Activists May Use Their Targets' Trademarks
lee1 writes "Sometimes political activists use a company's trademark as part of a campaign to embarrass it or call attention to an issue. And sometimes the company sues, claiming that they own the mark and its satirical use is prohibited. Now a Utah court has ruled that such suits must fail because the parodic use of the mark is not commercial and is a form of protected speech."
The companies in question should be forced to accept arbitration instead of lawsuits.
Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
Im shocked it came out of a US court at all.
---- Booth was a patriot ----
Im shocked it came out of a US court at all.
You may not have to endure that shock for long.
An appeal may be forthcoming, with a properly prepped judge.
Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
Where's all this Utah hate coming from? I spent a year there, and didn't think the culture was any different from any other US state (except possibly california).
My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
And a theocracy would want to protect the interests of big business because... ?