Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Asus To Ship Ubuntu 10.10 On Three Eee PC Netbooks

Posted by Soulskill on from the in-other-news-netbooks-still-exist dept.

An anonymous reader writes "Asus has announced that three Eee PCs will ship with Ubuntu Linux. Three 2011 models — the 1001PXD, 1011PX, and 1015PX — are immediately available, though no retailers seem to stock them yet. A Canonical exec had this to say about the new netbooks: 'There are a number of factors that make Ubuntu an attractive proposition for ASUS and its customers. Ubuntu continues to set the standard for slick design, ease of use and security, it is the world's third most popular operating system, and [it] has the most number of users in Linux. We [Canonical] were looking at publicly available data on the operating systems accessing Wikipedia last week and found the web site serves more pages to Ubuntu PCs than to iPads — there are a lot of users out there.' It might not be the same as Asus launching three flagship netbooks all running Ubuntu instead of Windows, but it's definitely a start. Asus says there are more Ubuntu netbooks to come later this year, too — hopefully they'll run Ubuntu 11.04."

142 comments

  1. Excellent about time by Shorty1911 · · Score: 1

    Good article on how Linux is coming up.

    1. Re:Excellent about time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah this has never been tried before by any manufacturers, especially with netbooks.

      I bet people will love it and it will be a total success! This is the Year of Desktop Linux!

    2. Re:Excellent about time by X0563511 · · Score: 0

      Wrong. Netbooks have been shipped with Linux before. Wal-mart had them. I got mine on Amazon.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    3. Re:Excellent about time by nstach · · Score: 2

      I am actually in shock. How is it even possible to miss the sarcasm here?

    4. Re:Excellent about time by boristhespider · · Score: 2

      This is Slashdot.

    5. Re:Excellent about time by RyuhoKudo · · Score: 1

      whoosh

    6. Re:Excellent about time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I honestly don't know. He must be a blast at parties, or the kind of guy who simply cannot stop to think when there appears to be an opportunity to correct a mistake on the Internet.

  2. Retailers by Niris · · Score: 1

    Would love to see Best Buy carry these, but I can only imagine the torrent of customers we'd get trying to understand what something other than Windows is. Also hope they include a disc or flash drive with a Ubuntu installer on it for when it randomly decides to not load up anymore.

    1. Re:Retailers by Gibbs-Duhem · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I dunno, they seem to manage fine with iOS and android. We're talking about netbooks, so the different form factor makes people intuitively not expect it to be *exactly* the same as what they've always used. And Unity is closer to looking like android/iOS than windows, which makes even more sense if the device is looking more like a phone than a desktop... although I definitely agree that not including Unity is an obvious choice. That stuff is just a disaster at present.

    2. Re:Retailers by Svartalf · · Score: 1

      Did you happen to have that sort of torrent with the Xoom or the Iconia Tab A500?

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    3. Re:Retailers by MoonBuggy · · Score: 1

      It's not a different form factor, that's the thing, it's the same old notebook design that's been hit by a shrink-ray. I'm guessing that if they do sell them in Best Buy, there are going to be plenty of people complaining that the things on the screen of the little laptop look different to the big laptop.

    4. Re:Retailers by somersault · · Score: 2

      Unity isn't in 10.10. Good thing, because it sucks. I'm now using Mint.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    5. Re:Retailers by IANAAC · · Score: 1

      Also hope they include a disc or flash drive with a Ubuntu installer on it for when it randomly decides to not load up anymore.

      "Randomly" is a bit unfair. If Linux doesn't load, it's because of an update gone wrong or a hardware failure, just as it would on any other OS. But that falls on the user to ensure what is or isn't updated, which seems to be asking too much from many.

    6. Re:Retailers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the couple of hours I spent playing with Unity, it looked like it might be a decent interface for a small-screen device like a tablet or netbook. It was too simplified for a proper desktop or laptop, so I switched back to Gnome, but it didn't quite strike me as a disaster. Of course, there might have been show-stoppers that I didn't play around long enough to see.

    7. Re:Retailers by quickOnTheUptake · · Score: 1

      But that falls on the user to ensure what is or isn't updated, which seems to be asking too much from many.

      Am I reading this right?
      If I'm running sid, then sure, I should watch out for broken updates. But if I'm running a distro that doesn't brand itself as pre-testing and unstable, it isn't my job as user to monitor the updates for potential breakage. Rather, it is the distro's job to test its updates before it pushes them out for general consumption. I think it is asinine to suggest that the users of a stable distribution shuold need to check the stability of updates that are pushed by the distribution.

      --
      Mod points: Guaranteed to remove your sense of humor.
      Side effects may include gullibility and temporary retardation
    8. Re:Retailers by Locutus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      didn't BestBuy sign a deal with Microsoft (ExpertZone) putting Microsoft employees inside of BB for training and lots of the training was how to bash Linux and Macs? I wouldn't doubt there was also a contract section eliminating their ability to sell other operating systems, especially GNU/Linux based ones. Here is a good search to start with:

      http://www.google.com/search?q=Microsoft+Best+buy+employee

      Don't count on Best Buy carrying these or expect to keep getting it pulled from your hands by Best Buy employees shoving Microsoft at you.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    9. Re:Retailers by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      It's Unix. Why are you molesting it all the time? Just leave it be.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    10. Re:Retailers by IANAAC · · Score: 1

      I think it is asinine to suggest that the users of a stable distribution shuold need to check the stability of updates that are pushed by the distribution.

      Define "stable distribution". Every single Linux distribution has pushed out a problematic update of one kind or another at some point in its history, So have Windows. So have Macs. It's grand and all that you want to absolve the user of any responsibility, but that's not how life works. Sometimes we screw up, mostly because we don't know what we're doing or haven't thought things through and blindly clicked the "continue" button. That includes the maintainers of distributions.

    11. Re:Retailers by quickOnTheUptake · · Score: 1

      Okay, first, yes updates do always bring the possibility of breakage. There is always the possibility of some weird configuration or corner case. (This is why stable generally demands relatively few updates, the more often you change things the more likely something is to break). So no, I'm not implying that a stable distro will never put out an update that breaks something for someone.
      I am saying that if I'm using a distribution that sells itself as being for mass consumption and stable, then these broken updates should be rare and each one should affect relatively few users. Rare enough that the end user shouldn't have to research the updates before hitting 'okay'.
      After all, if some patch is broken, and the typical user is able to find this out, that means the maintainers (who after all are supposed to keep up on this sort of thing) can find it out too and thus--this being a stable distribution for mass consuption--the update should have already been yanked by the maintainer or distribution.

      --
      Mod points: Guaranteed to remove your sense of humor.
      Side effects may include gullibility and temporary retardation
    12. Re:Retailers by Sparx139 · · Score: 1

      I'm using a Lenovo s10-3t at the moment, running unity. It's fantastic for touch screens, and because my screen is so small the fact that the launch bar auto hides to maximise screen space is fantastic. The biggest frustration is if you are trying to navigate with a mouse (because you have dirty/sticky fingers, for example). The interface isn't much fun if you use a mouse, so you end up using the keyboard for everything (Super brings up the launcher, from which you can just use the search bar to select whatever you want). Other than that, it works pretty well

      --
      Our culture doesn't get smarter, it just finds new ways of being retarded.
    13. Re:Retailers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seem Gnome still works perfectly fine with 11.04. I had an older system that wouldn't support 11.04 and it appears even newer ones may not work that well. The problem I suspect is with the graphics drivers not being up to par to sustain a 3d accelerated interface. That is on the systems which work best with GNU/Linux the 3d accelerated drivers aren't antiquate (at least some Intel graphics based systems, these work best, as they have open source drivers with 3d acceleration and suspend to ram support).

    14. Re:Retailers by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      It's Unix

      Not it's not. The correct name is GNU/Linux. Gnu stands for "Gnu is not Unix".

      QED.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    15. Re:Retailers by mfraz74 · · Score: 1

      If the Eee PCs are using the Netbook version of Ubuntu 10.10, then they are using Unity. It started off in the UNR and for 11.04 they merged UNR and Ubuntu Desktop with both having the Unity interface. I used UNR up to and including 10.04, when I tried 10.10 on the netbook I switched to Kubuntu.

    16. Re:Retailers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except updates breaking things are the norm for Ubuntu, not the exception.

      But hey, as always, blame the user. It's worked wonders for Linux these past 20 years.

    17. Re:Retailers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unity was not in 10.10 desktop, but it was the default session in 10.10 netbook edition.

      As far as I know they could be shipping it with unity, or at least Unity's old mutter based version.

  3. Why worry? by Haedrian · · Score: 1

    "Asus says there are more Ubuntu netbooks to come later this year, too — hopefully they'll run Ubuntu 11.04.""

    Why worry? Its not like it takes too much time or effort to update to the next version. At least this way if people hate Unity they aren't forced to use it.

    1. Re:Why worry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      People arn't "forced to use" unity if they hate it, you can still install and switch to KDE or Gnome (as i did when i upgraded from 10.10 ro 11.04), however i agree that the decision to use 10.10 is a good one as its very stable now, and ships with Gnome as opposed to Unity.

        (by this logis, 10.01 "forces" people to use Gnome who might want to use unity, eventhough its as simple as installing the approperate packages from the repositories.)

    2. Re:Why worry? by digsbo · · Score: 2

      My wife's been using Ubuntu since 9.10. She's been basically happy with it, except for the few times she's had trouble getting mp3s from Amazon. But there's no way she'd know to switch the desktop, and I have told her not to upgrade to 11.04 to avoid dealing with it for the time being.

    3. Re:Why worry? by Vectormatic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      good god i hope they dont ship 11.04. Your average gnome 2.4 desktop is mildly understandable for joe sipack (especially once you move to just one panel, at the bottom), but unity is a fricking usability disaster. Once they ship eee's with 11.04, they will have a repeat of the original eee 701 on their hands, massive returns by clueless commoners unable to connect to their wireless and start ther browser.

      i've tried installing 11.04 on my oldish laptop, and the thing is horribly unstable, and basicaly unusable, while old versions of ubuntu run without a hitch

      Honestly, the first system i buy with ubuntu 11.04 pre-installed will have its drive wiped as if it were running vista

      --
      People, what a bunch of bastards
    4. Re:Why worry? by kvvbassboy · · Score: 1

      Why worry? Its not like it takes too much time or effort to update to the next version.

      False. If there is one problem with Ubuntu, it is that upgrading from one version to another is completely broken, and ASUS would be better off not having too handle such problems.

      If you are one of those few who have not had any problems, consider yourself lucky. However, it may be possible to ensure that it works properly for a limited set of laptops.

    5. Re:Why worry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF? Why are so many geeks always fostering and supporting the most lazy-assed retards on the planet?

      Unity is a piece of shit, no doubt about it. But the Windows/Mac-like desktop concept is just a different piece of shit.
      They are both mind-boggingly easy to use.

      Seriously, if someone can't use them, the how the fuck is he getting up in the morning? How is he tying his shoes? Let alone drive a car?
      I don't want to be *anywhere* close to such a person on a road. He's a deadly projectile.
      And I can't even imagine the disaster of having such a "person" do a critical job for you. Like nurse/doctor, bridge engineer, fuel truck transporter, etc.

      Efficiency is a good thing. But if you save so much work and skill, that it makes things *worse*, you're a lazy ass and are NOT entitled to any simplification or idiot padding.
      So STOP doing that!

      If Joe Sixpack can't even manage Unity or Windows, while a 3-year-old kid from a half-slum half-jungle place in the 3rd world doesn't even wonder if he can do it, but SIMPLY DOES IT, then Joe Sixpack is the next in line for a Darwin award, and SUPPOSED to fail at natural selection. It's SUPPOSED to be harder for him.
      It's only because of spineless servants like you, that they even survive. So STOP IT. You're hurting us all!

    6. Re:Why worry? by Haedrian · · Score: 1

      I only had a problem once with Kubuntu. Basically it crashed during upgrade and when it came back my mouse and keyboard wouldn't work. But everything got fixed when I chose 'update' again.

      Never had problems otherwise over the past 3 years or so.

    7. Re:Why worry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the 701 sold extremely well, and was so simple to use that many formerly non-computer users got one. They were aimed at young women, and did very well. The EeePCs only started slumping after they started shipping them with Windows, which was way too slow for the amount of RAM and the relatively slow CPU. Then people had to slow them down further with antivirus and antispyware software. I'd still be using my old 701 except for the small screen size. Instead I got a 10" screen Acer and put 10.10, and now 11.04 on it. I didn't know it was unusable, so I've been using it just fine. :-) I can understand why people like and dislike Unity, but it's easy enough to turn off and go with Gnome, if preferred. I think it's probably best for a touchscreen.

    8. Re:Why worry? by Abreu · · Score: 1

      My home machine has been Ubuntu only since 8.04 and I upgraded to 11.04 without any problems.

      Each user has their own desktop, mine uses Unity, my wife's is Gnome configured to look like WinXP and my 6 year old has a Gnome desktop with minimal menu for edutainment software, games and a locked down browser to visit Discovery Kids and Cartoon Network's sites.

      We are very happy and everything works fine.

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    9. Re:Why worry? by Abreu · · Score: 1

      False, I have been updating from one version of Ubuntu to the next for at least 2 years, with minimal problems.

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    10. Re:Why worry? by Hadlock · · Score: 2

      "Massive usability disaster" is an understatement. I tried lodging my complaints about 10.10 unity on the netbook and got shouted down on the official forums. 10.04 is nearly ideal, but 10.10 is slow as molasses and not at all intuitive or structured around getting things done in an expeditious manner. It's even more frustrating for "power users". I heard a rumor that Unity from 10.10 netbook edition was going to get rolled into a later desktop release. I hope not.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    11. Re:Why worry? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      She can't click on her login, then change the dropdown to something other than unity?

      You might want to find a smarter wife.

    12. Re:Why worry? by Homburg · · Score: 1

      11.04 has Unity in the desktop release (indeed, there's no longer a separate netbook edition), but it's a significant rewrite and, IMO, significantly better (certainly faster and more stable) than the 10.10 version of Unity.

    13. Re:Why worry? by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      False, I have been updating from one version of Ubuntu to the next for at least 2 years, with minimal problems.

      Aside from the fact that upgrades take about six hours, the last time I upgraded my MythTV server the upgrade crashed part-way through and took some effort to fix. For the laptop and netbook I generally just copy /home to an external disk and then reinstall because it's faster and more reliable.

    14. Re:Why worry? by digsbo · · Score: 1

      What OS does your wife use?

    15. Re:Why worry? by digsbo · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the info. I had not had time to think about dealing with the upgrade to 11.04 (I only read there were some bumps w/ 11.04 and I never bothered customizing the user desktops before), but after reading your post, I might do it this weekend.

    16. Re:Why worry? by iceaxe · · Score: 1

      Sorry to hear that you've had trouble. Personally, I've been quite pleased with Natty, especially since switching to xfce.

      I like it so much that the next time I do a full OS install I'll be using Xubuntu. (Currently just running xfce on plain ol' Ubuntu, 11.04 upgraded from a fresh install of 10.10)

      Do bear in mind, though, that I'm the sort who thinks a widescreen monitor is best used rotated 90 degrees because emacs works really great that way.

      --
      WALSTIB!
    17. Re:Why worry? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      My live in girlfriend who has lived with me for over 5 years, been going out for about 11, runs 11.04 on her PC, and Android 2.3.3 (CM 7) on her Droid.

    18. Re:Why worry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you got lucky. I upgraded to Gutsy (7.10) and it completely broke my install - wouldn't even get to the login screen. I was lucky I was dual-booting Windows so I could at least download a Feisty (7.04) disk to fix things.

    19. Re:Why worry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol

    20. Re:Why worry? by digsbo · · Score: 0

      She's been dating you for five years? You're lucky you don't have a smarter girlfriend.

      Sorry to be a dick, but you're earlier comment invited it. Was there really a need to insult my Linux using wife? Show some manners.

    21. Re:Why worry? by h4rr4r · · Score: 0

      No, 11 years. We have been living together for a little over 5.
      It's pretty clear your wife isn't the only dummy in your family.

      Try a little reading comprehension.

      Stop being a little girl and get over it. I actually think your wife is probably smart enough to use a drop down, you are just a jerk who underestimates her abilities.

    22. Re:Why worry? by SchMoops · · Score: 1

      How did you choose "update" without a keyboard or mouse? Tell me, Mr. Haedrian, what good is a phone call when you are unable to speak?

    23. Re:Why worry? by RobbieThe1st · · Score: 1

      As others have said, it's not really just the interface - for a netbook with a widescreen, it's great!
      The real problem is the instability. It's new, and needs a few more versions of being subjected to every weird hardware and software combination available before it'll be stable enough for Joe Sixpack. KDE 4.X and Gnome 2 have gone though this already, and tend to be rock stable.
      When Unity gets there, maby. But the first time it crashes because of an unstable graphics driver or other such, well... Joe Sixpack can't fix it himself, nor will have any clue what caused it, and will assume that it's the "computer" that's the problem.

      Contrast that with my KDE+Metacity desktop, which when I installed a custom kernel(and thus broke the nvidia driver) I ran for at least 6 hours on the fallback 2d graphics *without noticing* until I tried to run a 3d game. That sort of fall protection is what's needed in a system for Joe Sixpack: If something fails, it may not run any games, but at least it'l run Firefox and boot!

    24. Re:Why worry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You aren't forced to use Unity on 11.04 anyway - there is an option to use the Gnome desktop on the login screen.

    25. Re:Why worry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was really unstable right after the release but it already received a few upgrades and it's working fine, right now. Takes some time to get used to Unity, though.

    26. Re:Why worry? by Cougar+Town · · Score: 1

      I upgraded to 11.04 and had no issues. I tried Unity out and didn't like it so I just chose the classic desktop when I logged in and was right back to my normal Gnome environment. There's really nothing to "deal with" ... just upgrade and then it's as simple as choosing Gnome when you (or her) login if you don't want Unity. It's really that easy. Unity is just the new default, but Gnome is still there if you choose it.

      You should stop telling her not to upgrade and just do it. I've been a daily Ubuntu user since 6.06... I depend on it for my job, so it's important to me that it works, and works well... I always backup before upgrading so I can roll back just in case things aren't good... but I can honestly tell you that there's really no issue here. Upgrade and enjoy... with or without Unity.

    27. Re:Why worry? by Haedrian · · Score: 2

      Actually I solved it by inserting another USB mouse. It was quite weird, the touchpad was dead but the USB wasn't. Then I used the onscreen keyboard.

    28. Re:Why worry? by zevans · · Score: 1

      Do bear in mind, though, that I'm the sort who thinks a widescreen monitor is best used rotated 90 degrees because emacs works really great that way.

      Almost everything does. Not sure which "consumer" decided computers should all be widescreen rather than longscreen, but he better hope I never meet him in a narrow alleyway.

      --
      "... and more and more now there are all kinds of electronic goodies available" -- Pink Floyd 1972
    29. Re:Why worry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could not agree more. The Unity is a complete disaster especially for the beginner. If one tries to find a solitaire, after many clicks the Unity shows it logically next to the "Additional drivers". Libre office is next to the log file viewer. What happened to logical and/or hierarchical user interface?

  4. The Year of Linux on the Desktop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I've got a feeling that 2011 is the year of Linux on the desktop.

    My previous calculations based on random numbers in the Bible was off by about 5 years or so.

    1. Re:The Year of Linux on the Desktop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got a feeling that 2011 is the year of Linux on the desktop.

      This will fit in nicely with Slashdot's former predictions of:

      2010
      2009
      2008
      2007
      2006
      2005
      2004...

    2. Re:The Year of Linux on the Desktop by dslbrian · · Score: 5, Funny

      I've got a feeling that 2011 is the year of Linux on the desktop.

      Yes, on Oct 21st the worthy Mac and Windows users will be raptured to a place where their old machines will be discarded and instead they will use Eee Books running Ubuntu. This will be a time of Unity.

      The unworthy will be stuck using their Mac and Windows machines, or for the truly unworthy BSD.

    3. Re:The Year of Linux on the Desktop by SteveFoerster · · Score: 3, Funny

      DNF is shipping. Anything can happen.

      --
      Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
    4. Re:The Year of Linux on the Desktop by shutdown+-r+now · · Score: 1

      The divine plan is missing GNU/Hurd... or is that fate truly so unspeakably horrible?

  5. Pity they picked Ubuntu right now by boristhespider · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It might all be fine again in a year's time, it was fine a year back, but plumping for Ubuntu just as they go their own way with Unity doesn't strike me as the best way of getting a slick Linux. (The same would go for a GNOME 3 distro right now, like Fedora.) I'd have been tempted to put on Linux Mint, Mandriva or openSuSE -- something accessible and slick enough, but likely to have a more stable user experience for a while...

    1. Re:Pity they picked Ubuntu right now by boristhespider · · Score: 1

      Ignore me. Reading which version they put on is useful before jumping in and commenting like an idiot.

    2. Re:Pity they picked Ubuntu right now by Lanteran · · Score: 1

      They run ubuntu 10.10. No unity required.

      --
      "People don't want to learn linux" hasn't been a valid excuse since '03.
    3. Re:Pity they picked Ubuntu right now by boristhespider · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I've not been on Slashdot long but it's long enough to get out of the habit of even reading the summary, let alone the article...

    4. Re:Pity they picked Ubuntu right now by Nimey · · Score: 1

      They're going to run it on netbooks, however, and the 10.10 netbook remix used Unity.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    5. Re:Pity they picked Ubuntu right now by Goaway · · Score: 1

      Yeah, no, going their own way with Unity is pretty much the only they are ever going to get a "slick Linux".

    6. Re:Pity they picked Ubuntu right now by boristhespider · · Score: 1

      That may be true in the future - I'm willing to wait and see - but right now Unity isn't *that* slick. Neither is GNOME 3, by all accounts, though I've not tried it myself so I can't say. Unity might be great in a year's time (or even at 11.10) and if so, well, great. I'm not that wedded to KDE or XFCE... But right now it would seem a bit premature to plump for 11.04.

      Fortunately for Asus, though not for me, I didn't actually read anything (even the *title*) and Asus went for 10.10, which is probably what a lot of people would have recommend they do if they really wanted Ubuntu...

    7. Re:Pity they picked Ubuntu right now by boristhespider · · Score: 1

      I've not used Unity on a netbook but what I've read gives me the impression that it's a bit less of a... culture shock, on a netbook. I'd imagine Asus tested it out and found that it was fine.

    8. Re:Pity they picked Ubuntu right now by Homburg · · Score: 1

      The Netbook Edition of 10.10 does use Unity. The 11.04 version of Unity is a pretty big change over the earlier version (for example, they changed from using Mutter in 10.10 to using Compiz in 11.04), and, IME, is much more stable.

    9. Re:Pity they picked Ubuntu right now by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      Unity on the netbook is pretty slow, clunky and unintuitive. It's sort of like they reverse-engineered the apple dock from a blurry, static screenshot and forgot to add smoothness and right click context menus, drag and drop functionality, etc. Someone way up the decision chain did someone a favor without reviewing it personally.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    10. Re:Pity they picked Ubuntu right now by Goaway · · Score: 1

      Yes, well, it sure isn't quite ready for primetime yet, but here we have it anyway. At least their bug tracker should get a workout.

    11. Re:Pity they picked Ubuntu right now by boristhespider · · Score: 1

      Hmmm. If that's so, then I read wrong. Glad I never tried it.

    12. Re:Pity they picked Ubuntu right now by boristhespider · · Score: 1

      Yeah. I plan on trying it in November :)

    13. Re:Pity they picked Ubuntu right now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I bet the Asus hopes the warranty is void before the Ubuntu starts proactively offering update to Ubuntu with Unity, otherwise they get complaints that the update broke their machine.

  6. 10.10 by Nerdfest · · Score: 5, Insightful

    10.10 is the right version to distribute ... 11.04 is (Unity aside) way too flaky to inflict of someone you wish to impress with the reliability of Linux. this is cool though ... I've been thinking for a while that Canonical should distribute their own line of hardware, perhaps 3 models of laptop at various levels of power and price, similar to the Apple model, but cheaper, and open. This would get around some of the problems people run into with unusual, unsupported wireless and video cards. If done right, it could probably pull off marketing it as a bit of an upscale laptop.

    1. Re:10.10 by Culture20 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'd suggest 10.04 LTS. 10.10 is going to EOL too soon.

    2. Re:10.10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      10.04 is a better choice for ASUS as it will be supported until April 2013. 10.10's support ends a year earlier.

    3. Re:10.10 by MeNeXT · · Score: 1

      10.04 is the right version 10.10 has shutdown issues with eeepc I have a 1015pem ans the sound system prevents shutdowns. see here I did not have this issue with 10.04 I was hoping that 11.04 would fix it.

      --
      DRM? No thanks, I'll just get it somewhere else...
    4. Re:10.10 by wile_e8 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I've been thinking for a while that Canonical should distribute their own line of hardware, perhaps 3 models of laptop at various levels of power and price, similar to the Apple model, but cheaper, and open. This would get around some of the problems people run into with unusual, unsupported wireless and video cards. If done right, it could probably pull off marketing it as a bit of an upscale laptop.

      You mean like System76? I guess it's not run by Canonical, but they are Ubuntu partners.

    5. Re:10.10 by Have+Brain+Will+Rent · · Score: 2

      I don't know about 10.10 being the right version... my Broadcom 43xx b/g/n in my laptop only runs at 2Mbs (let me emphasize that is 2 mega BITS) after I upgraded to 10.10 - it had been working fine before that and if I boot Windoze it works fine in that too....

      --
      The tyrant will always find a pretext for his tyranny - Aesop
    6. Re:10.10 by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      It's ironic you call it 'Windoze' at the same time you're making it clear that it actually works better than Lunix.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    7. Re:10.10 by Have+Brain+Will+Rent · · Score: 1

      I think you are confused.

      First, Ubuntu 10.10 is based on Linux but it is not Linux any more than any other distribution built on top of a linux kernel is Linux.

      Second, even if all distributions based on Linux had this particular problem that wouldn't make Windoze a better system because it did that one thing better.

      Third, my point was explicitly that Ubuntu 10.10 had that problem for me with that particular hardware but that previous Ubuntu versions didn't so it is difficult to see how you could honestly generalize that to "windoze works better than Linux".

      So no, you misunderstanding does not make my comment ironic, it just means you didn't understand what I said.

      --
      The tyrant will always find a pretext for his tyranny - Aesop
    8. Re:10.10 by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      First, Ubuntu 10.10 is based on Linux but it is not Linux any more than any other distribution built on top of a linux kernel is Linux.

      So you're saying Ubuntu 10.10 isn't the true Linux because Linux works better than Windows. That sounds a bit like the No True Scotsman fallacy to me.

      Consider the following Gedankenexperiment.

      I upgrade my notebook to Windows 8. Suppose if my network card/graphics card/power management on my laptop starts behaving like like something from the 1990s performance-wise in Windows 8. I.e. the network card is slow (according to you), the graphics poorly accelerated (actually this applies to Ubuntu compared to Windows - see here http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=linux_windows_part1&num=11) and the battery life much poorer (actually this applies to Ubuntu 10.10 compared to earlier versions - see here http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=ubuntu_maverick_netbook&num=1).

      Would that mean

      1) Windows 8 sucks and I should switch back to the OS I got for free with the machine which actually works.

      2) I'll still be secure in the knowledge that I made the right choice of OS. After all, just because all my hardware performs poorly in the current version of Windows doesn't mean the platonic ideal of Windows is in any way besmirched.

      Now furthermore consider if the laptop came with a pre-installed, totally free copy of XP where all my hardware performed well and instead of Windows 8 I'd upgraded to Ubuntu where all my hardware performed badly. Would that mean Ubuntu sucks or not?

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    9. Re:10.10 by Have+Brain+Will+Rent · · Score: 1

      So you're saying Ubuntu 10.10 isn't the true Linux because Linux works better than Windows.

      I made no such claim. Please stop putting words in my mouth.

      --
      The tyrant will always find a pretext for his tyranny - Aesop
    10. Re:10.10 by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      So your claim is limited to something like this

      "The fact that Ubuntu has poor performance in one area compared to Windows does not mean that Windows is better".

      or perhaps the slightly stronger

      "The fact that Ubuntu performs worse than Windows in the majority of benchmarks on Phoronix does not mean that Windows is better"

      or even

      "The fact that all modern Linux distributions perform worse than contemporary releases of Windows in the majority of benchmarks on Phoronix does not mean that Windows is better"

      I'd say you're stating something equivalent to the first but you actually believe and aim to imply the last one. Not that I'd want to put words in your mouth or even thoughts in your head. Though in the latter case it's tempting to put the otherwise unused space to some use.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    11. Re:10.10 by Have+Brain+Will+Rent · · Score: 1

      Oh no! An ad hominem attack!!! Ho Hum, so predictable.

      --
      The tyrant will always find a pretext for his tyranny - Aesop
  7. Hopefully they WON'T run Ubuntu 11.04 by wall0645 · · Score: 2

    Don't want to turn people off of Linux.

    1. Re:Hopefully they WON'T run Ubuntu 11.04 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's only the old-timers that hate Unity, in my experience, so I don't think that this'll be a problem.

      I do remember when running Linux on my last netbook, even Gnome2 was a little heavy for it, so I ended up going with Openbox. Hardware should have gotten a bit faster since then, though.

  8. Asus shipping Linux again? I know what that means! by Zerth · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Microsoft must have been late with its kickback check this quarter. I hope the check isn't already in the mail, otherwise these won't be available for long.

  9. Sounds nice by mmcuh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If I got one I would most likely install Debian on it, but if they make it work smoothly with Ubuntu it will probably be easy to make it work smoothly with Debian as well. And it would be nice to not have to pay the Microsoft tax, even if it's not much cheaper. Hell, it would be nice even if they are more expensive as long as Microsoft isn't getting any of it.

    1. Re:Sounds nice by McGiraf · · Score: 2

      most OEMs pay MS per unit shipped, no per unit with windows installed.

      You'll pay for windows, even if you do not get it

      One of the reason is called th MS "tax"

    2. Re:Sounds nice by Xtifr · · Score: 3, Interesting

      most OEMs pay MS per unit shipped, no per unit with windows installed.

      That practice was, as I understand it, supposed to have ended in 1994. There have been allegations that it continues, but no whistleblowers have come forward with a smoking gun, which is pretty impressive, given the number of people that would have had to be privy to such agreements over the years.

      These days, I believe, they rely on financial incentives tied to adware and trial-versions of software to be bundled with OEM releases of Windows, to offset the cost of Windows itself and remove the incentive OEMs might have to offer cheaper (e.g. free) OSes as an alternative. The result is: Microsoft is happy because they're still getting paid, even if it's by ISVs instead of directly by the OEMs, and because they get to promote their other products; the OEMs are happy because they're paying less for the OS; and ISVs are happy because they're getting a very cost-effective form of advertising. The only losers are the customers who now get machines clogged with adware and free-trialware that they may have no interest in, and other OS vendors who can no longer compete on price, even if that price is zero.

      This is where it gets interesting: if Ubuntu can start making enough money off of their partnership deals with companies like Amazon and Google, they may be able to start paying OEMs for including Ubuntu instead of Windows. Hence, I suspect, Ubuntu's recent controversial moves regarding Banshee.

  10. Ubuntu on EeeBox is great by kbob88 · · Score: 1

    Great that they're switching to Ubuntu. I've got Ubuntu running on a little Asus EeeBox in the kitchen for the past two years. It came with some Asus-branded version of Linux that was terrible; but I dumped that right away for Ubuntu. It works great; never had any problems. It's a nice, small box, humming away under the cabinet, connected to a monitor mounted on the wall. My wife and kids use it primarily for email and web stuff, and play music on it. None of them have ever complained about Ubuntu or asked how to use it. I'm not sure my wife even knows it's not MacOS or Windows...

  11. About Time... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

    The original Linux EEE PCs ran the most god-awful distro imaginable. For reasons I cannot fathom, they had Xandros puke out a sick abortion of the usual Xandros desktop(itself more or less a sick abortion of Debian) just for them. It was painfully bad, partially broken, and basically disconnected from repositories that ever received any actual updates.

    1. Re:About Time... by Animats · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The original Linux EEE PCs ran the most god-awful distro imaginable.

      It had to fit in 2GB of file space, and still have something left for users. But I agree that it sucks. I have several EeePC 2G Surf machines, obtained cheaply from a failed startup company. I use them to run some embedded system demos, where all that runs is one Python application. The biggest problem is that the WiFi driver is flaky. The second biggest problem is that the "union" file system, which makes one read-only file system and one read-write file system appear to be a single pathname space, leaks inodes, and has to be flushed out occasionally.

      The problem with Asus is that they can't be trusted as a Linux vendor. They've had on again, off again Linux support for years.

    2. Re:About Time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I worked at Xandros when they did the EEE PC work. Turns out Xandros was the only company willing to put up with the crap from ASUS, and it pretty much did them in. I wish Canonical much luck this go-around. It will be sad to see another Linux distro swirl down that toilet.

    3. Re:About Time... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Interesting. What sort of crap was ASUS dishing out? I know them only as a fairly generic shipper of cheap x86s. Are they deeply dysfunctional and/or nasty on the OEM relations side?

  12. Re:Asus shipping Linux again? I know what that mea by kbob88 · · Score: 2

    Microsoft must have been late with its kickback check this quarter.

    Where is that funny & insightful mod button when you need it?

  13. Shouldn't cost them much to offer the option. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm already running Xubuntu 10.10 on my Asus 1015T. It was the easiest Linux install I've ever done. Nothing needed to be tweaked to get sound, wifi, or video working. I only had to add myself to the pulse groups to get Skype working smoothly.

    Unity was utterly heinous, however. I used it for less than a day before my frustration with the user interface lag brought me back to XFCE. I do have to say that an ultra-light version of the Unity dock -- with less glitz and more configuration options -- would be pretty killer.

  14. SSD versions? by Skapare · · Score: 1

    Where are the models with SSD? Why did they stop making/shipping those?

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    1. Re:SSD versions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      People stopped buying them, just like they stopped buying the ones with the 9" screen. It's a shame, I loved my tiny SSD-based netbook.

    2. Re:SSD versions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think consumers who value the advantages of a SSD in a carry-around device are a very small subset of the netbook market. Many people now use netbooks as a primary, or even only computer. And for those consumers, 16GB simply won't do.

    3. Re:SSD versions? by Nerdfest · · Score: 1

      I think they stopped making them when most netbooks switched to being shipped with XP. I believe XP requires quite a lot more space than a Linux install, so most of the netbooks started shipping with 120 GB hard disks. As usual, I may be wrong, or at least have my timing off on the change.

    4. Re:SSD versions? by jedidiah · · Score: 0

      A 120G is useful for more than just the OS install. It's also handy for data.

      If a machine is under-spec'ed it will likely do poorly regardless of what OS you put on it.

      I got a couple of the original netbooks off of woot for yuks and the keyboard is painful to use (but not too bad) but the storage is just too meagre.

      The screen is also a bit tiny. This is an area where the whole tablet (or hybrid) thing makes a lot of sense. More screen, smaller over all footprint.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    5. Re:SSD versions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You shouldn't really be storing much data on a netbook, the clue is in the name. 16GB SSD works fine for me with an Unbuntu installation. If I really needed more there is an SD slot.

    6. Re:SSD versions? by Nerdfest · · Score: 1

      You're probably doing like I am, and using it as a full-blown laptop with a tiny screen and keyboard, which really wasn't the original intention. It is damn handy to have that extra space, but I think I'd actually prefer the reduced boot time and increased battery life.

  15. Great if you don't want to pay the tax. by jijacob · · Score: 2

    Even if you don't run Ubuntu, it will be nice to get the same hardware for less money. It drives me crazy when I try to buy a laptop, and there is no option to purchase it sans OS. This way even if your favorite flavor is not Ubuntu, at least you won't be paying for an OS you don't plan on using.

  16. Re:No Ubuntu 11.04? by kvvbassboy · · Score: 2
    Wow no. I highly doubt it. It could be something to do with the fact that two months is just not enough for them to test Ubuntu 11.04, and that there are too many unresolved issues with Unity and Compiz.

    What I am more worried about is, when 10.10 becomes obsolete or when 12.04 comes out, can ASUS or Canonical provide a seamless upgrade? As of now, the answer is no, you invariably end up breaking something.

  17. Re:No Ubuntu 11.04? by quantumplacet · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Thanks but no thanks for the FUD. In the off chance you are a retard and not a troll, please let me explain. It takes considerable time and effort to validate an OS for a piece of hardware. More than two months in fact. Asus has to offer support for these netbooks, so they cannot put an OS on it that has not been thoroughly tested on the hardware. When they started this task, 10.10 was the latest and greatest. Strangely enough, they decided not to start all over in the middle of the process simply because a new release came out. Also, it's pretty ridiculous to call 10.10 "obsolete". Non LTS Ubuntu releases go EoL after 18 months, so 10.10 will not be obsolete for another year.

  18. Odd comparisons... by yarnosh · · Score: 1

    There are a number of factors that make Ubuntu an attractive proposition for ASUS and its customers. Ubuntu continues to set the standard for slick design

    Compared to what? Windows XP? I'm pretty sure nobody is looking to Linux to get design ideas. OS X sets the standard for clean, polished design, IMNSHO. Windows 7 next if you care about translucency. It is still pretty obvious that Linux is primarily created by programmers, though it has gotten better over the years. As a programmer myself, I can tell you that you shouldn't let us design interfaces. In an ideal work environment, I would be paired with a designer who knows his shit. Well, unless I'm doing backend coding.

    ease of use and security, it is the world's third most popular operating system

    Depends, are we counting mobile devices? Because I think then Linux woudl take 5th if not 6th. Unless you count Android as Linux, but I don't think that's quite right. Just like iOS isn't OS X. Must be marketing or PR department making these statements.

    Anyway, I thought netbooks could already be had with linux pre-installed? Or are those just people who wipe Windows XP and install themselves?

    1. Re:Odd comparisons... by nickb64 · · Score: 1

      I think all the netbooks w/ Linux preinstalled got killed off pretty quickly since people mostly returned them.

      The only place I know of that you might be able to get a preinstalled Linux netbook still is someplace like system76 or whatever it's called, that site that sells Ubuntu preinstalled machines

    2. Re:Odd comparisons... by formfeed · · Score: 1

      I think all the netbooks w/ Linux preinstalled got killed off pretty quickly since people mostly returned them.

      That was a long time ago -two years?- at a time when people came from Windows laptops. Netbooks were new, and Linux something for hackers.
      Now, Linux is still something for hackers, but people have their android phones, and there are tablets around. Netbooks are not experienced as the underpowered laptops but as a step above the android phone. A Linux netbook might just be the step up from the android gadget.

    3. Re:Odd comparisons... by formfeed · · Score: 1

      I think all the netbooks w/ Linux preinstalled got killed off pretty quickly since people mostly returned them.

      That was a long time ago -two years?- at a time when people came from Windows laptops. Netbooks were new, and linux something for hackers.

      Now, linux is still something for hackers, but people have their android phones, and there are tablets around. Netbooks are not experienced as the underpowered laptops but as a step above the android phone. A Linux netbook might just be the step up from the android gadget.

  19. Yawn by jaeric · · Score: 0

    Another story about Linux on retail hardw....zzzzzzzzzzzzz.

  20. Yeah, but why not just get the Windows license? by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    it's free. You usually don't get any discount on the Linux netbooks & nettops...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Yeah, but why not just get the Windows license? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if only laptops came with a real windows CD and license key. doesn't seem to be the norm.

    2. Re:Yeah, but why not just get the Windows license? by mmcuh · · Score: 2

      Because the Windows licence funds Microsoft stunts like SCO?

    3. Re:Yeah, but why not just get the Windows license? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same reason I don't pick up after my neighbor's dog. Just because crap's free doesn't mean I want it.

    4. Re:Yeah, but why not just get the Windows license? by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

      Heck, it's not just free. You can 'return' the license and make money. There's guides on how to do it. It's easy if you're in Europe.

      --
      Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    5. Re:Yeah, but why not just get the Windows license? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Y'know, I wouldn't mind the cheap, 'starter' license, if I were allowed to use it in a VM under my preferred Linux system. I'm sure it would prove useful now and then - unlike rebooting into the XP partition on my Linux box today, which I never do.

    6. Re:Yeah, but why not just get the Windows license? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a great news if it is really for free.

      Las Vegas Foreclosures

  21. Re:No Ubuntu 11.04? by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    Either that or Unity influence is at work!

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  22. Re:No Ubuntu 11.04? by godrik · · Score: 1

    "Also, it's pretty ridiculous to call 10.10 "obsolete". Non LTS Ubuntu releases go EoL after 18 months, so 10.10 will not be obsolete for another year."

    Well, it is on its way straight to the graveyard. It will no longer be supported next april. If I was a retailler that do not already have some, I probably won't get any. It would be crazy to provide a laptop with an OS that won't even have 10 months of support by the distribution.

  23. Re:No Ubuntu 11.04? by darkshadow88 · · Score: 2

    I suspect that most of the upgrade problems are caused by installing drivers that aren't in the official repositories. I have never had a problem with a system that had only packages from the repos installed. One of my machines has been upgraded in place, version by version, since 6.06; another, since 7.04; and others since 8.04, 8.10, and 9.10. All of them have been upgraded, version by version, to either 10.10 or 11.04 (and I even upgraded to alpha builds on one of those machines!), and not one of them has ever had a problem with the upgrade.

    (One thing that all five of those machines have in common is nVidia graphics. I don't have any experience with upgrading a system that has Intel or ATI graphics, so maybe the upgrades aren't so smooth there.)

  24. Eee PC hardware is Linux friendly by eric31415927 · · Score: 1

    I'm on my second Eee PC now. The first was a 701 (7" screen). The second is a 1001P (10" screen).
    The hardware has been well supported in the various kernels because the Eee PC's were popular and ASUS was onside.
    The hardest part of sourcing a new Linux-flavoured laptop used to be ensuring that all the hardware worked out of the box.
    It was often best to install a Linux-flavour on an older laptop to help ensure all the hardware worked.
    However, older laptops had used-battery issues and, of course, older hardware.
    I welcome these new Linux-friendly laptops.
    Hopefully other corporations will join the bandwagon.

  25. Three by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Three netbooks? Sounds like an attempt to make all of them sell fast.

  26. Re:Asus shipping Linux again? I know what that mea by sconeu · · Score: 1

    No, you misunderstand.

    They're shipping it on exactly three netbooks, not three netbook MODELS.

    I hope I get one of the three... I'd hate to be the fourth buyer and have to pay the MS tax...

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  27. I've been running it on a 1001 for 15 months by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 2

    I've been running UNR on a 1001p for a year and a bit now and it's fairly flawless. Respectably quick for a wee machine like that, odd-but-nice navigation, and stable with one exception: if it's running under the effects-laden UNR interface then X will sometimes fall over. It's happened maybe 20 times since I've had it - unsure as to the source, but my first total guess would be something between the nVidia driver and Ubuntu. The wireless took a bit of fiddling to get working too, but no huge hassle, just a couple of installations. I'm hoping that the combination of a newer OS than I'm running plus an in-house build will sort both issues out.

    If you're not a fan of the Unity interface (and I get the impression I'm in the minority by liking it) you can easily just boot into good-old-gnome, but given the screen size I never bother. Battery life is a solid 6 hours without being particularly careful (wireless on, screen bright, playing videos with the sound on), dropping to about 4 hours after a year and three months of daily use.

    Cracking machine for the money, and Ubuntu sits very nicely on top. My initial review of it is here: Asus 1001p review

    --
    Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
  28. Running and Asus1001p with UNR by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 1

    I've been running UNR on a 1001p for a year and a bit now and it's fairly flawless. Respectably quick for a wee machine like that, odd-but-nice navigation, and stable with one exception: if it's running under the effects-laden UNR interface then X will sometimes fall over. It's happened maybe 20 times since I've had it - unsure as to the source, but my first total guess would be something between the nVidia driver and Ubuntu. The wireless took a bit of fiddling to get working too, but no huge hassle, just a couple of installations. I'm hoping that the combination of a newer OS than I'm running plus an in-house build will sort both issues out. If you're not a fan of the Unity interface (and I get the impression I'm in the minority by liking it) you can easily just boot into good-old-gnome, but given the screen size I never bother. Battery life is a solid 6 hours without being particularly careful (wireless on, screen bright, playing videos with the sound on), dropping to about 4 hours after a year and three months of daily use. Cracking machine for the money, and Ubuntu sits very nicely on top. My initial review of it is here: Asus 1001p review [blogspot.com]

    --
    Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
    1. Re:Running and Asus1001p with UNR by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 1

      Sigh...something bugged out. "My initial review of it is here: Asus 1001p review"

      --
      Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
  29. Microsoft Sues Canonical For Patent Infringement by HangingChad · · Score: 1

    Film at 11. Or maybe they'll use another surrogate, like SCO.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
  30. Macs at Best Buy by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

    The last time I was in Best Buy, they were selling Macs. I suspect that management would be upset if an employee was pulling them out of customers' hands.

    1. Re:Macs at Best Buy by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      If I was Best Buy I'd have Mac Genii, Linux Zealots and Microsoft Sales Rep. I'd attach spurs their ankles and stage a cockfight for the customer's amusement.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    2. Re:Macs at Best Buy by Locutus · · Score: 1

      yeah baby!

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  31. 11.04 has power consumption issues by swaq · · Score: 1

    I think 10.10 is a better choice for a netbook at least until this issue gets resolved... https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/760131

  32. an even better marketing move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    would be for asus to rename itself "jesus". then it would attract the evangelical consumer.

  33. Kuba Jewgieniew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks for sharing some info.

  34. Bad & good idea by zer01ife · · Score: 1

    For ASUS, it's a great beginning with Linux being a mainstream and best for security concerns for the users. However, for me,I dislike dealing with Ubuntu 11.04 GUI bugs which limits controlling the whole OS itself. I'm just saying that the GUI needs improvements and flexibility, that's all.

  35. Tall screen by hendrikboom · · Score: 1

    OK. How do you use the 90-degree rotated widescreen? How do you get the software to reorient in that direction?