

  14. Re:Only a few left.... by dascritch · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well, as long America is a British Empire Colony, no way to explain them the beautiful simplicity of the Metric system.

    --
    (Sorry my bad French) Je fais parler les Guignols de l'Info. Le pied, quoi.
  15. At the risk of invoking Godwin by Dunbal · · Score: 5, Informative

    The fact that the old Soviet trains ran on a non-standard gauge was a contributing factor to the survival of the Soviet Union from the German blitzkrieg. Germany was not able to immediately use the Soviet rail system to reinforce and supply its troops, and was faced with having to use a few captured locomotives while re-engineering the Soviet rail system to accommodate German trains. Because of this most of the supplies needed by the army had to be shipped by road, except there are a few months out of the year when Russian roads turned into rivers of mud...

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    1. Re:At the risk of invoking Godwin by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes, they did. But it took *time*, and they couldn't do everything. The German railroad units mostly concentrated on advancing maybe half-a-dozen railheads for the entire Eastern Front. By the time winter started in 1941, advancing German forces had completely outrun the slowly reconstructed railways and were in considerable supply difficulties because of that.

  16. Re:And still shortsighted by frisket · · Score: 2

    Ireland, however, uses 5' 3". Fortunately we are an island, with no rail intercommunication with anywhere else :-)

  17. Re:Only a few left.... by Glendale2x · · Score: 5, Informative

    is there some clear advantage to 240v 50hz AC?

    No. Frequency is largely irrelevant. The only common (although probably not so much anymore) residential application I can think of are wall clocks with synchronous motors using the line frequency to keep time. Increasing the voltage would give you more usable power out of your common 15/20A household branch circuit, but that's it. Perhaps you could lower the total number of branch circuits by going to higher voltage, but I don't know how many people would really care that they have 1/3 fewer breakers. Or you have crazy ass things like the UK ring circuit.

    Take a look at a lot of your electronics and you'll see that they probably accept a "universal input" of 50/60Hz between 100-240VAC. One distinct advantage higher frequency has is allowing smaller size of components like transformers. This is why you'll see things like 115VAC @ 400Hz in aircraft.

    --
    this is my sig
  18. Re:Slight delay here? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Informative

    I suspect that one General Sherman's er... enthusiastic removal of southern legacy hardware really helped speed up the transition. He did have a real air of resolve when it came to dealing with insurgents.

  19. Re:And still shortsighted by Runaway1956 · · Score: 2

    Obviously, your education was lacking in firearms training and the study of railroads. You should have put a couple years in the Navy. You would have learned that a riot gun is actually a 12 guage shotgun, and that a 5 inch 54 caliber gun's chamber is 54 inches long, and 5 inches diameter where it necks down into the barrel.

    First "g" is hard, the "au" is a long "a" second "g" is soft. End it right there - the "e" is silent. I guess you could sound it out if I were to spell it G-A-J-E.

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  20. Re:Only a few left.... by dakohli · · Score: 2

    Date format is stupid all around the world. Everyone should just use 2011-05-08 15:00. Yes, drop the stupid am/pm stuff too.

    Try: 1500 08-05-2011

  21. Compared to what's possible/needed by sjbe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'd like to know which country has an electric grid that makes the US grid look primitive.

    I don't think it's so much that the US grid is primitive compared to other countries. Rather it is primitive compared with the available technology and projected needs. The monitoring and control equipment on much of the grid remains rather primitive, the wire infrastructure is fragile (major outages every time a serious storm blows through), many areas still depend on sending a person out to read the meter for billing, there is a too much interdependence without adequate safeguards, local generation (solar, wind, etc) remains problematic in many places, generation sources are relatively dirty, usage controls are primitive, etc. Most of our infrastructure was built decades ago and (IMO) too little was allocated for ongoing upgrades nor were the increases in demand adequately planned for.

    The grid works but it's not nearly as robust, efficient or clean as it could be. That's the problem.

    1. Re:Compared to what's possible/needed by hedwards · · Score: 2

      That depends where you live. Around here the power is rarely out for more than a moment, and even those times are infrequent. And really the only reason we notice at all anymore is because we're more used to having devices like computers that can reveal a power outage over night.

      But in general, the power grid is what you make of it, if you're utility sucks, then you're going to get poor reliability. Around here we have a public utility which handles it and they by and large do a good job.

    2. Re:Compared to what's possible/needed by Pieroxy · · Score: 2

      In France, I have a server in my garage. I moved recently, so I got a downtime, but it is the norm to get more than a year of uptime between power outages. I've lived a bit in the SF bay area, and what I got there was very very far from that. Not counting rolling blackouts, we'd rarely get two month without an outage.

  22. Re:And still shortsighted by plover · · Score: 5, Funny

    And, how do you pronounce 'savages'?

    WINN-dohs YUZ-ers

    --
    John
  23. Mil specs live forever by dargaud · · Score: 2

    I have no idea if this is true, but I've always liked this story that's been going around the 'net for years...

    --
    Non-Linux Penguins ?
  24. Gauge shift on the trans mongolian railway by ascii · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I took the trans mongolian railway from Moscow to Beijing about 10 years ago. One memorable experience is that near the border between Russia and Mongolia (or Mongolia and China i forget) they will change the bogie's on the entire train because the gauges differ in russia and china. The entire trainset is lifted up; the bogies moved out and new ones put in place. A very memorable experience.

    --
    naah sig schmig
  25. Wooshed by the wooshed by traindirector · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wooshed! by he who himself was wooshed.

    Also, for those who can't tell, I inverted the "o"s in woosh for added effect.

  26. Re:And still shortsighted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    On that train all graphite and glitter
    Undersea by rail
    Ninety minutes from New York to Paris
    Well by seventy-six we'll be A.O.K.

  27. Re:Only a few left.... by stumblingblock · · Score: 2

    Your forgot Esperanto.

  28. Re:Only a few left.... by Megane · · Score: 2

    143.5cm. There, all done! Now get cracking on moving all those rails 0.1mm closer.

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  29. Re:And still shortsighted by Tim+the+Gecko · · Score: 3, Informative

    I was surprised to find that this was standardized in the same Act of Parliament that mandated 4' 8 1/2" in Britain - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Railway_Regulation_(Gauge)_Act_1846

  30. Re:And still shortsighted by fotbr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    To be pedantic, when referring to artillery, and specifically naval artillery, a 5"/54 caliber gun would have a barrel length of 270 inches; as the 54 refers to the number of diameters that the barrel is long, not the chamber length.

  31. Re:Only a few left.... by zippthorne · · Score: 2

    No, little-endian makes more sense because it's consistent. In your example, you've got a big-endian super-format, where each of the constituents are little-endian. That's just stupid.

    And there's already a standard for dates. ISO 8601. It's basically what the parent described.

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  32. Re:240v is a lot more dangerous than 120v by green1 · · Score: 2

    Since it started driving higher currents through the same resistance (in this case the human body)

    It's very difficult to design your outlets to limit the current that will go through a human without limiting what will go through an electronic device, however lower voltages have less ability to overcome the same resistance to cause large amounts of current to flow through the heart (which is usually the important bit in the "killing" part)

    110v can kill you, so can 5v, or 3000v. But if I had to choose, I'd much rather trust the natural resistance of my skin to adequately limit the current flow from a 5v, or even 110v system than a 3000v one, or even a 240v one.

    On a somewhat related note, I know someone who moved from Britain to Canada many years ago, his primary reason to do so was because we use 110 instead of 240. He worked as an electronics repair person (mainly TVs) and was sick of taking 240v shocks. Personally I've always described it as "110 tickles, 240 doesn't!"

  33. Re:Only a few left.... by 91degrees · · Score: 2

    Hey, get China and India to standardise on your units and we'll consider it ourselves.

    Thing is we all think standardisation is good. Most of the world uses metric. It's easier for the 5% to change than the 95%.

  34. Re:There is only one true BROAD GAUGE by Noughmad · · Score: 4, Funny

    Because nothing says "awesome" like being named "Kingdom". Until somebody trades you for a horse.

    --
    PlusFive Slashdot reader for Android. Can post comments.
  35. Re:And still shortsighted by Flyerman · · Score: 2

    I think we're forgetting about how the trains into Australia will need to be scanned for any small breasted women who could be seen by pedophiles.

  36. Re:And still shortsighted by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    When it comes to trains the US

    I always thought the best gauge for trains was the standard N-gauge. I still have my Rock Island Golden Rocket in a box down in the basement. My gramps was an engineer for the Rock Island and I rode it from Chicago to the West Coast several times as a kid. What a magnificent train that was. It had a 12-bedroom sleeper car called La Palma and it was like taking a room at the Four Seasons from Union Station to Los Angeles. You'd fall asleep crossing the Mississippi at St Louis, lulled by the gentle motion and wake up in the Rockies.

    The coffee in the dining car ("El Comedor") was a special blend. It was served in those silver pots with heavy, short beige and red china that said "Golden Rocket". Delicious roasted potatoes and pork chops. Man, that was one sexy way to travel. Screw Southwest Airlines. If there were still decent passenger trains in the US, I'd never sit in another cramped 737 with a smelly fat-ass on either side of me eating cardboard extruded cookies.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  37. Re:Only a few left.... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2

    A friend once bought a laser printer in the US (60Hz) and took it to New Zealand (50Hz). The power supply handled the 120v to 240v issue, but the motor that fed the paper through the system couldn't handle the frequency difference so that when he printed, the image on the pages was compressed because the paper moved too slowly.

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  38. Re:Slight delay here? by Nimey · · Score: 2

    Sherman did what was necessary to end the war sooner. Tearing up the South's rail net, as these things go, was no atrocity.

    --
    Hail Eris, full of mischief...

    E pluribus sanguinem
  39. Re:And still shortsighted by Sique · · Score: 4, Informative

    And of course there isn't much rail traffic currently between europe and russia, the rail stock uses different gauges.

    Not exactly. In fact the rolling stock exchanges the wheels at the borders. The whole waggon gets liftet from the bogies, the bogies are rolled away, new bogies of the right gauge are rolled in, and the waggon gets eased down on the new bogies.

    The TALGO train which is used between Spain and France has adjustable wheels to adapt to the different gauges.

    --
    .sig: Sique *sigh*
  40. Re:Slight delay here? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

    Eh, those were just illegal enemy combatants, hardly to be afforded the protections of the Geneva convention that hadn't been written yet. Whatever was necessary to drag Jefferson Davis out of his spider hole, and all that. 4/11/61! Never Forget!

  41. Railfan.net moved their content... by Two99Point80 · · Score: 2

    ...the link in the article now points to a blank page. Try this instead: http://southern.railfan.net/ties/1966/66-8.ZZZ/gauge.html

  42. Re:Rail is best for heavy freight by Sique · · Score: 4, Informative

    Most of the energy losses at ~200 mph, are aerodynamic, not friction. Rail does not help there.

    Even here Rail helps. If you have a 1600 passenger train half full, you have only one front with air friction per 800 passengers. With cars seated two each you need already 400 fronts where each one creates its own air friction. So even the most aerodynamically perfect cars wont come close to a single train even with no consideration going into air friction.

    --
    .sig: Sique *sigh*
  43. Re:Only a few left.... by adolf · · Score: 2

    Some linear power supplies (think transformer, diode bridge, caps) that are designed for 60Hz will fail in ugly ways with 50Hz power. The current capacity of the transformer is reduced, and for power supplies that are already heavily loaded (which is disturbingly common for unregulated supplies) this can push them over the edge. (Not to mention the effects that frequency has on the desired size of filter caps, which might also be insufficient at 50Hz)

    Much of the audio gear I have would be unhappy at 50Hz.

    The opposite usually works fine, though: Linear supplies designed to operate at 50Hz are generally happy at 60Hz, as the current capacity increases.

    On the other hand, most of the current breed of switching supplies don't really care much about input voltage, frequency, or waveform: They're so not picky, these days, you can pretty much feed them anything resembling AC and they'll either produce proper output, or no output.

  44. US freight rail is doing very well by Animats · · Score: 5, Informative

    The US has a freight rail system that is the envy of Europe. (Europe is ahead in passenger rail, but that loses money.) Intermodal traffic (containers) is way up over the last decade, and profitable. There's new rail construction going on, and rails and locomotives have been upgraded in recent years.

    Modern large locomotives use what are essentially giant computer-controlled servomotors to drive the wheels, so that all the wheels on all the locomotives stay in sync and share the load equally, which means they can all be torqued up to just below where they start to slip. This means fewer locomotives per train, little or no wheel slip, and the ability to coordinate many locomotives spread throughout a train.

    Last year, Union Pacific ran a train 3.5 miles long from Los Angeles to Denver. Average freight train length in the US is now 6500 feet and climbing. That replaces a lot of trucks. Since Los Angeles built a no-grade-crossing rail connection to the port there, far fewer trucks are moving to the port.

    Europe still has a lot of little 2-axle freight cars. Those disappeared from US trackage some time before World War Two, replaced by the standard big four-axle cars still used today. The bigger cars are also stronger, with a consistent minimum coupler strength, which means longer trains are possible.

    Mixing high speed passenger trains and freight on the same track cuts severely into freight capacity. Each passenger train uses up the track time of six freights.

    1. Re:US freight rail is doing very well by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Ironically, one of the reasons passenger rail isn't taking off in the US is because it consistently gets bumped by freight rail.

      Our little Sounder commuter train from Seattle to Everett is constantly pre-empted for freight traffic-- usually mile-long trains hauling nothing but smelly garbage-- and its reliability is so bad, I finally just gave up and moved back to the bus. Considering the train runs 2/3rds empty every day, I'm not the only one.

    2. Re:US freight rail is doing very well by Jeff1946 · · Score: 2

      Yep, it is truly impressive to see these trains. I play golf at a course next to the rail lines that head out from LA to Cajon Pass. The trains have 4 diesels in front and two in the rear and all working hard to make the grade that has begun.

  45. Re:Slight delay here? by Duradin · · Score: 2

    Great, first Truthers, then Birthers, then Deathers and now Sumterers.

  46. Re:Only a few left.... by zzatz · · Score: 2

    50Hz requires more iron in the core of power transformers than 60Hz. Similar effects apply to motors. Now that consumer electronics have switched to high frequency switching supplies, that's not much of an issue for the end user. It does still matter for the transformers used in the power grid to step down from higher distribution voltages to lower domestic voltages.

  47. Re:And still shortsighted by compro01 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And by that time trains are obsolete already.

    I really rather doubt trains are ever going to be obsolete, barring us figuring out cheap teleportation. There's simply no better method of moving stuff en masse across land.

    --
    upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
  48. What I can't figure out. by readin · · Score: 3, Funny

    If the American south could convert to standard US gauge in only two days, why us is it taking the rest of the world so long to convert to US standard measurements? It can't be that hard to ditch the 4 syllable metric system for the more efficent 1 to 2 syllable Imperial system.

    --
    I often don't like the choices people make, but I like the fact that people make choices. That's why I'm a conservative.
  49. Re:And still shortsighted by Cimexus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Ooo can I reply to the troll?

    Yep. I sure want to leave Australia and move back to the US. I'm getting so sick of the higher salaries, greater number of holidays, mandated 4-6 weeks of annual leave, the more casual work-to-live culture, cleaner environment, low crime rate, higher life expectancy, affordable healthcare, booming economy, 1-5% unemployment (depending on State), good food, having decent quality TV news and current affairs (ABC/SBS), stronger consumer protection laws, massively lower poverty rate, having more choice in phone and internet services, not getting nudie-scanned or groped at airports, oh the list goes on. I'm just itching to get out of here!

    Ok so that's a bit tongue-in-cheek - I'm a dual American and Australian citizen and still spend a lot of time in both countries. No emi/immigration required for me. And there's still stuff that the US has Australia beat at. The highway system there is better than in Australia (which suffers from having a huge area but not a huge population/tax base to fund things from). The cost of living (particularly housing) is less too (though, wages are lower which offsets some of that advantage). The natural environment is also more diverse (don't get me wrong - Australia is beautiful, but it simply doesn't have the diversity of environments and climates that the US/North America does).

    But at this point in time I don't think you'd find to many Australians wanting to emigrate to the US. Perhaps the very wealthy, who would like to take advantage of the lower income tax for high earners. But Australia has been incredibly prosperous for the last decade or two - the middle class along with the rich. The financial crisis didn't even scratch it. Not surprisingly, it consistently ranks as one of the top handful of places to be (both in 'economic' and 'quality of life' indices).

    Having said that, there is a HUGE number of Australian tourists in the US in the last year or so. This is because it's now incredibly cheap to do so: the AUD is worth more than the USD for the first time in history (thanks to the US Fed printing USD like it's going out of style). The buying power of the AUD in the US is huge at the moment. Combined with generally higher Aussie wages and the already-low prices of goods in the US, it's a shopping bonanza. I have guys at work ask me to get clothes and running shoes and stuff for them when I visit the US because due to the currency movements it's literally less than half the cost. Hell, for big ticket items, it'd be cheaper to fly to the US, buy it, and fly back, than to buy it locally...

  50. Re:And still shortsighted by Cimexus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Most Australians travel internationally quite regularly. Not just to the US. Not every country is like the US where only a tiny proportion of people have a passport.

  51. Re:Might be already stated... by SuperQ · · Score: 2

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inflation

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nostalgia

    Try building a bridge that can take an earthquake and then have a planned life span of 150 years.
    http://baybridgeinfo.org/projects/sas-tower

    Sure, it was cheap, only $77mil.. But you might have been lucky to make $0.50/hour

    Adjusting for inflation that's 1.1 billion, and the thing failed in a 7.1 earthquake. Imagine what would have happened if the 9.0 that hit Japan happened in SF.

  52. Re:Only a few left.... by Patch86 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    English speech states the year last, and tends to have the month first.

    Interestingly, not in countries which use the DD/MM/YYYY format. In the UK, it is quite uncommon to hear "May the 8th 2011", and far more common to hear "8th of May 2011".

    I've often wondered about that in a chicken-and-egg sort of way. Was it the American turn of phrase, with the month first, that led to the US MM/DD/YYYY annotation, or is it the fact that the MM/DD/YYYY annotation is a US standard that has led people to adopt that turn of phrase? And vice versa for the UK?

  53. Re:Only a few left.... by moronoxyd · · Score: 2

    Ah, yes arrogance. Let me guess - you're from Europe? That's the only part of the world that has the arrogance to insist everyone else should live, act, and think exactly like they do. Woe to the person(s) who don't.

    I have to resist the urge to point out all the ways that Americans insist everyone else should live, act and think exactly as they do.

  54. Re:And still shortsighted by FhnuZoag · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Well, arguably having an incompatible railway network won World War II on the Eastern Front, so, I'm not counting on the Russians changing their system just yet. ;-)

  55. Actually business took rail seriously by Shivetya · · Score: 2

    the US government was not building rail lines. The majority of rail lines built in the 180s were done by private businesses, many without any grants or federal assistance. As such we have an abundance of rail still to this day for moving freight. As society improved roads became dominant because people valued their freedom, freedom to travel and where to live, all within their means.

    I don't understand why so many bemoan out passenger train service. There are only two profitable lines in the world and all the rest require subsidy because the expected number of riders never materialized. There is also the problem in the US of population density, or lack thereof across much of the country. I remember many years ago (think early 90s) having friends over from France who asked if I could pick them up at the airport. They flew into NY, I live in Atlanta. They asked about a short train ride and I explained to them how long it would take. Naturally they flew to Atlanta from NY. We then lent them our van and they toured the US. What was supposed to be two weeks for them turned into six.

    It is all about scale. Railroads do what they do best here, move freight. We then top that off with a large number of trucks because as a people we value convenience. That means not having just a few stores with items we want but many stores. It really is phenomenal how convenient we have it. Bring friends over from the Poland and Czech and they were amazed not at our grocery stores (they actually have a couple of good ones) but the sheer number of them. Just driving back from the airport to my house (twenty miles) we passed more of them than they knew of in their own home areas. Not one of them even mentioned travel by train btw, apparently they are quite used to travel by car. Even going so far as to tell me, never drive through Poland with a car that has German plates.

    We don't have a need for widespread high speed rail. We don't have the population density to support it. Even Europe doesn't have it in many areas even served by rail. It takes a lot of extra money to keep it all operating. Regardless of what some think, travel by train ain't fast, no matter the speed of the train. Airports even with our boneheaded security will get you farther faster. I can engineer a few "what about X to Y" but it still doesn't make it right.

    I love this one fact, the US moves nearly fives times as much by rail as Europe does. This is measured as how much freight is moved by train. Now tell me who has the problem?

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  56. Re:And still shortsighted by somersault · · Score: 2

    depends how overweight they are

    --
    which is totally what she said
  57. Re:Only a few left.... by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 2

    Incandescent lightbulbs are far to slow to flicker at that frequency (I can't believe they'd cool more than 10 degrees in the zero passing. It's just way to short) and CFL's have a electronic ballast which requires them to have a high frequency (about 5 KHz I believe). Large scale modern TL arrays (office) usually have an electronic ballast too (and thus are at a high frequency). Old small scale TL's do flicker at 50 Hz and can cause headaches.

    --
    Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
  58. Re:Only a few left.... by dj245 · · Score: 2

    But those are (were, it differs and is changing) on 400V three phase here. As is industrial equipment, bigger motors, welders etc (some of which are not uncommon in home workshops). And you don't have that available. The "European" system is 230/400V, not just 230V.

    Actually, 277/480V is quite common in the states for commercial and industrial uses. You can get it in your house too if you are willing to pay for it, but most people are not since there isn't any compelling reason to do so. The monthly service fees for the 480V hookup far exceed the cost of the extra copper that is required for the lower voltage cable.

    Keep in mind that electricity in the states is commonly distributed at 14.4kV and 120/240V is just the voltage you get after it has been converted by the step-down "pig pole" transformer on the neighborhood telephone pole. 120/240V is a convenient standard for home users the same way that 277/480 is a convenient standard for commercial and industrial customers. If you need something special and are willing to pay, the electric utility is more than happy to work with you and bill you accordingly.

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.