Slashdot Mirror


Tunnel Boring Machine Completes Hole Under Niagara Falls

abhatt writes with news that "Big Becky," a 4,000-ton tunnel boring machine, has finished chewing through over 10 kilometers of rock underneath Niagara Falls, Ontario, a project that's been underway since 2006. "The 10.2 kilometer tunnel is 14.4 meters in diameter. Big Becky ate through 1.6 million cubic meters of rock to reach her goal. That’s enough rock, officials said, to fill the Rogers Centre in Toronto. And the cement used to line the tunnel would build a sidewalk stretching from Windsor to Quebec City. ... The project took longer and cost more because Becky ran into unexpected conditions. She’s designed to go through solid rock, but encountered a stretch of loose, crumbling material that was unsuitable for tunneling. That forced a long and expensive detour."

193 comments

  1. No, I'm not going to RTFA just to find out by CheerfulMacFanboy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why they drilled that tunnel.

    --
    Fandroids hate facts.
    1. Re:No, I'm not going to RTFA just to find out by codegen · · Score: 3, Informative

      Divert water from the Niagara river to the Adam Beck generating Station. More Hydro Electric Power.

      --
      Atlas stands on the earth and carries the celestial sphere on his shoulders.
    2. Re:No, I'm not going to RTFA just to find out by grantek · · Score: 1

      The machine sounds pretty boring...

    3. Re:No, I'm not going to RTFA just to find out by MaXintosh · · Score: 1

      That's fine, because I did RTFA to find out, except no where in the article did they say what it was for. All we know is that they dug a very big hole, and they used a load of cheesy metrics to compare.

    4. Re:No, I'm not going to RTFA just to find out by timeOday · · Score: 1
      Surprisingly, the article doesn't even say why they drilled it, other than it being related to energy production.

      IMHO Niagara falls is a compelling model of how NOT to do conservation. It's littered with tacky tourist traps. (Just like what was attempted at most protected sites in the US before Teddy Roosevelt came along).

    5. Re:No, I'm not going to RTFA just to find out by hawguy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I thought they could already divert so much water through the hydropower tunnels that they have laws to mandate minimum flow rates at the falls to maintain the waterfall spectacle. Don't the new tunnels draw from the same water source?

      http://www.niagarafallslocal.com/NiagaraFalls/showthread.php?t=60

    6. Re:No, I'm not going to RTFA just to find out by dziban303 · · Score: 5, Informative
      Also, IT'S NOT FUCKING CEMENT, IT'S CONCRETE.

      Cement is an ingredient of concrete. It is not the finished product. Calling concrete "cement" is as stupid as calling clothing "cotton", or calling a sandwich "mayonnaise". Once you apply the mayonnaise to bread and add some lunchmeat, your creation has become a sandwich, and it is no longer simply mayonnaise.

      Yeah, I get that fucking irritated by this.

      AND SO SHOULD YOU.

    7. Re:No, I'm not going to RTFA just to find out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I can only surmise you're a Civil Engineer. No worries I'm Structural and I get my panties in a bundle about it sometimes too.

    8. Re:No, I'm not going to RTFA just to find out by jittles · · Score: 1

      Why they drilled that tunnel.

      I RTFA and I didn't see anything explaining why they dug the tunnel.

    9. Re:No, I'm not going to RTFA just to find out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they can drink the NY side's milkshake?

    10. Re:No, I'm not going to RTFA just to find out by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

      Why they drilled that tunnel.

      To make it easier to smuggle pot, copyright infringing bootlegs & child porn; Does anyone do anything for any other reason?
      --Friendly neighborhood MPAA/RIAA Goon

    11. Re:No, I'm not going to RTFA just to find out by haruchai · · Score: 5, Funny

      I guess you believe you have concrete reasons to be annoyed but your rant has likely cemented opinions that you're over-sensitive.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    12. Re:No, I'm not going to RTFA just to find out by happyhangone · · Score: 5, Informative

      Why they can use more water without affecting the laws governing the preservation of the fall's spectacle.
      http://www.opg.com/power/hydro/new_projects/ntp/why_niagara.asp

      What this proyect is all about!
      http://www.opg.com/power/hydro/new_projects/ntp/tunnel_route.asp

    13. Re:No, I'm not going to RTFA just to find out by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      And people don't program in "assembler" any more than they program in "compiler". It's called "assembly language".

      This post brought to you by Pedantic-Man(tm)!

      FYI - Pedantic-Man(tm) (don't forget the hyphen, kids!) prefers putting the period or comma OUTSIDE the quotation marks for both aesthetic and pattern-matching reasons. Have a nice day!

    14. Re:No, I'm not going to RTFA just to find out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Dammit, quit your yelling, I was in the middle of eating my mayonnaise and now I've got yeast all over my cotton!

    15. Re:No, I'm not going to RTFA just to find out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've order a BLT and no one was confused. Actually, while I understand and correctly use the terms cement and concrete, I'm not the slightest bit bothered by people using it wrong when it's 100% understandable what they mean. If you're on a job working with both cement and concrete, you'd darn well better use the right words. With normally people, you'd better learn to behave.

    16. Re:No, I'm not going to RTFA just to find out by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Can someone provide a translation between "Rogers Centers" and a unit of measurement that I'm more familiar with, such as a VW Beetle?

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    17. Re:No, I'm not going to RTFA just to find out by Walzmyn · · Score: 2

      They also didn't include a map. I mean, c'mon, if you're talking about a 10 freaking mile long man-made hole in the ground isn't a map showing it's route a pretty damned obvious thing to think that a reader would want to see?

    18. Re:No, I'm not going to RTFA just to find out by 14erCleaner · · Score: 1

      One more misleading bit, especially in the title: the tunnel goes under the city of Niagara Falls, not the falls themselves.

      --
      Have you read my blog lately?
    19. Re:No, I'm not going to RTFA just to find out by Glendale2x · · Score: 1

      Why they drilled that tunnel.

      Which is good, because I did, and it didn't say.

      --
      this is my sig
    20. Re:No, I'm not going to RTFA just to find out by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      What do you call it if you don't put in any aggregate?

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    21. Re:No, I'm not going to RTFA just to find out by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Because they could.

    22. Re:No, I'm not going to RTFA just to find out by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Someone eats a tuna sandwich and you ask him what he's eating and he says "tuna". Some people call their sidewalks "cement sidewalks" because cement is indeed a principle ingredient and the meaning is very unambiguous here in context. Everyone knows what they mean. In summary, there can be more than one word for the same thing!!

      This is all a part of the English language. It evolves over time and words change their meaning and the majority of people learn to live with. To me it is unfathomable why someone would complain that "unfathomable" is being used incorrectly in this sentence merely because we're not actually measuring the depth of deep water. People may try to write down official rules but language isn't going to obey them.

    23. Re:No, I'm not going to RTFA just to find out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They would have posted a map but they realized it would be useless in the hands of people who can't tell kilometers from miles. As Google Calculate is happy to tell you, 10.2 kilometers = 6.3 miles.

    24. Re:No, I'm not going to RTFA just to find out by onkelonkel · · Score: 1

      Mortar?

      --
      None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
    25. Re:No, I'm not going to RTFA just to find out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pedant fail; I believe the original sentence holds up. Possibly not on purpose, but still acceptable interpreted literally.

      the cement used to line the tunnel would build a sidewalk stretching from Windsor to Quebec City.

      As you can see, they're not writing they lined the tunnel with cement, they're saying they used cement to line the tunnel. And as cement is a part of concrete, they did indeed use some amount of cement to line the tunnel, the same amount of which presumably, together with some gravel, sand, water and miscellanea could be used to build a sidewalk stretching from at least one of the cities, towns or villages named Windsor to Quebec City.

    26. Re:No, I'm not going to RTFA just to find out by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Pretty sure if you use enough concrete to build a sidewalk from Poughkeepsie to Chickautagua, you're going to need enough cement to build a sidewalk from Poughkeepsie to Chickautagua.

      The point is, nobody has any fucking idea how much that is, even though it's broken down to grade-school metaphors...

    27. Re:No, I'm not going to RTFA just to find out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Suck a dick grammar Nazi.
      People used to code in in 8088 and 68k assembler, and 20 years ago it was proper to use that word in the title.

    28. Re:No, I'm not going to RTFA just to find out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You needn't bother. I did RTFA (sacrilege, I know) and by the end I was still left wondering why they did it.

    29. Re:No, I'm not going to RTFA just to find out by jmac_the_man · · Score: 1

      Those silly Canadians. If you're in Niagara Falls, why would you build a tunnel for a hydroelectric project under the city instead of under the waterfall?

    30. Re:No, I'm not going to RTFA just to find out by MaXintosh · · Score: 1

      How many Football Fields per television season(Germany) did it move? And could they provide the concrete surface in upper-east side Manhattan apartment floor equivalents? Inquiring minds want to know. I know the calculations are difficult, but with modern computers able to handle thousands of Libraries of Congress per commercial flight from New York to L.A., I'm sure they could have managed it.

    31. Re:No, I'm not going to RTFA just to find out by theguyfromsaturn · · Score: 1

      actually, the article while not saying what it was for kind of hinted at it:

      "She was greeted by Premier Dalton McGuinty, on hand to trumpet his government’s commitment to clean renewable power, even though the project is coming in two years late, and costing $1.6 billion instead of the $985 million budgeted."

      Clean renewable power + niagara falls = hydro power

      --
      I like my dinosaurs feathery, and my pterosaurs hairy (or is it pycnofibery?)
    32. Re:No, I'm not going to RTFA just to find out by theguyfromsaturn · · Score: 1

      Technically it's cement concrete. As opposed to asphalt concrete, or other concretes using some other type of binder.

      --
      I like my dinosaurs feathery, and my pterosaurs hairy (or is it pycnofibery?)
    33. Re:No, I'm not going to RTFA just to find out by RobertM1968 · · Score: 1

      That's fine, because I did RTFA to find out, except no where in the article did they say what it was for. All we know is that they dug a very big hole, and they used a load of cheesy metrics to compare.

      And now you understand why most of us don't waste our time RTFA!

      Anyway, that's my story, and I'm sticking to it.

    34. Re:No, I'm not going to RTFA just to find out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. From the same site as the first link: general map, detailed map and cross section.

    35. Re:No, I'm not going to RTFA just to find out by EdZ · · Score: 1

      Structurally unsound.

    36. Re:No, I'm not going to RTFA just to find out by pongo000 · · Score: 1

      Also, IT'S NOT FUCKING CEMENT, IT'S CONCRETE.

      This message brought to you by the American Concrete Institute: Advancing concrete knowledge!

    37. Re:No, I'm not going to RTFA just to find out by crazyvas · · Score: 1
      Correction:

      I guess you believe you have concrete reasons to be annoyed but your rant has likely concreted opinions that you're over-sensitive.

    38. Re:No, I'm not going to RTFA just to find out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think a Roger's centre is about 1/1000 of a Sydney harbour.

    39. Re:No, I'm not going to RTFA just to find out by bronney · · Score: 1

      A "Rogers Centers" exactly equals one "SkyDome"!

    40. Re:No, I'm not going to RTFA just to find out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you! I actually DID RTFA, but sadly it completely fails to mention what the tunnel's actual purpose was.

    41. Re:No, I'm not going to RTFA just to find out by Speare · · Score: 1

      He's taking the Slashdot community's helpful behavior for granite. It's not like we're rude individually, but you could say we're rude in the aggregate.

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
    42. Re:No, I'm not going to RTFA just to find out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A mind like concrete, all mixed up and permanently set.

    43. Re:No, I'm not going to RTFA just to find out by chrismcb · · Score: 1

      I RTFA and I didn't find out.

    44. Re:No, I'm not going to RTFA just to find out by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      Because it was something to do, why else?

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    45. Re:No, I'm not going to RTFA just to find out by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      You beat me to it. I broke down and read the article. You know that thing they teach about writing? Like HAVING A TOPIC?! Oy.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    46. Re:No, I'm not going to RTFA just to find out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also known as a milliSyd

    47. Re:No, I'm not going to RTFA just to find out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jeez, you're awful bent out of shape for having just watched a rerun of Bones ;)

      And here's the link for anyone who doesn't watch Bones - http://www.tv.com/bones/the-killer-in-the-concrete/episode/1006262/trivia.html

    48. Re:No, I'm not going to RTFA just to find out by Combatso · · Score: 1

      Shut up and go make me a sandwich.

    49. Re:No, I'm not going to RTFA just to find out by Combatso · · Score: 1

      Yah, from one side of a Canadian city to the other? We never did figure out that smuggling thing... note this tunnel does not cross the border.

    50. Re:No, I'm not going to RTFA just to find out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess you believe you have concrete reasons to be annoyed but your rant has likely cemented opinions that you're over-sensitive.

      I guess you believe you have CEMENT reasons to be annoyed but your rant has likely CONCRETED opinions that you're over-sensitive.

      There, FTFY.

    51. Re:No, I'm not going to RTFA just to find out by theBuddman · · Score: 1

      Wait, what's the difference between fucking cement and cement?

    52. Re:No, I'm not going to RTFA just to find out by davester666 · · Score: 1

      A Roger's Center is maybe 1/10 the size of a Library of Congress.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    53. Re:No, I'm not going to RTFA just to find out by cdpage · · Score: 1

      I think this link will be more helpful regarding the laws governing the preservation of the fall's spectacle.
      http://www.opg.com/power/hydro/new_projects/ntp/faq.asp

    54. Re:No, I'm not going to RTFA just to find out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's a "dick grammar Nazi"? Oh, I see now... you forgot a comma.

    55. Re:No, I'm not going to RTFA just to find out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fucking cement scrapes your dick. +1 Informative.

  2. The reason by DanTheStone · · Score: 2

    It's a sustainable energy project, not that anyone would have guessed that based on the summary.

    1. Re:The reason by mcmonkey · · Score: 1

      It's a tunnel for sneaking foreigners under the border, not that anyone would have guessed that based on the summary.

      Looks like it's time to build a wall. Anyone know where I can get some cheap labor?

    2. Re:The reason by Tumbleweed · · Score: 4, Funny

      Looks like it's time to build a wall. Anyone know where I can get some cheap labor?

      Detroit.

      What, too soon?

    3. Re:The reason by afidel · · Score: 1

      So is the power going into the NYC power conduit or into Lake Erie transmission loop? Despite the amount of clean power being generated 200 miles from my house (400 miles closer than to NYC) I have some of the dirtiest power in North America, making the switch from an efficient gas vehicle to a plugin hybrid a net loss for the environment.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    4. Re:The reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually if you have ever been to Niagra Falls NY, you would realise that it is to allow escapee's into canada

    5. Re:The reason by Combatso · · Score: 1

      You do realize the tunnel doesnt cross a border right?

    6. Re:The reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. More like a few decades late.

  3. "Rogers Center"s? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Slashdot is an American site, we don't need any Metric measurements like "Rogers Center"s. How many Libraries of Congresses can it fill?

    1. Re:"Rogers Center"s? by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 5, Informative

      There's no such thing as a "Rogers Centre." It's called SkyDome and will always be called SkyDome.

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
    2. Re:"Rogers Center"s? by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Yeah! And what's this "And the cement used to line the tunnel would build a sidewalk stretching from Windsor to Quebec City" crap? What kind of measurement is that? Empire State Building! Hoover Dam! Highways! That's how you compare concrete use here in America! Not with fucking sidewalks!

    3. Re:"Rogers Center"s? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Rogers Center (AKA Toronto Skydome) is the host stadium for the Toronto Blue Jays baseball team, so it isn't any more metric than a typical US stadium. Anyway, think "typical major football/baseball stadium size" and you'll be fine.

      On another page it's mentioned that the tunnel will supply 500 cubic metres of water per second, which they helpfully convert to 17660 cubic feet per second if you really want Imperial measurements. It's apparently enough to fill an Olympic-style swimming pool in seconds. Wow. Well, we are talking about a 14 metre tunnel (think ~14 yards, for the metrically-impaired) and a lot of pressure driving it.

      I wasn't able to find an official "volume of the Library of Congress" for either the buildings (there are several) or for stack space, but I was able to find out that it has approximately 838 miles of bookshelves. Bookshelves aren't exactly standard sizes, but assuming it is a 12-foot stack and 1 foot deep (both of which are probably way off, but must be within an order of magnitude), that would be 838miles * 5280ft/mile * 12ft * 1ft = 53 095 680 ft^3, which sounds huge. By comparison, Royal Albert Hall in the UK is 3 to 3.5 million cubic feet or 85 000 to 99 000 cubic metres. Anyway, divide by 17660 ft^3/s, and there's your answer: roughly 3006 seconds, or, ye gods, you can fill entire the shelf space of the Library of Congress in under an hour???!!!

      If anyone can find official "volume of the Library of Congress" in terms of books or buildings, it would be appreciated.

    4. Re:"Rogers Center"s? by theguyfromsaturn · · Score: 2

      Thanks for clarifying that. Nobody knows what the Rogers Center is. Now, Skydome has a meaning. Rogers Center means nothing to me. And it will change name as soon as a new sponsor shows up. I think people should boycott those sponsored names and keep calling structures a true non-changeable name. Whatever the sponsoring says. Sadly, it will never be the case of journalists who have to cater to sponsors.

      --
      I like my dinosaurs feathery, and my pterosaurs hairy (or is it pycnofibery?)
    5. Re:"Rogers Center"s? by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      A rock inside the SkyDome is worth about 1 cent. A rock inside the Rogers Centre is worth about 10 dollars.

    6. Re:"Rogers Center"s? by lexsird · · Score: 1

      No shit! I hate it when they change the name of something public to that of some rich cocksucker. They did that to the park in my home town, now it has some rich assholes name on it. WTF? If he wants his own park, let him go build his own, that one was OURS, the people. They are trying to turn our resevour into private land and kick the public out as well. They had a perfectly fine water treatment plant, but they shut it down in preparation of privatizing that prime land for the rich.

      Luckily we have some nosy citizens who show up to city counsel meetings and ask all the right questions.

      --
      Take the Red Pill.
    7. Re:"Rogers Center"s? by Combatso · · Score: 1

      In this case, the sponsor owns most of the media

    8. Re:"Rogers Center"s? by Combatso · · Score: 1

      Well, since its currently the Rogers centre, you can't fill it with rock.. You can put 60 ton of rock in, and each adition ton will cost you $2.50.

    9. Re:"Rogers Center"s? by yetiman · · Score: 1

      It's not a sponsorship deal...Rogers bought the 'Dome in 2005.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skydome

    10. Re:"Rogers Center"s? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been to the SkyDome. I've never heard of this Rogers Center place.

    11. Re:"Rogers Center"s? by Combatso · · Score: 1

      It's equivelent to about 18,000,000 Ten Commandment monuments.

    12. Re:"Rogers Center"s? by Bill+Hayden · · Score: 1

      Totally off-topic, but super interesting none-the-less. I noticed your signature, and in fact it has been scientifically proven that you *can* be addicted to placebos. And you have withdrawals when you come off it, the color of the placebo pill matters, the size of the placebo pill matters, etc. Placebos even work if you tell the recipient that it's a placebo! Watch this cool video about all the weirdness of the placebo: http://www.wimp.com/placeboeffect/

      --
      Protect your browser with the Force Safe Search add-on
    13. Re:"Rogers Center"s? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I feel the same way. In Cleveland a few years ago an insurance company bought the rights to sponsor the Indian's stadium but I'll always refer to it as Jacobs' Field.

  4. You're not missing out on much. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well I did RTFA and all it did was make some allusions to green energy but with no details. Some sort of hydro project I guess.

    1. Re:You're not missing out on much. by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

      The lead photo's caption says:

      "Workers celebrate as the "Big Becky" tunnel boring machine makes its breakthrough in Niagara Falls May 13, 2011 for the new hydroelectric project there."

      To be fair, the print is relatively small.

    2. Re:You're not missing out on much. by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 5, Informative

      The project was to up upgrade the existing hydroelectric generating stations that currently generate a little over 1.9 Gigawatts of electricity from the waters of the Niagara River. The Niagara River (on which you will find Niagara Falls) flows between the two Great Lakes, Lake Erie and Lake Ontario. It will add around 200 MW of power generating capacity. Thiswould have been a better news release article and explains a bit of the "green" projects in Ontario.

      There: all you ever wanted to know about WTF the OP's linked article should have told you. FWIW, I agree that the OP's linked article is pretty lame. But that's nothing new for mainstream journalism. But I have to admit, Canadian news media that were once pretty damned good, are now pretty damned weak (Leaving out important contextual information, inability to spell, lack of grammar skills, just not understanding what the fuck they are reporting on and too lazy to find out).

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    3. Re:You're not missing out on much. by meza · · Score: 1

      No mod points today so a simple thank you will have to suffice. I've recently been more and more annoyed at summaries lacking the essential point for the post to make any sense. Maybe I'm just getting old or something.

    4. Re:You're not missing out on much. by butalearner · · Score: 1

      No mod points today so a simple thank you will have to suffice. I've recently been more and more annoyed at summaries lacking the essential point for the post to make any sense. Maybe I'm just getting old or something.

      No, I fully agree, excellent GP post. However, we are still a step ahead of (or is it behind?) several other news websites, where so many interesting-looking article titles turn out to be videos without accompanying text. That pisses me off just thinking about it.

  5. worst article ever by SashaMan · · Score: 2

    You'd think they would explain, you know, WHY THEY BUILT THE TUNNEL. They explain it's a "sustainable energy project", but they don't actually explain how the tunnel is used or what exactly it's for.

    1. Re:worst article ever by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      I think it's a way of dumping more of that Maple syrup that they have been trying to foist off on the US for years.

    2. Re:worst article ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Picture's caption says:

      Workers celebrate as the "Big Becky" tunnel boring machine makes its breakthrough in Niagara Falls May 13, 2011 for the new hydroelectric project there

    3. Re:worst article ever by maxwell+demon · · Score: 5, Funny

      What do you mean, why they built the tunnel. It's a tunnel. You've got to build tunnels.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    4. Re:worst article ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why'd they build the tunnel? Is that like "Why did the chicken cross the road?" It's to get to the other side through something, of course.

    5. Re:worst article ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well that certainly explains everything! Thanks for clearing it all up!

    6. Re:worst article ever by peragrin · · Score: 1

      you don't build tunnels though, you bore them.

      besides we all know it is there so they can smuggle more drugs into the USA.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    7. Re:worst article ever by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1, Funny

      I'm sorry, but if you can't be bothered to take an interest in local affairs that's your own problem.

    8. Re:worst article ever by tom17 · · Score: 1

      HHGTTH fail.

    9. Re:worst article ever by happyhangone · · Score: 1

      Why they can use more water without affecting the laws governing the preservation of the fall's spectacle.
      http://www.opg.com/power/hydro/new_projects/ntp/why_niagara.asp

      What this proyect is all about!
      http://www.opg.com/power/hydro/new_projects/ntp/tunnel_route.asp

    10. Re:worst article ever by evil_aaronm · · Score: 1

      Well, fuck, mate - the Falls are practically my backyard, and I'm still reading to find out why this was done. Hadn't heard about it a-tall.

    11. Re:worst article ever by ustolemyname · · Score: 1

      Hitch Hiker's Guide To The Highway?

    12. Re:worst article ever by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Well, fuck, mate - the Falls are practically my backyard, and I'm still reading to find out why this was done. Hadn't heard about it a-tall.

      Probably it's because you didn't go to the cellar.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    13. Re:worst article ever by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Hitch Hiker's Guide To The Highway?

      Hitch Hiker's Guide To The Hyperspace, of course.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    14. Re:worst article ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what the other links are for. Click on the "Big Becky" link, then the others in the "Niagara Tunnel Project". It's a big hydroelectric project using the Niagara River at Niagara Falls. The other information includes: "Why at Niagara?", which explains there is excess, unused water allocation on the Canadian side of the river due to the shutdown of several old hydro plants near the falls (the river is shared between the USA and Canada), and excess generating capacity at the already-existing Sir Adam Beck generating station further downstream, if the water could get there. Thus, the tunnel connects the input above the Niagara Falls to the generating station downstream of the falls, augmenting the other supply that already goes to the station (a canal and pre-existing tunnels). There's a nice map and cross section here.

    15. Re:worst article ever by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      I think it's a way of dumping more of that Maple syrup that they have been trying to foist off on the US for years.

      If you don't love bacon covered in maple syrup, you're not human.

    16. Re:worst article ever by Namarrgon · · Score: 2

      Would've, but the lights had gone.

      --
      Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?
    17. Re:worst article ever by Glendale2x · · Score: 1

      I think it's a way of dumping more of that Maple syrup that they have been trying to foist off on the US for years.

      Fuck yes, bring that on. Maple syrup is tasty.

      --
      this is my sig
    18. Re:worst article ever by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      I submit that you've probably only tried carmel colored corn syrup and assumed you were whetting your pancakes with delicious grade A dark amber.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    19. Re:worst article ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then I'm really really proud and happy, that I'm not your kind of "human". (What I call "the self-torturing-and-loving-it NPCs".)

      What's next? Fried Mars bars, stuffed with cuttlefish and asparagus?

    20. Re:worst article ever by gmhowell · · Score: 2

      I was concerned about the leopard.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    21. Re:worst article ever by PPH · · Score: 1

      Worst ever? You're new here, aren't you?

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    22. Re:worst article ever by Culture20 · · Score: 2

      you don't build tunnels though, you bore them.

      I'll have you know that most tunnels find me rather engaging.

    23. Re:worst article ever by ljw1004 · · Score: 1

      They dug the tunnel because it was there

    24. Re:worst article ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? Because it wasn't there!

    25. Re:worst article ever by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      I would've thought that they'd need to dig the tunnel because it *wasn't* there. Incidentally, how *do* you dig a tunnel that's already there?

    26. Re:worst article ever by tom17 · · Score: 1

      hahah oops. HHGTTG fail to ME! :)

  6. Booooring. by goodmanj · · Score: 1, Funny

    I always said Canadians were boring.

    1. Re:Booooring. by Hartree · · Score: 1

      Boring is good.

      Try living in extremely interesting times.

  7. I'd tell you, but... by MrEricSir · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...it's boring.

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
  8. Same day as in Belgium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Belgium, "Wiske" ("= Little Louise", comparable to the Big Becky in TFA) today reached the right bank of the Schelde river. Complete video (Dutch) of the arrival of Wiske is here, a shorter English version (not showing the arrival) of the video is here.

  9. You know you're a Slashdot user when... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You scan the headline with "Tunnel boring machine" and read "Turing machine boring something hole".

  10. Re:Obvious! by Tiger4 · · Score: 1

    Why did the driller drill the tunnel?

    To get to the other side!

    --
    Behold, this dreamer cometh. Come now, and let us slay him... and we shall see what will become of his dreams.
  11. Nobody expected dirt to get in the way... by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 2

    Kind of funny that it ran into a timely detour because it hit a spot that WASN'T solid rock.

    Amazing that level of optimization fails due to loose dirt.

    --
    >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
    1. Re:Nobody expected dirt to get in the way... by haruchai · · Score: 2

      Guess none of them saw "The Core"

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    2. Re:Nobody expected dirt to get in the way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Solid rock is relatively self-supporting when perforated by a machine that cuts cleanly. So, solid rock needs vastly less after-drilling support structure than loose material, which wants to subside into any opening like sand through an hourglass. And, the geologic conditions can vary wildly foot-by-foot, rendering the design of the tunnel casing impossible until the conditions are actually encountered. Not the stuff of schedules or budgets. Going through solid rock allows the pre-fabrication of standard concrete casing segments that can be placed after the concrete has cured to its design strength, making for repeatable operations, and a homogeneous end product. Stakeholders like that.

    3. Re:Nobody expected dirt to get in the way... by feufeu · · Score: 1

      Kinda reminds me of high pressure water cutting: it does cut steel and such easily but fails on soft (cream) cake...

    4. Re:Nobody expected dirt to get in the way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This problem fails to be funny once you realize that hitting a non-solid geological formation while boring through the ground means that you are forced to consider the possibility that a huge-ass ton of rock can suddenly crash on top of your head and that the little 10km tunnel you are currently in can suddenly be flooded.

    5. Re:Nobody expected dirt to get in the way... by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      I'm not surprised. Then again anyone that's lived in Ontario and parts of NY/MI for most of their life already know that dirt varies from a few feet deep to several dozen feet deep or more. There's that whole 'scraped the topsoil off the canadian shield for several thousand km' thing and dumped it here thing that I guess these guys didn't look into.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    6. Re:Nobody expected dirt to get in the way... by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Kind of funny that it ran into a timely detour because it hit a spot that WASN'T solid rock.

      Amazing that level of optimization fails due to loose dirt.

      What's so funny or amazing about it? If you drill a hole through loose dirt, it ceases to be a hole seconds later. This has nothing to do with 'optimization'.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    7. Re:Nobody expected dirt to get in the way... by ddocjohn · · Score: 1

      If you played minecraft you'd know that hitting gravel is a pita

    8. Re:Nobody expected dirt to get in the way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is rock (shale), but much softer than the limestone, sandstone, and dolomite they were expecting, and it is prone to spalling off in small bits. You can get a sense of the problems they encountered from this picture -- the top of the tunnel is supposed to be round, not pointed like the picture shows. They obviously had trouble stabilizing the roof in the shale zones. Apparently the rock was not strong enough, and whatever rock bolts they were using weren't enough, or they had to deploy a lot more of them.

      Besides the tunnel stability issues, the bits of these tunnel borers are carefully optimized for a particular rock hardness and consistency, and if you deviate from that too much they won't work very well. Boring through rock the consistency of firm clay, for example, involves a completely different mechanical strategy at the bit than harder rocks. I guess the easiest analogy to think of is the different tool shapes needed for drilling or cutting into metal, concrete, and wood.

    9. Re:Nobody expected dirt to get in the way... by owlstead · · Score: 1

      Try tunneling under Amsterdam and see what muck is like to drill through :( The new metro line is already about 5 years overdue (not to mention way the added 1000 million of costs).

    10. Re:Nobody expected dirt to get in the way... by Mspangler · · Score: 1

      "Kind of funny that it ran into a timely detour because it hit a spot that WASN'T solid rock."

      Actually, "incompetent rock" is a long-standing problem in mining. Definition 4

      incompetent
      adj
      1. not possessing the necessary ability, skill, etc. to do or carry out a task; incapable
      2. marked by lack of ability, skill, etc.
      3. (Law) Law not legally qualified an incompetent witness
      4. (Earth Sciences / Geological Science) (of rock strata, folds, etc.) yielding readily to pressure so as to undergo structural deformation

    11. Re:Nobody expected dirt to get in the way... by ifrag · · Score: 1

      Big Becky is apparently a Minecraft noob and forgot to bring a shovel.

      --
      Fear is the mind killer.
  12. No goatse yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This is a story about a massive hole! Where's the goatse links?

    1. Re:No goatse yet? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Sorry - it's not ready yet because they've encountered a stretch of loose, crumbling material.

    2. Re:No goatse yet? by Per+Wigren · · Score: 1

      Here you are. (a perfectly appropriate domain name for this story)

      --
      My other account has a 3-digit UID.
  13. pesky cybers terrorizing us next? mediots? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    may as well as we learn to fear/hate/destroy them critters too. freaking truth mongers, have they no fear of losing their sacred right to remain silent? we'll see about that? just more fodder. certainly not boring. you call this weather?

  14. Motivations of Society, wealth or fear. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At first, I would be concerned with the manipulation of the natural paths over water from collective precipitation, but then
    considering the vast amount of energy to capture someone would think that it was a good idea.

    The discernment of that motivation, is reflected at the smallest unit of the planet, to collect what others would want or need, and doing it before your competitors. Yet still, this is motivation to collect free energies with only shallow preparations of the known effects that could be potentially disastrous.

    Consider the following video, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LIkgXTQetX8

    Is wealth become the new fear, that if one does not claim these unharnessed resources then such opportunity might not present itself again?

  15. It's a drug smuggling tunnel! by HangingChad · · Score: 1

    The 10.2 kilometer tunnel is 14.4 meters in diameter. Big Becky ate through 1.6 million cubic meters of rock to reach her goal.

    Those sneaking Canadians digging a drug smuggling tunnel. It's either that or they plan to sneak their armies across the border and invade.

    One of those.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    1. Re:It's a drug smuggling tunnel! by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      It's either that or they plan to sneak their armies across the border and invade.

      Replace "armies" with "platoon" and your comment might actually make sense ...

    2. Re:It's a drug smuggling tunnel! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey it's not our fault Americans know prime BC weed when they see it. There's no supply without demand.

    3. Re:It's a drug smuggling tunnel! by mjwx · · Score: 1

      The 10.2 kilometer tunnel is 14.4 meters in diameter. Big Becky ate through 1.6 million cubic meters of rock to reach her goal.

      Those sneaking Canadians digging a drug smuggling tunnel. It's either that or they plan to sneak their armies across the border and invade.

      One of those.

      Six platoons of mounties are on their way to polite you into submission.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    4. Re:It's a drug smuggling tunnel! by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Nah, this is just phase 1 of the Trans-American Maple Syrup Pipeline.

      Phase 2 involves overland steel piping and pumping stations to bring the syrup to New Jersey.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    5. Re:It's a drug smuggling tunnel! by Combatso · · Score: 1

      Wouldnt it have to cross the border to be a smuggling tunnel? Seems off to use a tunnel to get drugs from one part of a city over to another part of a city. Most canadians use a truck for that.

    6. Re:It's a drug smuggling tunnel! by HangingChad · · Score: 1

      Seems off to use a tunnel to get drugs from one part of a city over to another part of a city.

      It simply proves they're kinda new at the drug smuggling game, eh.

      --
      That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    7. Re:It's a drug smuggling tunnel! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's either that or they plan to sneak their armies across the border and invade.

      Well, then the tunnel is obviously about 200 years too late for that. I suppose we could always resurrect the Great Canadian Bagel and show you what lumberjacks and curlers can really do.

    8. Re:It's a drug smuggling tunnel! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would have worked better if they bored it east instead of north, eh?

  16. bore me to death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    were any mutants discovered?

  17. Our chief weapon is surprise... dirt and surprise by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

    You'd think by now there would be a standard way to drill loose material. (For example, I've heard of projects injecting water and freezing it, then dig through the ice-mix. But there must be a better solution by now; a recoverable geopolymer, injectable, texture of chalk when set?)

    --
    Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
  18. I don't understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kilometers? Cubic meters?? Toronto???

  19. I know the feeling by eamonman · · Score: 1

    It's like when you bring 10 pickaxes, find mostly dirt, then you realize you foolishly forgot to make even a couple of shovels.

    --
    0- Eamonman Proud member of DNRC
    1. Re:I know the feeling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's like when you bring 10 pickaxes, find mostly dirt, then you realize you foolishly forgot to make even a couple of shovels.

      Shovels? How un-dwarven. Real dwarves part the dirt with their beards.

    2. Re:I know the feeling by Tacvek · · Score: 1

      Is that not the very reason to always carry a crafting table, and a bit of wood with you? I generally just craft shovels when I need them.

      --
      Stylish sheet to fix many problems in Slashdot's D3: https://gist.github.com/801524
  20. Nope... by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    Mole-people. But as already been pointed out they're not very interesting to meet. You might say that they're.... (wait for it)... not very interesting.

    What, what were you expecting me to type?

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  21. Re:Our chief weapon is surprise... dirt and surpri by Jartan · · Score: 2

    I would think drilling through loose material would be easy. Isn't the problem more about stopping the ceiling from dumping more material into the spot you just emptied?

  22. Maybe not there... by BearRanger · · Score: 1

    But other tunnel boring projects do anticipate this sort of thing. I'll point to the city of Seattle and Washington state, which plan to replace an elevated freeway with a deep bore tunnel. Not through solid rock, but through glacial till material that is the equivalent of mixed dirt and gravel. Apparently the tunnel engineers don't think it will be a big problem to drill through it. (It will be hard on the drills themselves, but they can do it.) I think they're more concerned about the tunnel collapsing afterwards. Which was likely the concern at Niagara Falls too had they gone through something other than solid rock..

    1. Re:Maybe not there... by PPH · · Score: 1

      I think they're more concerned about the tunnel collapsing afterwards.

      Not really a problem if you anticipate soft ground when selecting boring equipment. It sounds like the Niagara equipment was designed for hard rock boring. In some senses, these are the simplest machines as they don't have to balance the ground pressure. In some cases, it is not necessary to line a hard rock tunnel immediately after the boring operation.

      Soft ground boring equipment is designed to maintain ground pressure balance and install tunnel lining as they proceed.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  23. Minecraft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously you've never had the experience of being suffocated by a ton of gravel falling on your head after hacking away at that diamond ore block on the ceiling!

    1. Re:Minecraft by PPH · · Score: 1

      No. But I dated a fat lady once who liked to be on top.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  24. The real reason for the tunnel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's no surprise Americans want out of the US. We're just making it easier for them :)

    1. Re:The real reason for the tunnel by Combatso · · Score: 1

      Then they should make a tunnel that actually spans the border. This tunnel is under Niagra, not under the river.

  25. Cement is concrete with rocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nuff said.

    1. Re:Cement is concrete with rocks by SpiralSpirit · · Score: 1

      ...no. concrete is cement (generally portland cement) mixed with aggregate and often some other materials to control or alter various properties of the concrete or of its curing. so you got it backwards, and he'd still be pissed.

  26. So ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    That's enough rock, officials said, to fill the Rogers Centre in Toronto.

    So then its filled, right?

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:So ... by blair1q · · Score: 1

      It'd be a first if it was.

    2. Re:So ... by Combatso · · Score: 1

      that sir, is the funniest quip ive seen here in a long while.

  27. Re:Our chief weapon is surprise... dirt and surpri by blair1q · · Score: 2

    It's the stuff constantly dumping on the top of the borer instead of falling and being sucked up by its front end. These things run on rails, so except for the first few meters their workspace needs to be relatively clean.

    It's also much harder to stabilize loose stuff for use as a tunnel, and almost impossible to trust your load calculations. Nice, hard rock eliminates all that. Just throw in some cleats, spray on the gunite to seal cracks and prevent loose crap from becoming debris, and go to lunch.

  28. I wish they by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 1

    would stop with the stupid comparisons. The miners had enough puss in their blisters to fill a 1998 Toyota Tercel. There was enough media their to impeach a president. God when can we trust people to understand units of measurements without comparing it to something that would never happen (like filling a sports stadium with rock (unless it is AC/DC in the 80's then it could happen).

    1. Re:I wish they by Combatso · · Score: 1

      perhaps because the general audience would be bored to death by raw numbers.. this is light, yay for us story in a shitty newspaper. Their readership doesn't want to sit and think about numbers, they want to get little quotes like 'enough rock to fill the skydome' that they can impress their friends with at the coffee maker.. The amound of rock and the amount of concrete doesnt matter to the story at all, its just fluff to make the reader feel smart.. Slashdot is a different audience, we may want to see actual units of measure, design specs and tolerances... The average douch in Toronto reading this article on his coffee break could care less.

  29. Canadian units? by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    "That’s enough rock, officials said, to fill the Rogers Centre in Toronto. And the cement used to line the tunnel would build a sidewalk stretching from Windsor to Quebec City."

    The Americans, Burmese and Liberians have imperial, the rest of the world has metric. But now we have RogerCentre's as units of volume and Windsor-to-Quebec units of distance to understand when dealing with Canucks?

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:Canadian units? by calidoscope · · Score: 1

      I take you're not familiar with The Registers system of units. Volume can be measured in Bulgarian airbags, Bulgarian funbags, Olympic swimming pools, etc.

      --
      A Shadeless room is a brighter room.
    2. Re:Canadian units? by Combatso · · Score: 1

      Since the SkyDome (Rogers Centre) was built in the 80's all its measurments were done in Metric.. Therefor, a Rogers Centre is a metric measurment.. We have Rogers Centremeters, Rogers Centrelitres and Rogers Centreminutes (a unit of time established by how long it takes to open the roof).

    3. Re:Canadian units? by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's a group that the USA wants to identify with - "we use the same measurement system as Burma and Liberia! Wait, they're too busy shooting each other to learn metric? What's our excuse again? U S A!! U S A!!"

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  30. Feed for Sir Adam Beck power plant by Animats · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's a feed tunnel for the Sir Adam Beck power plant below the falls. It's the third tunnel built for that purpose, and adds 194MW of generating capacity.

    There's so much plumbing in place at Niagara Falls that the falls can almost be turned off. There's a minimum water flow over the falls established by international agreement, but that's for aesthetics. At night, and during the tourist off season, more water is run through the hydroelectric plants.

    Back in the 1980s, some boater was upstream of the falls, closer than he should have been, and lost power. He managed to run aground upstream of the falls. This was noticed at the Niagara Mohawk power plant control room, where an operator opened all feed and diversion tunnels and closed gates at the upstream weir, shutting off most of the falls until a rescue crew could fetch the boater.

    1. Re:Feed for Sir Adam Beck power plant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, so they actually *do* turn off the falls at night, and for a good reason? Amazing. And here I was thinking it was just an amusing story for the dumb tourists...

    2. Re:Feed for Sir Adam Beck power plant by greed · · Score: 1

      They turn them down at night; to something like half the flow required at peak daytime viewing hours.

      Then they shine lights on them; the tour guide at Sir Adam Beck smugly called them "weapons of mass distraction". (He also asked me more questions about my DSLR then he could answer about their power station... but I am an electrical engineer, so already knew way more than the "tourist" stuff. And the guide was in the market for a new camera.)

      They change the colours periodically, and if we hadn't been short of time, I'd have gotten some shots of the gels part-way across the projector lenses. It turns out of you spend enough time taking pictures at night, they DO turn the lights off... 5 minutes to midnight, at least on Mother's Day.

      (Since power demand is low at this time of year, and it's spring runoff, I doubt the water level was reduced by much that particular night. In the summer, they'll be storing everything they can in the pump-generating reservoirs on both sides for that 4PM demand peak... the one Ohio mucked up a few years back.)

  31. Detour? by JanneM · · Score: 1

    Why did they detour for gravel? All you need to do is dig out the bottom block, then quickly place a torch on the floor. All the gravel above will be disintegrated as it falls onto the torch. They're professionals; aren't they supposed to know this sort of thing?

    --
    Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    1. Re:Detour? by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 1

      They couldn't get to the bottom block. It was protected by a balrog.

      --
      I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
  32. You Canadites and your "metrics" by mykos · · Score: 1

    Why couldn't you just say it's "a bit over two leagues"?

    1. Re:You Canadites and your "metrics" by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      Why couldn't you just say it's "a bit over two leagues"?

      So it's slightly larger than Major League Baseball?

    2. Re:You Canadites and your "metrics" by VolciMaster · · Score: 1

      Because "a bit over three leagues" would be more accurate (league)

  33. Re:Our chief weapon is surprise... dirt and surpri by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    drilling through loose material is very easy, however if the boring mechanism is designed to go through hard rock, the bored material might be prone to jam up the drilling mechanisms, and more importantly, the tunnel will probably cave in after the machine passes.

  34. Typical /. Canadian bias by sootman · · Score: 1

    Thatâ(TM)s enough rock, officials said, to fill the Rogers Centre in Toronto. And the cement used to line the tunnel would build a sidewalk stretching from Windsor to Quebec City.

    So I guess that's a large volume and a long distance, respectively? Whatever. Could be a strip mall and two neighboring towns for all I know. ;-)

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  35. Yawn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The tunnel under the English Channel is much larger. So tell me again, why is this news?

    1. Re:Yawn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's new, and tunnel under the English Channel is old?

  36. That's not a boring machine... by LongearedBat · · Score: 1

    That's a picture of a crashed UFO (plus a couple of Canadians who found it).

  37. What I want to know by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 1

    is why they called a beast capable of chewing through kilometers of rock "Becky". I'd have thought "The Umber Hulk" or maybe "The Spiky Iron Fist" would have more subterranean-cred.

    1. Re:What I want to know by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      Obviously, you haven't met the lead engineer's sister . . .

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    2. Re:What I want to know by cyclomedia · · Score: 1

      Named after the ex-wife?

      --
      If you don't risk failure you don't risk success.
  38. Boring ? by dargaud · · Score: 1

    "Boring: see engineer." -- from the Yellow Pages...

    --
    Non-Linux Penguins ?
  39. supposed to be impressive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1.6 Million cubic meters of excavated rock? Is that supposed to be impressive....
    try the gotthard basis tunnel in Switzerland with 13.3 Million cubic meters then....

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gotthard_Base_Tunnel

    Specifications
            Length:
                    Western tunnel: 56.978 km (35.404 mi)
                    Eastern tunnel: 57.091 km (35.475 mi)
            Total length of all tunnels and shafts: 151.84 km (94.35 mi)
            Diameter of each of the single-track tubes: 8.8–9.5 m (29–31 ft)
          Amount of excavated rock: 26,500,000 t (29,200,000 ST; 26,100,000 LT), (13,300,000 m3/17,400,000 cu yd, the equivalent of 5 Giza pyramids)

  40. Turing machine!? by morty_vikka · · Score: 1

    My eyes and brain must be getting old.. I read the title as "Turing machine Completes Hole Under Niagara Falls"...

    1. Re:Turing machine!? by neminem · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough, so did I. I don't think it's my brain going, I've just been brainwashed by the whole cs major thing. T.*ing machine = turing machine, clearly. Especially when you're talking about said machine "completing" something.

  41. Use the shovel! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > She’s designed to go through solid rock, but encountered a stretch of loose
    > crumbling material that was unsuitable for tunneling. That forced a long
    > and expensive detour.

    Nobody told'em to use the shovel instead of the pick axe ?

  42. Mineshaft Gap! by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    Now we just have to get 10:1 women to men ratio to ensure sammiches in the future.

  43. They should've done simulations with minecraft... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then they would have known to expect occasional loose patches of rock and blob monsters.

  44. Political Joke :-) by otaku244 · · Score: 1

    "She’s designed to go through solid rock, but encountered a stretch of loose, crumbling material that was unsuitable for tunneling. That forced a long and expensive detour." -sounds like an allegory for the US Government

    --
    Mod me down, I shall become more off-topic than you could possibly imagine.
  45. Meaningless specs for Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unless they express the dimensions in terms of how many football fields and how many Grand Canyons full of concrete and rock was moved Americans will have no comprehension of its size. 10.4km? 14.4 metres? Where is Windsor and Quebec City?

  46. tell me again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why do we need this?