Slashdot Mirror


FCC Commissioner Leaves To Become Lobbyist

An anonymous reader writes "Meredith Attwell Baker, one of the FCC Commissioners, is leaving the FCC to become a lobbyist for Comcast-NBC, just four months after approving their merger deal. She refused to put any significant conditions on the merger, saying that the deal would 'bring exciting benefits to consumers that outweigh potential harms.' Comcast has released an official statement saying that, 'Meredith's executive branch and business experience along with her exceptional relationships in Washington bring Comcast and NBCUniversal the perfect combination of skills.'"

16 of 309 comments (clear)

  1. Revolving Door by elohel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Revolving door. Enough said. Honestly, I'm tired of caring about it. Action will only happen when people begin to truly feel the effects. Logic is lost on the masses.

    1. Re:Revolving Door by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      We already do feel the effects. Higher prices, rubbish/no customer service, lack of a true open market, marketing/advertisers tracking everything you do.
      When the laws have failed us I see no reason to abide by those laws. I now ignore any law created to protect corporations.

  2. Corruption by TheSpoom · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Corruption just seems to be getting more and more visible and obvious, and nobody with the power to stop it gives a damn.

    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
    1. Re:Corruption by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No kidding. The fact that the DoJ isn't as we speak executing a search warrant on her offices, her home and of the corporate headquarters of Comcast-NBC as her and the CEO and board of director's legal teams are being instructed not to leave the country indicates just how pathetic the justice system has become, and just how willing the big players are to flaunt it.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:Corruption by Tx · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It shouldn't have to come to that. It's shocking that this is allowed; it should be in the contract when you sign up to work for a public body like the FCC that you can't then work for any company whose business you were involved in for at least x years.

      --
      Oh no... it's the future.
  3. Weird Statement by Adambomb · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Odd for a lobbyist to say something like "bring exciting benefits to consumers that outweigh potential harms", which confirms they believe there is a potential for abuses. A statement like that practically begs for someone to ask what these benefits are exactly, that she was able to even make such a statement.

    --
    Ice Cream has no bones.
  4. This is SO wrong.. by yossie · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If by 'Meredith's executive branch and business experience along with her exceptional relationships in Washington bring Comcast and NBCUniversal the perfect combination of skills.' they mean that she accepts bribes, er, a job offer from the people she JUST granted a favor to, then, YES.

  5. Translation by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Translation: Meredith's dedication to serving us during her tenure as FCC Commissioner, and her willingness to betray every principle, ethical or moral, makes her a perfect fit for our corporate atmosphere, much as a piece of shit makes a perfect fit for a septic tank. We look forward to long years of benefiting from her betrayal of the American people.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  6. Only for high officials by boristdog · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When my father retired from NASA, he had to wait two years before he could work for anyone who did any business with NASA.

    Apparently this sort of thing doesn't apply to political appointees.

    LBJ much?

    1. Re:Only for high officials by Nimey · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The teabaggers are what the Soviets would have called useful idiots. They'll be baited along just like the Christian evangelicals, being told "if you'll just vote enough Republicans into office all your problems will go away!", and somehow never figuring out that they're being had.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
  7. Non-compete by macraig · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's a sad testimonial to the lopsided state of our nation's political system when we need non-compete clauses for elected and appointed officials to prevent them from leaping to the Dark Side immediately after their terms end.

  8. Re:Disgusting by saneshark · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Everything that is wrong with politics and lobbying. Make lobbying illegal, dethrone corporate power.

  9. Re:Money buys power -- regulatees capture regulato by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Progressives have a lot to answer for.

    As long as the citizenry believe that one party or the other are too blame then the citizens are just useful idiots. Conservatives like to consolidate power too, it's just you probably happen to agree with their reasons for doing it so it's ok. It's those lousy progressives. Also, in this particular instance it was the lack of using that consolidated power that is the problem.

  10. Re:You can't make talking illegal. by negRo_slim · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How can you make lobbying illegal?

    By making paid lobbying illegal.

    --
    On the Oregon Cost born and raised, On the beach is where I spent most of my days
  11. Re:Money buys power -- regulatees capture regulato by JDAustin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Because Republicans are progressives... all the way back to Teddy Roosevelt.

    She wasn't a progressive but a statist. And yes, you can have Republican statist but getting rid of them is one of the reasons why we have the tea parties.

  12. Re:Money buys power -- regulatees capture regulato by Wandering+Idiot · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You are assuming that things like company towns and stores and oppressive corporate control in general is something that would happen by default without government regulation.

    Why wouldn't they be? Unregulated monopolies are a great business model! (They just generally suck for everyone but the owners of the company) And why would it matter if "the public actually starts to care about specific abuses" if the government has no regulatory power to do anything about them?