Stamping Out Low-Cost Nanodevices
RogerRoast writes "Vanderbilt University scientists report that they have developed a simple technique for stamping patterns invisible to the human eye onto a special class of nanomaterials. According to the article, the method works with materials that are riddled with tiny voids that give them unique optical, electrical, chemical and mechanical properties. 'It's amazing how easy it is. We made our first imprint using a regular tabletop vise,' Sharon M. Weiss the lead author said. The article was published in the latest issue of the journal Nano Letters."
I prefer to stamp them out with the sole of my shoe,
Nasty little nanodevices, always getting under the baseboards. Good riddance.
#naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
The title made me think it would be about a way of getting rid of unwanted nanodevices in the environment - maybe some sort of vacuum combined with a filter. Stephenson's "The Diamond Age" has the problems of unwanted nano-machines as one of its themes.
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Neal_Stephenson
Hopefully someone who is on an academic IP address can explain why this is any different than the standard wet-embossing techniques that we've been using to do this kind of thing for the last decade and a half... those SEM images sure look awfully similar to the stuff I was doing back in 2001. Maybe they're just saying that they crush the porous substrate whereas with standard techniques we suck up solvents in substrate inks? That would be kind of neat, although it seems like it'd be limited in utility so I imagine it's more clever than that... do they crush some porous substrate and then manage to lift off the pattern or otherwise remove the crushed portion? Do they have a technique to deposit different substrates on the same device? Otherwise, it's not really going to be useful for most electronics right? I mean, making a pattern of n-type silicon isn't going to make a useful device unless you can deposit p-type and conductor on the same device and manage high degrees of alignment... maybe they mean that this can be used as memory? DIffraction gratings by themselves are rather boring...
A shame that the article doesn't say what the substrates actually are. I do like the photos of the little tubes, although without a scale bar I'm not sure what I'm looking at.
"The article was published in the latest issue of the journal Nano Letters"
... but to post in nano letters is a bit arogant me thinks !!
It's one thing not to be able to see the patterns created
I want nano devices with teleporters to hang out in my intestines, transporting in food where it needs to go, and down lower, transporting the results out. These same nano bots can clean my house and maintain my engine at the microscopic level. Working together they could manage my lawn and keep it precisely 3 inches and transport water in as needed. For that matter, with enough of them, we could live in nanite-buildings.
I see all this coming to a hysterical end the first time someone cracks the system though. That couldn't happen could it?
*Ducks*
- Dan.
~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
Painless and self-renewing (or maybe reprogrammable!) nano-tattoos coming soon to flesh near you?
It's certainly been a staple of cyberpunk.
It's already here. Think geek has a wand that changes an e-Ink tatoo to a new picture.
-- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.