Slashdot Mirror


Google Founders' Jets Caught On WSJ's Radar

theodp writes "Via an FOIA request, the Wall Street Journal acquired records of every private aircraft flight recorded in the FAA's air-traffic management system for 2007 through 2010, using them to build a private jet tracker database. Among the high fliers who found their records unblocked were Google founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin, whose 767 and Gulfstream reportedly burned an estimated 52,000 gallons of aviation fuel and $430,000 on two round-trips from the U.S. mainland to Tahiti to catch last summer's total eclipse of the sun. A Google spokeswoman confirmed the pair's jaunt, but added that Page and Brin mitigated the greenhouse gas emissions from their aircraft usage by purchasing an even greater amount of carbon offsets. Tech-boom billionaire Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban seemed unfazed by the prospect of his past plane movements becoming public: 'I have a plane,' Cuban quipped. 'I bought it so I could use it. Shocking, isn't it?'"

10 of 427 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Sorry to sound apologetic... by Richard_at_work · · Score: 4, Insightful

    More to the point, this is a private person doing something privately with their earned fortune, its none of the WSJs business.

  2. Who wouldn't? by Superken7 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So who of us would not fly every now and then on a private plane in order to travel through the world? Isn't this also the case for many polititians, especially "important" ones?
    Honestly, I would do it.

  3. Re:Sorry to sound apologetic... by CaptainLard · · Score: 4, Insightful

    True its none of our business. But since its out, if they were concerned enough to buy carbon offsets couldn't they have also "flight pooled"?

  4. Fairly irresponsible by WSJ by mdarksbane · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I mean, the rich have privacy rights, too. Why the hell should everywhere they fly be made public?

    1. Re:Fairly irresponsible by WSJ by dzfoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They're not archiving those aircraft movements; the pilots must register their flight plans with the FAA, and such registrations are a matter of public record. The FAA, the Federal Aviation Administration, is a public agency.

      Note that the flight plans in question could be associated with Messrs. Brin and Page because they own the plane, which is a known fact, not because the FAA keeps track of who goes where in their own private transport.

                -dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
  5. Re:Sorry to sound apologetic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You don't need to get groped at the airport if you have your own private charter flight. That's got to be worth the cost of the plane right there.

  6. Re:Sorry to sound apologetic... by kulnor · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ageer, this represents a serious breach of privacy. What would you think if your car location data would be publicly available? So anyone can basically know when/where you went? I have no problem if this you authorize to publish your data but not like this.

  7. Re:Sorry to sound apologetic... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You don't need to get groped at the airport if you have your own private charter flight.

    And if you have your own private 767, you can get groped on the plane.

    If you catch my drift.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  8. Re:Mark Cuban by kqs · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is just another news item for the tabloids.

    Sad that the WSJ has fallen from far-right-but-respectable to tabloid so quickly.

  9. Re:Sorry to sound apologetic... by Score+Whore · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If they were concerned about the carbon footprint couldn't they have just bought the offsets and stayed home? Actually the whole idea of carbon offsets is just bullshit. I wonder if they worry about a new era Martin Luther who will show what a mockery their Indulgences really are?

    Even more to the point, how exactly is their whereabouts being tracked this way any different than their effort of tracking and selling the activities of every single person who ever uses the internet? Seems perfectly fine to me for them to have their travels publicized and mocked as appropriate.