Slashdot Mirror


Activists May Use Their Targets' Trademarks

lee1 writes "Sometimes political activists use a company's trademark as part of a campaign to embarrass it or call attention to an issue. And sometimes the company sues, claiming that they own the mark and its satirical use is prohibited. Now a Utah court has ruled that such suits must fail because the parodic use of the mark is not commercial and is a form of protected speech."

7 of 203 comments (clear)

  1. Also by Dunbal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The companies in question should be forced to accept arbitration instead of lawsuits.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    1. Re:Also by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Simple. You stack the panels with consumer advocates with baseball bats.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:Also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      So the People Eating Tasty Animals satire site for PETA should not have been sued to oblivion then?
      Or does this ruling depend on whether you like the plaintiff or defendant more?

  2. Re:A big victory... by nurb432 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Im shocked it came out of a US court at all.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  3. Re:A big victory... by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Im shocked it came out of a US court at all.

    You may not have to endure that shock for long.
    An appeal may be forthcoming, with a properly prepped judge.

    --
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
  4. Re:A big victory... by cpu6502 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Where's all this Utah hate coming from? I spent a year there, and didn't think the culture was any different from any other US state (except possibly california).

    --
    My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
  5. Re:A big victory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And a theocracy would want to protect the interests of big business because... ?