Dropbox Accused of Lying About Security
lee1 writes "Dropbox faces a possible FTC investigation because of misleading statements it has made about the privacy and security of its 25 million users' files. The cloud storage company previously claimed that it was impossible for its employees to access file contents, but in fact, as the encryption keys are in their possession, this is false. The complaint (PDF) points out that their false security claims gave Dropbox a competitive advantage over other firms offering similar services who actually did provide secure encryption."
First, you are wrong. The data in your account is interesting to a whole host of people, regardless of how insignificant you are. Maybe there's a credit card number in there. Maybe there's clues to your password. Maybe your social graph is interesting to a marketer. In this age, even an insignificant person's data is of interest to someone.
Secondly, DropBox lied. Plain and simple. They made a security claim that wasn't true and sold their service based on it. If you really want to live in a world where it's perfectly acceptable for people to lie about their services in order to get your business, I wish you well.
Need a Python, C++, Unix, Linux develop
I hope this makes more people consider running their own system to handle this, lipsync is trying to provide that, it's on github https://github.com/philcryer/lipsync
fak3r.com
I can understand the concerns about credit cards and bank info, but I don't really get why people are so freaked out about marketers learning a bit of generic info about their lives:
Person 1 -- Oh no! An advertising firm got hold of my semi-private information!
Person 2 -- That's terrible. What did they do with it?
Person 1 -- Well, they started showing me ads for things I might actually buy.
Person 2 -- Gods! Have these men no shame?
How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
Give Wuala a go. It supports client side encryption, and is much more polished then Spideroak.