Slashdot Mirror


China Calls US Culprit In Global 'Internet War'

On Wednesday we discussed news of Google's accusation that sources originating in China were interfering with Gmail using malware and phishing techniques, targeting Chinese political activists, US government officials, military personnel, and others. In response to the accusations, a Chinese official denied government involvement in the attacks, while the US government indicated they would investigate the matter. The attacks were more sophisticated than a typical phishing attempt, they involved Yahoo and Hotmail as well, and they have likely been going on for months. Now, according to a CBS report, "The Chinese military accused the US on Friday of launching a global 'Internet war' to bring down Arab and other governments, redirecting the spotlight away from allegations of major online attacks on Western targets originating in China."

114 comments

  1. Wag the... by Ardx · · Score: 0

    Panda?

    --
    Whoa there dude! Check your keyboard, somebody might have slipped you a Dvorak.
    1. Re:Wag the... by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 2

      Both are supreme villains.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    2. Re:Wag the... by Moryath · · Score: 0, Troll

      Looking at the Chinese is like looking at the Scientologists. This could also be applied to the Iranians, or to many other dictatorial regimes composed of blowhards, up to and including the modern US Republicans/TeePartiers.

      Whenever they start accusing someone else of something, assume either (a) they're doing it themselves or (b) they're doing something far worse and trying to draw attention away from it.

      You may also safely assume (c), if they're not doing it themselves they wish they were.

    3. Re:Wag the... by teslafreak · · Score: 1

      Democrat right? BOTH parties are screwed up. Equally too.

    4. Re:Wag the... by DigiShaman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's called psychological projection. You will find that the bulk of this mindset makes up a disproportional amount of ideologs. For every conservative that you name, I can name an american liberal. No need to get into a pissing contest here.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    5. Re:Wag the... by rickb928 · · Score: 2

      "many other dictatorial regimes composed of blowhards, up to and including the modern US Republicans/TeePartiers."

      "Whenever they start accusing someone else of something, assume either (a) they're doing it themselves or (b) they're doing something far worse and trying to draw attention away from it."

      Well played, sir. The irony is deafening...

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    6. Re:Wag the... by flyneye · · Score: 1

      I don't see enough relevant difference between Republicans and Democrats to call this farce a two party system.
      Freedom gone. Money gone. Motivation gone. We're panda food.

      This is coming from a plain old garden variety libertarian.

                 

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    7. Re:Wag the... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a bunch of crap:

      The US didn't demand Cisco and other big players put in backdoors so the US could get names and activities of dissidents so those folk would disappear and wake up in pieces, Larry Niven style.

      The US doesn't hack Chinese businesses day and day out ruthlessly.

      The US doesn't have sanctioned and funded agents who write malware just to infect Chinese computers for profit.

      The US doesn't take Chinese corporate execs and say that they will be handing all over their trade secrets, or they, and anyone else on US soil will get arrested on some criminal act and wind up the "guests" of a chinese prison camp for 20+ years.

      Expect more of this; China is starting to rattle its saber and want to become a military power and not just a trade king.

  2. This is gonna be good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Things are about to get very interesting

  3. Hilarious by gubers33 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    China got caught with their hand in the cookie jar and immediately creates a story about the US playing foul on the internet whether it is true or not, the only reason it was released by them is to avoid attention. China is not going to be able to avoid this they have been in the midst of internet controversy for the past few years from Green Dam software (Great Firewall of China) being created from stolen source code, to hacking Google and other countries to this newest event. They need to figure out if you start poking around in someone's backyard who has more advanced systems they are going to find out soon or later.

    --
    Just because you are wrong and I called you out on it doesn't mean I am a Troll.
    1. Re:Hilarious by DigiShaman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      News and historical revisionism is all part of the CCP's modus operandi. To them, it's one of many tools to control society and socially architect a future generation mindset.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    2. Re:Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like there is trouble brewing at home, maybe that is why the misdirection? Google "china government bombings"... plenty of people there unhappy with corruption at the moment.

    3. Re:Hilarious by sl3xd · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Extremists on any part of the political spectrum use the same tactic; whether liberal, conservative, or libertarian.

      I reject your reality and substitute my own.

      North Korea lives by this standard...

      --
      -- Sometimes you have to turn the lights off in order to see.
    4. Re:Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hail Reagan!

    5. Re:Hilarious by benjfowler · · Score: 0, Troll

      The moral pygmy pissants running China now know that if enough people get upset, they're history, and nothing under heaven and earth will save them. I bet they see their property bubble bursting, and I bet (and hope) they're shit scared. This stupid propaganda just shows they see the handwriting on the wall.

    6. Re:Hilarious by dunng808 · · Score: 1

      What do we call this new Cold War? The Even Colder War? The Cyburr War? The Big Chill ... no, that's taken. The China Sindrome? Too obscure?

      --

      Gary Dunn
      Open Slate Project

    7. Re:Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Worse yet they're more efficient that the Repubmocrats here. Billary Clinton has handed off the socialist baton to Crackrok Obama who have done both their parts to architect a future generation mindset.( Kids R Suckerz). Badly enough though, its been going on since at least President Wilson and as social correct consciouslessness rises freedoms dissapear altogether, taken a little piece at a time. Think about it, Socialist Scientologist Democrat gave us the last huge screwing on Copyright in the name of the almighty Mouse. Thankfully he was ASSassinated by a patriotic tree on a ski slope.
      Don't let 'em fool you kid, you were born and bred in the U.S.S.A.

      Go back and read the founding documents, the writings of the founders, see their intent for yourself, then you can see where the supreme court got good and F**KING corrupt. Just take a lookee at their "analysis and interpretation of the constitution" after you see what you're getting suckered out of. http://www.gpoaccess.gov/constitution/index.html

      To answer your question, they're like our government but with a stronger hold on the people.

      Think of it like the old adage about how to cook a frog.
      You put froggy in a pot of water, but build the fire slowly.
      The frog won't even notice he's done for until it is too late.
      China is an old recipe for frog soup.
      The U.S. just thinks this is a relaxing spa so far.

    8. Re:Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Uhh...everyone lives by that standard...

      If you think there is some true reality out there that people of a different ideological ilk than yours are ignorant of, you're just rejecting their reality and substituting your own. You can not perceive the world around you without personal bias.

      You, sir, are guilty of classic us vs them thinking.

    9. Re:Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kook alert

    10. Re:Hilarious by jhoegl · · Score: 1

      That is an Adam Savage quote...

      How dare yee!

    11. Re:Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ++

      I can't wait for China to have a PMS moment and create their own internet. My SSH server will thank them. They can take the Koreas with them, as well as the old Russian Federation...

    12. Re:Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cold war. Hah, that's rich. Would there even have been a Cold War, if Russia was fronting all of America's debt?
      No, I'm afraid you will have to find a better way out of your financial obligations than that. Ante up.

    13. Re:Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow, a post full of half-witticisms, random platitudes, seemingly significant use capitalization, and non-sequiturs. Is that you, NRADude?

    14. Re:Hilarious by Korveck · · Score: 1

      This is not the first time China got caught conducting espionage of this sort. But US has no means to deter China from continuing. At best the States Department will complain about it, and a war of words ensues until the story dies down.

      No one outside China takes the Chinese media's views seriously as the media outlets are clearly controlled, or at least tightly watched over, by the government. It does not matter though. Their intended audiences are the Chinese citizens who listen to them daily. Only a very small portion of the citizens actually get news from outside. The Chinese media just have to spin the story around so that US is the true villain in this internet war game, that Google is secretly helping the evil empire of US. As long as the Chinese think their government is in the right, that's mission accomplished.

    15. Re:Hilarious by gilbert644 · · Score: 2

      Funniest part is that the Chinese government is so fascist that they don't recognize that claiming American involvement in the overthrow of dictators is actually pro-American.

    16. Re:Hilarious by biryokumaru · · Score: 1

      It seemed to work fine with Russia owing the US.

      --
      When you're afraid to download music illegally in your own home, then the terrorists have won!
    17. Re:Hilarious by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      The US basically advertised the fact they were creating an cyber warfare unit whose purpose was attacking other countries infrastructure not defence. The government of China pointing this out is hardly revelatory.

      The easiest way to deal with this, is to treat incoming data as a product export from the country of origin. If the exported data contains malicious content, the costs caused by that malicious content simply need to be calculated and a fine applied to the country of origin, upon the event and it's source being legally substantiated. It would then be up to the country of origin to recover those costs from the actual offenders.

      Failure to agree with this system of agreed controls, substantiated by treaties, should result in data export restrictions being placed upon that country.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    18. Re:Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really don't want laws like that. It means that China would just use a victim country for its origin of attacks.

    19. Re:Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, because WW2 was a really "cold war" and aiding the allies prior to an actual declaration of war, that is totally relevant.
      And, frankly, just indulging your argument for a second, consider that the USSR's way of life was utterly dismantled, based on the circumstance you are drawing a parallel to. "Fine"? About as fine as American finances.
      I say we call this new era "The Neverending Repayment Program".

    20. Re:Hilarious by aywang31 · · Score: 1

      The Chinese government is also very adept at showmanship. Wait till the next time that the US and Taiwan agree to another arms sale. The PRC only does stuff dead quiet (like the J-20 stealth fighter) or really loudly.

    21. Re:Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Immediately creates a story about the US.... HEY, they are copy cats! In the land of Hollywood, surely you guys have "created" stories too.. YES.... yes you have.

    22. Re:Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The easiest way to deal with this, is to treat incoming data as a product export from the country of origin. If the exported data contains malicious content, the costs caused by that malicious content simply need to be calculated and a fine applied to the country of origin, upon the event and it's source being legally substantiated.

      Now, now, the Canadian Government has apologized for Bryan Adams on several occasions! Look guy, you just can't come back to us now years later asking for money.

      But in all seriousness, this is a ridiculously stupid idea. What you're proposing would require all countries to pervasively monitor all internet traffic that extends beyond their national boundaries - this results in pervasive deep packet inspection (fyi, we here in civilized countries still consider DPI to be a gross violation of our right to privacy in our papers and person, something you Americans once knew a little about as I recall). Failing to implement DPI would leave nations open to direct financial attack through the use of botnets, so again only the poor countries would lose out and we end up with a pervasive police state. Is that really you Director Gen Keith B. Alexander?

    23. Re:Hilarious by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Actually I think it is you guys who don't realise that meddling in another country's affairs is anti-American. The Arab Spring started with the people in those countries, not with America invading or enforcing sanctions etc. Okay, Facebook and Twitter played their part, but the revolution came from the people.

      Even if the country you invade is "evil" like Iraq under Saddam or Afghanistan under the Taliban that doesn't make America the good guys, at least not in the eyes of many in the Arab and Asian worlds (yes, Afghanistan is in Asia and the people there are Asians). Just because we think it is a just cause and the right thing to do doesn't change the fact that it looks like we go to other countries and use our military to further our own agendas.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    24. Re:Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cyberia War :D

    25. Re:Hilarious by jcarr · · Score: 1

      I'd love that happens in the future, but historically America has overthrown democracies in favor of dictators many times. There are a whole bunch, but here are two:

      1953 Iranian coup d'état
      1973 Chilean coup d'état

      In fairness, the american constitution allows us to talk about this history whereas in China, maybe not so much.

  4. Safe-Mail.net & Tor = better solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why use Gmail when you can use Safe-Mail.net through Tor with SSL during the entire session?

    1. Re:Safe-Mail.net & Tor = better solution by petteyg359 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because I can use SSL with Gmail, and I trust Google more than I trust some random mail server I've never heard of. Also, safe-mail advertises 3Mb (I seriously hope they're just idiots and are actually offering 3MB, because 375KB isn't going to last long for anybody who actually uses their email account. 3MB isn't going to last long, either.). Gmail currently gives me almost 8GB.

      If I'm really concerned about privacy, I can use one of my many email accounts on my own server. Then again, are you sure that all the intermediary servers your mail goes through are using SSL?

    2. Re:Safe-Mail.net & Tor = better solution by biryokumaru · · Score: 1

      Then again, are you sure that all the intermediary servers your mail goes through are using SSL?

      Of course they are! In fact, I did a geo-location on one of the computers I'm connected to through TOR and it looks like it's a pretty secure one in the Chinese government! If you can't trust them, who can you trust? See, TOR is a great idea for safe web access!

      --
      When you're afraid to download music illegally in your own home, then the terrorists have won!
  5. Never a leader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China will NEVER be a leader of the free world as the US is, first and foremost because Chinese are alien to freedom itself, the only world China will be leading is the world subjugated but its secret police and that's how far it can go.

    1. Re:Never a leader by DigiShaman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As it currently stands, China may become the leader of the world, but most certainly it will not be one of freedom.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    2. Re:Never a leader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China can never become "leader" in a world as openly prejudiced as ours.

    3. Re:Never a leader by benjfowler · · Score: 2

      The world will be as prejudiced as it likes against tyrants, thieves and murderers.

    4. Re:Never a leader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then the world will be at war, because the western man will not accept the asian man as his superior.

    5. Re:Never a leader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yea ok, china pisses someone off enough to stop trading with them and they loose like 90% of their GDP overnight, other than "willing slaves", they have nothing to offer the world

    6. Re:Never a leader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have believed that you are living in freedom? How about Bankers, capitalists, CIA and multiple agencies and cruel police in your country. What are they doing?

    7. Re:Never a leader by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Being the leader of the free world isn't worth shit other than warm n' fuzzies, being the leader of the economic world is what counts, and subjugation is more profitable than freedom. Imagine in the US if all regulation were rolled back to 1800s levels and you still had all this modern technology and knowledge. That's China. Foxconn is an example of a 21st century company town. Sucks to be an Average Joe in China but it looks damn good on the quarterly statements.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    8. Re:Never a leader by jcarr · · Score: 1

      What was read in China:

      The world will be as prejudiced as it likes

  6. But didn't China..... by chrisj_0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Reroute half the internet last year?

    1. Re:But didn't China..... by mentatmatt · · Score: 1

      I thought that was Pakistan trying to block youtube content?

  7. China did it. by sethstorm · · Score: 2

    Ok.

    * Various political interests that China wants to kill off are targeted.
    * The US military is targeted.
    * The US government (outside of the military) is targeted.
    * A company that left China out of concerns for it being used as an attack platform was targeted.
    * The rest of the evidence points to China's red hands being all over this.

    The only answer worth giving to the Chinese government: 使''èZï¼

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    1. Re:China did it. by biryokumaru · · Score: 1

      The only answer worth giving to the Chinese government: 使''èZï¼

      I agree, we should punish them by making the entire internet reliant on ASCII instead of an internationally compliant Unicode system!

      --
      When you're afraid to download music illegally in your own home, then the terrorists have won!
  8. The Chinese Communist Party... by benjfowler · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    are a fucking disgrace, and should be thoroughly ashamed of themselves.

    These rather stupid and outlandish statements will get them nowhere. Nobody is going to believe what they're saying.

    They must be on drugs to think that the US supporting people in exercising their natural human impulses to be free, is a "war against China". That's some seriously demented shit.

    China's constant spying and aggression can't go unpunished. We cannot continually let the CCP thieves and tyrants steal our technology and oppress their own people. There MUST be serious consequences for China, otherwise they'll get more bold and aggressive -- the worse for us. I would go as far as to say that military force can be justified -- China cannot be allowed to believe that they can get away with what they're doing.

    1. Re:The Chinese Communist Party... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Warmongering Warmongering Warmongering Warmongering Warmongering Warmongering Warmongering.

      There is no reason to engage China militarily when we haven't cleaned up our mess in Iraq and Afghanistan, and now Libya. Another military conflict would be economically and socially disastrous for the US. I'm convinced that China would destroy us quickly if we tried.

    2. Re:The Chinese Communist Party... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering China is effectively financing the wars in Iraq & Afghanistan, how do you propose to
      a) finance the misadventure
      b) maintain supply chains when China makes all your stuff?

      Answers??

      The US is only interested in wars it can sustain to maintain its massive military-industrial-security complex. An actual war, with an actual adversary. Well thats just crazy talk.

    3. Re:The Chinese Communist Party... by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Warmongering Warmongering Warmongering Warmongering Warmongering Warmongering Warmongering.

      There is no reason to engage China militarily when we haven't cleaned up our mess in Iraq and Afghanistan, and now Libya. Another military conflict would be economically and socially disastrous for the US. I'm convinced that China would destroy us quickly if we tried.

      technically, by staying in Afghanistan and Iraq we provide China with free military coverage of sea lanes and easy resource extraction from those countries without them having to pay for it (or at least loan us the money at interest to pay for it) - if we were serious we'd bring our troops home from both wars and let China provide it's own military resources to extract it's own cheap resources, instead of us paying for it.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    4. Re:The Chinese Communist Party... by biryokumaru · · Score: 1

      I'm convinced that China would destroy us quickly if we tried.

      Either you are not in any way familiar with our relative military strengths, or you are trying to make a very absurd joke.

      Not only do we have almost immeasurable technical superiority, enormously more capable and well trained troops and an order of magnitude more depth of strategic intelligence on their military than they have on ours, but our forces all actually want to fight for our country. China's only hope is either to continue milking us until we ruin ourselves financially (which is much further off than you might imagine), or to support a radical third party who would do something stupid and get themselves slaughtered to weaken us (like, say, Iran or North Korea).

      --
      When you're afraid to download music illegally in your own home, then the terrorists have won!
    5. Re:The Chinese Communist Party... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And with whose money are you paying said troops and buying said weapons?

      Hmmmm?

    6. Re:The Chinese Communist Party... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have been watching too much Rembo films lately? US army has not been able to eliminate Taliban (only tens of thousands) or insurgency in Iraq. US cannot attack China unless it is prepared for millions of deaths.

  9. Wait a minute... by bl4nk · · Score: 2

    I've personally been noticing a lot of suspSuí zhe yídòng dào zhèl kàn dào shénme

  10. Business as usual in Beijing: by Hartree · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Google traces targeted gmail password trawling attacks to China.

    Reaction?

    The "independent" (and presumably "fair and balanced") Global Times calls Google "snotty nosed". The equally "independent" Xinhua News Agency says that the acusation that China was behind the gmail phishing was "evil intentioned".

    The Chinese military ups the ante and accuses the US of an undeclared cyber war on the whole world.

    In other news, the Reichstag still appears to be vaguely smoldering.

    1. Re:Business as usual in Beijing: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds to me like somebody's looking for a fight. The only reason to instigate the first punch is a planned counterattack.

  11. Regardless of China does or does not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The gullibility of the american public never ceases to amaze me.

    I swear to god, the next US president should be the damn kool aid mascot.

    1. Re:Regardless of China does or does not. by sconeu · · Score: 1

      I swear to god, the next US president should be the damn kool aid mascot.

      OH YEAH!!!

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    2. Re:Regardless of China does or does not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now that would have been a video. Osama sleeping in his bedroom, and Kool-Aid man busts through the wall while wearing Stars and Stripes themed boxing shorts, like Apollo Creed. "OHHHHHH YEAH!"

    3. Re:Regardless of China does or does not. by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      Damn it, you beat me to it! Well played!

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  12. You can always unplug it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hey China, nobody here held a gun to your head and forced you to use the Internet. We invented it for our own use, and thought it would be a good idea for peers to connect worldwide.

    We had a saying during the Cold War: If you don't like the US, you're free to leave. This contrasted our philosophy with that of the Soviet Union, where emmigrating was very difficult.

    Likewise, if you don't like the Internet you're free to create your own local network which is partially what you're doing with your "great firewall". Trouble is, you want it both ways. Sorry. Not our problem. If you can't firewall out everything you don't like then that leaves you with a choice:

    Deal with some things you don't like, or unplug it.

    1. Re:You can always unplug it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We had a saying during the Cold War: If you don't like the US, you're free to leave.

      Weasel words to excuse the repression of individual liberty in the name of an economic ideal. But yeah yeah, if you don't like Amurica you can giiit out!

  13. ha by itchythebear · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I chuckle every time i read an article like this. Yes, I'm sure the United States is participating in electronic espionage (or whatever you want to call it), but does that surprise anyone? Seriously, is anyone surprised at this, like at all? As a United States citizen i would actually be very upset if my government wasn't doing this. The flip side to this is that I can really not be that upset at China for doing the same thing. So really this is a non story and the only one governments are fooling when they make claims like this are... no one.

    --
    If what I just said sounded like a troll, it was probably just a failed attempt at humor.
    1. Re:ha by mhesd · · Score: 2

      The real flip side would be that there are hundreds of US right activists political persecuted in the US, emigrated to China and now targeted by the US government or army by phishing attacks. Did you ever heard from at least one of these mysterious activists?

    2. Re:ha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one said the U.S. DOESN'T participate in electronic espionage (remember United States Cyber Command?) its just a matter of catching them in the act.

      China on the other hand admits to have a cyber security government branch and then DENIES RESPONSIBILITY WHEN IT GETS CAUGHT! You can't have your cake and eat it too. Either you admit you have such a branch (which they already have) and man up when you're caught (which they haven't) OR you deny having such a branch (little late for that) and claim its just some rogue, non-government organization (heres a tip China: don't try to blame the victim when the victim has been bitching about you and going before Congressional hearings about dealing with you for the past few years)

    3. Re:ha by KingBenny · · Score: 1

      yea, the only one who should hang here is the one 'super'-hacker who got sloppy enough to let it slip into the mainstream media. I'm also pretty much convinced that stuff like this happens, or better even : happened all the time ever since organized government got invented/implemented

      --
      Free speech was meant to be free for all... how can anyone grow up in a nanny state ?
  14. In Real News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The US is on track to return to its 2008 $800+G/year trade deficit with China and the rest of the planet during 2012.

    I wonder if Chinese servers running denyhosts accumulate thousands of US IP addresses in their hosts.deny files.

  15. Isn't this story about 2 years old? by presidenteloco · · Score: 0

    "Google gets hacked from China. Decides to close China office and servers. Operate from Hong Kong"?

    Why is this thought to be news?

    --

    Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
    1. Re:Isn't this story about 2 years old? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Google gets hacked from China. Decides to close China office and servers. Operate from Hong Kong"?

      Why is this thought to be news?

      Because so many stupid companies are still uploading their spreadsheets to google docs.

    2. Re:Isn't this story about 2 years old? by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

      Now that they're no longer operating in China, they can't exactly threaten to close their China office again, so the Chinese government can hack them pretty much with impunity. (Not that the Chinese government really cared the first time.)

  16. Pay attention to what they say by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2

    They say "the Government of China did not have anything to do with the attacks".

    They do NOT say "the Chinese Army had nothing to do with the attacks".

    It's all in the details and the saving of face.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:Pay attention to what they say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fun fact: The Chinese Army is not controlled by the Chinese Government. The Chinese Army is controlled by the Chinese Communist Party. Chinese Communist Party != Chinese Government

  17. We will moon China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And then show them how to die like real human beings.

  18. Chinese strategy is like a cheating spouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Classic strategy. Maybe John Edwards helped them.

    1 Admit nothing
    2. Deny everything
    3. Make counter accusations

  19. Its not China bashing if its true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China can never become "leader" in a world as openly prejudiced as ours.

    As the book Death by China says: Its not China bashing if its true, same for prejudice. FWIW, the book is written by a well known economics professor and has gotten praise from both the political left and right, well US political left and right that is. The forward is written by a survivor of the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre, another endorsement comes from a former member of China's state security. So it offers more than a US perspective.

  20. no this sounds like Rod Blagojevich spin but not a by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    no this sounds like Rod Blagojevich spin but not as good. China can at least blame on a fail guy or try to say that we did not think that hacking was a crime.

  21. What does Google have to gain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A relatively simple question. What does a profit-based company like Google have to gain by accusing a giant nation like China, with billions of potential customers, of illicit behavior?

    I expect that all they want is for China to stop being so damn clumsy about it. It'd be nice if they stopped altogether...but if they MUST hack Google's customers, Google would prefer that they be more discreet about it. They're tired of their security systems lighting up like a fireworks show every day and all those security consultants are expensive.

    Seriously people. Google gets "attacked" worldwide on a regular basis. The ONLY reasonable explanation for them to complain about any specific nation is because that nation is either extremely successful in attacking them, extremely obnoxious about it, or both.

  22. This sounds familiar... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm no fan of America, but the phrase this brings to mind is "and you are lynching negroes".

  23. China fucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tell me why we should buy their shit at our own peril.
    Really America were not better than the commies.
    The statue of liberty has tears.

  24. In other words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China has been engaging in internet espionage and cybercrime (likely through the Chinese military), and accuses the US of same to deflect criticism. Not buying their innocence for a second.

  25. Ok, so it mangled the unicode. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    The only message worth giving in reply to the Chinese government: NÇ zhÃge piÃnzi!

    (yes, it's translated output of "You liar!", in phonetic)

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  26. Full of bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How long until we all realize that China is full of bullshit and that crap like this is just them pathologically lying in order to cover their asses?

  27. who? Google? we don't know that company... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And surprisingly ... www.google.com is now unreachable from China
    (some will probably say "oh we are very sorry, our DNS servers are just been "harmonized")
    hint for the one stuck in this mess : use 66.249.89.99

  28. Everyone's doing it, just own up to it by fa8os · · Score: 2

    China's just the sucker that gets caught doing it. They're after all sorts of targets, government or otherwise. I had them ruin my. Xmas holiday when they tried unsuccessfully to send 10G DDoS attacks across the wire. Just protect your stuff, because there are a lot of people out the with a lot of motivation to either get your IP, money, are just try to shut you down. China's just one of many. If you have any sort of online presence you are a potential target.

  29. Re:cession by hoboroadie · · Score: 1

    I was pondering today, as I was putting in a couple square rods of tomatoes, that we haven't really had the big famine yet around here, so all of this -out of work/fuel/money stuff is just an artificial construct being imposed on us by the same paper money/alternate reality crew that has been presenting this show all along. Reality-based lifestyles are really going down the tubes pretty fast though; Aside from the deforestation/climate change, Fracking and Mountaintop Removal are really fucking up our fresh water resources. All this squabbling is just petty compared to any one of the real disasters that are occurring. Take your pick, Topsoil/Water/Air, it's coming. Weird new fungi, plankton bloom, the inevitable coming oil spill in ANWR {Drill, Baby, Drill}.
    I don't think we need to worry about China.

    --
    They feared that it could be used to suppress protest or support unpopular rule.
  30. It would be nice if something NEW happened by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry for violating Godwin's law, but, after all, 60 years ago Hitler accused the US of treating Jews inhumanely. This seems to be done in the same spirit. Oh right, 70 years by now. I'm getting old.

    They say the world has changed. Then again, they say the earth is flat too.

  31. Chinese? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chinese?

    More like Whinese!

  32. Re:cession by flyneye · · Score: 1

    Are the tomatoes right next to jalepenos ,onions and cilantro? Nothing clears gloom and doom like homebrew picante sauce.

    Not worried about mountains, they can top them, force just keeps pushing them up.
    At some point the earth was a mess of minerals and chemicals before we showed up, yet, we showed up and thrived.

    I'm not going to worry a whole f**king lot about the food thing either. When we quit paying subsidies to farmers to grow nothing or worse, plant on unarible or flood prone ground, year after year,season after season, then collect fed subsidized insurance and subsidies, then shit will change. Farmers who are actually worth a shit will go back to actually working and producing food. Responsible farming will return and the dunderheads will end up selling land and working for actual farmers as is the proper way in nature and business.

    I'm not going to worry about the oil. We have plenty without even involving the UAE. Here come the electric vehicles, solar and other powers. We have plenty of oil for lubing moving parts. I'm beginning to do my own homebrew energy anyway.
    Fungi? Plankton? Nature doesn't make mistakes, don't forget our species evolves relevantly ,probably quicker than any other species. Those that don't are on their way off the radar anyway.

    I'm not going to worry about China.
    I replace worry with planning in all cases. I encourage others less talented than myself to worry about China, it keeps the dialog open.

    --
    *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  33. and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...that's how the world's end begins

  34. China is the 1st country to react to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the Pentagon's message, which was not directed at China, but cyberattacks in general.

  35. Ban the republican party by Dainsanefh · · Score: 1

    Bring on the peaceful, united New World Order. One Planet, One nation.

    --
    Twitter: @dainsanefh
    1. Re:Ban the republican party by Dainsanefh · · Score: 1

      Heil Hitler!

      --
      Twitter: @dainsanefh
    2. Re:Ban the republican party by Dainsanefh · · Score: 1

      Sieg Heil!

      --
      Twitter: @dainsanefh
    3. Re:Ban the republican party by Dainsanefh · · Score: 2

      Sieg Heil! LOLOLOL!

      --
      Twitter: @dainsanefh
    4. Re:Ban the republican party by Dainsanefh · · Score: 2

      ONE TWO THREE!

      --
      Twitter: @dainsanefh
    5. Re:Ban the republican party by Dainsanefh · · Score: 2

      dsf sdgasdg sdag eswg

      --
      Twitter: @dainsanefh
    6. Re:Ban the republican party by Dainsanefh · · Score: 2

      ole ole ole ole

      --
      Twitter: @dainsanefh
  36. You're most likely correct (on everyone doing it) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because it only takes 1 rotten apple to rot the entire barrel (& if one gov't. is doing it, the rest will HAVE to follow - "human nature @ its finest" (not)).

    However - I know 1 thing though, in regards to this statement I'll quote from you:

    "Just protect your stuff, because there are a lot of people out the with a lot of motivation to either get your IP, money, are just try to shut you down" - by fa8os (761693) on Friday June 03, @10:40PM (#36335302)

    Amen to that: I know that much, because I've been populating a custom HOSTS file here since around 1997, & am currently up to 1,426,502 entries of known bad sites/servers/hosts-domain names... the % coming out of the communist block? HUGE!

    In fact, it's predominantly what I see while it fills with data each day, every 15 minutes...

    (Mostly .cn, .ru, .su, some .pl (makes me sad, polish descent here is why on that one) & many from the cocos islands (.cc TLD range), but those could be anyone on the latter one & moreso than the others imo @ least...)

    APK

    P.S.=> Despite what the Chinese gov't. says, I know & see where the 'bad guys' are coming from out there, & for more than a decade++ now - &, a hell of a lot of it's outta China &/or Russia (which makes me wonder about the Chinese, specifically - See, I've always thought of them as a wise "keep to themselves" kind of people with a 5,000 yr. old recorded history culture - too smart to be into stupid shit like you mention, & I guess that's changing - but, what do I know on that account, & I mean REALL know? Well, I've worked with Chinese guys, & went to school for CSC with a few too, & I never would have thought of any of them I knew personally as that way... guess I might be wrong, or I have NO IDEA what their gov't.'s made them do once they left academia & returned to China!)

    ... apk

  37. Good psyops by Oxford_Comma_Lover · · Score: 1

    > Sorry for violating Godwin's law, but, after all, 60 years ago Hitler accused the US of treating Jews inhumanely. This seems to be done in the same spirit. Oh right, 70 years by now. I'm getting old.

    Yes, although this is a much better psyop. Think about it: China simultaneously diverts attention from its attacks, weakens the credibility of the US on cyber issues, undermines pro-western support in arab nations, undermines moderates in arab nations, etc...

    Realize that being associated with the United States often undermines the credibility and popular support of moderate or pro-democracy parties in Arab states, where there is a lot of Anti-US feeling. People who strongly dislike some thing about Iran, for example, really like that it stands up to the United States.

    This was a GOOD move politically on China's part, even though it is probably at least something of a lie, possible almost entirely a lie. My bet is the US, aside from Stuxnet, has been assisting with cyber-assets in the various revolutions--because those are the most costless assets to deploy, and they don't draw us into major wars. China is attempting to leverage that cyber activity against us by magnifying whatever role it played. Our recent statement that it can be an act of war lends their claims legal weight and makes it easier for anti-US papers and pundits and the international community to criticize the US.

    I don't support China--I'd much rather have countries as US friends than as friends of China--but this was a great move on China's part.

    --
    -- IANAL, this isn't legal advice, and definitely isn't legal advice for you. Also, Squee!
    1. Re:Good psyops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I don't support China--I'd much rather have countries as US friends than as friends of China--but this was a great move on China's part.

      Yes, but by reacting to Pentagon's general message (which was not directed at any particular country!) earlier than any other country did, China created an opportunity for good "anti-psyops".

  38. So many gullible Readers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is US's cyber warfare budget again? Nearing $1B yet? What's it all being spent on? Just Cisco firewall routers and pure defensive SW/HWs? I doubt it! I wouldn't be surprised that this is just a continuation of the old Spy vs Spy relationship. I wouldn't be surprised if US's hack into Chinese government email systems to be in multiple magnitude of what's being reported here. Do we really believe US's cyber warriors to be that less competent to the Chinese? Well, I am not going to be a sucker of govt/media spin.

  39. Block China in the firewall by msoftsucks · · Score: 1

    I use the service from http://www.countryipblocks.net/ to create rules in my firewalls to just block out China, Korea, an Russia. This cuts down significantly the hacking attempts on my servers. Its time to reject buying anything "Made in China" to show them that this kind of behavior is unacceptable.

    --
    Quit playing Monopoly with Bill.
    Linux - of the people, by the people, and for the people.